ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

PhD course in Geographical Information Systems and Science

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-10-05 - 2009-11-01
Antal svar: 8
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 44%
Kontaktperson: Jonas Tornberg»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Arkitektur 300 hp

Goals and fullfilment of goals

The learning outcomes are given in the course programme, that is the knowledge, understanding, skills and perspectives you are expected to reach. Notify for each outcome how well they have been fulfilled.

1. Learning outcome

8 svarande

Very insufficient»2 25%
Insufficient»3 37%
Sufficient»1 12%
Excellent»2 25%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.37

- I"m still not comfertable with using GIS.» (Very insufficient)
- The ESRI prep course was good but the course exercises weren´,t» (Insufficient)
- the lectures were too broad and general, uncoordinated so skills were not easy to aquire thru them, only thru the exercises» (Insufficient)

2. Are the aims and goals reasonable in relation to your pre-knowledge ?

8 svarande

No, the goals are to elementar»3 42%
Yes, the goals are reasonable»4 57%
No, the goals are too ambitious»0 0%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 1.57

- Even if a person is new to GIS I think the end level should have been higher, especially since most people took the pre-course as well.» (No, the goals are to elementar)
- the goals were not communicated clearly and not specified into concrete ideas» (No opinion)

3. Are the goals reasonable in relation to the scope and amount of credits?

8 svarande

Too small scope in relation to credits»0 0%
Reasonable scope in relation to credits»5 83%
Too wide scope in relation to credits»1 16%
No opinion»2

Genomsnitt: 2.16

- unclear criteria of the scope so difficult to answer » (Reasonable scope in relation to credits)
- the on-line course was too time-consuming in relation to the credits. so there was not enough time for the individual projects.» (Too wide scope in relation to credits)
- The presentation goals aren"t clear and have changed through time.» (No opinion)

The Pre-Course from ESRI Virtual Campus

This question is applicable to students that followed ArcGIS Basic and Spatial Analyst courses

4. What is your opinion about the courses?

8 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Less adequate»1 12%
Adequate»4 50%
Excellent»3 37%
Not participated in the course»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- complicated the whole learning process that we could not do courses in advance, due to tech problems, swallowd the attention» (Adequate)
- Good courses, but takes a LOT of time, so it was well that they got adjusted timewise» (Excellent)

The Lectures

5. What is your opinion about The Introduction lecture?

8 svarande

Poor»2 28%
Less adequate»0 0%
Adequate»5 71%
Excellent»0 0%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.42

- Too many overlaps to be interesting. Mainly a waste of time» (Poor)

6. What is your opinion about The GIS Fundamentals lecture?

8 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Less adequate»0 0%
Adequate»5 62%
Excellent»2 25%
Not participated in this lecture»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

7. What is your opinion about The Map projections/coordinate systems lecture?

7 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Less adequate»0 0%
Adequate»5 71%
Excellent»2 28%
Not participated in this lecture»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

8. What is your opinion about The Representation of Geography lecture?

8 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Less adequate»1 12%
Adequate»6 75%
Excellent»1 12%
Not participated in this lecture»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- But the practical was really badly constructed.» (Adequate)

9. What is your opinion about The Cartography lecture?

8 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Less adequate»1 12%
Adequate»4 50%
Excellent»2 25%
Not participated in this lecture»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- why did we not use gis instead of paper maps in the excercise!!» (Less adequate)
- But the practical was really badly constructed.» (Adequate)

10. What is your opinion about The Maintaining and using GIS data in quantitative and qualitative

8 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Less adequate»2 25%
Adequate»2 25%
Excellent»3 37%
Not participated in this lecture»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- why not send someone who were more familiar with gis, felt like we joined someones learning process instead of getting good ideas» (Less adequate)
- But the practical was really badly constructed.» (Adequate)

11. What is your opinion about The Data collection and GPS lecture?

8 svarande

Poor»1 12%
Less adequate»0 0%
Adequate»2 25%
Excellent»4 50%
Not participated in this lecture»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- But the practical was really badly constructed.» (Adequate)

12. What is your opinion about The GIS software and data preparation lecture?

8 svarande

Poor»1 12%
Less adequate»0 0%
Adequate»5 62%
Excellent»2 25%
Not participated in this lecture»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- But the practical was really badly constructed.» (Adequate)

13. What is your opinion about The benefits of using GIS in research on lecture?

8 svarande

Poor»1 12%
Less adequate»2 25%
Adequate»3 37%
Excellent»2 25%
Not participated in this lecture»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- I guess most people attending this course already have a clue about this.» (Poor)
- But the practical was really badly constructed.» (Less adequate)

14. What is your opinion about The Spatial Analysis lecture?

8 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Less adequate»2 25%
Adequate»3 37%
Excellent»3 37%
Not participated in this lecture»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.12

- The practical was good, but there was no computerroom available at Lindholmen for that practical.» (Excellent)

15. What is your opinion about The Spatial Modelling lecture?

8 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Less adequate»2 25%
Adequate»5 62%
Excellent»1 12%
Not participated in this lecture»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.87

16. What is your opinion about The Visualization - workshop/lecture?

8 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Less adequate»2 25%
Adequate»3 37%
Excellent»2 25%
Not participated in this lecture»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- better to try out in gis to advance level» (Adequate)

17. What is your opinion about The GIS system development and applications lecture?

8 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Less adequate»0 0%
Adequate»5 62%
Excellent»2 25%
Not participated in this lecture»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

18. What is your opinion about Terrain models and Hydrology lecture?

8 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Less adequate»1 12%
Adequate»5 62%
Excellent»1 12%
Not participated in this lecture»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

19. What is your opinion about Urban Sprawl and Sustainable City Planning lecture?

8 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Less adequate»3 37%
Adequate»3 37%
Excellent»1 12%
Not participated in this lecture»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3

The Exercises

The Project Supervision

Education and course administration

20. What support have you got for your learning from course literature and other material?

8 svarande

No opinion»0 0%
Very little»2 25%
Rather little»2 25%
Rather big»3 37%
Very big»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- The course literature wasn"t of much use and neither were most of the lecture hand outs (because these were more about personal projects than how to work with GIS). My biggest help was the GIS online help and the internet.» (Very big)

21. How did the organisation, memoranda, direct information etc. function?

8 svarande

No opinion»0 0%
Very bad»3 37%
Rather bad»3 37%
Rather well»1 12%
Very well»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Course structure has to be improved.» (Rather bad)

Work environment

22. How do you rate the possibilities to get assistance and ask questions?

8 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»2 25%
Rather good»4 50%
Very well»2 25%
I have not asked for assistance»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- But it depends on the person.» (Rather good)

23. How has the cooperation between you and students in your class been?

8 svarande

Very bad»1 12%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»5 62%
Very good»2 25%
I have not tried to cooperate»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- But I"ve only tried to cooperate with my direct colleague.» (Rather good)

Concluding questions

24. What is your overall opinion of the course?

8 svarande

Very bad»2 25%
Bad»2 25%
Passed»0 0%
Good»3 37%
Very good»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.87

- Like I said before the structure of the course needs improving and mostly the communication. Also I like to see an improvement of the practicals. And maybe even more practicals and less lectures, since a person can only learn GIS by trying it out for themselves!» (Bad)

25. What should be preserved next time this course starts again?

- the ESRI prep course»
- Personal guidance during the personal project preparation.»
- Most parts should be preserved»
- most of the lectures are ok, although they need coordination. The on-line course was valuable but took too much time from the rest of the course. »

26. What should be changed next time?

- Give the participants all codes and cards prior to the course. Have less lecturers. Remove all excercises or reconstruct them.»
- More practicals and less lectures. And if the student group is bigger than 15 persons, it is good to have at least 2 "helpers" during a practical.»
- better planned, admin, clear criteria for course work, planned meetings with supervisor, cooridnation between lectures to prevent repeats»
- course administration needs a lot of work, especially as clearly stated goals, outputs and learning criterias. criterias for the project and for the presentation should be given in written. You are dealing with students from different disciplines so this is key.»

27. Other comments

- It might be nice if the course is a full time course for 2 weeks. This way it is probably easier to attend the whole course!»

28. What is your opinion about the exercises?

8 svarande

Poor»1 12%
Less adequate»2 25%
Adequate»3 37%
Excellent»2 25%
Not participated in the excercises»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- Like I said before more time and effort should be put into the practicals.» (Less adequate)

29. What is your opinion about the supervision?

8 svarande

Poor»1 12%
Less adequate»3 37%
Adequate»3 37%
Excellent»1 12%
Had no supervision»0 0%
No opinion»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- I liked my supervisor but when doing something a bit more advanced i guees your better of alone for the most part. You do not want to end up teaching your supervisor your topic and what the necessary steps to succeed are.» (Less adequate)
- During the practicals it was poor.» (Less adequate)
- Mats was very helpful» (Excellent)

Kursutvärderingssystem från