|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Computer security, Lp 1 Ht09, EDA263/DIT641Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2009-10-12 - 2009-10-28 Antal svar: 34 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 6% Kontaktperson: Åsa Samdell»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.34 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.23 - Started the course late, and did not catch up.» (At most 15 hours/week) 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?33 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.18 - Only attended the laborations and one lecture» (25%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?33 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 - The actual course is on a significantly lower level than the goals seem to specify. The topics are barely even touched in the course.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer) 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.93 - The people taking the course are likely to know the most trivial parts of computer security already, such as the concept of "password".» (No, the goals are set too low) 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?30 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.93 - A lot of reading, hard to fit it all into one exam.» (To some extent) Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?34 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.7 - The lab assistants sometimes provided quite insightful advices.» (Some extent) 7. How were the lectures?34 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.61 - The level of the lectures was much lower than that of the book.» (Fair) 8. What was the best about the lecture part of the course?- Good lecturers»- -Guest lecture -practicals examples» - the way of teaching of both was outstanding and i didnt face any difficulty in any lecture.» - Allowed people without knowledge of security whatsoever to learn things.» - simple to understand» - Good overview.» - Great with slides.» - understandable and reasonable» - over all the lectures were intrusting and provide good knowledge.» - good slides» - Must be the lecture» - It was not boring.(what a relief). This is because introductory courses are always boring because of their abstract nature, this was quite interesting. » - up-to-date examples from real life» - Tog upp det viktigaste man behövde kunna.» - The explanations» - The lactures give very clear idea about the topic.It was described in a very good manner.» 9. What can be improved about the lecture part of the course?- at bit less info each time»- Assume that students either know the most trivial basics, or at least assume that they will read the chapter summaries of the book.» - lectures are easy to learn» - Fuzzy about security policies since this was important. Use a computer to display slides.» - lecture slides could be improved, downloads, book, lecture, offprint consists in some part of a lot of redundant information here it would be nice, to reduce this, or mark it out more clearly that one could read either .. or» - maybe could be closer to the reality security matters» - Since there were two persons responsible for the lectures we heard the same material twice, but it was just a small part.» - it was well organized.i dont think some thing else to be added» - use powerpoint instead of OH» - More technical examples instead of just concepts.» - Common style/layout on slides would be nice for readin afterwards.» - More examples» - Don"t know really, wouldn"t wanna change anything» - -» - lectures may become interactive and involve students in some way to become more interesting and attractive.» - More guest lectures from real life situations.» - I think no improvement needed at all.» 10. How was the Identification and Authentication lab?34 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.91 - Probably very simple for unix/c programmers, but good for the rest of us...» (Adequate) 11. How was the GPG lab?34 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.97 - Could easily be replaced with 20-30 minutes of reading in the book.» (Fair) 12. How was the Vulnerability Scanning with Nessus lab?34 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.97 - Keeping the computer updated can be learned from any newspaper. The rest can be replaced with 5 min reading in the book, plus 10 min of tutorial reading if you want to use Nessus.» (Poor) 13. What was the best about the lab part of the course?- dont know»- -interesting subject -learn a lot of things during each lab -teacher are always here to help us or answer our questions» - Some of the assistants gave insightful feedback and asked questions which required more security-focused thinking.» - we have to learn something, so do it yourself.» - 2nd and 3rd lab.» - definitely the first lab» - That there were labs at all!» - authentication» - GPG lab was so cool :)» - Hands-on experience of gpg.» - The group work» - hmm, can"t say» - Increased understanding of the current parts.» - Enjoyed all labs except of the first» - The fact we got to learn by trial and error!» - It helps me very much to learn a lot of new things practically.» - The lab assistants had adequate skills/competence» 14. What can be improved about the lab part of the course?- more help on where to find answers to the questions»- No» - The labs should require thinking, and not just following instructions and writing down the results. The labs could be changed so that the submissions could be corrected automatically. Also, it should be allowed to do the labs alone.» - gain learning about practical part» - Lab need to be correct quickly so you dont have to wait, week and week and week to get the results... 1st lab can be extended and updated to present situation.» - - see above, more challenging, - may be some parts voluntary giving bonus points for exam ... » - Faster rejectes, but I understand if resources a limited.» - be a bit more difficult» - add one more lab and make labs more healthy.» - faster corrections» - More secure code writing, Introducing security plan creation or analsis.» - Simpler lab booking, online? Shouldn"t have to book every week, normal approach is to book same time each week.» - less people in the lab :)» - more lab times» - can"t think of anything» - I think all the the work done is reasonable.» - Bookings on paper?!? What year is this ,)» 15. How was the balance between lectures and lab part of the course?- dont know»- Good» - It is ok» - Good.» - Good.» - rather good» - it was good balance.» - Should be more labs.» - One more lab between gpg and nessus lab would have been good, maybe on evaluating and securing code?» - the lab was pretty balanced, but the lectures were quite a lot.» - well» - There were too many lectures, while learning is more convenient via lab work. » - It was OK» - Excellent balance between lactures and lab part of the course.» - The balance is good. Keep as is.» 16. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?33 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.6 - from the offprints i liked very much:
kerberos
pgp (both)
firewall
good:
unix security
soso:
the rest
Computer security:
couldn"t read more than till chapter 3
100 pages with saying things not worth more than 3 pages just killed me ... ,)» (?) 17. In the course, we suggested "Stallings & Brown, Computer Security" as an alternative book. Please give us feedback on its quality34 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.08 - The amount of reading material was huge, it will be better to lessen the quantity in order to increase the quality.» (I did not read it) 18. To what extent has the course syllabus been of help during this course?30 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.26 - Good, clear structure of the course.» (Large extent) 19. Do you think the course syllabus require any changes?- No»- Nopes, It is ok» - no» - No» - so far it is quite enough for me :)» - Syllabus could be more precise as there is a lot to read and little time to prepare for exams. » - No» - Reading references were a bit unclear (maybe a bit due to double references). Course book reading list very inclusive, maybe cut some contents?» - No» - Sorry but didn"t go through it» - no» - No.» 20. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?33 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.12 - See lab comments...» (Very badly) Study climate21. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?32 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.65 - No exercise sessions or the like.» (Rather poor) 22. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?32 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.4 - I spent most of the laboration time explaining what passwords were and so on.» (Rather poorly) 23. How was the course workload?33 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.24 - The work load is very high if the syllabus is followed. But if students use filtering and targeting specific most important parts, then the work load is less. » (High) 24. How was the total workload this study period?33 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.78 - Studying at 150% most periods, including this one.» (High) Summarizing questions25. What is your general impression of the course?33 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.75 - Much too simple. Either the students have some basic understanding of security, or they can read the book. This course assumed that neither was possible.» (Poor) 26. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Labs are very good»- The first lab was good in many ways. The course book was also very good.» - Encryption/Decryption» - Lectures. 2nd, 3rd lab.» - Labs.» - authentication and GPG labs» - ever thing» - Mix of labs and lectures.» - The lecture, The lab» - Labs» - -» - Lab assignments.» - All the lacture notes and relevent data regarding to the course. » 27. What should definitely be changed to next year?- The book "Security in computing" is not really good. Too many repetition»- Either make the course more difficult, or create a continuation course (in addition to network security and language based security) with the same topics, but at a deeper level. It would also be interesting with much more research material in the course.» - Nothing» - 1st lab. Overhead slides...» - the 3rd lab» - I think there should be group excercises. This is the first course in the Networks and Distributed programs and group excercies would not only contribute to learning but to know other students.» - nothing» - Lab booking system.» - workload should be reduced » - -» - The number, content and the method of lectures. » - Every thing is reasonable.So I do not think that there should be any changes in the course next year.» 28. Additional comments- It"s impossible to find the 3rd edition. Can you stop your references to this edition and update them to the fourth ?»- Course helps me a lot about security in computers.» - Who came up with the great idea that we put the exams of TWO mandatory courses (New MPNET students) in the beginning of the exam period, on MON & TUE?! To little time to study to both of them, choice has to be made.» - nice class:) thank you very much» - Thanks alot to all the team of CS.They were very cooperative to us.» - Happy Xmas in advance :)» - thanks!» - I like Arne :)» - The course give very dood ideas about the security of the computer which are very helpfull in reducing the future problems.»
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29%