|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Applied computational electromagnetic, EEK221Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2009-10-12 - 2010-02-04 Antal svar: 16 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 43% Kontaktperson: Valborg Ekman» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.16 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.56 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?16 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.81 Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?16 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.5 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.15 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.06 - I"d like that the course is a bit more demanding.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable) 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?15 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.13 - There is actually no examination as in an exam.» (To some extent) Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?16 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.62 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?16 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.68 - In fact I didn"t use any literature for this course» (Some extent) 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?16 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.68 Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?16 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?16 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.68 11. How was the course workload?16 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.62 - A little to low I will say.» (Adequate) 12. How was the total workload this study period?16 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - I had three courses.» (High) Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?16 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.18 - The course is good, at the end one can feel that there are many things that have been learned. Is a step by step learning.» (Good) 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- either you or ola carlson has to decrees some load from the course»- Everything. » - Everything, I just think that the study cases should consider a little more realistic problems. In the case of the seminars, I think they could be better explained and better understood by the class if they are given as a COMSOL tutorial, with students in the computer room, so everyone can follow what the group in front is talking about. This will give a much more clear undestanding. The COMSOL files could be sent by email to everyone, so time would be saved.» - All the assignments and the seminars.» 15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- no seminar, only project presentation, otherwise it could be huge load on students.»- more assistant on the lab assignment» - If the objective of the course is to think more about the physics rather than the software use I would suggest that in the projects, some mandatory theoretical review should be included so that theory is verified with the use of the software. » - Since the project work is 40% of the final grade, I would consider at least 2 weeks to work on them, with a little more hard and more realistic problems, where maybe design considerations of equimente could be considered. To achieve this, I think that all the lectures (which were just 6) should be given within the first 8 days of the course. If the lectures are speed up a little, more time could be allocated for the project.» - The seminar were almost only presentations. Could be more interesting with more discussion around the tasks.» - The licence for the COMSOL should be acquired faster.» - Nothing should be changed except the time for the seminar was abit short hence if it is possible it can be provided a bit earlier .» 16. Additional comments- Yuriy is great»- The seminar assignment and the project should be given with more time and not with just one week in order to organize better our time. Be aware that students are taken other courses.» - I want to appreciate one thing that is the Personal acceptance and tha cooperation provided by Yuri very helpfull and I want to say him keep it up and thanks for his undeservable help he provided us .»
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0%