ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Power system analysis, ENM050

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-10-12 - 2010-02-04
Antal svar: 21
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 29%
Kontaktperson: Valborg Ekman»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

21 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»3 14%
Around 20 hours/week»3 14%
Around 25 hours/week»5 23%
Around 30 hours/week»7 33%
At least 35 hours/week»3 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.19

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

20 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 5%
50%»4 20%
75%»8 40%
100%»7 35%

Genomsnitt: 4.05

- all except 2 lectures» (?)
- I were only on the tutorials, the standard on the lectures were very low. Spacialy on the parts with the transformer were the teacher used OH-papers with unreadeble hand writing and some kind of swedish-english.» (25%)
- Quality varied from time to time. Also sometimes we had a lot of other things that felt more urgent to complete.» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

21 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»12 57%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»9 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

21 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 4%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»19 90%
No, the goals are set too high»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

20 svarande

No, not at all»2 10%
To some extent»7 35%
Yes, definitely»9 45%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.55

- Half the exemenation was about the last weeks part of the course. » (No, not at all)

6. To what extent has the teaching (lectures and tutorials) been of help for your learning?

21 svarande

Small extent»2 9%
Some extent»4 19%
Large extent»10 47%
Great extent»5 23%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

- The lectures were probably the worst i have had on Chalmers usless english from the teacher and the pedagogic were the get the students to sleep. The tutorials were vary good, good english from the techer and structured and easy to understand.» (Small extent)
- Tutorials were a big help, lectures some.» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

21 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 19%
Large extent»14 66%
Great extent»3 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.95

- The content is very tiny in the course book. » (Some extent)

8. To what extent have the worked-out examples been of help for your understanding of the lectures?

20 svarande

Small extent»1 5%
Some extent»4 20%
Large extent»11 55%
Great extent»4 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

9. To what extent has the practical laboratory demonstration been of help for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent»3 15%
Some extent»5 25%
Large extent»9 45%
Great extent»3 15%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

- I suggest the lap to include some demo about the other type of motors other than the DC. I think we should have DEMO on IM, SM, SR and PM.» (Some extent)
- I would like to say that the lab activity has been designed very well to give a better understanding of the concepts covered in the course.» (Great extent)

10. To what extent has the computer-based design project been of help for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»5 25%
Large extent»9 45%
Great extent»6 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.05

- It was limited to the DC machine» (Some extent)
- A lot of the instructions were impossible to understand, without the instructor just saying what the answers should be, until the end of the course. (Symmetrical components for instance) and a bunch of the questions were poorly defined.» (Some extent)

11. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

19 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»12 63%
Very well»7 36%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

Study climate

12. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

20 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»8 40%
Very good»12 60%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

13. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

20 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 5%
Rather well»8 40%
Very well»11 55%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

14. How was the course workload?

20 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»6 30%
High»12 60%
Too high»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- the project was really time consuming if you wanted to do your best. the lectures also were not matched with the project very well.» (High)
- In fact the course is very heavy and I think need to be reduced. » (Too high)

15. How was the total workload this study period?

20 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»6 30%
High»9 45%
Too high»5 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.95

Summarizing questions

16. What is your general impression of the course?

20 svarande

Poor»1 5%
Fair»1 5%
Adequate»3 15%
Good»13 65%
Excellent»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

- except the project.» (Poor)

17. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Trial examination»
- make the course a bit easier»
- I think the course should be split to two courses. First Course, talk in detals about DC. IM and SM in more detals. Then Second course talk about The SR, PM and the design issues with much more details. »
- Tuan has a very good knowledge in the power system course. Although he has not good accent, he knows a lot and he should stay as the lecturer.»
- Faculty , handouts »
- The lab exercise was very good and should definitely be preserved.»
- The tutorials»

18. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- nothing»
- I am definitely agree with a lecturer from industry but he (or she) should be a practical and at the same time have a good knowledge on academic subject. »
- more practical lab work would be really great.»
- It should be 2 exams instead of 1 and divide the course load in 2. The last lecture (17) was too close to the exam. The lectures should finish earlier. The lectures should be changed from handwriting to computer writing. »
- method of teaching should be made more practical »
- The examinator, new course book»

19. Additional comments

- none»
- In overall, I have learned a lot. But there is not enough time to absorb all the material, because we have another course in parallel and it takes time too.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från