|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Physical computing, Lp 1 Ht09, DAT125/DIT830Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2009-10-12 - 2009-10-28 Antal svar: 18 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 7% Kontaktperson: Åsa Samdell»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.66 - A lot more during the last few weeks.» (Around 20 hours/week) 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.05 - It was most of the time much too easy for me.» (50%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.55 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.15 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.93 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?16 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.62 - Should have had a somewhat bigger project in the end.» (To some extent) Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.11 - It was unnecessary to have a whole lecture about examples of other projects. » (Some extent) 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2 - The book was a total waste of money!» (Small extent) 8. Please evaluate the lectures in general.- As the course content is so interesting the lectures can be more useful. It does not provide so much knowledge really»- Not that good.» - Not good, hard to follow and didn"t always feel relevant for the course/Goals...» - not so helpful» - Fine» - Not really» - More information on the foundations of the electronics or the technology of the components we used in the labs could be given» - Pointless» - The aim of some lectures felt somewhat fuzzy and unclear. The lecturer has a lot of knowledge, but has a hard time communicating it.» - A bit slow but interesting.» - To far away from the practical labs. Give more physical examples.» - The lectures were not very interesting, and sometimes I felt like I could read them at home.» - Weak» - Mediocre !» - The teacher could seem to be unserious sometimes. When teaching, he should not be sitting down and looking at his own laptop. The tutors where good, and had the knowledge. » - too much practice without enough theory before.» 9. Evaluate the use of Lab introductions.- They really need some revisions some need extra explanations and some has so many errors. The students can be helpful for revising them»- Easy to understand» - Pretty good» - Good, strait forward!» - great» - good to understand how components work» - They were clear and to the point.» - Good» - Overall very good, gave basic (but essential) knowledge.» - Very good» - It was helpful.» - Pretty helpful, could have been more easy for newbies.» - Could have been better !» - The information in the introductions should be updated, some information in link are not the same as in the instructions.» - good, but not enough. because so much infomation in short time need to learn.» 10. Evaluate the labs in general.- They were so interesting»- Good» - Very good labs» - Really nice labs!» - good» - really good» - Not very challenging but very adequate for an introduction lesson on physical computing.» - Good but too easy.» - Good progression of difficulty. Got to test a lot of things before the mini-projects, which was a good thing.» - Awesome. But the "Blog" part is too much informal, maybe make it more explicit by giving a deadline/ instructions on what to write.» - Good, but more structure in the guidelines not only links to other web-pages.» - The lab session was helpful, and it allowed us to get into practice. » - Okay» - Good, really good !» - good assistance, enough metireal. but perhaps so big group.4 students share one suite of resouces(not only metireal but also knowledge) sometimes as long as one of us understand or finish the task teacher would sign on the paper. I mean,lab didn"t check does everyone understand of not.» 11. Evaluate the Mika Satomi"s lecture and Lab.- It was wonderful. The lab was really good experience»- Good» - Good idea, but hard to get help from Mika since she all 17 (?) groups wanted help from her.» - Fun lab, little time to finish!» - great» - Not bad, but missing a more accurate goal.» - I think the hacking of the game controller was a bit fuzzy. Because there was no schematics and we experienced some weird errors, but except form that, it was quite inspirational lecture and lab.» - Dont know who he is.» - Interesting to see, learn and try something new and different. Nice to see some real-world use!» - Awesome. But the time limit should be more strict, I think the time given to do a project should limit its ambitions.» - Nice to have an introduction in this field» - it was fun and new to me.» - Didn"t go.» - Interesting and fun» - good and new idea for me. pretty easy but essensial.» 12. Please evaluate the mini projects- Not finished yet, but it seems like a great experience»- Good and fun» - Fun and good way to practice what we"ve learned so far.» - Great!» - great» - Really good» - I think it was quite challenging to develop a project from scratch in just 3 days. It was a good practice for implementing physical computing prototypes» - Good» - Fun and challenging, but took A LOT of time...» - Awesome.» - Good opportunity to practice the electronic knowledge we have gained. Some of the projects were really impressive.» - it was a good way to examine the output after studies.» - Fun» - practical and awesome» - Pretty good, some in the end are quite similar. » - really good! Because it is the best way to check the knowledge I learned in labs before. » 13. Please evaluate the Home assignments, their function and format- The were not so useful, they didn"t have anything to be learned»- They were okay, not really needed perhaps.» - Didn"t really see any point in those..» - Really good. u have to learn things through out the course instead of examination! Great!» - great» - Not bad, helps to keep up» - Sometimes there was too much material to read after the labs pdf is posted on the website. except from that they were quite good. » - Good idea but too easy.» - OK. Good to make you sit down, read and write about things. However, it felt a bit weird to not receive any feedback - made you not care about them that much. Like the write-by-yourself-format though.» - I think the last one was a bit pointless, but otherwise it"s a good way to be sure someone has the sufficient knowledge do proceed with the next labs/classes.» - They have seem a little bit random.» - They were a way to let me read the texts(because I"m always lazy reading everything)» - pretty useful!» - kinda boring» - I don"t know the function or home assignments. I think it is unnecessary. We don"t get any feedback what so ever, feels like a waste of time. » - they are good questions but I didn"t use them during practice. so it didn"t help me so much.» 14. Please evaluate the use of a course blog for presenting your work- It could be better»- It was ok» - Not useful at all. Wouldn"t have used it at all if it hadn"t been mandatory.» - Good when you know how it works!» - great» - Great way of sharing» - It was nice to see other groups projects, what they did during the labs, since sometimes you can be busy with your lab or project and missed the chance to see what other groups are doing.» - Really good idea!» - Interesting to see what the others have come up with or done. However, didn"t visit it any time other than when posting something myself. And don"t use Wordpress! Awful UI...» - Interesting in a way, but too much informal.» - A good way to present the work. But maybe it has to be a little bit more » - it was quite good as other groups" ideas could inspire me.» - no one reads it :(» - really good, but the blog page is kinda boring» - I don"t know the function of the blog. I think it is weird to have to put things on it.» - I don"t like it! First, no clear categries. Second time-consuming. I believ that presentation is the most efficient way.» 15. Please evaluate the Studios, their structure, availability of resources, etc.- Really good»- They are really good.» - Good with resources, but a little crowded..» - The resources are really good, pity the Studios are separated by a corridor!» - great» - They could be bigger» - I think more information can be given on what kind of material is on the studio , especially for developing component based or technology based prototypes. For the workshop, I think there can be small tutorials on how to use the tools in the workshop especially for designing the casing of the products and also the workshop is quite messy and it"s hard to find what you are looking for. Optionally, In the lab, there can be also more coat hangers since most the time, our coats mopped the floors (because of those extra-small chairs :)» - Really good! 5 stars!» - Nothing to complain about, except that other people would "hog" equipment, and didn"t clean up after themselves.» - Nice, but too crowded and most of the time dirty.» - To small when everyone is working there.» - they were very good» - awesome!» - really good studios» - The resources should be updated, as many of them are broken.» - something like color were dry, which means need to be changed.» 16. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.17 - FIX A REAL SCHEDULE! Text in a table... what year is this, 1996?» (Rather badly) Study climate17. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.61 - Very good lab assistants, but too few at times» (Rather poor) 18. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.61 - I felt bad when I work with three Swedish boys. Even I told them to talk in English,they still made big laugh after a conversation in Swedish. They have their reason because they were talking something unrelevent about the work. I still can not accept it.» (Rather poorly) 19. How was the course workload?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.94 - Got a bit much towards the end...» (Adequate) 20. How was the total workload this study period?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.44 - Lots of hours at school, but it was great fun. Since there are no exams, the workload needs to be high during the period.» (High) Summarizing questions21. What is your general impression of the course?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.55 22. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The labs»- Labs and Mini project» - mini-project» - Labs, Blog» - The overall concept» - Labs/projects» - The projects» - The lab session. they were very helpful and studetns could work together and learn from each other.» - Home assignments» - lab help and supervision» - The way of project, tutors. » - one of the assistance Farshid.» 23. What should definitely be changed to next year?- The lectures, the home assignments, lab intros, course book»- Home assignments» - fewer class members» - wearables approach, do a more time project or a list of predefined projects» - Lectures» - The workload should be higher» - Blog and last home assignment (pointless)» - Better structure on lectures» - The lecture session. It was boring to hear a lot of introductions.» - Lectures» - more interesting lectures» - No home assignment. » - the way to group people! Only one foreigner in one group is not reasonable! And also no swedish in one group is not good either!» 24. Additional comments- a real life demonstration of some *awesome* physical computing installation could be arranged (for inspiration) !»
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11%