|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Software architecture, Lp 1 Ht09, DAT135/DIT540Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2009-10-12 - 2009-10-28 Antal svar: 24 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 8% Kontaktperson: Åsa Samdell»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.24 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.5 - I spent around 13 hours per week working at the project, but skipped many lectures.» (At most 15 hours/week) 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?24 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.04 - That would have been a complete waste of time, Sven-Arne shouldn"t be allowed to teach courses with English as main language» (0%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.17 - After seeing this question, I went to the Student Portal, and read the description, which I found difficult to understand.» (I have not seen/read the goals) 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.20 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2 - The goals seams reasoanble but the demands in the project-part of the course are way to high.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable) 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?21 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.66 - dont think that memorizing steps of techniques like atam/cbam etc is a good way of learning.» (To some extent) Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.39 - We had meetings but they were that informative» (Small extent) 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.21 - Haven"t used it yet» (Some extent) 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.43 - Very poorly updated/structured webpage. We never received any database-accounts, the deadlines for the project were not easy to find on the web page. Also, the Fire system was up and runnning but the web site still said "Soon"!» (Very badly) Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.26 - Sven-Arne does not seem to know what he wants exactly. » (Very poor) 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.47 - I could not speak swedish in order to have a better communication.» (Rather poorly) 11. How was the course workload?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.34 - Some weeks were very hectic and some week there were almost nothing to do. I felt like 1 week to implement the first system was to short of a time. Two weeks would have been much better better.» (Adequate) 12. How was the total workload this study period?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.69 - A project in this plus problem sets and labs for algorithms.» (High) Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.17 - I sadly felt the course was very woolly, unsubstantial and hard to understand. The impression I got from the subject of SW Architecture is basically that it consists of a bunch of fashionable but meaningless phrases like "view", "viewtype", "viewtype style", "architectural style" and so on.» (Poor) 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The project»- The project.» - The practical project.» - Some kind of project, but with more connection with the course. Maybe take a look at the textbook example of "Objektoriented Systemutveckling"(TDA592), where there were weekly assignments that corresponded with the teaching that of last week.» - The project of software architecture should be review rather than implementation emphisis should be on study and analysis of different architectures» - the project was fun» - The project could be smaller and to focus on the design rether than the implementation.» - Nothing» - Lecture notes and all the course related material.It is very reasonable for learning the ideas of software architecture.» 15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- More focus on the architecture part, maybe smaller projects to try different architecture and define the goals clearly to show what the differences are and why/when they are used»- Lecturer, project» - Relate the project to the lectures content. Improve lecture quality with more real world examples and references.» - Dålig engelska och struktur hos både föreläsaren och handledaren. Detta kan nog inte avhjälpas på ett år och de bör därför bytas ut tillsvidare.» - more pictures of architectures.» - Give more examples during the lectures! It is impossible to understand the concepts of the subject otherwise. In the lectures it was basically said for instance, "Yeah, views are something that you can use while doing architecture". Ok, but what ARE views? Please give more examples! Also, it was hard to understand the "progression" of the lectures - where they are coming from and where they are heading. Having slides that clearly show what the subject is all the time would help. During the project, it was very unclear what we were supposed to do for each week. If we were to plan it out by ourselves, fine, but please say so from the start, and what the end result should be! Aren"t those exactly the kind of projects in real life which often end up as failures, those where the developers have no idea what the customer actually wants? Also, working with the project was, without exaggeration, easily 95% coding and 5% "architecture". If the core of the course is architecture and the comparison of different architectural approaches, then why have us code a system of such magnitude? Why not just handing us diagrams and documents or similar and let us reason about and focus on the architectural questions? We used information from the book and lectures only in a few paragraphs in the project report, everything else was completely done using knowledge from previous courses. Finally, the book was not especially good. See above commentary about that.» - The lectures. Firstly, lecturer"s presentation skills should be improved. Secondly, the presentation content should emphasize applicability of each subject to real life. I don"t mean stories about large projects nobody ever heard of, although they are interesting sometimes. I mean examples, and better using the products most people know and use.» - is not bad, but has nothing to do with this course)» - Project should be reviewed » - let someone else do the lectures» - Try to help and interact with new students early in campus» - The assignment. It did not focus on the course content at all. The assignment should have focused on software architecture but instead we were suppose to suppose to spend about 1-2 weeks with the SA and then spend the rest of the time coding. Sure coding is a very good thing to know and we need to practice it. However this is a course about SA, we should practice SA related things in the assignments in my opinion. The assignment did not help me broaden my understanding of the topics discussed in the lectures, which I think it should have. Why not have an assignment that makes us design the architecture of a system from scratch.» - Project.There should be atleast two projects without any implimentation.» - I have to say the lecturer. I don"t know if it was the language barrier, but the lectures were poor.» - Sven-Arne should not teach this course. Phu Phung should also be replaced, when he lacks allot of knowledge in this filed. The project should either be replaced with something that correspond with the course(not web-development or distributed applications, there are already better courses about these things) or taken away completely. It did not give me any insights in software architecture, just more knowledge in implementation-problems and there solution (which is not bad, but has nothing to do with this course)» (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand) - Some other teacher who knows English. Different project with focus on architecture or weekly exercises instead.» (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand) 16. Additional comments- Interesting subject, just a shame that the project and the lecturer did not use that. The project != the course goals»- I"ve talked to allot of people, both Swedish students and exchange students, and they all say the same, Sven-Arne should not be teaching. After the summerbreak I was looking forward to starting on the SET-master program. But after this course, which is a fundamental course in software development, I"m not sure any more. If this is what Chamlers has to offer at their highest level of education, then maybe Chalmers isn"t the school I thought it was. » - For the project, we were expected to know a lot about databases, webprogramming and datacommunication. Courses that are not mandatory and many have not taken them. We ended up spending a lot of time on the project which led us to missing lectures and having a hard time cathing up to the exam.» - A would have really liked to have some exercise or assignment that allowed my to apply what we learned in the lectures. Maybe rework the assignment to allow this or add some new component to the course.» - Overall the course was good.The enviornment was very good and i learned a lot.» - The project was not that relevant to the course. Make the course more like the product line course. Where experience industri people teach and makes things relevant.»
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20%