Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Software engineering using formal methods, Lp 1 Ht09, TDA292/DIT270

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-10-12 - 2009-10-28
Antal svar: 17
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 44%
Kontaktperson: Åsa Samdell»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

17 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»6 35%
Around 20 hours/week»5 29%
Around 25 hours/week»2 11%
Around 30 hours/week»3 17%
At least 35 hours/week»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.29

- I have the impression that I bought the book for nothing since everything was in the slides. I almost never read the book.» (Around 30 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

17 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»3 17%
75%»6 35%
100%»8 47%

Genomsnitt: 4.29

- Very good lectures.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

17 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»4 23%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 5%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 17%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»9 52%

Genomsnitt: 3

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

14 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»14 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- But you migth have logic as requirement, I think that it was hard for them that not take this course.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

14 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 21%
Yes, definitely»8 57%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 3

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent have the lectures been of help for your learning?

17 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 17%
Large extent»10 58%
Great extent»4 23%

Genomsnitt: 3.05

- some lectures were 100 % useful while some were not useful at all, depending on the lecturer. » (Some extent)

7. To what extent have the exercises been of help for your learning?

17 svarande

Small extent»3 17%
Some extent»9 52%
Large extent»4 23%
Great extent»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.17

8. To what extent have the lab assignments been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»5 31%
Large extent»7 43%
Great extent»4 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.93

- i think its better to have more (but short) assignments and with the deadlines early in the course.» (Some extent)

9. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

17 svarande

Small extent»4 23%
Some extent»2 11%
Large extent»10 58%
Great extent»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.47

10. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

17 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»11 64%
Very well»6 35%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

- Very useful forum to ask questions.» (Rather well)

Study climate

11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

17 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»5 29%
Very good»11 64%
I did not seek help»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.76

12. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

17 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»5 29%
Rather well»7 41%
Very well»5 29%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

13. How was the course workload?

17 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»3 17%
Adequate»11 64%
High»3 17%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- I think we were given too few exercises. As regards the very many things we had to know for the exams, having some more exercises would have been very helful. It would have been interesting to work on harder things, in order to challenge a little ourselves. » (Low)

14. How was the total workload this study period?

17 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»3 17%
Adequate»7 41%
High»7 41%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.23

- I had 3 courses.» (High)

Summarizing questions

15. What is your general impression of the course?

17 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 11%
Good»8 47%
Excellent»7 41%

Genomsnitt: 4.29

- good course.» (Good)

16. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Every thing, because every thing is perfect.»
- everything»
- Wolfgang Ahrendt :) He is a great teacher »
- labs where good excercises in Promela and JML»
- Everything»
- The course webpage was excellent, it contained lots of useful information for the course. This is especially true when it comes to the exercise part, where also solutions were presented online.»

17. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Lectures Slides/Notes should be online in advance. Exercises should be online at the beginning of the week. Teach Assistants needs to keep more interact with students during exercise sessions, and makes sure that whole exercise contents are cleared for every one. »
- there are lot of quite formal definitions of axioms, theorems etc they should be illustrated more. such as construction of intersection buchi automata does not contain any description on the slides. from mathematical expressin its difficult to follow.»
- More exercises. More creative possibilities in the labs. It is not good that there is only one way to do the labs.»
- Despite the respect I have for Richard Bubel as a researcher, I really think he should not give lectures at all because no matter how knowledgeable you are, it is useless when you do not have enough language skills to transfer your knowledge to others. »
- pehaps a little more excercises (maybe not in promela)»
- Some lectures should be relocated. For instance the logic part which was presented at very first lectures could be moved a little bit forward for example right before we started the KeY part. Then the course would be started with Promela. That makes the course more interesting.»
- nothing»
- More laborations, or larger lab assignments. The lab workload was too low.»

18. Additional comments

- Thank you.»
- everything else seems good.»
- You migth have logic as requirement, I think that it was hard for them that not take this course.»
- It was a pity that I could not learn as much as I expected from Richard"s lectures just because I could hardly understand what he was saying, actually at the beginning of the course I thought he is speaking German and not English, so I wasted a lot of energy and concentration only to understand him which was really like torture and made his lectures so boring that finally I decided not to go to the lectures he was giving, while it was exactly the reverse case for Wolfgang"s lectures which I participated all with much interest and enthusiasm. »
- The class interaction is appreciated.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från