Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Fault-tolerant computer systems, Lp 1 Ht09, EDA122/DIT061

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-10-12 - 2009-10-28
Antal svar: 18
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 22%
Kontaktperson: Åsa Samdell»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

18 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 11%
Around 20 hours/week»4 22%
Around 25 hours/week»9 50%
Around 30 hours/week»2 11%
At least 35 hours/week»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.77

- a lot to read» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

18 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 5%
50%»2 11%
75%»5 27%
100%»10 55%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

18 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 11%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»5 27%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»11 61%

Genomsnitt: 3.38

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

16 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»16 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

18 svarande

No, not at all»1 5%
To some extent»5 27%
Yes, definitely»6 33%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»6 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.94

- To mutch detail questions on the exam. Questions 4-8.» (To some extent)
- I"m guessing it is hard to cover all material on the exam, but it was good that there were many points on the modeling since that seemed like a big part of the course.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

18 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 16%
Large extent»12 66%
Great extent»3 16%

Genomsnitt: 3

- The lectures seemed very detailed and slow, but the exercise was helpful.» (Some extent)
- Well, I didn"t attend most of the lectures due to personal issues, so the answer to this question depends on that.» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

18 svarande

Small extent»1 5%
Some extent»10 55%
Large extent»6 33%
Great extent»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.38

- too much text in the slides, more pictures are more efficient to understanding and memorizing » (Some extent)
- it was not very clear what to focus on (for example almost the whole book should be read carfully or normal. This makes it hard to study as you cannot learn 100-200 pages by heart.)» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

18 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 5%
Rather well»10 55%
Very well»7 38%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- i think a little bit more explaining in the lab would be good» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

18 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 5%
Very good»15 83%
I did not seek help»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 4.05

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

18 svarande

Very poorly»1 5%
Rather poorly»2 11%
Rather well»7 38%
Very well»8 44%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.22

- I would like all the computer courses to be a lot more interactive.» (Rather well)

11. How was the course workload?

18 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»14 77%
High»3 16%
Too high»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.27

- the lab is quite good but the report is too much !! the text of the lectures are too much to read + course book + literature ( articles) » (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

18 svarande

Too low»1 5%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»13 72%
High»3 16%
Too high»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

18 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 5%
Adequate»2 11%
Good»12 66%
Excellent»3 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.94

- A better book would be really great. The current book doesn"t cover a lot of the parts of the course.» (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- guest lectures»
- all»
- It is good and can be the same az this year»
- The layout of the course, it felt like you got the information in the right order and the modeling was well explained. The exercise sessions were also very good, I liked the fact that Daniel asked what we wanted and adopted the sessions instead of just following a set path.»
- the course should be divided into two parts that aims students to be able to analyze and design fault-tolerant systems. 1- general ability to make simple ordinary systems fault-tolerant i.e. networks, servers, circuits, etc. 2-special ability to calculate and estimate the reliability of system for students that wants to continue working in this subject.»
- Markov&GSPN and both labs»
- The excercises were helpful and should be preserved. Also the many guest lectures were pleasant.»
- The labs are really good except finding random numbers such as for failure rate to provide a specific reliability. This finding a number seems stupid to many of the students.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- more help IN the labs»
- nothing.»
- I think it should be less repports/papers to read, it was to mutch.»
- no need to change»
- nothing special»
- What should changes is the "speed" of the course (it should be increased) and maybe some questions that result from not reading the reading preparation should be cut off by referencing the book etc.»
- The course book maybe. Or addition of some articles which are more explanatory and related to the course content specially some literature covering the mathematical part of the course which was really poor in the course book.»

16. Additional comments

- I didn"t like the course book.»
- the guess lectures and Articles such as Arian 501 are very nice and interesting. also the teacher is very friendly and kind and respectful. all Bests to Teacher and the assistants »

Kursutvärderingssystem från