ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Course Evaluation Advanced Vehicle Dynamics 2009, TME100

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-09-28 - 2009-10-12
Antal svar: 15
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 44%
Kontaktperson: Mathias Lidberg»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

15 svarande

<15 hours/week»1 6%
Around 20 hours/week»3 20%
Around 30 hours/week»9 60%
Around 40 hours/week»2 13%
>50 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- Interesting subject so course hours okey!» (Around 30 hours/week)

2. Attendance on lectures

How many per cent of the lectures did you attend?

15 svarande

<25%»1 6%
25-50%»0 0%
50-75%»2 13%
>75%»12 80%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- 100%» (>75%)

3. Attendance on assignments sessions

How many per cent of the lectures did you attend?

15 svarande

<25%»1 6%
25-50%»0 0%
50-75%»2 13%
>75%»12 80%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- 100%» (>75%)
- Very useful!» (>75%)

Teaching and course administration

4. What is your opinion of the main course text book by Pacejka?

15 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»3 27%
Rather good»7 63%
Very good»1 9%
No opinion»4

Genomsnitt: 2.81

- Very good, but I prefer a book including 100% pure vehicle dynamics. We did not use at least 80% of the book because of the extensive content in pure tyre dynamics. » (Very good)
- I did not buy the book.» (No opinion)

5. What is your opinion of the lecture notes?

15 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»1 6%
Rather good»11 73%
Very good»3 20%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.13

- To little figures with the forces. No motivations where the equations heritage from. Often equations appeared without motivation which is bad through a learning perspective. » (Rather bad)

6. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

15 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»8 53%
Very well»7 46%

Genomsnitt: 3.46

7. What is your opinion of the material selected for the lectures?

15 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»12 80%
Very good»3 20%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- Tyre model lecture was not very clear, I think it should be ether removed or improved.» (Rather good)

8. What is your opinion of the teaching in lectures?

15 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»3 21%
Rather good»9 64%
Very good»2 14%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.92

- Hints to make the lectures better: Take it easy and slow down explaining material. Have figures showing the dynamic systems which motivates the equations. Quality rather than quantity.» (Rather bad)
- Tim Gordon should explain the concepts slowly and in detail. He gave his lecture with speed of light! Two solutions recommended: Either he has to be assigned for more lecture hours or if this cannot be done, Mathias Lidberg should carry on teaching in topics related to control, since it takes some time for the students to get used to a new lecturer! » (Rather good)

9. What is your opinion of the material selected for the assignments sessions?

15 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»10 66%
Very good»5 33%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- Good assignments but could be minimzed to get a better workload and also a better understanding» (Rather good)
- The first assignment where mostly confusing» (Rather good)
- Simulations in Matlab is really good way of learning and understanding formulas.» (Very good)

10. What is your opinion of the work load of the assignments?

15 svarande

Very bad»1 6%
Rather bad»3 20%
Rather good»9 60%
Very good»2 13%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- To much workload put on the assignments. Although there were no faults with the assignments themselves, it was good thoughout learning. Although the help was non.» (Very bad)
- As in the basic course, four assignments is a lot of work especially when writting report. Maybe three assignments would be sufficient.» (Rather bad)
- To advanced matlab but rather good content in the assignments that covered the course as well» (Rather bad)
- Everything needed in the report should be explained in detail in order to avoid conflicts. For instance, trajectory of the vehicle may not necessarily be needed to explain dynamic behaviour of the vehicle (even though it is important for the student to understand the things), but if instructors want to see them in the report, then this should be stated in the assignment paper!» (Rather good)

11. What is your opinion of teaching in assignments sessions?

15 svarande

Very bad»1 7%
Rather bad»1 7%
Rather good»9 64%
Very good»3 21%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3

- Derong was a very good teacher. She was kind and helpful.» (Very bad) (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)
- More teachers are needed, especially at computer exercises» (Rather bad)

12. What is your opinion about using Simulink as tool in this course?

- Very Good! It is a very useful tool!»
- Nice, because it is a good way to be introduced to that software.»
- Very good.»
- Actually quite diffcult for someone with no experiences on matlab.»
- I liked it. I think Simulink is very practical when it comes to modeling. However, I heard that it has been very hard for people who had not worked with Simulink before.»
- It is a powerful tool to be learned, so I guess this is a correct decision to use it here.»
- rather good»
- very good.»
- Good tool to use»
- It"s okey but Matlab purely is prefered»
- Good»

Study climate

13. How is the general study climate in the master programme?

15 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»11 84%
Very good»2 15%
No opinion»2

Genomsnitt: 3.15

- Some of the Swedes are very difficult to work with, because they are to selfish!» (Rather good)

14. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

15 svarande

Very poor»1 6%
Rather poor»1 6%
Rather good»5 33%
Very good»8 53%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- There should have been more exercise oppertunties» (Very poor)
- I have never experienced a problem in this aspect. » (Very good)

15. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

15 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 6%
Rather well»4 26%
Very well»8 53%
I did not seek cooperation»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.73

- But only with exchange students!» (Very well)

16. How was the course workload?

15 svarande

1 (Too low)»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»5 33%
4»8 53%
5 (Too high)»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

Summarizing questions

17. How well did the course fullfill your expectations?

15 svarande

1 (not at all)»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»3 20%
4»10 66%
5 (very well)»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.93 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

18. What is your general impression of the course?

15 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»4 26%
Good»9 60%
Excellent»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.86

19. What is your opinion of the material selected for the exam?

15 svarande

Very bad»1 6%
Rather bad»2 13%
Rather good»11 73%
Very good»1 6%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- Was hard to connect the exam with the course » (Rather bad)
- Rather good, except the questions related to control theory. » (Rather good)
- Good advanced level on the exam, thought a little bit wrong focus in some questions since » (Rather good)
- Some areas where unfortunaly missing» (Rather good)

20. What is your opinion of the work load during the exam?

15 svarande

Very bad»2 14%
Rather bad»1 7%
Rather good»9 64%
Very good»2 14%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.78

- I was short on time doing the exam.» (Rather good)

21. What is your opinion of the level of difficulty of the exam?

15 svarande

Very bad»1 6%
Rather bad»5 33%
Rather good»7 46%
Very good»2 13%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- It was difficult!» (Rather bad)
- Practicing problem solving when preparing for the exam would help.» (Rather good)

22. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The lab, but it shall come much earlier. Simulink. Assignments, but more help and theory motivating the assignments. Derong was very good for the assignments. »
- Assignments and the way of donig them, with the possibility to ask to the teachers during specific lectures.»
- Simulink»
- The morning at Stora Holm and the three last assignments using Simulink.»
- Vehicle Dynamics Lab session, Assignment topics»
- assignments»
- To have collection of illustrative problems available for study would help as well as solutions to class problems.»
- Driving and testing the Saab performance»
- Tim contributed to interesting lectures»

23. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Less theoretical lectures and more practical examples in lectures done by the teacher»
- To many big questions to solve under the exam, there is not enough time. (Stress exam)»
- The exam difficulty should be lowered. »
- Tim Gordon should give his lecture slower!»
- nothing»
- Add problems.»
- More focus on understanding, less focus on a lot of assignments»
- More dynamic system figures. Connect the theory more to the reality» (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)

24. Additional comments

- nothing»
- One of the most difficult course I have read but it was an good experience.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.93
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.93
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.73

Kursutvärderingssystem från