Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Modern subatomic detection and analysis methods, FUF065

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-09-18 - 2009-10-31
Antal svar: 9
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Ulf Gran»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

8 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 25%
Around 20 hours/week»5 62%
Around 25 hours/week»1 12%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.87

- I attended all lectures and studied on my own, but I don"t remember how many hours per week.» (?)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

9 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»1 11%
100%»8 88%

Genomsnitt: 4.88

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

8 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 12%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 25%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»5 62%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- Dont recall what the goals were» (?)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

7 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»7 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

9 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 11%
Yes, definitely»8 88%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.88

- It"s good to have an oral exam but it still makes the student feel like the idiot he (or she) really is when you can"t answer a question. I"m not complaining about the level of the examination because it was very resonable, I"m just trying to say something about how akward it is. Or I could be talking completely nonsens, your choice... » (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 22%
Large extent»5 55%
Great extent»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 3

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»2 22%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»5 55%
Great extent»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 2.77

- It was hard to get hold of Leo. Would be helpful if Cremona was informed of the fact that this book is used in the course next year.» (Small extent)
- The book wasn"t available from Cremona and when we asked about it they said they would have to order it from the publisher so they wouldn"t have it until the course had ended anywas. But I don"t think that Leo would have helped the learning very much (or at all). So again, no complaints.» (Small extent)
- I read the whole coursebook. But it didnt cover everything in the course and was very much to read in one course. Some extra material, links etc. could be useful.» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

8 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»4 50%
Very well»4 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

9. How relevant were the laboratory parts in the course?

9 svarande

Very relevant»4 44%
Quite relevant»4 44%
Less relevant»1 11%
Not relevant»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.66 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The laboratory exercises were very good, I can"t say I remembered much about detectors from the course in Subatomic Physics during the third year.» (Quite relevant)

10. How relevant was the study trip?

9 svarande

Very relevant»8 88%
Quite relevant»1 11%
Less relevant»0 0%
Not relevant»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.11 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- It was intense but very interesting.» (Very relevant)
- It was great to see how an advanced testing facility worked and what it looked like (and seeing that the labs didn"t look very much like the plans - wires everywhere!)» (Very relevant)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 1.38

Study climate

11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

9 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 11%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»8 88%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.77

- Since there were many students who had a great deal of special knowledge of the course - it was very difficult to find the currage to ask question.» (Rather poor)

12. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

9 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»4 44%
Very well»5 55%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.55

13. How was the course workload?

9 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 22%
Adequate»7 77%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.77

14. How was the total workload this study period?

8 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 12%
Adequate»5 62%
High»2 25%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.12

- String Theory and SUSY as well so I only have myself to blame.» (High)

Summarizing questions

15. What is your general impression of the course?

9 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»6 66%
Excellent»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

16. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The visit to GSI if possible.»
- The study trip. Marvelous to see how things work in practice. Thomas did a very good job with the lectures but it would have been nice if Göran took one or two as well, just to see somebody else"s view on things.»
- The trip was great and I also like the lectures a lot. »
- study trip and lab exercises»
- Studytrip, labs.»
- I think the study trip was good, it gave a better understanding of how the experiments work»

17. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- It"s a shame it"s the only course in this kind of physics. A follow-up course would be nice.»
- Stupid students like me. God I did a lousy job with the oral.»
- It was hard to find a copy of the course book. »
- don"t know -> the course was good as it was!»
- Add extra material,references or links etc. for material which isnt in the coursebook. »

18. Additional comments

- To read the coursebook was very timeconsuming. Maybe the book should be an alternative to other material. I think/guess some didnt follow the coursebook.»

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 1.38
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.12

Kursutvärderingssystem från