ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Quantum field theory, FUF020

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-09-17 - 2009-10-31
Antal svar: 3
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Ulf Gran»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

3 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»0 0%
Around 25 hours/week»2 66%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

3 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 33%
75%»0 0%
100%»2 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

3 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 33%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»0 0%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»2 66%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

3 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»3 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

3 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 33%
Yes, definitely»2 66%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

6. Was it clear from the start what was expected from the student to reach the different grades?

3 svarande

Yes»1 33%
No»2 66%
Don"t know»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.66

7. Did you feel that this course made you fully prepared for the following courses? (Particularly Physics beyond the Standard model)

3 svarande

Yes»0 0%
No»2 66%
Don"t know»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

- I think the course was very difficult and sometimes a bit confusing. Many things I had trouble with understanding became clearer in the next course Physics beyond the sm, if that is because it was the "second" time I saw things or because of maybe a clearer presentation I don"t know, but it could be the latter.» (No)
- If it was supposed to prepare us for SUSY we should have learned A LOT more about the Standard Model, and there just isn"t time!» (No)

Teaching and course administration

8. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

3 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 100%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- I think I learnt mostly by doing the exercises and reading Peskin, because many things were very hard to digest and took long time, maybe the lectures went a bit to fast.» (Some extent)
- Per had improved a lot if compared with ACP but I must have developed some type of mental blockade against learning QFT. Despite trying all summer I still don"t understand even the algebra...» (Some extent)

9. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

3 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 33%
Large extent»2 66%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- P&S is undoubtably a very thorough book, but it certainly isn"t easy to understand and the problems are a killer.» (Some extent)
- Peskin is good, but hard and some calculations and reasoning I had a hard time to understand, but it helped to ask the lecturer.» (Large extent)

10. What do you think about the home problems? Did they cover a fair part of the course material?

- I think they took VERY long time to do. Maybe it would have been better if the lecturer could have given more tips or suggestions how to attack the hardest problems.»
- Yes. The problems are well chosen but are bloody difficult. For a reason I guess, if you understand the problems you understand the material. »
- Absolutely they did cover the whole part of the course»

11. There have not been strict deadlines for the home problems. What do you think about that?

- VERY BAD. That made me not hand them in (I believe), I think everyone need a deadline, the deadline need not to be super-strict but it has to exist.»
- Would I have succeeded in doing the problems with at strict deadline? No. But I still think it"s a good idea to set dates.»
- Thats was not so good as people may delay the submission of the assignments»

12. What do you think about the feedback on your home problems?

- I didn"t hand them in under the course.»
- Per is good at answering questions and helping. I"m just too afraid to ask...»
- they home problems was really useful»

13. Should there be problem solving classes to complement the lectures?

3 svarande

Yes»3 100%
No»0 0%
Maybe/don"t know»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

- Would have helped immensely.» (Yes)

14. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

3 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»3 100%
Very well»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

Study climate

15. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

3 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 33%
Very good»2 66%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- Per seems to be available always and never refrains from answering questions, but you have to find the courage to ask.» (Rather good)

16. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

3 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 33%
Rather well»0 0%
Very well»1 33%
I did not seek cooperation»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

17. How was the course workload?

3 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»1 33%
High»1 33%
Too high»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 4

18. How was the total workload this study period?

3 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»1 33%
High»1 33%
Too high»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 4

Summarizing questions

19. What is your general impression of the course?

3 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 33%
Adequate»1 33%
Good»1 33%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- This course I felt I had to have a completely different and higher dicipline compared to other courses to manage.» (Fair)

20. A large fraction of those who started this course did not finish. If you were one of those, please tell us why!

- I started to hand in the problems late and was immediately afterwards all the time. Also I found this course much more difficult then all other courses I"ve taken, the calculations were maybe not that difficult but there were so many new concepts and methods I felt.»
- I"m not clever enough to learn the material, I think.»
- I think there should be extensive problem solving sessions »

21. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The lectures aren"t bad but I think Per REALLY should urge students to read the relevant parts of P&S before he lectures about it, I think it would help a lot. He shouldn"t have to do such a thing because you should do it by default, but I think if he points it will make some (including me) do it.»
- the Literature»

22. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Next course should have exercise sessions.»
- I have pointed out that the course isn"t bad at all, but I would like to see that it stretches out over two periods, 15 points, so that you could learn about the standard model properly and about renormalization. This would of course mean that Gabriele"s course would have to be postponed to the second year of studies and that"s a problem if it collides with Master Thesis.»
- Assigments deadlines..»

23. Additional comments

Kursutvärderingssystem från