Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

AI 1 course feedback 2009, CIU026

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-11-03 - 2009-12-15
Antal svar: 8
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Claes Strannegård»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

8 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»3 37%
Around 20 hours/week»4 50%
Around 25 hours/week»1 12%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.75

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

8 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 12%
50%»1 12%
75%»1 12%
100%»5 62%

Genomsnitt: 4.25

- Since I have taken the same course at Halmstad University, I only joined the differentiating lectures.» (25%)
- had alot of other courses which overlapped.» (50%)
- i was late on arrival from my country» (75%)
- except one lecture.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

8 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 12%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»0 0%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»7 87%

Genomsnitt: 3.62

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

8 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»8 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

8 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 37%
Yes, definitely»4 50%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- sometimes is difficul to find the propper words to explain.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 25%
Large extent»3 37%
Great extent»3 37%

Genomsnitt: 3.12

- i think i learned the most wahen i met with my classmates to review the material, but maybe it"s because I"m not very used to this kind of teaching.» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 25%
Large extent»3 37%
Great extent»3 37%

Genomsnitt: 3.12

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

8 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»2 25%
Very well»6 75%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- It"d be better if the lab responsible has a room and meeting hours at the university.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

8 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 25%
Very good»6 75%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

8 svarande

Very poorly»1 12%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»3 37%
Very well»3 37%
I did not seek cooperation»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- we shared ideas for the labs and we had discussion meetings.» (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

8 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»8 100%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- I think a few more lab exercises should be included. » (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

8 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»6 75%
High»2 25%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- I"m taking a swedesh course also.» (Adequate)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

8 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 12%
Good»4 50%
Excellent»3 37%

Genomsnitt: 4.25

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The exercises were quite good, they were just like gamas.»
- good lecturer, should be preserved to next year. Maybe a bit better view of how every subject/lecture is connected with the rest.»
- The guest lectures were very useful in broadening the vision of the field. Should definitely be preserved.»
- Guest lectures of NLP and one from irobis. »
- Lab assignments and guest lectures (especially the ones from industry)»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Sometimes the class was boring because it was only slides, and slides and more slides. Improve the interactivity»
- »
- One more lab assignment can be added up.»
- It"d be better if the lab responsible has a room and meeting hours at the university.»

16. Additional comments

- It would be great if you provide an exercise to be done before the lecture and then give the explanation in the lecture. »
- Giveing lecture note earliar than lecture time in order to get possibility to preper before comming to the lectures.»
- the lectures of Mr.Claes were very useful/good.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från