ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Functional materials, TIF115

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-06-10 - 2009-07-10
Antal svar: 15
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 150%
Kontaktperson: Janusz Kanski»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Teknisk fysik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

Estimate the total time, that is, the time you spent in class or outside class working on this course. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

15 svarande

At most 15 h/week»7 46%
About 20 h/week»8 53%
About 25 h/week»0 0%
At least 30h/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.53

- I wish i have had more time!! It is a very interesting course!» (At most 15 h/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

15 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»2 13%
50%»2 13%
75%»4 26%
100%»7 46%

Genomsnitt: 4.06

- Too much in other classes! » (25%)
- Nearly 100% Mist 1 or 2 lessons» (100%)

Goals and their fulfillment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

15 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 13%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 6%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»6 40%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»6 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.06

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this and the following question only if you know the course goals.

14 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»14 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination(s) assess whether you have reached the goals?

14 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»5 35%
Yes, definitely»9 64%
Do not know/Have not yet attended examination»0

Genomsnitt: 2.64

6. Was the division 60% exam, 40% project appropriate?

14 svarande

Yes»9 64%
No, more weight to exam»2 14%
No, more weight to project»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 1.57

- It was nice to have both project and examine. But I think there was more hours spending on the project than 40%» (Yes)
- But perhaps there could have been two projects or some hand in questions. I think a written exam is an inappropriate examination for this type of course.» (No, more weight to project)
- 50% 50%» (No, more weight to project)
- I would say that the workload was 80% project and 20% exam» (No, more weight to project)

Teaching and course administration

7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Minor extent»1 6%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»12 80%
Great extent»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 3

- When the lecture notes were provided to us before the lectures we were able to make complementary notes during session, this was very good. Otherwise the lectures were interesting for listening. » (Large extent)

8. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Minor extent»1 7%
Some extent»3 21%
Large extent»6 42%
Great extent»4 28%

Genomsnitt: 2.92

- A lot of things included in the course are not in the coursebook. Even if there was other suggested reading, the recommendations for this were to vague (like recommending an entire book and not just the relevant parts). » (Some extent)
- Lecture notes was good but the book was only like a factbook. Not too good for the learning in the course.» (Large extent)
- Overall good lecture notes. » (Great extent)

9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc. work?

15 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»2 13%
Rather well»5 33%
Very well»8 53%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- I would have liked some study questions to make it clearer what to focus on in the material.» (Rather poorly)
- I think handouts should be put on the webside at least 2 days before the lecture if you want to read it through and have some questions.» (Rather well)
- I appreciate that the course home page in the Göteborg university system was kept updated. However, rules concerning the exam could have been clearer (permitted aids etc.).» (Rather well)

10. Was the review lecture useful?

15 svarande

Did not attend»5 33%
Yes»9 60%
No»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 1.73

- What review lecture?» (Did not attend)
- I think the quantum lessons did not gave me anything cause we have not read about it before so it is hard to see the whole in 2-3 lessons.» (No)

Study climate

11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

14 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 7%
Rather good»4 28%
Very good»9 64%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

- Sometimes when you don´,t understand a thing it´,s hard to ask.» (Rather good)

12. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

15 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 7%
Rather well»3 23%
Very well»9 69%
I did not seek collaboration»2

Genomsnitt: 3.61

- Sometimes some fellow students could be very laisy and that´,s a problem when there is to be a teamwork :(» (Rather well)

Workload

13. How was the course workload?

15 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 13%
Reasonable»11 73%
High»2 13%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- The project took quite a lot of time» (Reasonable)
- High workload on project, reasonable on exam (considering that it"s supposed to be 60% of total workload)» (High)

14. How was the total workload this study period?

15 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»3 20%
Reasonable»6 40%
High»5 33%
Too high»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.26

Project

15. Was the project relevant for the course?

15 svarande

Not at all relevant»0 0%
Somewhat relevant»0 0%
Quite relevant»3 20%
Very relevant»12 80%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- Very interesting to do a project in functional materials, it´,s like in the future thought.» (Very relevant)

16. Did the project presentations contribute to your learning?

15 svarande

No»1 6%
Yes»14 93%

Genomsnitt: 1.93

- To a high extent. It would be beneficial to have much more time for presentations.» (Yes)
- A bit!» (Yes)
- It was very interesting to listen to other peoples project. Unfortionally there was not all attended to listen to all projects.» (Yes)

Overall impression and specific recommendations

17. What is your general impression of the course?

15 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Good»14 93%
Excellent»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.06

- Intersting reseach area, good lectures and lecture notes. » (Good)
- It is very interesting!» (Good)
- Interesting areas!» (Excellent)

18. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Projects.»
- Lecture notes before session. »
- The proyect was very interesting for me . »
- To have both a lecture part and a project part.»
- The projects! Different teachers to each part.»
- Project was good.»
- The projects. They were an excellent opportunity to learn more about interesting things.»

19. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Home exam or hand in questions feels more relevant. I think the subject is too broad to learn much for an exam, it would be more relevant to test how well one can find and assess information on the subject.»
- It will be better to have some tutorials.»
- The course was ok , so I think that it could be in the same way . »
- More time on project presentations.»
- The lectures about semiconductors would have been better with better notes/ppt!! It was pritty hard to learn from them and realise what was important!!»
- All students should listen to each others project.»
- Providing more than one old exam to practice on would be a good thing. »

20. Additional comments

- Good course!!»
- Lecturers could perhaps recommend articles on the recent research in the field that they lecture about, particularly when it is something not included in the coursebook. »

Kursutvärderingssystem från