ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Semiconductor materials physics, FMI040, MPNAN, VT2009, extra svar nytt försök, FMI040

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-06-10 - 2009-06-11
Antal svar: 1
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 100%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Teknisk fysik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

1 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 100%
Around 20 hours/week»0 0%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

- Not so much time spent since there were no home assignments or lab preparation/reports» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

1 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»0 0%
100%»1 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

1 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 100%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

1 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 100%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»0 0%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

1 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 100%
Yes, definitely»0 0%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- The exam was strange, I think it didn´,t reflect the lectures given during the course, it was focused only the last chapters of the book. » (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

1 svarande

Small extent»1 100%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

- The type of lectures given are not motivating. They are solely ppt slides with a lot of general information but no clear topics on which to focus.» (Small extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

1 svarande

Small extent»1 100%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

- I dont think the compendium is neccessary and there could be better books to read from. The thing is that some of the questions of the exam are based on specific content of the book, so if someone doesnt buy it the person risks failing those questions. Furthermore, I don´,t agree completely that the lecture notes from the teacher were sold to the students, in all other courses I took during the year the lecturers made available their notes online.» (Small extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

1 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»1 100%
Very well»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

1 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 100%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»0 0%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

1 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 100%
Rather well»0 0%
Very well»0 0%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- I only studied together with a couple of students previous to the exam.» (Rather poorly)

11. How was the course workload?

1 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 100%
Adequate»0 0%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- The coures is not demanding, its only to attend the lectures since there are no handouts. Only a literature work but which can be done quickly.» (Low)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

1 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»1 100%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

1 svarande

Poor»1 100%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»0 0%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

- The course can be much better. Semiconductor physics are one of the main subjects in nanoscience and because of that I think that the program coordinators should pay attention to this course. ppt based lectures are boring and don´,t motivate the student on the contents of the course. I think the quality of the course should be improved considerably.» (Poor)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The laborations, but they should be improved and give more interaction to the students. This year we only had to attend them but no report or related work was required.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- A strong revision about this course is recommended, it should be one of the strong courses from the programm! If not the teacher then the lectures have to be changed and given with more "passion", of course each student has to be self-motivated to study but the teacher´,s passion is a big influence to make us interested in a course.»

16. Additional comments

- Unfortunately I have to say that I was very dissapointed with this course, it was not at the level of the other quality courses I took from the Nanoscience program.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från