|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Internal Combustion Engines, Advanced Course, 2009, MTF 225Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2009-06-04 - 2009-06-28 Antal svar: 24 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?% Kontaktperson: Petter Dahlander» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Maskinteknik 300 hp
Course Administration and information1. Were the goals of the course clear after reading the course PM and the information on the course web page?24 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.62 2. Was the web page satisfactory?24 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4 - More suggested reading could be uploaded.» (Ok) 3. Was the course PM satisfactory?24 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.87 - But not better...» (Ok) Learning4. Were the goals of the course fulfilled?24 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.75 - But there could have been more engines in the course» (Yes) 5. Do you consider that you had good enough pre-knowledge?24 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.37 - because, it was my first courses in Internal combustion engine» (Not at all. I missed a lot) 6. Which parts of the course were difficult and which parts were easy?- It wasn"t that hard. »- optical measurement technics were abit difficult to get a grip around» - Actually, the parts talking about engines were quiet easy to understand. Regarding the optical measurement methods, diagnostic and so on, that was a bit more difficult but the visit at the lab helped to understand.» - The difficult part was to understand some of the slides, for example the optical mesurement slides. But it"s good at the same time that it"s hard because then you have to make some research on the side. Understand all the different parameters and how they influence performance in the engine is the most difficult thing with the course I think. The easiest parts are all the basic facts, like the fuel slides.» - Task were very difficult because courses and tasks didn"t coincide.» - Nothing to say: we had to face with all typical engineering problems, so there were not difficult/easier parts.» - hard: accoustic and how to optimize the volumetric efficiency, optical measurements nothing easy for me» - Some overlap with the intro to ICE course last term. » - everything was fine» - It was difficult to grasp the lectures about optical measurements as well as the some stuff in the CFD lecture.» - svårt att koppla helheten ibörjan. men efter assignment 2 så klarnade det...» - Optical measurements and when GT-Power didn"t do what we wanted.» - CFD lectures were difficult, » 7. Is it clear what your knowledge from the course can be used for?24 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.79 - Probably to make engine related experiments and development» (Yes) 8. Do you consider the course to be scheduled right in time in the global course plan?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.34 - Well, it"s not a problem, but ICE is in lp1, and this course is in lp4.» (No. Too late) 9. Did you find the “,suggested readings”, questions uploaded to the web page helpful?24 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.04 - THe information was clear and easy to follow» (Yes) Lectures10. What do you think about the lectures as a whole?24 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.75 - Interesting» (Very good) 11. How many lectures did you go to? (%)24 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.04 12. If you did not go to the lectures, what was the reason?- early morning lectures»- Mostly skipped them for formula student.» - Unfortunatly not really insterested in some lecture topics.» - too early, good weather» - Early morning lectures» - overlaping» - Var tvungen att jobba...» - Formula student.» - overlap with other lecture» 13. How did you like Petter Dahlander’,s lectures?(Engine modeling, Sprays, Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics, Gasoline Direct Injection)23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.08 - Interesting lectures and teacher» (Good) 14. How did you like Ingemar Denbratt’,s lectures?(Gas Exchange, Charge motion, Alternative fuels, Engine operating characteristics, Development trends CI+SI)24 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.91 - lite ostrukturerad. lite för stressad. dåliga handouts...Jätte duktig på det han pratar om!» (Poor) 15. How did you like Mats Andersson’,s lectures?(Optical measurement methods)20 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - Where not there.» (?) 16. How did you like Sven Andersson’,s lectures?(Diesel Spray Combustion)23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.04 - Well performed but not so charasmatic» (Ok) 17. How did you like Anders Karlsson’,s lectures?(CFD in industry)19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.47 - Didn"t give me anything.» (Poor) Design Task (Computer Exercises)18. What did you think about the design tasks as a whole?24 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.29 - Useful. A little too time-consuming, but it"s just my feeling.» (Good) 19. How many GT-Power exercises did you go to? (%)24 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.08 - The second design task was finished before the end of the exercise sessions so I didn"t attend the 3 or 4 last ones.» (60-80 %) 20. What did you think of GT-Power software?24 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.16 - hard to understand and use to optimize the engine» (Good) 21. What did you think about Daniel Dahl"s supervision?24 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.41 - Very helpful and easy to talk to» (Good) 22. What did you think about Jonas Wärnberg"s supervision?24 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.33 - Always answered questions!» (Good) Engine Laboration23. What did you think about the engine laboration?24 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.7 - Engine did not work. Could not complete the engine laboratory as a result.» (Poor) Course Literature24. What did you think about the Heywood book?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.78 - Because, I find that it"s stupid of reading a book entirely (which is expensive). I consider that the teacher has to read the book and who has to summarize any important information by chapters (for example by making a handout). The book could be interesting for people who are really interesting by the Internal combustion Engine, but after the courses and not during the courses.» (Poor) 25. What did you think about the lecture handouts?24 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.83 - blandat. vissa vara bra. andra fanns överhuvudtaget inte. » (Poor) Your work26. How many hours per week did you spend for this course?(Total work including home work)22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.5 - I don"t know. But most of the time spent were on the assignmnets, which were very good!» (?) The Exam27. What about the exam?24 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.04 - A bit of surprise but a good way to show what you have learned» (It was ok.) Summary28. What did you think about the course as a whole?24 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.91 - The only problem was that it should have been more negine tech. for example vibrations...» (Good) 29. What parts of the course should be kept to next year?- Design Tasks»- The design tasks. Engine lab.» - Design task, laborations, GDI"s and future engines lectures» - The engine laboration» - Especially the design tasks.» - look next answer» - laboratory work, tasks, teachers» - Computer GT-Power lab was very interesting. Engine lab was not so interesting. Would recommend linking the GT-Power lab to the engine lab (for example, verifying some simulation results by laboratory engine measurements.) » - The design tasks! The teachers in general were very good and should be kept till next year.» - behåll inlämningsuppgifterna. riktigt bra att det är upp till en själv att testa själv. lärorikt. bra med diffus ledning. dock så kan man ha ett litet möte med varje grupp ungefär halvvägs in i assignment så att man kan diskutera lite kring uppgiften...liten redovisning efter halva typ...» - Design Tasks» - GT-Power, the assignments and laboration.The few lectures I participated were also good!» - gt power, gas exchange, spary (SI, DI), future trendends,» 30. What should be changed for next year?- Written report for the engine lab, otherwise one does not keep to much of it.»- Maybe the optical measurment technics could have been given after the lab visit?» - The book» - Post all the suggested readings for all parts of the course, and at once.» - -More equations and explanations about Continuity/Navier Stokes/Energy -More about CFD -Less about optical methods » - Invite some industry insiders/experts as lecturers. » - More work with real engines. In design task 2 it would be great if the students had a real eninge to look at in order to get better feelings for dimensions etc.» - Kraven är för lågt ställda tycker jag. Även om ni anser att det är en avancerad kurs och att man har ett egetintresse tycker jag att man skall ha en högra kravbild. framförallt på assignments.» - Change lecture room to one that has better air circulation so you don"t fall asleep» - Some of the lectures. Get it more cohesive.» - Optical Measurement, maybe more discussion of results and less technique, CFD do less equations » 31. What you like to have a compulsary lab tour in order to better understand optical measurement methods?- No»- That would be a great idea» - Yes» - Yes, as said earlier, it was very useful to me.» - Oh yes, that would be good. I think this time, it was just before the exams and then people are not as interested.» - Yes, it"s ok.» - very interesting idea, it is a good way to give interest to a lecture and to understand» - Lab tour should definitely be kept and perhaps strongly recommended to students. But I think it should remain optional since not all students may be interested in this field.» - yes, it gives u an idea about the technology and setup» - Yes, that would definitely be a good idea. Prefferably directly after the optical measurements lectures!» - Yes» - It was fun to see how you work with engines.» - That would be great!» - Ja it was good to get a better understanding» 32. General comments- About lectures, the teachers should give some guide lines or sum up of the important and hard parts to understand better the book and the course. In Sweden, you have good ideas to give interest to the students, and their ideas are take into account. »- very good as a whole» - I think its not the best way to grade such complex subject based on 10 exame questions, more graded exercises, graded laborations and graded presentations would be good. »
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0%