Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Nordic Master 2008/09, Maritime Law

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-05-29 - 2009-06-29
Antal svar: 6
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Magda Wilewska-Bien»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

6 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»2 33%
Around 25 hours/week»2 33%
Around 30 hours/week»2 33%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

6 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»1 16%
100%»5 83%

Genomsnitt: 4.83

- In maritime law it would be good to have more lectures. The subject is not so easy to understand and study by your self.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

6 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 33%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»4 66%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- I suppose it"s rather difficult to produce lucid goals when you"re cramming the world of maritime law into a 6 ECTS course.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

6 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»6 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Vague goals are usually reasonable..» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

6 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 16%
Yes, definitely»5 83%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

- Brilliant case studies (both demanding and amusing!). The written exam was ingenious as well since it made us cover most parts of the field of maritime law during our preparations. However, the teacher"s assessment of the exam is a giant mystery. What did i do right? Where did I go wrong? How did I earn the grade I got?» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 33%
Large extent»2 33%
Great extent»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Few lectures for such a demanding course. But that"s an attribute of the programme rather than the course I suppose. Not a single staight and informative answer from the teacher. But that"s kind of expected considering he"s a lawyer..» (Some extent)
- A very skilled teacher in this course that made the lectures worth visiting.» (Great extent)
- More teaching would be good.» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 16%
Large extent»2 33%
Great extent»3 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- All advised course literature where needed to reach the goals of the course.» (Great extent)
- Heavy literature. But that"s perfectly in order since this is a master programme.» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

6 svarande

Very badly»2 33%
Rather badly»1 16%
Rather well»1 16%
Very well»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- The web page did not work at all.» (Very badly)
- Well, LearnGate didn"t work and the handouts should have been posted earlier to allow us to distribute our workload more evenly.» (Very badly)
- It didn´,t worked so good. The teacher had difficulties in posting material on the web page. The material where handed out through mail.» (Rather badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

6 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 33%
Very good»3 50%
I did not seek help»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

- Good and quick respons from the teacher.» (Very good)
- I did not seek help but others did and information and questions were sent to all participants" e-mail. » (I did not seek help)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

6 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 33%
Very well»2 33%
I did not seek cooperation»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 4

- For this course it was an great advantage to sit in groups and do part of the works.» (Rather well)
- No collaboration intended for this couse I beleive. » (I did not seek cooperation)

11. How was the course workload?

6 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 66%
High»2 33%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- For the first time during the programme it felt like we were studying on an advanced level. The earlier courses were pretty much high school standard which is strange considering the fact that we"ll receive a masters degree with a Chalmers stamp. » (Adequate)
- Quite high. Think It was needed though to get all parts included in the learning process.» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

6 svarande

Too low»1 16%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 66%
High»1 16%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

- Too low at the beginning of the semester, too high at the end.» (Too low)
- It was quite high in total. But there should also be some demand in the learning and some effort spent as it is a Master programme.» (Adequate)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

6 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»2 33%
Excellent»4 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.66

- Would like to have more lectures.» (Good)
- Very good and skilled teacher with relevant experience. Do your outmoust to keep him until next course within the programme. » (Excellent)
- Entertaining, demanding, informative. More maritime law in the programme!» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The teacher and the learning objectives including the form with case studies.»
- teacher, cases and the type of exam»
- The approach with problem based learning was good.»
- Everything.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Maybe it´,s an idea to divide the students into small work groups from the beginning. As this way of deal with the case studies where quite efficeint. »
- nothing»
- Better feedback on the exam.»

16. Additional comments

- Interesting and a very relevant course to the programme.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från