Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Nordic Master 2008/09 - Shipping and Marine Environment, Shipping and Environ

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-05-29 - 2009-06-29
Antal svar: 7
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Magda Wilewska-Bien»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

7 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 14%
Around 20 hours/week»4 57%
Around 25 hours/week»2 28%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.14

- Very difficult to estimate since the time spent is distributed unevenly during a course primarily based on assignments.» (Around 20 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

7 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»1 14%
100%»6 85%

Genomsnitt: 4.85

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

7 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 28%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»5 71%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

7 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»7 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Appropriate as an introduction to the environmental impact of maritime activities and related regulations» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

7 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»5 71%
Yes, definitely»2 28%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.28

- Student lectures are productive since knowledge is assessed and distributed simultaneously. Especially for this programme where normal lectures are scarce. However, a course where all you have to do to pass is to hand something in, regardless of quality, is NOT suitable for an education that is supposed to be on an advanced level.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»2 28%
Some extent»3 42%
Large extent»1 14%
Great extent»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.14

- Few lectures in a course based on home assignments. But this is not necessarily a bad thing. In this case the assignments were structured in a way that forced us to acquire a broad knowledge of the subject in question. And I believe that the teacher was willing to provide feedback and instructions when questioned even though I didn"t seek such assistance myself.» (Small extent)
- Lectures in school as well on learngate were helpful.» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 14%
Large extent»3 42%
Great extent»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

- The literature provided by the teacher was a good starting point. And then there are wonderful things like the internet and old school libraries.» (Large extent)
- Very good course litterature.» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

7 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»4 57%
Very well»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

7 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»3 42%
Very good»2 28%
I did not seek help»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

- Good and quick respons from teacher.» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

7 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»3 42%
Very well»3 42%
I did not seek cooperation»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

- The producing + opposing scheme is very effective in introduction courses like this one.» (Rather well)
- In this course the work was mostly individually.» (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 57%
High»2 28%
Too high»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

- The workload was high. But as It was very interesting and learning, it was worth It.» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

7 svarande

Too low»1 14%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 57%
High»1 14%
Too high»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

- The workload was too low at the start of the semester and too high at the end.» (Too low)
- The workload was adequate for the first part on the spring term (when we took this course).» (Adequate)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

7 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»3 42%
Good»3 42%
Excellent»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The form of the work to be handed in. Including the questions that needed to be answered/handded in.»
- The course is very good as such.»
- Course litterature»
- Lectures on learngate. The literature. Home exam and written assignments.»
- Student lectures, the emphasis on regulatory frameworks.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- If possible narrowing the learning objectives. It can be difficult though as It is a complex subject.»
- Nothing.»
- essays and presentations (it took almost two whole days just to present)»
- A clear distinction between fail/pass.»

16. Additional comments

- Overall good and interesting course.»
- Professor Larsson has done exellent job.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från