Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Nordic Master 2008/09 Risk Management, Risk Management
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2009-05-29 - 2009-06-22 Antal svar: 4 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?% Kontaktperson: Magda Wilewska-Bien» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.3 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 2 | | 66% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 1 | | 33% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.33 - I haven"t started the course yet because of lack of time and lack of information and lectures from the teacher.» (?)
- Bad planning, no information prior to gathering in Åbo, insufficient lecturs and lecturers in Åbo, no information after. This course was a total waste of our time and money.» (At most 15 hours/week)
2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 4 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 0 | | 0% |
75%» | | 1 | | 25% |
100%» | | 3 | | 75% |
Genomsnitt: 4.75 - Participated in the lecturers thats been provided.» (75%)
- See above comments» (100%)
- But there weren"t any appropriate lectures due to teacher"s illness» (100%)
- Not much teaching was offered... Some lectures on the web page (as some other teachers has done) would be good. » (100%)
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?3 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 2 | | 66% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 1 | | 33% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.66 - Risk management can be a complex and blur subject, so I understand if the goals within a course can be hard to define.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)
4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.2 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 1 | | 50% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 1 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 2.5 - The goals as I have interpret them have been reasonable.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)
- Regarding the goals and the actual help/lectures» (No, the goals are set too high)
5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?4 svarande
No, not at all» | | 1 | | 25% |
To some extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, definitely» | | 0 | | 0% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 3 | | 75% |
Genomsnitt: 3.25 - The examinatio is still in process and so is the finalizing of the course. » (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)
- Difficult in our situation where we have a lack of lectures and poor help material in order to understand the entire subject» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?4 svarande
Small extent» | | 3 | | 75% |
Some extent» | | 1 | | 25% |
Large extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.25 - In my opinion there is no point in having one lecture in statistics. » (Small extent)
- The teaching have been helpful to some extent. But I think it requires lot of self studying and self determination what risk managment is about.» (Some extent)
7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?4 svarande
Small extent» | | 3 | | 75% |
Some extent» | | 1 | | 25% |
Large extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.25 - What literature?» (Small extent)
- There were only ppt:s which are difficult to understand by just having them» (Small extent)
- We only had some power point presentations handed outon paper copies. Difficult both to read (small pictures) and to understand another persons notes. » (Small extent)
- See comment on Q6.» (Some extent)
8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?4 svarande
Very badly» | | 2 | | 50% |
Rather badly» | | 2 | | 50% |
Rather well» | | 0 | | 0% |
Very well» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.5 - Due to ilnees of one of the teacher within the course, the where some lack of information.» (Rather badly)
Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?4 svarande
Very poor» | | 1 | | 25% |
Rather poor» | | 1 | | 25% |
Rather good» | | 1 | | 25% |
Very good» | | 0 | | 0% |
I did not seek help» | | 1 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 2.75 - As I have understand from the other students its been rather poor. Me myself didn´,t had so much to ask about.» (Rather poor)
10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?3 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 1 | | 33% |
Very well» | | 1 | | 33% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 1 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 4 - I contacted other students within the programme and finalized the group work together with them.» (Rather well)
11. How was the course workload?2 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 50% |
High» | | 0 | | 0% |
Too high» | | 1 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 4 - A lot of traveling and time used for very little learning» (?)
- All in alla it was well distrubuted workload.» (Adequate)
- As we didn"t have any lectures we did have to gather much information by ourselves» (Too high)
12. How was the total workload this study period?3 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 33% |
High» | | 1 | | 33% |
Too high» | | 1 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 4 - Three courses was to much for this period especially since we did not get any lectures in risk management and if you have to find out all by your self what to learn in a course it takes even more time than it normally would.» (Too high)
Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?4 svarande
Poor» | | 3 | | 75% |
Fair» | | 1 | | 25% |
Adequate» | | 0 | | 0% |
Good» | | 0 | | 0% |
Excellent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.25 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The lecture with the russian doctor who talked ablut uncertainty management was a very intersting substitute for some of the missing lectures in Åbo.»
- Nothing, make a proper course and keep it in Gothenburg»
15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Skip the mathematic part that described probability. Replace it with the Russian doctor in risk management, O. Perminaova.»
- In case of illness there should be a "plan B"»
- More information would be good.
Whats the point in having one lecture in statistics?
The course should be changed to meet the requirements and the work in our work places.»
16. Additional comments- I can understand some of the critique in this course. But not all. I think It was o.k performed course if considering the circumstanses. »
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|