Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Advanced design materials, MPP095

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-05-25 - 2009-05-29
Antal svar: 6
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 25%
Kontaktperson: Oskar Rexfelt»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

6 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 16%
Around 20 hours/week»3 50%
Around 25 hours/week»1 16%
Around 30 hours/week»1 16%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

- no workload until the last week» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

6 svarande

0%»1 16%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»1 16%
100%»4 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.16

- missed a couple of hours coming late .. » (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

6 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 33%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 16%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 50%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.16

- but i prefered this classes where the stress was more on an individuals opinion rather than blindly follow the opinion of another individual who had written a book .» (I have not seen/read the goals)
- Goals were quite vague and were hard to interprete.» (The goals are difficult to understand)
- Det som krävdes för varje delmoment ändrades efterhand vilket gjorde det rörigt och jobbigt för oss studenter att begripa vad som krävdes av oss och vad som skulle göras!» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

6 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 16%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»4 66%
No, the goals are set too high»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Målen var inte konsekventa och tydliga nog att man överhuvudtaget skulle förstå dem. De stämde inte överens med verkligheten och uppfyllde således inte sitt syfte.» (No, the goals are set too high)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

6 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 50%
Yes, definitely»1 16%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

- the stool project was interesting the door project could be introduced in an earlier stage .. but also students should be assured that it was not a big deal as people concentrated on it more of scoring better grades and impressing rather than actually working on redesign» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»2 33%
Some extent»2 33%
Large extent»2 33%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- It is highly questionable to use teachers who can"t speak english. The quality of the lectures was really, really bad.» (Small extent)
- Tycker inte att föreläsningarna lärde mig något nytt vilket gjorde det hela oinspirerande, vilket var tråkigt. Förväntade mig mer av en materialkurs på avancerad nivå» (Some extent)
- as most of it is application of common sense and opinions i would consider the teaching and lecture more of kindling our minds to think . » (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»1 16%
Some extent»1 16%
Large extent»3 50%
Great extent»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- The course text is of little help since large portions covered in the lectures were not included inside the text. eg(sustainability, large extent of design quality)» (Small extent)
- more of a reference than a study material» (Some extent)
- Great book...» (Large extent)
- Bra och inspirationsgivande kursbok och kursen borde formas mer efter den istället för föreläsarnas specifika intresseområde/forskningsområde. Som det är nu förloras den röda tråden pga detta» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

6 svarande

Very badly»1 16%
Rather badly»1 16%
Rather well»3 50%
Very well»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- all lecture presentations should have been uploaded but only a selected few were put up.» (Rather badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

6 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»3 50%
Very good»2 33%
I did not seek help»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- Många studenter förlorade dock intresse och engagemang efter en tid» (Rather good)
- Lecturers were willing to answer queries and meet student if required.» (Very good)
- during the lectures very good .» (I did not seek help)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

6 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»3 50%
Very well»3 50%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Av samma anledning som ovan» (Rather well)

11. How was the course workload?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 20%
Adequate»2 40%
High»1 20%
Too high»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- i would say uneven.» (?)
- Många onödiga returer pga missförstånd och för dålig information» (Too high)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

6 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»2 33%
High»2 33%
Too high»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Läste kandidatarbetet samtigt så rätt hög, men jag är nog ett specialfall» (High)
- i took extra course» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

6 svarande

Poor»3 50%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»2 33%
Excellent»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- It was one of the worst courses I have taken on Chalmers.» (Poor)
- Tycker verkligen inte kursen lyckas med sitt syfte, vilket är synd eftersom den hade kunnat vara riktigt bra så som det lät i beskrivningen och i kurs pm.» (Poor)
- Shit course. we dont learn anything new in the course. » (Poor)
- only course which actually mentioned that the content will be based on opinion . » (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The various project based assignments and in class assignments were a great help in understanding remembering key concepts.»
- The book»
- the teachers opinion on ideas frank and appreciative is to be commended .. i would like to take similar course again.:)»
- door assignment.»
- Cooperation with interesting brands like Thule»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- More detailed guidiance and instructions regarding the various projects and the final written report should be given.»
- The confusing stoolproject. It was very vaguely defined and need much improvement.»
- Kursinnehållet, strukturen och tydligheten i uppgifterna»
- More assignments on the way about different things instead of having an home written exam in the end. Put in more realistic material selection. not like the one about the stool that just was like all other product development courses from earlier studies, with pugh, kesselring and sketching. The focus really was on this parts instead of the pure material selection that this course is about.»
- Contacts persons that do not leave the company after some weeks. »

16. Additional comments

- The course was a waste of time...»
- This course should not be recomended for the product development master. The students there, already got this knowledge.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från