Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Semiconductor materials physics, FMI040, MPNAN, VT2009, FMI040

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-05-20 - 2009-06-02
Antal svar: 8
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 40%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Teknisk fysik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

8 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»4 50%
Around 20 hours/week»2 25%
Around 25 hours/week»1 12%
Around 30 hours/week»1 12%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.87

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

8 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 12%
50%»1 12%
75%»2 25%
100%»4 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.12

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

8 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 37%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 12%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 25%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»2 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.37

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

8 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»2 25%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»3 37%
No, the goals are set too high»3 37%

Genomsnitt: 2.12

- feel like, there were to many lecture slides and this makes lect. bit boaring most of of the time. » (No, the goals are set too high)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

8 svarande

No, not at all»1 12%
To some extent»1 12%
Yes, definitely»1 12%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»5 62%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»2 25%
Some extent»3 37%
Large extent»2 25%
Great extent»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

- I like that the lecturer explains topics in a simple way, with examples. The pace of the lectures was also appropriate.» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»2 25%
Some extent»1 12%
Large extent»2 25%
Great extent»3 37%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- there was a lot of errors in compadiam, and many time it seens bit confusing as well.» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

8 svarande

Very badly»1 12%
Rather badly»1 12%
Rather well»5 62%
Very well»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

8 svarande

Very poor»1 12%
Rather poor»1 12%
Rather good»2 25%
Very good»4 50%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.12

- specially during exam time, when u need to ask a lot of question.. teacher as well as tutor is not awaialable in that crucial time.. » (Rather poor)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

7 svarande

Very poorly»1 14%
Rather poorly»2 28%
Rather well»2 28%
Very well»2 28%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

11. How was the course workload?

8 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»3 37%
Adequate»2 25%
High»3 37%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

12. How was the total workload this study period?

8 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 50%
High»0 0%
Too high»4 50%

Genomsnitt: 4

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

7 svarande

Poor»2 28%
Fair»2 28%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»2 28%
Excellent»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

- the course is a quite good, but it"s sometimes rather difficult to understand the concepts.» (Fair)
- The course has helped me to understand solid state physics much better and showed how to apply it for practical estimations. Maybe the lectures were too relaxed sometimes, but it was easy to follow.» (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- labs and groupwork»
- the solving sessions. the compendium.»
- The general structure and topics covered.»
- The course assistant.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Teaching speed was too high. I would say that almost the most important and the largest part of the course was taught in the first 4 weeks. And it was rather difficult to understand and follow the lecture with such speed. It would be helpful if student could have the answers to the question sets after the solving session. The solving session can be more beneficial if it is performed on the black board, partly.»
- Lab works should include some hands-on experience (this year they were helpful for understanding material better, but we didn"t see any equipment working and haven"t done any measurements)»
- The professor»
- two things i must say, 1st, there should be tutorial, where teacher or tutor solves some unsolved problem, and then give some assignments to student as home work. It will give numarical understanding to the phenomenon. or you can assign 5 or home assignments where the successful comeletion can give bonus marks in main exam. second, when u talk about laboration, it should not be just theoritical demostration,...i dont think if we have done any experiment, or practical work in whole course except viositing MBE machine once. Also, as per as my interaction with other student, i must say, that when teacher explain on black board, the more student understand...teaching is not just sliding PPts, the knolwdge delivery is also very inportant in simpler words. (i am sorry if i am more critic) »

16. Additional comments

- I think the teacher must dedicate much more time to the conceptual teaching of the subjects in the course. »
- The new professor in the next year should have enough time for students to ask questions and treat unbiased. Does not speak swedish in the class to describe the questions for swedish students since Chalmers is an international university and teaching should be in english.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från