Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Microwave Projects, part I, MCC060, MPMPE, VT2009, MCC060

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-05-20 - 2009-06-02
Antal svar: 6
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 42%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

6 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 33%
Around 20 hours/week»2 33%
Around 25 hours/week»2 33%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

6 svarande

0%»1 16%
25%»1 16%
50%»3 50%
75%»1 16%
100%»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- useless» (0%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

6 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 16%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 16%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 16%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 50%

Genomsnitt: 3

- dont care» (I have not seen/read the goals)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

6 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 16%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»5 83%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.83

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

6 svarande

No, not at all»1 16%
To some extent»5 83%
Yes, definitely»0 0%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.83

- The examn was on parts that was not a in this course. Not all parts but some» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»3 50%
Some extent»3 50%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.5

- no extent» (Small extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»1 16%
Some extent»2 33%
Large extent»2 33%
Great extent»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

6 svarande

Very badly»1 16%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»3 50%
Very well»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 3

- The handouts were not good.» (Very badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

6 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 33%
Very good»2 33%
I did not seek help»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 4

- I wasnt interested...» (I did not seek help)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

6 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 16%
Rather well»1 16%
Very well»4 66%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

11. How was the course workload?

6 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 16%
Adequate»5 83%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

12. How was the total workload this study period?

6 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»2 33%
High»3 50%
Too high»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

- I had to read three courses simultanous to work. To hard but you have to live.» (Too high)

Course-specific questions:

13. Do you think the topics of project 1 are related to the course goals?

6 svarande

no, not at all»0 0%
no»0 0%
somewhat»2 33%
yes»3 50%
yes definitely»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

14. Did you get enough time to complete project 1?

6 svarande

no, not at all»0 0%
no»0 0%
somewhat»1 16%
yes»5 83%
yes definitely»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

15. Are you satisfied with project 2?

6 svarande

no, not at all»0 0%
no»1 16%
somewhat»3 50%
yes»1 16%
yes definitely»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- Groups were too big. Some students got away doing nothing. But the project was good.» (somewhat)

16. Did you get enough help in project 2?

6 svarande

no, not at all»0 0%
no»1 16%
somewhat»1 16%
yes»3 50%
yes definitely»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

Summarizing questions

17. What is your general impression of the course?

6 svarande

Poor»1 16%
Fair»1 16%
Adequate»3 50%
Good»1 16%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

18. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- project»
- The binder. Allowance to use the lab and equipment for mounting/testing.»
- Projects»
- The projects»
- The projects ws really nice, but why start one where you dont think ew eill have time to finish. And why did we even have project 1. Ok it was intrestingt but really somewhat unnescessary. You should be able to write a report and have a presentation at these levels of study....» (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)

19. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- nothing»
- The first project took more time, and this year we had 3 weeks to finish it (if I remember correctly). So more time for that.»
- Why have the exam? It is a project course and almost everything on the exam eas on other parts»
- Smaller groups in project 2 or a bigger project to provide enough to do for everyone. I would recommend to take in a guest lecturer for the "soft topics". Someone who is an expert in project management and inspiring. Maybe someone from industry or department of industrial economy or GU.»
- Literature, handouts, teacher, lectures, exam.»
- No exam (mandatory lectures instead), more time to project 2.»

20. Additional comments

- Over all good.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från