ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Optoelectronics MCC055, MPMPE, VT2009, MCC055

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-05-20 - 2009-06-02
Antal svar: 10
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 45%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

10 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 10%
Around 20 hours/week»4 40%
Around 25 hours/week»3 30%
Around 30 hours/week»2 20%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

- I was only taking one course this study period, meaning that I could spend a lot of time on the optoelectronics course. » (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

10 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 10%
75%»5 50%
100%»4 40%

Genomsnitt: 4.3

- I missed 25% of the teaching due to time conflict with my other course.» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

10 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 10%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 10%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»8 80%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

9 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»9 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

10 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 10%
Yes, definitely»6 60%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»3 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- the exam was very diversified» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 22%
Large extent»6 66%
Great extent»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.88

- especially tutorial exercises and the laboratory» (Large extent)
- Anders did a great job in the lecturing» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 10%
Large extent»4 40%
Great extent»5 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- Good book as well!» (Large extent)
- To have a book/script costum made for a course is really good. It means that everything in the book is relevant. On the other hand I think it is a bit shallow in some sections, not explaining where some equations come from. But the origin of the most important equations is clarified. » (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

10 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»0 0%
Very well»10 100%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Everything was smooth» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

10 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 10%
Very good»8 80%
I did not seek help»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 4

- both martin and anders did a good job in answering questions.» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

9 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»4 44%
Rather well»2 22%
Very well»3 33%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.88

- The cooperation in the project group didn"t work out that well. » (Rather poorly)

11. How was the course workload?

9 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 44%
High»4 44%
Too high»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

12. How was the total workload this study period?

9 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 22%
Adequate»3 33%
High»3 33%
Too high»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- I only took this course.» (Low)
- My second course was an MTS course, which had a lower work load.» (Low)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

10 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 10%
Good»4 40%
Excellent»5 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.4

- there were some halleluja moments :-)» (Good)
- It"s a good course about a very interesting subject. The teaching is very competent. » (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Anders! and the book as well»
- The course as a whole is good. »
- Tutorial»
- The home assignments and the laboration exercises. »
- The labs and home assignments. The book is also good.»
- The book and Anders as the professor.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- the lab-setup should work»
- The tutorials could be more interactive.»
- Workload should be decreased :)»
- i think the time slots for the tutorials could be set better, not too close to the lecture of the same topic, so people have some time to have a brief review of the chapters before the tutorial sessions. »
- The project is quite boring and takes a lot of time. If you require a certain maximum time for project presentations, make sure that people stick to that. It is unfair if one tries to present within the time limit when others can exceed it considerably.»
- Better tutorials with a teacher that explains how to solve problems and why things are like they are. Not just state the answers in the way Martin has done.»

16. Additional comments

- thanks for a good course in optoelectronics!»
- Thanks to Anders, Martin, Goran and Peter.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från