ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPRSS: RRY065 Applied Remote Sensing Sp4, 08/09

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-05-20 - 2009-06-01
Antal svar: 4
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Arto Heikkilä»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

4 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»3 75%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- The structure of this course was of self-training nature, with very little follow up and feedback from the examiners» (At least 35 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

4 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»3 75%
100%»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 4.25

- Most of the lectures were very superficial and no bibliographic references were provided» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

4 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 25%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 75%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- not all of them are fulfilled though» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)
- The topics were interesting, but demanding. It demands more than half-time work, as it was supposed to be.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

4 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»4 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

4 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 50%
Yes, definitely»1 25%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»1 25%
Some extent»2 50%
Large extent»1 25%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- See answer to question #2» (Small extent)
- The lectures where not focused on the project at hand but provided a background.» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»2 50%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»1 25%
Great extent»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

- the litterature was almost nonexistant apart from a smaller handout on doas» (Small extent)
- See answer to question #2» (Small extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

4 svarande

Very badly»1 25%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»2 50%
Very well»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- Course administration was one of the weakest parts of the course. It is NOT acceptable to have the examinors not knowing wherever the grade scale is ig-g or 3-5 in the course. Its not acceptable to not be able to design a system on beforehand can identify grades for individuals instead of the whole group. » (Very badly)
- Only fer lectures were uploaded, as it was expected» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

4 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»3 75%
Very good»1 25%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- The lecturers where away on field campaigns or conferences during key parts of the course. In general the examiners have not been present in the projects.» (Rather good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

4 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 25%
Rather well»1 25%
Very well»2 50%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

11. How was the course workload?

4 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»2 50%
High»2 50%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- projects take time... » (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

4 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 75%
High»1 25%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

4 svarande

Poor»1 25%
Fair»1 25%
Adequate»1 25%
Good»0 0%
Excellent»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- The group work was not a good idea. If you are in a group where the ambitions are very diverse no one will be satisfied and if some members of the group do not contribute it is actually much more work covering up for them although you actually end up with less result. » (Poor)
- It is a good course because the projects are pertinent and demanding, but I was expecting more feedback from the lecturers» (Adequate)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The fun LAND project»
- The group work with (every 2-3 weeks) meetings with supervisors.»
- The practical approach is good.»
- The projects were interesting, but demanded a lot of work. Maybe only one project would be enough to cover all the problems and to have more input from the examiners»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- the projects should be more clear especially the land project which felt very open and hard to limit. Course administration has to IMPROVE!»
- Keep the way of working but let the lectures be more focused on what is supposed to be the project. Also remove the group work and have individual work where the students are free to cooperate. »
- The projects are very demanding and the lecturers were not participating very much. Bibliographic guidance would be desirable.»

16. Additional comments

Kursutvärderingssystem från