Visa resultat

Material och tillverkningsteknik Z-2009, MMK072

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

19 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»		12		63%
Around 20 hours/week»		5		26%
Around 25 hours/week»		0		0%
Around 30 hours/week»		2		10%
At least 35 hours/week»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 1.57

- Var på alla föreläsningar, läst lite i callister LV1 & LV2, sen ingenting förrän LV8.» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

19 svarande

0%»		0		0%
25%»		0		0%
50%»		0		0%
75%»		9		47%
100%»		10		52%

Genomsnitt: 4.52

- sick first two weeks» (75%)
- Not 75%, a little bit over that, but not 100% either.» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

3. How understandable are the course goals?

I have not seen/read the goals»		5		26%
The goals are difficult to understand»		1		5%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»		9		47%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»		4		21%

Genomsnitt: 2.63

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

16 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»		0		0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»		15		93%
No, the goals are set too high»		1		6%

Genomsnitt: 2.06

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

No, not at all»		0		0%
To some extent»		6		35%
Yes, definitely»		4		23%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»		7		41%

Genomsnitt: 3.05

- Plastdelen var kanske lite för detalijerad till skillnade mot de andra delarna.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. What did you think about the lectures on materials science?

not good at all»		1		5%
not useful/interesting»		0		0%
ok»		4		21%
quite useful/interesting»		10		52%
very good»		4		21%

Genomsnitt: 3.84

- Lite synd att inte powerpointsen låg ute på nätet, det är lättare att veta vad som är viktigt då. Även att det inte fanns så mycket övningar att göra, framför allt på phase diagram» (very good)

7. What did you think about the lectures on polymeric materials?

not good at all»		0		0%
not useful/interesting»		0		0%
ok»		7		36%
quite useful/interesting»		11		57%
very good»		1		5%

Genomsnitt: 3.68

- Skulle vilja ha övningar här också» (quite useful/interesting)

8. What did you think about the lectures on metal forming?

not good at all»		0		0%
not useful/interesting»		5		26%
ok»		6		31%
quite useful/interesting»		4		21%
very good»		4		21%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

- slidesen var väldigt särskrivna. Jag vet att jag är rätt känslig, men känns som man borde läsa igenom grejerna först. Det är ju Chalmers trots allt ,)» (quite useful/interesting)

9. What did you think about the lectures on metal cutting?

not good at all»		4		22%
not useful/interesting»		7		38%
ok»		4		22%
quite useful/interesting»		2		11%
very good»		1		5%

Genomsnitt: 2.38

- I did only attended one lecture.» (?)
- Too much about specific details. Not useful/interesting» (not useful/interesting)
- Har läst liknande innan och kände inte att lektionerna tillförde mig något» (not useful/interesting)
- Svårt att ta till sig allt. Vinklarna, ta med ett svarvverktyg och visa isaället för att ha det på power pointen. Blir kanske lättare då.» (ok)

10. What did you think about the lectures on unconventional machining?

not good at all»		0		0%
not useful/interesting»		1		5%
ok»		5		27%
quite useful/interesting»		10		55%
very good»		2		11%

Genomsnitt: 3.72

- Onödigt att testa på denna del och den frågan som var skulle man besrikva ett verktyg, oitressant. Bra del att ha med dem kanske mera övergripande.» (ok)

11. What did you in general think about the handout material?

not good at all»		1		5%
ok»		14		73%
very good»		4		21%

Genomsnitt: 2.15

- The additional literature was bad. Reading intruction was god.» (not good at all)
- The handouts on the web should be in pdf fomat rather than .doc. It"s impossible to read the "folmel-blad" if you don"t own a licence for microsoft word» (ok)
- Visas läsanvisningar var väldigt bra och frågorna som var med på matreialdelen andras var lite sämre. Synd att Power pointen till metal cutting kom ut efter föreläsningarna och läsanvisningarna lika så. Man hann ju inte läsa på efter varje föreläsning så då skett man i det-» (ok)

12. What did you think about the computer lab?

not good at all»		2		10%
not useful»		5		26%
ok»		8		42%
quite useful»		2		10%
very good»		2		10%

Genomsnitt: 2.84

- To old material, quite boring and hard to understand.» (not useful)
- Kanske som repetionensmöjlighet i slutet.» (not useful)
- Could be better» (ok)
- It was not very much of a lab, but you actually learned something.» (ok)
- boring, but useful» (ok)

13. What did you think about the polymer identification lab?

not good at all»		1		5%
not useful»		1		5%
ok»		4		21%
quite useful»		11		57%
very good»		2		10%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

- Lätt att förstå. Rolig lab.» (very good)

14. What did you think about the lab on metal cutting?

not good at all»		0		0%
not useful»		3		15%
ok»		2		10%
quite useful»		8		42%
very good»		6		31%

Genomsnitt: 3.89

- Bra och rolig lab som var lite mer "hands on"» (very good)

15. What did you think about the exercise regarding phase diagrams?

not good at all»		0		0%
ok»		7		38%
very good»		11		61%

Genomsnitt: 2.61

- I wasn"t attending.» (?)
- Skulle vilja ha med att öva på.» (very good)

16. What did you thing about the exercise on metal forming?

not good at all»		2		13%
ok»		11		73%
very good»		2		13%

Genomsnitt: 2

- I didn"t participate» (?)
- I wasn"t attending.» (?)

17. What did you think about the exercises on metal cutting?

not good at all»		0		0%
ok»		9		50%
very good»		9		50%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- I wasn"t attending.» (?)

18. How much did the Callister book help in your learning?

didn"t buy the book»		2		11%
very little»		4		22%
to some extent»		1		5%
quite much»		8		44%
very much»		3		16%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- Found a pirate copy @ piratebay.org. I used it a several times, so: very little or didn"t buy the book.» (didn"t buy the book)
- As many american books there are very much words to describe some simple things» (very little)
- It"s too much, and a very American book. Easy to read, but still it would have been better with a Swedish book.» (to some extent)

19. How much did the book on manufacturing tecnology (Moderna produktionsteknik) help in your learning?

didn"t buy the book»		8		42%
very little»		5		26%
to some extent»		4		21%
quite much»		2		10%
very much»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Kind of a useful book, even though not all of it was used.» (to some extent)

20. How well did the course administration and web page work?

Very badly»		0		0%
Rather badly»		1		5%
ok»		5		26%
Rather well»		8		42%
Very well»		5		26%

Genomsnitt: 3.89

- Don"t ever upload word-documents only. Especially not those with formulas in it. None of my OS"s does have M$ Word, so I had a difficult time trying to read them.» (Rather badly)

21. How do you evaluate the effort/engagement of the course examiner?

very poor»		1		5%
rather poor»		0		0%
ok»		3		15%
quite well»		8		42%
very good»		7		36%

Genomsnitt: 4.05

- Om man skickade mail fick man svar på en gång och det kändes som om att det hände saker om man frågade efter det.» (very good)

22. How do you evaluate the effort/engagement of the other teachers?

very poor»		0		0%
rather poor»		1		5%
ok»		7		36%
quite well»		9		47%
very good»		2		10%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

- good, except kinnander» (ok)

Study climate

23. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

Very poor»		0		0%
Rather poor»		2		11%
Rather good»		7		38%
Very good»		3		16%
I did not seek help»		6		33%

Genomsnitt: 3.72

24. How was the course workload?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		4		21%
Adequate»		14		73%
High»		1		5%
Too high»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.84

25. How was the total workload this study period?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		0		0%
Adequate»		5		26%
High»		13		68%
Too high»		1		5%

Genomsnitt: 3.78

Summarizing questions

26. Which part was especially difficult to understand?

27. What is your general impression of the course?

Poor»		1		5%
Fair»		1		5%
Adequate»		7		36%
Good»		9		47%
Excellent»		1		5%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

- även om man inte kommer välja en master på ämnet känns kursen bra för förståelsen och vikten av material val.» (Good)

28. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

29. What should definitely be changed to next year?

30. Do you think one of the teachers should get the pedagogical prize?

31. Additional comments