ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Space Science and Techniques, RRY015

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2007-12-18 - 2007-12-21
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 73%
Kontaktperson: Magnus Thomasson»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

11 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 1 9%

Around 20 hours/week» 6 54%

Around 25 hours/week» 2 18%

Around 30 hours/week» 1 9%

At least 35 hours/week» 1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.54

- The plenty of tutorial problems" in 2nd and 3rd week which occupied most of the time to solve them in this course. The problems were challenging and after attempted the problems it laid a good foundation of this course.» (At least 35 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

11 svarande

0%» 0 0%

25%» 0 0%

50%» 0 0%

75%» 3 27%

100%» 8 72%

Genomsnitt: 4.72

- Almost 99% unless a couple of days I were sick.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

11 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 0 0%

The goals are difficult to understand» 0 0%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 1 9%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 10 90%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

11 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 0 0%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 9 81%

No, the goals are set too high» 2 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.18

- Just nice. It would be good if the course runs in two quarters, that is students have time to learn and to understand, to think and to absorp the materials taught better.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)
- The course is kinda juicy. Good and interesting, but much to learn!» (No, the goals are set too high)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

11 svarande

No, not at all» 0 0%

To some extent» 4 36%

Yes, definitely» 7 63%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.63

- I suggest 5 hours is good. There merely have no time for one to think further for the "hard" problem, and to review those had been done.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 1 9%

Large extent» 5 45%

Great extent» 5 45%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

- The teaching is actively involved the students to participate the course, it is very much different from the other course which is only listeninig without throwing ideas. Moreover, the presentation traind one to be able to demonstrate his/her opinion in the public, and get the strong support and advice from the teachers. The tutorials class was excellent too!» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 4 36%

Large extent» 6 54%

Great extent» 1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

- SOLUTIONS!!!» (Large extent)
- - "exercise book" helped a lot - compendium was good to read & understand - course literature mostly for background information or deeper explanations» (Large extent)
- I really liked the printed hand-outs material. It was clear, and everything important was there.» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, etc work?

10 svarande

Very badly» 0 0%

Rather badly» 0 0%

Rather well» 2 20%

Very well» 8 80%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

9. What is your opinion about the group work?

(More than one answer possible.)

11 svarande

Not very useful, I learned little from the discussions» 3 27%

Useful, I learned much from the discussions» 4 36%

Too little time scheduled» 3 27%

Adequate time scheduled» 1 9%

Too much time scheduled» 0 0%

The groups were too small» 0 0%

The groups were of adequate size» 0 0%

The groups were too large» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.18

- I couldn"t tick more than one box. The time is adequate and groups are of correct size. I think that group works are a great idea to understand more about our subject.» (Not very useful, I learned little from the discussions) (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)
- I cant click more than one answer, so I copied answers to below: -Useful, I learned much from the discussions -The groups were of adequate size -Adequate time scheduled Comments: The G.W. found interesting. I learnt not only our mission, but also other students too. Their opinions, methods, difficulties, creativities, teamwork and presentation style.» (Useful, I learned much from the discussions)
- More than one answer is not possible... but except for my tick above, I think that too little time was scheduled, and that the groups were of adequate size.» (Useful, I learned much from the discussions)
- group discussions were helpful because things were discussed that can be questioned. Trying to explain and discuss deepens your understanding of the subject. maybe the time scheduled was a little bit too short. On one side you were forced to deliver fast results, which is a good thing to learn, but on the other side sometimes discussions had to be cut off because otherwise results would not have been delivered ...» (Too little time scheduled)

10. Suggest how the group work can be improved next year!

- 1. Keep the grp.wrk. as fun as this year. 2. Avoid power point...whatsoever but write down on the transparent sheet as we did. 3. Three students per grp is the best. »
- Some more time might be needed. It would also be good to get more feedback from the teachers on how well the tasks are solved.»
- - Being able to give our mission sheets at the end of each session and have correction or comments or hints. - Sharing these mission sheets between groups, so that we know better what the others are doing.»
- Small tasks to hand in.»
- If just some bonus point would be dedicated to the final points, we will be able to work more on that .»
- The group size should be two persons.»

Study climate

11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor» 1 9%

Rather poor» 0 0%

Rather good» 2 18%

Very good» 8 72%

I did not seek help» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.54

- A quick response from Eva.» (Very poor)
- Help was always provided and questions patiently answered by all lecturers.» (Very good)

12. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

11 svarande

Very poorly» 1 9%

Rather poorly» 0 0%

Rather well» 4 36%

Very well» 6 54%

I did not seek cooperation» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

- We exhanged many ideas in solving the tutorial questions.» (Very well)

13. How was the course workload?

11 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 5 45%

High» 5 45%

Too high» 1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

- Busy and busy until exam but still can cope...» (High)
- Many moments in the course to handle» (High)
- Too few points for the required ammount of time needed to spend to pass the course.» (Too high)

14. How was the total workload this study period?

11 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 3 27%

High» 6 54%

Too high» 2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- This course took ALL my time. Fortunately, the other course I took only required 2 days of studing to pass...» (Adequate)

Summarizing questions

15. What is your general impression of the course?

11 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 1 9%

Adequate» 0 0%

Good» 4 36%

Excellent» 6 54%

Genomsnitt: 4.36

- the lecturers and their assistant did well !» (Fair)
- Very interesting course! Great teachers! However, a bit too large...» (Excellent)
- It is really a space sc and techniques!» (Excellent)
- One of the most amusing courses I have studied. Good teachers, who are enthusiastic and interested in their own subject as well as having good pedagogic skills.» (Excellent)
- I really liked this course. It"s demanding but interesting» (Excellent)

16. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- I think all should be preserved!»
- The lectures as well as the problem solvin classes are very good.»
- The exercise sessions :-)»
- Avoiding slides and writing the lecture on board »
- Group work»

17. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Maybe better course material on the space environment?»
- Plasma physics compendium. »
- Give more time to the project, or make the tasks less general, to reduce time needed for it.»
- The year date ? ,-)»
- The contents should be decreased !»
- The course literature was not oggd or adequately used.»

18. Additional comments

- I will definitely recommend the course to others, despite the large ammount of effort needed to take it!»
- A good course which is not involving too many maths term in Q1. I could quite comfortably reading at home and have confident.»
- Thanks for a great course!»
- No further comments. Merry Christmas and Happy new year !!»
- If some solved examples be added to the exercise book it will be good»
- Maybe it would be good to have the possibility to get some points from problems ("homeworks") that are handed in during the Study Period, to force the students from the beginning of the course to keep up with reading and as a consequence reduce their workload in the two weeks before the exam. (probably just helpful for students with time management problems)»

Kursutvärderingssystem från