ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

eHealth, SSY115, VT2009

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-05-14 - 2009-05-24
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 18%
Kontaktperson: Madeleine Persson»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

11 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»3 27%
Around 20 hours/week»2 18%
Around 25 hours/week»3 27%
Around 30 hours/week»3 27%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.54

2. How many lectures did you attend?

11 svarande

Less than 11»0 0%
11-12»1 9%
13-14»10 90%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

3. How many project presentation sessions did you attend?

10 svarande

None»0 0%
1»8 80%
2»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

- Västtrafik...» (1)
- i still plan to attend » (2)

4. How often did you attend the consultation times?

11 svarande

Never»6 54%
Once»3 27%
A few times»1 9%
Often»0 0%
Very often»0 0%
Every time»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 1.9

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

5. How understandable are the course goals?

11 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 9%
The goals are difficult to understand»2 18%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»5 45%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

6. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

10 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 10%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»8 80%
No, the goals are set too high»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2

- I felt like learning nothing. Mostly the same thing repeated every week, only document research work, no reflexion required... I was very disapointed.» (No, the goals are set too low)

7. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

11 svarande

No, not at all»1 9%
To some extent»4 36%
Yes, definitely»3 27%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

Teaching and course administration

8. How were the individual lectures:

Matrisfråga

- totally boring subject... boring lecturers... lectures cover each other too much...»
- Collect immediate feedback next year, I can only remember 1/3 or of the lectures distinctly.»

Introduction to eHealth, Bengt Arne Sjöqvist, Chalmers/Ortivus
11 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»4 36%
Very good»5 45%
I did not attend the lecture»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.81

Pre-hospital care, Bengt Arne Sjöqvist, Chalmers/Ortivus
11 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 9%
Rather good»4 36%
Very good»5 45%
I did not attend the lecture»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.54

Pacemakers and ICD, Patrik Hidefjäll, Ortivus
11 svarande

Very poor»1 9%
Rather poor»1 9%
Rather good»5 45%
Very good»4 36%
I did not attend the lecture»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

Quality, Bo Bergman, Chalmers
11 svarande

Very poor»3 27%
Rather poor»1 9%
Rather good»1 9%
Very good»6 54%
I did not attend the lecture»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

Terminology, Hans Åhlfeldt, Linköping University
10 svarande

Very poor»4 40%
Rather poor»2 20%
Rather good»1 10%
Very good»3 30%
I did not attend the lecture»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.3

The national IT strategy, Gösta Malmer, SKL (SALAR)
11 svarande

Very poor»3 27%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»5 45%
Very good»3 27%
I did not attend the lecture»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

Organization, Conny Persson, SU
11 svarande

Very poor»3 27%
Rather poor»2 18%
Rather good»1 9%
Very good»5 45%
I did not attend the lecture»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

Standards, Mikael Wintell, VGR
11 svarande

Very poor»3 27%
Rather poor»2 18%
Rather good»3 27%
Very good»3 27%
I did not attend the lecture»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.54

Usability, Isabella Scandurra, Centre of eHealth, Uppsala university
11 svarande

Very poor»2 18%
Rather poor»1 9%
Rather good»2 18%
Very good»4 36%
I did not attend the lecture»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.27

EU-programs and AAL, Silas Olsson, European Commission
11 svarande

Very poor»3 27%
Rather poor»2 18%
Rather good»2 18%
Very good»3 27%
I did not attend the lecture»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

Action-project (dementia), Lennart Magnusson, University of Borås
11 svarande

Very poor»2 18%
Rather poor»2 18%
Rather good»3 27%
Very good»4 36%
I did not attend the lecture»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.81

Stroke rehabilitation, Martin Rydmark Mednet
11 svarande

Very poor»1 9%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»4 36%
Very good»6 54%
I did not attend the lecture»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

Bio informatics, Elof Dimenäs, Astra Zeneca/IT University
11 svarande

Very poor»3 27%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»4 36%
Very good»3 27%
I did not attend the lecture»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

Image systems and PACS, Lars Karlsson and Daniel Persson, Siemens
11 svarande

Very poor»2 18%
Rather poor»3 27%
Rather good»3 27%
Very good»3 27%
I did not attend the lecture»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.63

eJournals, Jan Hernell, Siemens
11 svarande

Very poor»2 18%
Rather poor»2 18%
Rather good»3 27%
Very good»4 36%
I did not attend the lecture»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.81

Medical Simulators, Christina von Dorrien, Mentice
9 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»4 44%
Very good»2 22%
I did not attend the lecture»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.88

Smart textiles, Lena Berglin, University of Borås
10 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»4 40%
Very good»2 20%
I did not attend the lecture»4 40%

Genomsnitt: 4

9. How did you like the course examination form (assignments, project, mandatory lectures and voluntary home exam)?

11 svarande

Very poor»2 18%
Rather poor»4 36%
Rather good»4 36%
Very good»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.36

- They are too much and too strict and I don"t see the point of this amount of work» (Very poor)
- Very boring assignments, project started too late. To make the lectures mandatory is simply a proof that the lectures are not attractive.» (Very poor)
- Very unclear goals to distinguish ok and good assignment results. "Very good, but..." as the comment on most returns make you wonder if it really was very good. The exceptional number of returns on assignment 4 makes me think the question was unclear or not posed as intended. So high return rates without a good motivation is unacceptable.» (Rather poor)

10. Did you choose to do (or do you plan to do) the home exam?

11 svarande

Yes»10 90%
No»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 1.09

11. How often did you check the homepage?

11 svarande

Never»0 0%
A few times»1 9%
Every week»3 27%
A few times a week»6 54%
Every day»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

12. How good was the quality of feedback from the teacher?

11 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 9%
Rather good»6 54%
Very good»4 36%

Genomsnitt: 3.27

- First draft handed back 5 days before the final report is due. Slow assigment correction. The pace of corection makes it feel like an MTS course gone wrong...» (Rather poor)

13. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»4 36%
Some extent»3 27%
Large extent»3 27%
Great extent»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.09

- I just listened to someone talking about my next assignment» (Small extent)

14. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»5 45%
Some extent»3 27%
Large extent»2 18%
Great extent»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 1.9

- Course literature?» (Small extent)

15. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

11 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 9%
Rather well»7 63%
Very well»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.18

Study climate

16. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 9%
Very good»8 72%
I did not seek help»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 4.09

17. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

11 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»4 36%
Very well»5 45%
I did not seek cooperation»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.81

18. How was the course workload?

11 svarande

Too low»1 9%
Low»1 9%
Adequate»7 63%
High»0 0%
Too high»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

19. How was the total workload this study period?

11 svarande

Too low»1 9%
Low»1 9%
Adequate»4 36%
High»4 36%
Too high»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.27

- Not your fault» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

20. What is your general impression of the course?

11 svarande

Poor»4 36%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 18%
Good»3 27%
Excellent»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- totally boring subject» (Poor)
- I was expecting something more technical, or more medicine oriented.» (Poor)

21. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- nothing... make this course elective»
- Almost everything»
- The project.»
- home assignment system, project report»
- lecture & assignment»

22. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- a lot... more interesting subjects/lecturers»
- Terminology lecture, mandatory attendance should be reduced.»
- The way of correcting assignments We are given assignenments we have no idea about and do not learn much from, I just gather a bunch of imformation and organize them without getting any insight.I don"t have enough background for waht I am asked to do»
- Almost all the lectures and the assignements. Or remove the assignement and replace it by a larger project (maybe larger group of people actually DOING something)»
- More technical lectures. Pointing at slides of patient records without demonstrations, explanations or comon sense involved is just plain confusing. Seeing a demonstration of such a system would be very nice.»
- Most of the guest lecturer repeat the same thing from one to the other. Each lecture is wanted to be so general that the learning outcome is very low since very few of the students actually know how healthcare actually works...»
- some contents taught in lecture this year »

23. Additional comments

Kursutvärderingssystem från