Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Course evaluation Industrial Management, TEK250

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-05-15 - 2009-05-26
Antal svar: 18
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 15%
Kontaktperson: Anna Moses»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

1. What is the estimated time you have dedícated to the course?

Try to estimate time including both lecture and own reading.

18 svarande

Maximum of 15 hours»5 29%
Around 20 hours»2 11%
Around 25 hours»5 29%
Around 30 hours»4 23%
At least 35 hours»1 5%
I do not know»1

Genomsnitt: 2.64

- Lectures were sufficient for me.No self study.» (Maximum of 15 hours)

Your personal workload

2. Approximately, how many lectures have you attended?

18 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»2 11%
50%»1 5%
75%»7 38%
100%»8 44%

Genomsnitt: 4.16

- They unfortunately clash with other lectures.» (25%)


3. Are the goals reasonable considering your pre-knowledge and the workload?

18 svarande

No, the goals are too low»0 0%
Yes, they are reasonable»18 100%
No they are too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

Lectures and administration

4. How much have the lectures helped your understanding?

Only possible to answer if you have attended the lectures.

18 svarande

Very little»2 12%
To a small extent»2 12%
To a large extent»7 43%
A lot»5 31%
I can not estimate this»2

Genomsnitt: 2.93

- Foe some calculating questions» (To a small extent)
- Since the lectures are filled with examples it makes them really interesting.» (A lot)
- Hard to say since I haven"t been able to go to so many but the ones that I went to were very good.» (I can not estimate this)

5. How have the lectures worked?

18 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Not so good»1 5%
Quite good»9 52%
Very well»7 41%
I do not know»1

Genomsnitt: 3.35

- boring» (Not so good)
- Lectures have been fine, but I as always it is desireable with as few lecturers as possible.» (Quite good)

6. To what extent have the course literature and course material helped your learning?

18 svarande

Very little»0 0%
To a small extent»2 14%
To a large extent»9 64%
A lot»3 21%
I can not estimate this»4

Genomsnitt: 3.07

- Since I haven"t been able to go to so many of the lectures.» (To a large extent)

7. How well did the course administration, webpage, handouts etc work?

18 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Not so good»1 5%
Quite good»11 61%
Very well»6 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.27

- A bit confusing with changes in the schedule and TimeEdit not beeing correct as compared to the course PM and such...» (Not so good)
- Very good if hand-outs could be published on the webpage BEFORE the lecture...» (Quite good)
- Lecture slides should be up before the lecture. everything else is perfect.» (Quite good)
- We should have gotten the slides at least one day before class. Other than that, the administration has been very good! » (Very well)

8. How good were the possibilities to ask questions?

18 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Not so good»1 5%
Quite good»6 33%
Very well»7 38%
I have not required help»4 22%

Genomsnitt: 3.77

- Lecturers only avaliable by email, other than during lectures» (Quite good)

9. How was the workload on the course?

18 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 11%
Reasonable»16 88%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.88

10. How was your total workload during this period?

18 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Reasonable»9 50%
High»3 16%
Too high»6 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

- because of the project work» (Too high)
- I have been taking this course as an extra course and I have also been working so this has been a tough period.» (Too high)

11. What is your total impression of the course?

18 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
On a pass-level»1 5%
Good»8 44%
Very good»9 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.44

- The subject itself has very many things that is pretty self evident. Increased price lower demand etc. Just one put a word on most things. But since the course is based on so many real life/industry examples and the lecturers seem experienced its still very interesting. Many courses with many lecturers feels poor planned but here I felt no gap neither unnecesary double information when changing lecturer. Well done!» (Good)
- Interesting course» (Very good)

12. Other comments:

- All lecturers are very competence and able to describe so that the students understand the subject. But lecture notes are somewhat too little text and explanation. They should be more self-explained than this in the case of missing a lecture.»
- industry examples or MRP software would help. having some visual examples of what is exactly happening in the real world»
- Very useful and interesting course. Though, I don"t see why lecturers need to be from SSE? Surely, the competence must also be avaliable within Chalmers. I do not appreciate so many different lecturers.»
- I would have liked it to be more group work or individual cases and perhaps that instead of an exam. I think I would learn more from that. The seminars were good but also a bit confusing since everyone could say their opinion even if it was "wrong" and we did not get the "right" answer in the end...»

Kursutvärderingssystem från