ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Robotics and Robot Systems, MPR212

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-05-27 - 2009-06-15
Antal svar: 10
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 19%
Kontaktperson: Rolf Berlin»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Maskinteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

10 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»4 40%
Around 20 hours/week»4 40%
Around 25 hours/week»2 20%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.8

- Not very demanding course...» (At most 15 hours/week)
- Mest tid på lab och kinematiken.» (Around 20 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

10 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 10%
50%»1 10%
75%»4 40%
100%»4 40%

Genomsnitt: 4.1

- To spend 30 min on showing how to calculate 4x4 matrixes is just fucking stupid! Why do we need to do this by hand? Is this something that would EVER happen in real life?» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

10 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 10%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 10%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»5 50%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 30%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Not very clear!» (The goals are difficult to understand)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

9 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 11%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»8 88%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.88

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

9 svarande

No, not at all»1 11%
To some extent»6 66%
Yes, definitely»2 22%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.11

- There were lots of questions in the exam that did have more to do with other fields, such as water cutting, than with robot systems. The exam could have, but did not ask about effects when combining these two fields.» (No, not at all)
- Kind of... but some questions was just stupid! Is waterjet cutting a part of this course?!?! NO! And to give that many points of ridiculous matrix calculation is bad!» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»2 20%
Some extent»4 40%
Large extent»4 40%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»3 30%
Some extent»4 40%
Large extent»3 30%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Some of the pdf literature is to old and boring to read. bad quality!» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

10 svarande

Very badly»1 10%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»7 70%
Very well»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Real course litterature would be nice. The lecture notes was hard to understand even if one had visited the lectures.» (Very badly)
- Good organisation on the handouts» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

10 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»2 20%
Rather good»3 30%
Very good»4 40%
I did not seek help»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- Per should have credit for fast email response!» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

10 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 10%
Very well»9 90%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- there were some problems with the selction of the project groups...» (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

10 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 10%
Adequate»8 80%
High»1 10%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

12. How was the total workload this study period?

10 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 10%
Adequate»6 60%
High»2 20%
Too high»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

- Nonlinear» (High)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

10 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»3 30%
Adequate»4 40%
Good»3 30%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Gäst lektionerna var ok.» (Fair)
- Good but could improve on some areas! Less focus on manual calculation - should be more as how it works in the industri. » (Adequate)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Good spread of robot areas in course and on exam.»
- The labs are good and fun! The guest lectures!»
- Project work is good. Guests lectures are good.»
- The 3 lab exercises, and the presentation of the witten paper.»
- Guest speakers»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Better structure of the questions in the exam (Better english). Sometimes its really hard to understand the questions and which figures are related to which questions.»
- Lab PM"s. Too long calculations on exam, should examine if you understand the principles and know the methods and NOT how fast and accurate you can do math calculations. Didn"t have time to finish exam.»
- The project need to be changed, it should be higher demands on the student and should reflect on your grade.»
- More lectures in Kinematics is required. The marks for the exam questions should be evenly distributed. »
- More interesting and diverse subjects to write the paper about. If you where a little late on chosing there was robot calibration, robot calibration, robot calibration and robot calibration to chose among.»
- Lab-PM (se nedan), Project-work (se nedan). Upplägget med 5 studenter i varje grupp när man är två som labbar. Varför inte ha 4 eller 6 så att det blir jämt.»
- The written examination should represent the course better.»

16. Additional comments

- Waterjet questions belongs to other courses, especially if they not even include the dynamic waterjet with robots..»
- Kursen kan bli så mkt bättre om ovanstående fixas. Det borde inte vara så svårt!»

17. What is your opinion about the invited guest spekers?

10 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»3 30%
Good»5 50%
Excellent»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- ABB very good.» (Good)
- Bra med intresanta föreläsningar» (Good)
- Very good! The best was the project manger of robot studio and Robot craft!» (Excellent)
- Both ABB and Robotcraft was really good lectures.» (Excellent)

18. What is your opinion about the laboratory work?

10 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»3 30%
Good»5 50%
Excellent»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- The tasks and programming part of the labs are very good. Though the lab PM is terrible, focus should be on learning how to understand and program a robot and trying to understand what the task is. Construct a new lab PM!» (Good)
- Good» (Good)
- Men Lab-PM behöver skrivas om. Informationen kommer i fel ordning och allt är bara ett virrvarr av nformation.» (Good)

19. What is your opinion about the project work?

10 svarande

Poor»2 20%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»6 60%
Good»2 20%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- Some really bad reports. No one did to much becuase the grade was just pass. Should give you some point on the exam and be a part of the grade!» (Poor)
- Hur kan man godkänna några av de arbeten som gjordes (Nuclear, Leica...etc)? När man själv kämpar för att skriva en bra rapport enligt "chalmers-standard" för att få godkännt så kan andra "slöa" och ta det lugnt och lämna in rapporter som är långt under standard. Vart tog kvalitetstänket vägen? Om man inte orkar handleda/följa upp rapporterna ska man inte ha ett sånt här delmoment. Under all kritik aktiskt.» (Poor)
- It would be better if the objectives of the projects are clearly stated in the beginning. Not clear what was the main point... sometimes more information was required to add, and at the end complaints about the extension of the project.» (Adequate)
- Does it need to be and project work in a course that has 3 lab exercises, 3 lectures a weak and own studying with kinematics? I would rather see a bit more robot studio work...» (Adequate)

Kursutvärderingssystem från