ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Active Safety 2009 evaluation, MMF320

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-05-12 - 2009-06-12
Antal svar: 17
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 62%
Kontaktperson: Mats Svensson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

1. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

17 svarande

0%» 0 0%

25%» 0 0%

50%» 4 23%

75%» 9 52%

100%» 4 23%

Genomsnitt: 4

2. The number of lecturers

The course used a large number of external experts as lecturers. How did you like this compared to the more typical course with one or a few acamic teachers?

17 svarande

I like this better» 10 58%

It makes little difference» 4 23%

I prefer the traditional teaching» 3 17%

Genomsnitt: 1.58

- All the lecturers were extremely pertinent, having a few expert"s opinion on their domain of expertise is priceless.» (I like this better)
- good» (It makes little difference)
- The most important inconvenient with this method is that since there is a lack of communication between lecturers, they tend to teach the same thing very frequently.» (I prefer the traditional teaching)
- I prefer traditional teaching because experts do not go into enough details!» (I prefer the traditional teaching)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

This is how the course goals are formulated:
After completion of this course, the student should be able to
- List the most important sensor principles under consideration for automotive safety applications and to explain their technological advantages and limitations.
- Explain the special challenges that are encountered in information processing in vehicle safety system applications.
- Explain the most common systems for vehicle control assistance and intervention and to analyse their potential and possible limitations.
- Explain different system principles for information based interaction and communication with the vehicle surrounding.
- Describe the most important principles for driver information display and to explain the challenges in designing systems that are adapted to the human cognitive capacity and human behaviour and response.
- Explain the potential for improved crash safety and post collision emergency care with the use of new technologies.
- Compare, evaluate and prioritise between different active safety systems.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

17 svarande

The goals are difficult to understand» 0 0%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 7 41%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 10 58%

Genomsnitt: 2.58

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

17 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 0 0%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 15 88%

No, the goals are set too high» 2 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.11

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

17 svarande

No, not at all» 0 0%

To some extent» 6 35%

Yes, definitely» 11 64%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.64

6. What did you think about having a home-examination

How do you like this compared to a 4-hour written examination?

17 svarande

I liked the home exam better» 13 76%

The two examination types are equal» 3 17%

I prefer a 4-hour written examination» 1 5%

Genomsnitt: 1.29

- For this course I think the home evaluation is more appropriate. With the project and the home evaluation every student has done an important amount of research and thinking about it, two things that take a lot of time and are way better done when the student takes his time to do it when he"s in a mood for it than during a stressful four-hour exam without any access to research papers and books.» (I liked the home exam better)
- In my opinion, a home examination allows being more organized and structured than a 4 hour written examination. It was therefore possible to have a sufficient time to think about each question and then write a more "pertinent" answer.» (I liked the home exam better)
- because it was so much bigger than 4hour exam it took a lot days to write and many questions are too open or tricky to be able to give reasonable answer» (The two examination types are equal)
- With this home exam it is hard to understand what the teacher wants as the quastians are formulated is general manner. So when you try to be exact you get low grades because teacher wanted more. On the other hand writing an essay for each question contradicts with our education. We are supposed to be engineeres and not writers.» (I prefer a 4-hour written examination)

7. Did the home exam help your learning of the course contents?

17 svarande

Yes, very much» 13 76%

Only a little» 3 17%

No, not at all» 1 5%

Genomsnitt: 1.29

- A bit difficult because it dealt with many aspects of the active safety field, but very interesting home exam.» (Yes, very much)
- I knew the course content before making the examination. However, it helped me to review it.» (Only a little)

8. Would you recommend that we continue to use this examination format?

17 svarande

Yes» 12 70%

Perhaps» 4 23%

No, not at all» 1 5%

Genomsnitt: 1.35

- yes if the examination is less time consuming and more focused» (Perhaps)

Teaching and course administration

9. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

17 svarande

Small extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 4 23%

Large extent» 12 70%

Great extent» 1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.82

10. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

17 svarande

Small extent» 3 17%

Some extent» 6 35%

Large extent» 8 47%

Great extent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.29

11. What did you think about the "Case" based group projects?

The intension is to allow you to collect and synthesise information similar to a real world investigation work. Another aim is to let you organise your work and learning in your own way. Did it fullfill these goals

17 svarande

Yes, very much» 13 76%

Yes, to some extent» 4 23%

No, not at all» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.23

- it is a real complicated work, and more when English is not perfect» (Yes, very much)
- It is not that easy to understand the pros and cons of the different systems, especially because the situations they will be used are numerous, the group work forced us to brainstorm on the subject.» (Yes, very much)

12. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

17 svarande

Very badly» 0 0%

Rather badly» 0 0%

Rather well» 10 58%

Very well» 7 41%

Genomsnitt: 3.41

- I would like the guest presentations to be uploaded within the next tow days after the lecture» (Rather well)
- perfect» (Very well)

Study climate

13. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

17 svarande

Very poor» 1 5%

Rather poor» 0 0%

Rather good» 3 17%

Very good» 11 64%

I did not seek help» 2 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.76

- Very good interaction with the lecturers and the teacher !» (Very poor)

14. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

17 svarande

Very poorly» 0 0%

Rather poorly» 0 0%

Rather well» 5 29%

Very well» 11 64%

I did not seek cooperation» 1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.76

- It depended on the student but rather well.» (Rather well)

15. How was the course workload?

17 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 1 5%

Adequate» 12 70%

High» 4 23%

Too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.17

16. How was the total workload this study period?

17 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 15 88%

High» 2 11%

Too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.11

Summarizing questions

17. What is your general impression of the course?

17 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 0 0%

Adequate» 2 11%

Good» 14 82%

Excellent» 1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.94

- The oppinion was really spoiled with the exam mark. I would prefer to answer questions that has exact answer and don"t need general discussions in the answer. » (Adequate)

18. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- the format of evaluation»
- extra people»
- The subject of the group work (the subjects all together cover most of the safety systems), the lecturers»
- The project. Working with 5 others students has been really nice and I learned a lot. I think this project "formula" is adequate for this course.»
- Stora Holm activity, group projects, demostration of simulator, home exam.»
- Lectures were really good, probably more material can be provided.»

19. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- maybe subjects of project»
- If it is possible, finding a "good" book covering most of the given lectures. »
- Nothing, but industrial experts should give more details about their area of interest. "Quality" is more important than "quantity".»
- Examination type should be reconsidered. Probably individual speaking with teacher can be used or universal 4hour writing exam.»

20. Additional comments

Kursutvärderingssystem från