Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Environmental risk assessment in engineering BOM060 MPEMA V09, BOM060

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-06-15 - 2009-07-01
Antal svar: 8
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 18%
Kontaktperson: Kathrine Jahnberg»

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus contain course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student.

1. Are the goals reasonable considering your own educational background and the number of credits of the course?

Answer this question and the two subsequent only if you do know the course goals.

8 svarande

No, the goals are too easy»1 12%
Yes, the goals are reasonable»7 87%
No, the goals are too advanced»0 0%
I have no idea about this»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.87

2. Did the examination reflect the course goals?

8 svarande

No, not at all»1 12%
To some extent»6 75%
Yes, definitely»1 12%
I have no idea about this»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Var ju så länge sen...» (To some extent)

3. Are the course goals adquate for what can be expected from a course like this?

8 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»0 0%
Yes, to an acceptable extent»5 62%
Yes, to a large extent»3 37%
Yes, to a very large extent»0 0%
I have no idea about this»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- It would be better to do some exercises: about the pollutant propagation in the soil and water, for example.» (Yes, to an acceptable extent)

Teaching and course administration

4. The teaching has been of help for my learning to...

8 svarande

a small extent»1 12%
some extent»4 50%
a large extent»3 37%
a great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

- Very different for different teachers: Lars and Andreas were good, Tommy fair and Sverker quite bad. » (some extent)
- En del föreläsningar var väldigt bra, och en del sämre... en del var bara en massa PowerPoint-slides med en massa text på...» (some extent)

5. What was your general impression of the administration of the course?

- Overall ok, info about presentations could have come a bit earlier...»
- Could have been better if administered by the geo-departement.»
- Good»
- Bra, förutom att tentarättningen tog VÄLDIGT lång tid. Enligt Chalmers regler SKA tentan vara rättad inom TRE kallenderveckor!!!»

Course Literature

6. How large part of the book have you read?

Risks and Decisions for Conservation and Environmental Management (Mark Burgman)

8 svarande

Nothing at all»1 12%
Only a small part»4 50%
About half the book»1 12%
Almost everything»1 12%
Everything»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.62

- Didn"t buy it.» (Nothing at all)
- Väldigt lite! Var några formler man hade nytta av, men de kunde vi ju kopierat...» (Only a small part)
- Quite good, but about a third of the text is references... strange.» (Everything)

Study climate

7. The opportunities for asking questions and getting answers and help were...

8 svarande

very poor»0 0%
rather poor»0 0%
neither good nor bad»0 0%
rather good»6 75%
very good»2 25%
of no interest for me»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4.25

8. The cooperation between me and my fellow students worked...

8 svarande

very poorly»0 0%
rather poorly»0 0%
neither poorly nor well»1 12%
rather well»4 50%
very well»3 37%

Genomsnitt: 4.25

- Since the project groups were chosen by us.» (very well)

9. The workload of the course was...

8 svarande

too low»0 0%
low»1 12%
OK»5 62%
high»2 25%
too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.12

10. The total workload this study period was...

8 svarande

too low»0 0%
low»0 0%
OK»6 75%
high»2 25%
too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

Summarizing questions

11. What is your general impression of the course?

8 svarande

The course was quite bad»1 12%
The course was quite fair»0 0%
The course was acceptable»3 37%
The course was good»4 50%
The course was excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- The course had too much emphasis on the theoretical side of the study and not enough practicality. There were also no past exam papers given prior to the exam and so it was difficult to comprehend what was going to be present on the exam, the style of the questions and the format were unknown. The "example of exam type questions" which were sent via email were totally inadequate. The pace of lectures was really slow, with too much time spent on unnecessary things. Such unnecessary things as SADA (please see comments below).» (The course was quite bad)
- Bra att den bara fokuserade på en del (RA) och inte på många olika (LCA, MFA, osv)» (The course was good)

12. Do you have suggestions for improvements - what should be done differently next year

- Spend less time on the courses, a lot of lectures give the same idea, a lot of ideas are repeated, so it"s lost time...»
- Well focused but the project needs more help to be done»
- Tänk på vad förläsningarna egntligen ska ge eleverna. Att bara stå och rapa upp en massa text så att folk somnar, eller kanske helt struntar i förläsningarna är ju ingen idé. Så var det med vissa föreläsningar...»
- Provide past exam papers - This importance cannot be stressed enough. Emphasise important concepts during the teaching time and don"t waste time on inferior information. Do not make students learn to use SADA, which use during this course will probably be the only time in their life they will ever use it.»

13. What do you think about the soil contamination/drinking water project?

- Interesting project, a disadvantage could be that it consists of two very different parts, which possibly makes the group members focusing only on one of the two parts.»
- very good and interesting»
- The idea is great but some more help about the software is needed for the future»
- Väldigt bra, även om det känns som att kontamineringsdelen var lite svår att få riktigt grepp om. Sada var svårarbetat...»
- The actual conducting of a risk assessment was interesting and maybe more emphasis should be placed on that. The use of SADA I felt was completely unnecessary and felt that it wasted students" valuable study time in having to learn how to use and understand a new computer software. I would have prefered to use that time studying for the exam than working on a computer.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från