ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPARC Housing Inventions, VT 09 ARK136

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-04-23 - 2009-05-14
Antal svar: 12
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 38%
Kontaktperson: Lotta Särnbratt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Goals and fullfilment of goals

The learning outcomes are given in the course programme, that is the knowledge, understanding, skills and perspectives you are expectd to reach. Notify for each outcome how well they have been fulfilled.

1. Learning outcome 1

- apply widened insights on experimental and innovative best practices in the European context to future housing designs in order to foster innovation

12 svarande

Very insufficient»0 0%
Insufficient»2 16%
Sufficient»9 75%
Excellent»1 8%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.91

- Too few examples or little differences between them» (Insufficient)

2. Learning outcome 2

- to perform advanced architectural analysis on housing situations and to produce adequate solutions to emerging new potential future demands on the housing market

12 svarande

Very insufficient»1 8%
Insufficient»1 8%
Sufficient»10 83%
Excellent»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.75

3. How did you find the first "pedagogical" workshop?

11 svarande

Very insufficient»0 0%
Insufficient»0 0%
Sufficient»7 63%
Excellent»4 36%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.36

- Very interesting to experience for the first time real brainstorming, but would have been more efficient if done within two days may be» (Sufficient)

4. How did you find the following workshops connected to the theme exercises?

11 svarande

Very insufficient»1 10%
Insufficient»0 0%
Sufficient»5 50%
Excellent»4 40%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- Great to pratice concept and "obstructions"» (Very insufficient)

5. How did you find the study trip?

12 svarande

no opinion»1 8%
very bad»0 0%
rather bad»1 8%
rather well»8 66%
very well»2 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

- Too short !» (rather well)
- but it was very short (one day)and only in Sweden. I think that concerning the theme "extreme housing" there are good examples in other counties to be seen as well» (rather well)

6. How did you find the lectures?

12 svarande

no opinion»0 0%
very bad»0 0%
rather bad»1 8%
rather well»10 83%
very well»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 4

- mer föreläsningar önskvärt!» (rather well)

7. How did you find the design task?

12 svarande

no opinion»0 0%
very bad»0 0%
rather bad»0 0%
rather well»8 66%
very well»4 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

8. Are the aims and goals reasonable in relation to your pre-knowledge ?

12 svarande

No, the goals are to elementar»0 0%
Yes, the goals are reasonable»12 100%
No, the goals are too ambitious»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2

9. Are the goals reasonable in relation to the scope and amount of credits?

11 svarande

Too small scope in relation to credits»0 0%
Reasonable scope in relation to credits»10 100%
Too wide scope in relation to credits»0 0%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2

- too short time between midcritic and final presentation, should be some more days to be able to develop the comments further » (Reasonable scope in relation to credits)

Education and course administration

10. What support have you got for your learning from course literature and other material?

11 svarande

Very little»0 0%
Rather little»2 20%
Rather big»7 70%
Very big»1 10%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- "The rooms of dwelling: their measurements and detail" - mycket bara överig rekommenderad litteratur - mycket tveksam» (?)

11. How did the organisation, memoranda, direct information etc. function?

12 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather well»10 90%
Very well»1 9%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3.09

Work environment

12. How do you rate the possibilities to get assistance and ask questions?

12 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»1 8%
Rather well»6 50%
Very well»5 41%
I have not asked for assistance»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- mer handledning och seminarie önskvärt» (Very well)

13. How has the cooperation between you and students in your group been?

12 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»4 33%
Rather good»2 16%
Very good»6 50%
I have not tried to cooperate»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

Concluding questions

14. What is your overall opinion of the course?

12 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
Passed»2 16%
Good»5 41%
Very good»5 41%

Genomsnitt: 4.25

- Could have been more inspiration and examples about extreme new architecture in lectures and assistance» (Good)
- I would never had the chance to experiment such a project of housing invention in my home school and it was great» (Very good)

15. What should be preserved next year?

- the workshops, consultations,mid-critics, group working»
- The workshops indeed, the pedagogy of the course»
- The workshops were really good The extreme housing seminar was inspiring The "crits" along the way to the final critic»
- the workshops »
- More Site visits»

16. What shuold be changed the nest year?

- Prepare the students for HSB comments...»
- Some time the hand in dates clashed with other modules, so perhaps just some adjustment to the schedule. The study trip to Denmark had been nice as not all students have been there... »
- participation of external guests during the final presentation»
- Give more time for consultations and deadlines»
- study trip - more consultations during the course»

17. Other comments

- Thanks !»

Kursutvärderingssystem från