ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Interaction desing project, Lp4 Vt09, TDA501/DIT870

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-05-18 - 2009-06-03
Antal svar: 13
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 5%
Kontaktperson: Åsa Lundgren»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

13 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»3 23%
Around 25 hours/week»1 7%
Around 30 hours/week»4 30%
At least 35 hours/week»5 38%

Genomsnitt: 3.84

- Weekends at univ.» (Around 30 hours/week)
- In the end of the course we worked 24/7» (Around 30 hours/week)
- At least 10 hours/day during a few weeks.» (At least 35 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

13 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»3 23%
100%»10 76%

Genomsnitt: 4.76

- There was not so much to attend, which makes sense. Just supervision and initial exercises. The latter made no real sense.» (100%)
- There were no lectures» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

12 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 25%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 8%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»5 41%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- I read the goals but don"t remind them.» (?)
- The theme was not so good this year.» (The goals are difficult to understand)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

9 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»9 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- I read the goals but don"t remind them.» (?)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

9 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»5 55%
Yes, definitely»1 11%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.77

- I read the goals but don"t remind them.» (?)
- Strange to have both a home exam and a report in a course where we allready have worked so much.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»4 30%
Some extent»7 53%
Large extent»1 7%
Great extent»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 1.92

- The supervisors and teachers have provided good feedback when being asked.» (Large extent)
- I include the previous courses in hardware and help fro Farshid.» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»10 76%
Some extent»2 15%
Large extent»1 7%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.3

- Did we have any?» (Small extent)
- It was own research, no course literature was required for the course.» (Small extent)
- Small extent, since we did not have any.» (Small extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

13 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 7%
Rather well»7 53%
Very well»5 38%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

13 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 7%
Rather good»5 38%
Very good»7 53%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.46

- It became better in the end when it was possible to ask Farshid» (Rather poor)
- Very helpful supervisor.» (Very good)
- Olof and Farshid were always there if needed.» (Very good)
- The frequent supervisions were a very good opportunity to ask questions, getting help» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

13 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»2 15%
Rather well»3 23%
Very well»8 61%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.46

- somebody"s work didn"t fulfill on time, and somebody didn"t work seriously, wasted lots of time to wait for working together,just because some didn"t come on time.» (Rather poorly)
- A lot of heated arguments and personal differences, but in general good.» (Rather well)

11. How was the course workload?

13 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»6 46%
High»6 46%
Too high»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.61

- High but fun. I donät see the point with an individual essay.» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

13 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»1 7%
High»9 69%
Too high»3 23%

Genomsnitt: 4.15

- The other class (TDA468 - Human Centered Design)"s workload was extremely high.» (High)
- The HCD course is coming too late in the year period, and the additional company project makes compromises difficult.» (Too high)
- Human Centered Design"s fault.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

13 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»3 23%
Good»6 46%
Excellent»4 30%

Genomsnitt: 4.07

- Excellent opportunity to do a longer project, with good materials, workshops and supervision.» (Excellent)
- Very intereseting! One learns how to plan and take responsibility for one"s own act.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The freedom of subject.»
- The way the design document worked when it had to be constantly updated was very good. Students could use the design document in the final report which eased the stress in the end.»
- The deadlines, they were tight but _very_ helpful-»
- exercises before carrying out the project»
- Farshid.»
- Farshid, really good lab assistant.»
- Having a theme»
- The frequent supevisions structured our work, we saw them as a small deadlines and tried to be ready with a certain task untill the meeting.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- More guidance on design methods, more attention to what is happening, more time ! Less exercises at the beginning, and more advise as to how to perform the project. »
- More open theme and make sure that students follow the theme.»
- Modifying the theme so that GameDesign has an easier chance of implementing it. »
- unknown»
- A more abstract theme is needed. The personality exercises took too much time. One week instead of two would have been better.»
- The theme was very bad»
- The theme»
- Having another theme. Perhaps have a wider theme and then have two different subthemes for the interaction design track and game design track respectively.»

16. Additional comments

- Great course, great department, keep it up.»
- Very intersting and well-structured course!»
- Great course!»
- Fun course, but the theme was not very good»

Kursutvärderingssystem från