ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

GIS, VVT105

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-04-15 - 2009-05-03
Antal svar: 22
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 33%
Kontaktperson: Ida Karlsson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

22 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 7 31%

Around 20 hours/week» 10 45%

Around 25 hours/week» 3 13%

Around 30 hours/week» 2 9%

At least 35 hours/week» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

22 svarande

0%» 0 0%

25%» 0 0%

50%» 3 13%

75%» 4 18%

100%» 15 68%

Genomsnitt: 4.54

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

22 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 2 9%

The goals are difficult to understand» 1 4%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 9 40%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 10 45%

Genomsnitt: 3.22

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

21 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 3 14%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 18 85%

No, the goals are set too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.85

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

22 svarande

No, not at all» 2 9%

To some extent» 7 31%

Yes, definitely» 13 59%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- Helt värdelöst att ha examen i denna kurs. Hade varit MYCKET bättre om man examinerades via de tre GIS-pojekten. Förslagsvis borde de varit större, omfattande och redovisade i rapport- och presentationsform.» (No, not at all)
- There was some questions on the exam that was from previuos year, and did not really apply this year. Number 7 is one example. How many did even try to answer that one?» (To some extent)
- Good exam with expected, reasonable questions.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

22 svarande

Small extent» 1 4%

Some extent» 7 31%

Large extent» 11 50%

Great extent» 3 13%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

- Hade väldigt svårt att koppla föreläsningarna med själva GIS-programvarorna. Förstod naturligtvis att det var teorin och bakgrunden till programmen vi gick igenom, men det var ändå väldigt svårt att knyta an till det.» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

22 svarande

Small extent» 2 9%

Some extent» 5 22%

Large extent» 13 59%

Great extent» 2 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.68

- Old exams was more or less the only thing that gave a hint what to learn.» (Small extent)
- Boken var inte riktigt optimal. Dessutom var teorifrågorna inte stälda utifrån den boken vi hade, utan en tidigare version.» (Some extent)
- I think the book was good but it was very much text. It could have been more comprimised i think. » (Large extent)
- Very good course book» (Large extent)
- The book was good.» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

21 svarande

Very badly» 0 0%

Rather badly» 3 14%

Rather well» 13 61%

Very well» 5 23%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

- Please, use the tools that are avaible ("study portal") instead of taking a lot of teaching time in class to manage work groups!» (Rather badly)
- The course homepage was not updated very often, but maybe it wasn"t needed..» (Rather well)

9. When is the best time for the study visit to the City Planning Office?

22 svarande

First quarter of the course» 14 63%

Second quarter of the course» 4 18%

Third quarter of the course» 4 18%

Fourth quarter of the course» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.54

- Mer sånt! Det var roligt och framför allt intressant!» (First quarter of the course)
- Är väl rätt bra att ha det i början...» (First quarter of the course)

10. Should there be different subjects for the MapInfo assignment for the MPGEO and MPEMA students?

22 svarande

Yes» 5 62%

No» 3 37%

No opinion» 14

Genomsnitt: 1.37

- I can"t see why, but I can"t see why not eighter...» (No opinion)
- Wasn"t it possible to choose subject by yourself? I think it was good this year.» (No opinion)
- I think it was good but I am an MPGEO student.» (No opinion)

Study climate

11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

22 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 0 0%

Rather good» 5 22%

Very good» 16 72%

I did not seek help» 1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3.81

- Funkar väldigt bra! Gunnar svarar alltid på frågor och det går att besöka kontoret när helst man vill, vilket är mycket bra. Dessutom lämnas en fråga aldrig obesvarad. Så här borde alla examinatorer vara.» (Very good)
- Exept for one exercise in ArcGIS, when the teachers refused to answer questions. That was strange, we gave up and went home, which I think not was the plan. » (Very good)
- Kunde alltid komma till Gunnars kontor!» (Very good)

12. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

21 svarande

Very poorly» 0 0%

Rather poorly» 0 0%

Rather well» 5 23%

Very well» 16 76%

I did not seek cooperation» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.76

13. How should the group composition be decided?

22 svarande

By the teacher» 2 9%

By the students» 12 54%

By the teacher and the students together» 8 36%

No opinion» 0

Genomsnitt: 2.27

- On the studentportalen!» (By the students)
- on the internet» (By the students)
- Make it clear that groups will be decided on the student portal before a special date. When the time is out, the teacher put the people that is not in any group into one..» (By the teacher and the students together)

14. How was the course workload?

22 svarande

Too low» 1 4%

Low» 4 18%

Adequate» 16 72%

High» 1 4%

Too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.77

- Hade kunnat få in mer i kursen.» (Too low)
- Hade velat ha mer uppgifter att arbeta med, och större projekt. Upplevde kursen som lite "för lätt". Jag har dock lärt mig en hel del om GIS ändå...» (Low)

15. How was the total workload this study period?

22 svarande

Too low» 1 4%

Low» 8 36%

Adequate» 12 54%

High» 1 4%

Too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.59

- Usually there are one hard or difficult course together with a more easy one, it felt like both TUP and GIS were easy ones.» (Low)

Summarizing questions

16. What is your general impression of the course?

22 svarande

Poor» 1 4%

Fair» 1 4%

Adequate» 4 18%

Good» 14 63%

Excellent» 2 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.68

- Tycker att det var alldeles för mycket teori. Hur en fil lagras i GIS känner jag inte är så intressant. Hade varit bättre om det var mer praktiskt, att vi fick lära oss mer om hur programmet fungerade.» (Fair)
- The assignments could have been larger, so that students had to do some work outside schedule-hours, and gain more experience using the GIS softwares. » (Adequate)
- The exercises gave more than the lectures.» (Good)

17. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Computer exercises with Jonas and Måns»
- Computer exercises and study visits.»
- Studiebesöken och de tre projekten.»
- Computer work»
- The project and study visit to Copenhagen.»
- The book, the computer exercises.»
- Jonas and Måns in Arcgis assignment»
- The assignments we did with the computer.»
- exersice»

18. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- A bigger assignment instead of an exam maybe»
- The powerpoint slides on the lectures (those with the pictures from the book) did not provide so much information and should be replaced»
- In addition of computer exercises more practical things should be included. »
- Tycker verkligen att Gunnar skall överväga om tentan är korrekt examinationsform i denna kurs. Mitt förslag är att man utökar och lägger större vikt vid de tre projekten, både vad gäller genomförande och presentation. Därefter examineras studenterna genom att projekten betygsätts.»
- More "real" excersises in ArcGIS and not only "follow the book"!»
- The study visits to Gothenburg municipaly can easly be discarded. The lectures! They were just the pictures from the course book!»
- The content in the text book is to some extent not related to the computer lab(Mapinfo and Arcmap). Lecture and computer lab should be more related to each other. »

19. Additional comments

- Exercise of database creation, GIS project management should be included.»
- Nix...»
- For the Mapinfo assingment, it could be that teachers guide students to choose different subject. Like this quarter, we have too many people chosse "accident" and the presentation is somehow boring.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från