Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Sustainable Design, ARK 191

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-04-23 - 2009-04-29
Antal svar: 15
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 34%
Kontaktperson: Michael Edén»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Arkitektur 300 hp

Goals and fullfilment of goals

The learning outcomes are given in the course programme, that is the knowledge, understanding, skills and perspectives you are expectd to reach. Notify for each outcome how well they have been fulfilled.

1. Learning outcome 1

1. Formulate or contribute to a programme with goals about sustainable architecture

15 svarande

Very insufficient»2 13%
Insufficient»2 13%
Sufficient»9 60%
Excellent»2 13%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.73

- Wasn"t this the "systemic design" part?» (Insufficient)
- I feel like the programming phase may have been carried out more thoroughly for those involved in Systemic Design. I did one for myself, although it wasn"t required. » (Sufficient)
- A broad spectra but I miss some parts eg. the social track of sustainability....but I guess you focused on ENVIRONMENTAL approaches...and that"s a large subject in it self» (Sufficient)
- My knowledge about sustainable features has rised and my awareness and readyness to handle messures of KWh» (Excellent)

2. Learning outcome 2

2. Design a housing project fulfilling goals concerning sustainability issues

15 svarande

Very insufficient»0 0%
Insufficient»1 6%
Sufficient»13 86%
Excellent»1 6%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3

- a bit difficult to design a sustainable house for the first time with only one consultation and so little time. good workshop» (Sufficient)

3. Learning outcome 3

3. with focus on energy efficiency

15 svarande

Very insufficient»0 0%
Insufficient»3 20%
Sufficient»10 66%
Excellent»2 13%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.93

- There could have been some more "technical" lectures» (Sufficient)
- Great passive house workshop!» (Excellent)

4. Learning outcome 4

4. including urban landscape design and Storm water management

15 svarande

Very insufficient»1 7%
Insufficient»6 42%
Sufficient»5 35%
Excellent»2 14%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.57

- I still feel a pretty amateur about landscape planning, but perhaps I need to research this more on my own ,)» (Sufficient)
- Again there could have been a little bit more focused and precise» (Sufficient)
- difficult site for the water management so there were no comments about that» (No opinion)

5. 5 Learning outcome 5

including use of solar energy, both thermal and electrical

15 svarande

Very insufficient»1 6%
Insufficient»1 6%
Sufficient»11 73%
Excellent»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 2.93

- I have a decent overview, but our group became very divided with tasks in the solar project and we didn,t teamwork very well on all the parts.» (Sufficient)

6. Learning outcome 6

6. using of materials with low environmental impact

15 svarande

Very insufficient»0 0%
Insufficient»1 6%
Sufficient»5 33%
Excellent»9 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

- It wasn"t much focus on this.» (Insufficient)
- This is a subject for learning through life, and the biggest outcome is the awareness that I can arrange my own sustaiable file with materials and which parameters are important to add to such a list.» (Sufficient)
- The amount of time given to complete this project was sufficient.» (Excellent)
- I"ve learned a lot about this...a whole new world of materials has opened for me» (Excellent)
- this overcrossed the expectations , the result is a full libery» (Excellent)

7. Learning oucome 7

7. Integrate the visionary sustainability approaches into an architecture that meets the users’, needs and demands, especially universal design.

15 svarande

Very insufficient»0 0%
Insufficient»3 20%
Sufficient»10 66%
Excellent»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 2.93

- This is, according to me, one of the key parts in sustainability thinking and I missed some more lectures etc about that.» (Insufficient)
- to little time and to few consultations» (Insufficient)
- Housing has a premier..a very good course in this with two professors. I think this course shall not competet with that.» (Sufficient) (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)

8. Are the aims and goals reasonable in relation to your pre-knowledge ?

15 svarande

No, the goals are to elementary»0 0%
Yes, the goals are reasonable»13 92%
No, the goals are too ambitious»1 7%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.07

- for me as Swedish who already knew a bit about universal design» (Yes, the goals are reasonable)

9. Are the goals reasonable in relation to the scope and credits?

15 svarande

Too small scope in relation to credits»0 0%
Reasonable scope in relation to credits»8 61%
Too wide scope in relation to credits»5 38%
No opinion»2

Genomsnitt: 2.38

- Maybe the course should continue until the end of the semester?» (Too wide scope in relation to credits)
- There is not enough time to make all that is requested. Too wide scope in relation of the time (2 weeks to develope a complet project? too ambitious and the students suffer great stess)» (Too wide scope in relation to credits)
- I think the goals are too ambitious for such a small time. It"s frustrating to have such little time and not to be able to do a better project including all the inputs and goals of this course.» (No opinion)
- yes and no, the project would have been better with more time but I did learn a lot, especially on the workshop even though that was a very long day, but please not another lecture about lindås and järnbrott. At least change them a bit before.» (No opinion)

Education and course administration

10. What support have you got for your learning from course literature and other material?

14 svarande

Very little»1 7%
Rather little»6 42%
Rather big»5 35%
Very big»2 14%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.57

- In this course ark191. I have the tools to search,but since I worked alone I searched for materials but did put focus on design and picturemaking. » (Very little)
- A one day literature seminar would have given a lot. Some more reading please. » (Rather little)

11. What support have you got from the passive house workshop?

15 svarande

Very little»0 0%
Rather little»3 20%
Rather big»5 33%
Very big»7 46%

Genomsnitt: 3.26

- very nice workshop :)» (Rather big)
- unfortunally I couldn"t attend the second day but the first one was great...but exhausting. » (Rather big)
- I think the lectures (they were very good!) of the workshop would have been enought and that the models, etc, were maybe not useful. Instead, it would have been nice to go deeper into the passive houses principles and calculations.» (Rather big)
- I really enjoyed that knowledge, and would in a next course love to use these calculateion and extimating methods of energyvalue. Hope to save it for the near future. » (Very big)
- Good workshop! » (Very big)

12. What support have you got from other lectures, site plan assessment and consultations?

15 svarande

Very little»1 6%
Rather little»7 46%
Rather big»7 46%
Very big»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

- For the first time I felt that consultations did not bring me forward in my designapproaches. Wheter I was good or the consultations not at my "level" I cannot tell.» (Very little)
- Some more resources should have been spent on consultation...maybe with different supervisors. The "solar panel study visit" was really a waste of time. It gave verry little.» (Rather big)

13. How did the organisation, memoranda, direct information etc. function?

15 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather well»8 66%
Very well»4 33%
No opinion»3

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- The landscape task was a little unclear.» (Rather well)
- One small thing could be that it is better to have one paper only with what the teacher like to see fulfilled in the assignment, mostly because of the chaotic feeling in the end of the project, when there are many papers to look through to see that the goals are fulfilled. » (Very well)

Work environment

14. How do you rate the possibilities to get assistance and ask questions?

15 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»2 13%
Rather well»6 40%
Very well»6 40%
I have not asked for assistance»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

15. How has the cooperation between you and students in your group been?

This question concerns the first week mainly

15 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»2 13%
Rather good»4 26%
Very good»9 60%
I have not tried to cooperate»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.46

- Perhaps the blame is mine, but it was unfair when many of the exchange students took holiday and the rest of us were stuck with the work!» (Rather bad)
- We had a good group.» (Very good)

16. How did you find the mixture between group work and individual work?

14 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»2 14%
Rather good»5 35%
Very good»7 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

- ok» (?)
- Also that you could choose to work individual or in group was good.» (Very good)

Concluding questions

17. What is your overall opinion of the course?

15 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
Passed»3 20%
Good»10 66%
Very good»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.93

- but it could have been better, with better lectures and more consultations, at least group consultations.» (Good)

18. What should be preserved next year?

- Passive house workshop!»
- Material course, passiv house workshop»
- It is good to have the start with making a materialbook, to have the opportunity of using that material when working alone. »
- group work + individual work»
- The passive house workshop.»
- The passive house workshop. »
- The lectures of the passive house workshop and the challenging project we had.»
- the work shop»
- The way things were explaned. The challenge of the site. (Interesting would be to build a passive house in a city environment, or make an old building from the city more sustainable (= future). Because there is the need the biggest.-)»
- the first assigmen»

19. What shuold be changed the nest year?

- Perhaps the solar task could be changed, broadened in scope or a completely different site altogether.»
- The final project should get started at the begninning of the term so that you could adapt those diffrent ascepts/workshops into your project and at the same time develope your project. »
- Could there be a collaboration between the excellent housingwork and your work?»
- I am not sure about the real efficiency of the work on solar panels, too short, didn"t learn much.»
- More clear program of what should be designed - the assignment. »
- See comments above»
- The model exercises of the workshop are a loss of time according to me. It would be very good to have more time for the project and more consultations.»
- the lecture about Lindås and Järnbrott, I have already heard them 3 times before, which 2 were last semester. Prepare the lecturer better»
- The assignment should be given before the workshop. In this way we can applie the workshop to our building and we have time to evoluate in a short time. »
- sometimes more time to work or more time for consultations»

20. Other comments

- More landscape lectures is nessesary, ecpecially about sustainable landscpaping. If you work with such a difficult plot, more time should be given to work with landscpape. The model building is nessesary for everybody to understand the landscape. More time is nessesary. »
- I am satisfied with my own work but think that rather many of projects was of quite low quality. Some hadn"t even understood how a passive house work and drawed project with natural ventilation with out heat exchangers, no air lock or no sun shading. I think there should have been clearer demands of what we where supposed to make in the program and more focus on the technical sustainable part in from the critics, because that is really what this course is about.»
- Thank you for this interesting course!»
- How is it possible that 1/3 of the class (or even more) skipped the Friday presentation? was it not mandatory??? I find it a lack of respect envers the client and the fellow students. Some reduction in the grade should be given to them, it would be fare. I also find it not very serious that the handing in can be at any time. People should organize their time more properly or if the majority is late in handing in maybe it means that the scope is to big? too big a project for such a short time.»
- more examples of existing projects »

Kursutvärderingssystem från