Visa resultat

Chalmers Masters Programme Evaluation 2009

Masters Programme

1. Architecture and Civil Engineering

Architecture»		27		15%
Architecture and Engineering»		4		2%
Design and Construction Project Management»		42		23%
Design for Sustainable Development»		13		7%
Geo and Water Engineering»		31		17%
Interior Architecture»		0		0%
Sound and Vibration»		17		9%
Structural Engineering and Building Performance Design»		46		25%

Genomsnitt: 4.75

2. Bioscience, Molecular science and Chemical Engineering

Bioinformatics and System Biology»		16		12%
Biotechnology»		40		30%
Chemistry and Bioscience»		18		13%
Innovative and Sustainable Chemical Engineering»		56		43%

Genomsnitt: 2.87

3. Computer Science, Information Technology and Electrical Engineering

Biomedical Engineering»		28		9%
Communication Engineering»		60		20%
Computer Science: Algorithms, Languages and Logic»		27		9%
Integrated Electronic System Design»		43		14%
Interaction Design»		23		7%
Networks and Distributed Systems»		44		14%
Secure and Dependable Computer systems»		21		7%
Software Engineering and Technology»		53		17%
Intelligent Systems Design»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 4.51

4. Engineering for Sustainable Development

Electric Power Engineering»		35		30%
Environmental Measurements and Assessments»		8		7%
Industrial Ecology - For a Sustainable Society»		35		30%
Sustainable Energy Systems»		35		30%

Genomsnitt: 2.61

5. Management of Innovation and Technology

Business Design»		21		12%
International Project Management»		15		8%
Management of Economis and Innovation»		57		33%
Nordic Master in Maritime Management»		6		3%
Quality and Operations Management»		26		15%
Supply Chain Management»		46		26%

Genomsnitt: 3.81

6. Mechanical, Automation, and Industrial Design Engineering

Advanced Engineering Materials»		26		9%
Automotive Engineering»		33		12%
Industrial Design Engineering»		30		11%
Naval Architecture»		17		6%
Product Development»		40		15%
Production Engineering»		38		14%
Solid and Fluid Mechanics»		33		12%
Systems, Control and Mechatronics»		48		18%

Genomsnitt: 4.87

7. Microtechnology and Nano Science

Materials and Nanotechnology»		20		30%
Microtechnology»		10		15%
Nanoscale Science and Technology»		15		22%
Wireless and Photonic Engineering»		21		31%

Genomsnitt: 2.56

8. Physics, Space Science and Mathematics

Applied Physics»		14		17%
Complex Adaptive Systems»		30		37%
Engineering Mathematics and Computational Sciences»		16		20%
Fundamental Physics»		5		6%
Nuclear Engineering»		0		0%
Radio and Space Science»		14		17%

Genomsnitt: 2.86

Background and Introduction

9. How satisfied are you with the Masters programme so far?

Not at all»		22		1%
Not so satisfied»		121		9%
Neither/Nor»		131		10%
Satisfied»		668		52%
Very satisfied»		330		25%
No opinion»		5		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.92

10. What year did you start the programme?

2007»		564		44%
2008»		711		55%

Genomsnitt: 1.55

11. Where did you study for your Bachelor degree?

Sweden - Chalmers»		659		51%
Sweden - another university»		37		2%
University outside Sweden»		528		41%
Other»		50		3%

Genomsnitt: 1.97

12. Are you

Female»		357		28%
Male»		916		71%

Genomsnitt: 1.72

13. How satisfied are you with the information (before applying) about the Masters programme (MP)?

1277 svarande

Not at all»		32		2%
Not so satisfied»		186		14%
Neither/Nor»		218		17%
Satisfied»		650		50%
Very satisfied»		168		13%
No opinion»		26		2%

Genomsnitt: 3.64

14. From where did you get the most important information about the programme?

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

The web»		865		67%
Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers»		375		29%
Presentation/Information within Chalmers»		268		20%
Presentations/information outside Chalmers»		27		2%
Written information (not web)»		113		8%
Friends»		362		28%
Other sources (please comment)»		49		3%

- Other student that had already studied at Chalmers.» (The web, Presentation/Information within Chalmers, Other sources (please comment))
- The information in the web pages could be expanded enormously!» (The web, Friends)
- At the university in the hallways. We talked about the new Master programs in general.» (The web, Friends, Other sources (please comment))
- I first came within the erasmus exchange program in 2007, thus my coordinator in France had some informations about it.» (The web, Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers, Other sources (please comment))
- Books were relevant to the course» (The web, Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers, Written information (not web), Other sources (please comment))
- My home university» (The web, Other sources (please comment))
- The one who was supposed to run the SET programme, Peter Öhman » (Other sources (please comment))
- There was not much information about the program, for instance we got an email a few months before it started that "by the way, all the courses and exams are in english"...» (Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers, Friends)
- I tried two Masters programmes and decided after a couple of days.» (Other sources (please comment))
- But not much information» (Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers)
- I called and talked to the head of the programme.» (Other sources (please comment))
- Personal communication via e-mail with the master coordinator.» (Other sources (please comment))
- My own conviction that sustainable development is of most importance while being in the building sector, made me choose sustainable development. I found this also supported by the bible. My first choice was sustainable development.» (Other sources (please comment))
- Students already enrolled at a master programme» (Friends, Other sources (please comment))
- the Responsible for Abroad Education in my home university» (The web, Other sources (please comment))
- Talked to the master coordinator on my own» (The web, Friends, Other sources (please comment))
- Det var inte så mycket info alls.» (Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers, Other sources (please comment))
- Other sources such as google/yahoo groups.» (The web, Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers, Presentation/Information within Chalmers, Friends, Other sources (please comment))
- From my home University (ITESM Campus Monterrey, México)» (Presentations/information outside Chalmers, Other sources (please comment))
- chalmers homepage studieportal » (Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers, Presentation/Information within Chalmers, Friends, Other sources (please comment))
- I called the Chalmers to get the information I needed, I met even the sudent counceller.» (The web, Other sources (please comment))
- ERASMUS MUNDUS PROGRAM FOR NANOSCALE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. » (Other sources (please comment))
- DISCUSSION with Master Coordinator» (The web, Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers, Friends)
- Jag startade min master 2007. Information kring möjligheter kring kursval kom ut väldigt sent och de ansvariga var oftast dåligt pålästa. Det gav ett oseriöst intryck. » (Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers)
- Studieportalen» (The web, Friends)
- Business Design have their own information gathering» (Presentation/Information within Chalmers, Friends, Other sources (please comment))
- I talked to PhD students that I met through my bachelors thesis work.» (Written information (not web), Friends, Other sources (please comment))
- Especially the information about the course selection was very bad.» (The web)
- Erasmus» (The web, Other sources (please comment))
- People at MC2» (The web, Presentation/Information within Chalmers, Other sources (please comment))
- Older students» (The web, Friends)
- From a lecturer at an English university with a link to Chalmers.» (The web, Other sources (please comment))
- Professor from my previous university. » (Friends, Other sources (please comment))
- Contact with personal, since there are no good information on the web all information that students needs has to be searched for from people. And there are often no one to ask and personal gives different answers all the time. This really ruins Chalmers.» (Friends, Other sources (please comment))
- Association of Bangladeshi Students (ABS) website.» (The web, Other sources (please comment))
- From friends that started before me. The rest of the information was very very poor.» (Friends, Other sources (please comment))
- During the programme I realized what exactly we are doing and are going to learn before that I had something else in mind(Not that I wasn" satisfied with the program, I just had different picture)» (Other sources (please comment))
- Graduated students.» (The web)
- during searching best chemical engineering program offered by various universities, i got the information about education system of Sweden, Sweden has an edge to offer sustainable courses in the world, that gave me the motivation. » (The web)
- Torben Hasenkamp» (Friends, Other sources (please comment))
- The information was very good - the fact that the information didn"t reflect the reality is another question.» (Presentation/Information within Chalmers, Friends)
- former classmates!» (Presentation/Information within Chalmers)
- by friends in Europe» (The web)
- Was handed imforation from Master program responsible on an information day.» (Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers, Presentation/Information within Chalmers, Written information (not web))
- should have information earlier, since it affects the course selection in year 3» (The web, Written information (not web))
- direct contact to professors» (Other sources (please comment))
- I study Industrial ecology» (The web, Presentation/Information within Chalmers)
- I was Erasmus student in 2007 doing some courses from the master» (Other sources (please comment))
- A network on Yahoo where we all gathered and shared the information.» (The web, Friends, Other sources (please comment))
- The papers That I saw the name of teachers who are working at chalmers» (The web, Other sources (please comment))
- My university in France.» (The web, Presentations/information outside Chalmers, Written information (not web), Other sources (please comment))
- Studiecentrum» (The web, Other sources (please comment))
- YES course in Braunwald, Switzerland» (The web)
- Chinese websites about studying aboard » (The web, Presentations/information outside Chalmers)
- Made my bachelor theseis at the department, Sjöfart och Marinteknik, before starting the masters programme.» (Presentation/Information within Chalmers, Friends)
- The day when all the masterprogrammes were presented in the Chemistry Building and also down in the "kårhus"» (The web, Presentation/Information within Chalmers)
- I got in touch with some MP students that I met for coffe/MP discussion» (Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers, Presentation/Information within Chalmers, Other sources (please comment))
- Reputation» (The web, Other sources (please comment))
- Since many people take a year off between bachelor and master, please make sure that the web provide information enough! Everybody are not in the country/in town when you have your presentation day.» (The web, Friends, Other sources (please comment))
- As always before you are a student at the university is is very hard to get information, this is not only Chalmers but all universty.» (The web, Written information (not web))
- the assignments that i have had so far were not useful because in 7 week you don"t have enough time to read the books and do the assignment.so you have to do both without getting them deeply in order to just pass the course and forget it soon. » (Friends)
- Would like to have some more presentations about the programme» (The web)
- I was abroad when it was time for selecting so the only source I had was the web.» (The web)
- Personally made phone calls to Chalmers.» (The web, Other sources (please comment))
- after admined to chalmers, i get most information from the course homepage.» (The web)
- Very poor communication from teachers in regards to what the programs actually contains. The information on MEI"s webpage is downright wrong, I know now that I have started. Several of the courses being advertised we have no opportunity to take, for instance. » (The web, Friends)
- Professor Per Larsson-Hedefors and my own interest in the subject.» (Other sources (please comment))
- Elkraftdagen» (Presentation/Information within Chalmers, Friends, Other sources (please comment))
- In some BBS,there are many people graduated from chalmers who can give me some suggestions. » (The web, Other sources (please comment))
- Chalmers Alumni» (The web, Presentation/Information within Chalmers, Other sources (please comment))
- Pakistani community online group (pakchalmerist) on yahoo groups. » (The web, Presentations/information outside Chalmers, Friends)
- Student portal. what"s really important is the program syllabus and individual course home pages.» (The web)
- Forums and online communities» (The web, Presentations/information outside Chalmers, Other sources (please comment))
- By students from the class above the first day» (The web, Other sources (please comment))

Your own effort

15. How many hours per week have you spent studying at this programme?

1275 svarande

Less than 30 hours/week»		134		10%
Between 30-40 hours/week»		430		33%
Between 40-50 hours/week»		444		34%
Between 50-60 hours/week»		190		14%
More than 60 hours/week»		80		6%

Genomsnitt: 2.73 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.73

Goals and goal fulfilment

16. Have you seen the goals of the Masters programme (before now)?

Yes (more than 5 times)»		126		9%
Yes (between 2 and 5 times)»		398		31%
Yes (once)»		350		27%
No»		339		26%
No opinion»		62		4%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

17. How understandable are the programme goals?

The goals are difficult to understand»		14		1%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»		397		31%
The goals are clear enough»		603		47%
The goals are very clear»		105		8%
No opinion»		154		12%

Genomsnitt: 2.99

18. Do you think the goals are reasonable for a master degree?

No, the goals are set too low»		21		1%
No, the goals are a bit too low»		115		9%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»		914		72%
No, the goals are a bit high»		28		2%
No, the goals are set far too high»		1		0%
No opinion»		190		14%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

19. Do you think the goals are fulfilled within the programme?

No, not at all»		32		2%
To some extent»		311		24%
Almost»		432		33%
Yes, definitely»		323		25%
No opinion»		173		13%

Genomsnitt: 3.23

Programme layout/structure/design

20. How satisfied are you with the programme curriculum?

Not at all»		30		2%
Not so satisfied»		175		13%
Neither/Nor»		185		14%
Satisfied»		707		55%
Very satisfied»		119		9%
No opinion»		57		4%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

21. Is there any subject/course that you would like to add into the programme?

Yes»		525		41%
No»		307		24%
No opinion»		422		33%

Genomsnitt: 1.92

- basic electronics (for D-students) and advanced electronics.» (?)
- Some basic course in electric technology» (?)
- fler ingenjörskurser, är typ inga, känns som man går mer på HDK eller Konstfack» (?)
- Additional FEM course, one is to little.» (?)
- solid state physics.» (?)
- The reason why I"m not satisfied is the mandatory course in the second year which makes it difficult to study abroad.» (?)
- maintainance, how to design to simplify and to maintain code» (?)
- Web related project is good to add» (?)
- hybrid vehicles» (?)
- Product development Organizational behaviour» (Yes)
- Design of experiments» (Yes)
- Semicounductor Material Physics » (Yes)
- Basic economy for engineers» (Yes)
- Process safety-runnaway reactions, exothermic reactions, powder explosions, electrostatic charging etc.» (Yes)
- I wish for much more focus on business » (Yes)
- More real programming» (Yes)
- Any course that has a main focus on electronics» (Yes)
- a more technical course on sustainable energy» (Yes)
- A course on enzymes» (Yes)
- Power management» (Yes)
- More courses in information technology and business information systems» (Yes)
- organisational behaivor quality mgmnt» (Yes)
- Some experimental course would be very interesting. We only deal with the theory and simulations and it would be good to get some experience of experiments.» (Yes)
- More hardware courses» (Yes)
- Cross-cultural management» (Yes)
- Distributed System programmings» (Yes)
- maybe some more operations management» (Yes)
- Energy in a larger context, e.g. sustainable energy futures» (Yes)
- A course with focus on product development» (Yes)
- project managment more biology courses more selection courses in period 2» (Yes)
- About vehicle structures» (Yes)
- Courses that are not repition from the first three years. The Mandatory courses was just repition to learn excange students about sweden» (Yes)
- Bigger possibility to study nuclear chemistry.» (Yes)
- Something with economic calculations for development projects would be good...» (Yes)
- More system-level oriented courses in the second year.» (Yes)
- A course like Machine Learning would most likely fit better than the current recommendations in the image track. Also possibly a course like Radar systems with applications because of its imaging aspects.» (Yes)
- I would like a course with aim towards microcontrollers/microprocessors and how to programme these along with their advantages» (Yes)
- More advanced courses in security» (Yes)
- More programming for bioengineers » (Yes)
- I think the masters programme networks and distributed system did NOT feature enough distributed courses. » (Yes)
- Add the Database course to the programme, a Software engineer without any database course? now really that"s a joke. And for godssake do NOT let Rogart Heldal teach it!!!!!!» (Yes)
- Fluid materials as well» (Yes)
- TRIZ methodology, or ideation frameworks» (Yes)
- I have barely learned anything since my bachelor"s degree to comment on the last section of questions. Since the whole program became 5 years, they haven"t added a single course. This results in the students being forced to go abroad to study, because there simply aren"t courses to take here. And the courses given here should teach us something new, now it"s just the same thing we"ve learned in the three years. I expected the level to rise when reaching the master program, but it has reached kinder garden level, it"s joke that will waste two years of my life. Courses that should be added: -Sustainable Design -Solid CAD modelling (catia, proe or solid works) -Mechanical design, several courses -marketing -graphic design -business oriented courses Take inspiration from master programs at TU Delft for instance!» (Yes)
- More management courses» (Yes)
- Programming course, electronic course, more practical course, PLC-course» (Yes)
- The courses in the tissue engineering/biomaterials track only last a year. It would be good to have 2-3 more courses to fill the last term with.» (Yes)
- More about sustainable energy technologies, one wind power course, one solar power course, one wave power course etc. If one can"t make new courses then the course "Sustainable power production and transportation" should be included as it takes up this technologies (but very light).» (Yes)
- A course that will replace Sustainable development, perheps gas turbine technology» (Yes)
- More courses about geokonstruction, trafikplanering anda samhällsplanering. And also a course about project managent (since many of us from Geo probably gonna work within "Anläggningsprojetk" the first years").» (Yes)
- As always, more "hands on" elements.» (Yes)
- More programming. » (Yes)
- Embedded systems, more applied courses in control. A applied automation course were a production line is to be programmed in several labs or hand ins would be nice. It should include PLC programming, .NET programming, database and SCADA system. » (Yes)
- More of how sustanable development can be integrated in process engineering. A good example is the Industrial Energy Systems course» (Yes)
- Computer aid Management like MS-project and Premavera. » (Yes)
- The first year is very good but I like choices for the next (and last) semester that is approved by our master program. Some course in economics additional to the power market would be appreciated.» (Yes)
- Audio engineering» (Yes)
- There was not many course options to choose, especially in communication track of my programme. There may be some courses corporated with the companies in Sweden that help to show the real working life. » (Yes)
- finance + more about ip rights (earlier than the last semester)» (Yes)
- More urban planing and advanced trafic planing. Way too much water courses..» (Yes)
- Microwave measurement techniques (7.5 hp)» (Yes)
- Introduction course for the international students.» (Yes)
- More technical aspect» (Yes)
- A product development project. We study a lot of product development management but have no practical training (except if you come from Mechanical Engineering). The Product Development Project that is in "elective" in the master program does not count, as it is almost impossible to get a spot in it. » (Yes)
- A database course. It is something a programmer must know about, especially someone with a master. And don"t let » (Yes)
- some more reflections on economy affecting sustainable development and architecture» (Yes)
- Better knowledge about manufacturing/production» (Yes)
- 1-another "signal processing" course is really needed or maybe the current course should be 15 credit and presented in one semester to go deeper in applications as well as concepts 2-since this is an international programm and all students are not familiar with "java" programming,it could be an elective course wich gives the essence of java programming» (Yes)
- More actual technical courses, and not just curses that give a total vague picture. P.e. why havn"t I read a single course in renewable technolgy in a masters programme for energy?» (Yes)
- Hybrid vehicles, Windpower» (Yes)
- More basic astrophysics - for those choosing the astrophysics track, it would be good with a more thorough astrophysics course than the one given together with Earth Science in lp2.» (Yes)
- Organizational Behavior» (Yes)
- Before, the course "Adaptiva algoritmer och intelligenta maskiner" was compulsory for the mechatronics specialization. I would like to see a course like that to be included into the specialization.» (Yes)
- More R&D/innovation strategy, planning, organization.» (Yes)
- I am quite not sure abut what to add. I do not feel like I can come up with anything but I took a course called software product line engineering. I really appreciated that course. So, any course, similar to that one, could be great.» (Yes)
- Technological challenges with fusion energy» (Yes)
- Project course» (Yes)
- Courses covering legislation in the area to a larger extent.» (Yes)
- More technical cources aimed at biomedical industry.» (Yes)
- More courses within the subject geotechnics, in which you use computerprogrammes that actually is used in the industry» (Yes)
- Probability theory, Machine learning» (Yes)
- A course in hydrogeology and a course in rock mechanics» (Yes)
- I would like housing inventions to integrate the ark186 I would like ark191 to be bigger and integrate the themes used in the housing invention course.» (Yes)
- continious course in thermo dynamics, a course in the technical parts of sustainable energy alternatives (not only the soft parts), » (Yes)
- Earth Quake Engineering» (Yes)
- Courses LIke in which we can practically work in the field of Networks.The courses similar to CCNA,CCNP should be offered.» (Yes)
- Project with implementing networked software.» (Yes)
- courses related with networking» (Yes)
- Dam Engineering, Bridge Enigineering» (Yes)
- Model driven Development» (Yes)
- There are lots of courses that can be added if the program administrators had looked into other universities similar program"s profile. Nevertheless 1.Human resource management is necessary but it is not offered. 2.Risk management 3.Construction equipments 4. Legal issues in construction (not only contracts) » (Yes)
- I would like more optics courses. Particularly some project/laboratory course.» (Yes)
- Financial course, More hands-on courses and less high level academia! » (Yes)
- The lean production course should be made mandatory since there is much connection to that philosophy in other courses» (Yes)
- More traffic courses, for example something with tracks and train.» (Yes)
- There are really no true masters courses, most courses are very easy (bachelors level) or graduate courses» (Yes)
- - ECONOMICS !! (like Cost evaluation, Corporate Finance) It"s very surprising that the Program doesn"t even tackle the economic dimension of the firm while it"s the most important part of it. - more than 1 course on Lean Management» (Yes)
- An introduction course about how Chalmers function for the international students. » (Yes)
- More courses within the areas road and trafik, for example a course with tracks (train and tram) More courses within geotechnics. Should be more courses to choose from, you don"t have the option to specialise in anything otherwise. you just get an overall knowledge about everything, which is good aswell but not as the only alternative.» (Yes)
- Financial Courses» (Yes)
- the program is combination of energy and chemical engineering .some more esential courses in detailse,g multiphase flow should be added» (Yes)
- more workshops and courses about materials and design!! » (Yes)
- More Biology and Neural networking based courses» (Yes)
- More networking courses» (Yes)
- A basic course that connect people togheter, maybee cultural differences. Many times i found myself beeing somekind of guide to chalmers or the system around. And some students does not seem to have a greater environmental understanding before attending the MP.» (Yes)
- MÅNGA fler kurser om vägbyggnad och vatten- och avlopp.» (Yes)
- Signals and systems» (Yes)
- More courses containing new research at a deeper level that the ones available now.» (Yes)
- more technical and less management . all management papers talk about customer focused and it is more of repetition of views » (Yes)
- Fler kurser rellaterade till väg och trafik, samt geoteknik. I nuläget kan man inte få någon spetskompetens, utan bara en bred utbildning, man är till exempel TVUNGEN att läsa vissa kurser som ligger långt utanför ens ämnesområde. Alldeles för bred master.» (Yes)
- control theory» (Yes)
- Subject of software architecture and design should be targeted in more courses and with better quality.» (Yes)
- More geo- engineering or at least more courses to choose between in each quarter» (Yes)
- A proper course in environmental management and strategies. The existing one is very descriptive with an approach that tends to encourage disbelief and negativity towards companies - I want to learn how a company should manage environmental challenges with business sustainability as a leading theme.» (Yes)
- The syllabus says "This programme gives you the opportunity to develop your skills in purchasing, logistics, marketing, transport and general management" NO MANAGEMENT AT ALL!!! all the courses were extremely technical, no skills in management were given. I tried to over come with things such as project management and organizational beheviour, but a course on soft skills would help alot» (Yes)
- I think that more courses in material science should be added as optional courses, for example about ceramics. Other courses from the Chemistry and Biochemistry programme could be recommended for different tracks. Advanced analytical chemistry for example.» (Yes)
- As a communications engineer, I see very very little effort being put into sustainability. Although, we can build sustainable business such as LTE, are we going to have a sustainable future. I feel there should be 1 mandatory course, such as "ecology for engineers". As most of them tend to ignore this ! I am highlighting this course in particular after consulting one of my friends in the industry.» (Yes)
- Project management, research theory» (Yes)
- More medicin, courses how body - medicin works, more eHealt/computer added systems, how medicins affect body...» (Yes)
- More robot courses (like the atonomous robots and humanoid robotics courses in the MPCAS programme)» (Yes)
- More courses within geo and more within water. Now you have to choose courses from both because there are not enough courses to aim at one of these parts of the programme » (Yes)
- Manufacturing related courses» (Yes)
- some of the not courses in design energy equipment, heat power technology. More energy related courses to chose from at each periode » (Yes)
- Environmental Chemistry (pollutant transport) Natural Product Chemistry (A whole course, not with medicinal chemistry)» (Yes)
- I would like to see some course that focuses on the social aspects of sustainable development.» (Yes)
- project management TQM six sigma » (Yes)
- Det finns alldeles för få kurser inom geologi-geoteknik, och även vattenbyggnad, istället är det utfyllt med en massa dåligt planerade miljökurser. Det var inte därför jag sökte programmet, hade jag vetat detta hade jag läst master (och ev. grundutb. i Luleå)» (Yes)
- Courses on how to go further with ideas, most projects end in being just concepts or blueprints. What happens next in the process?» (Yes)
- bridge engineering. commercial software» (Yes)
- FEM, rigid body dynamics, courses more towards applied mechanics.» (Yes)
- This master program has a complete and clear route for Packaging specialization. But the courses presented about Microelectromechanical systems and bio subjects are quite few. There are only 3-4 professor in the Microtechnology department, which must be double at least. » (Yes)
- Some biomaterial course» (Yes)
- Basic course in operations management (rather than manufacturing strategy)» (Yes)
- Deeper geology» (Yes)
- Battery Storage Systems,Power Cable Engineering, and Electrical Machines» (Yes)
- Service Contract management» (Yes)
- a more general understanding of ships, shipping and how they are build.» (Yes)
- more construction related courses rather than solid organizational management courses.» (Yes)
- Artificial Intelligence, maybe.» (Yes)
- 1. axiomatic set theory 2. complexity theory 3. seminar course in algorithms (similar approach to frontiers of programming languages) 4. seminar course in Logic and Foundations of mathematics (similar in approach to Frontiers of programming Languages)» (Yes)
- More detailed energy technology course» (Yes)
- Basic computer adied sketch, Photoshop, Illustrator and etc.» (Yes)
- A second course in mathematical modelling going deeper into differential equations and stochastic simulation.» (Yes)
- More interaction with companies/future work places outside school» (Yes)
- more graphic design courses, since it is very important.» (Yes)
- Human resource management, psychology management, value management, economics.» (Yes)
- Embedded system» (Yes)
- Network Simulation and Network Management Network Traffic Analysis BGP or MPLS» (Yes)
- A financial course would be nice» (Yes)
- Maybe a course with a more practical orientation on start-ups (how to fund an innovation, how to do the law parts etc..)» (Yes)
- I attended Automotive Industrial Design Engineering in Teknik design department, there were not much about automotive industrial design or automotive design history included in our program, nor enough about industrial design. also we, as student, always felt the need to have courses like teaching photoshope software and proper hand sketching. another problem was that industrial relevant projects or lectures were not really included in our program, while other programs benefited a lot from that.» (Yes)
- more labs» (Yes)
- Much more and earlier planning by the techears and communication of this planning to the students! Also, much more respons on the hand-in assignments, since the program is based on learning by doing. » (Yes)
- Mer geoteknik och Geologi kurser.» (Yes)
- Theory of elasticity and plasticity Advanced Engineering mathematics Design of Slender Structures Advanced Steel Structures Advanced Bridge Engineering » (Yes)
- Basic course in sketching (in english)» (Yes)
- One full subject on Power System Protection. At present it is included only for two lecture. Power system protection is very vast subject and it is very useful for Power electrical engineering.» (Yes)
- Advanced Embedded System Design DSP Design with HDL Mixed Signal IC Design » (Yes)
- Add more tracks with exam packages (like small Minor), e.g. Bionano. This will help the student throughout is decisions.» (Yes)
- The overall lack of any technology or course which remotely resembles somethin you see in the real world is distrubing. Yes, there are some exceptions, but overall, the bigger part of Chalmers is stuck somwhere between 95-98 and little improvments are being made to the overall value of a Chalmers Education.» (Yes)
- more industry relevant courses » (Yes)
- en stor projektkurs (gärna i samarbete med företag) där man får tillämpa kunskaper inom både mekanik, elektronik, signalbehandling, programmering» (Yes)
- Maybe more practical work» (Yes)
- more pharmacetical chemistry and more analytical chemistry » (Yes)
- Production Economics» (Yes)
- some physics and mathematics courses should make compulsory. moreover, MPRSS should offer master in astrophysics, etc but not master in MPRSS instead.» (Yes)
- More practical skills in making sketches in Flash or other graphic program. We need it everyday and not everyone can it. » (Yes)
- more stuff about crystallography, and deformation mechanism.» (Yes)
- More mathematics, computer programming (like C/C++)» (Yes)
- More courses about energy and more courses to choose from during the autumn semester» (Yes)
- I think that the pace of the masterprogram is much lower then the three first years. Now I want to lean and then the courses should include more. I have not put in the same workload now as before and still getting the same grades. » (Yes)
- More course are needed for the one who opted for analog side.» (Yes)
- Hands on curses, construction. » (Yes)
- *Project management *More hybrid-courses with better teacher *» (Yes)
- More about signal processing» (Yes)
- More courses related to networks» (Yes)
- A better UNIX programming course.» (Yes)
- Rapid prototyping tools such as photoshop, Flash, google sketch up, CSS/Html so as to communicate better the design ideas and structure the graphical skills more. This is a very common requirement in industry, and not a necessary entry requirement for the master.» (Yes)
- some real practice, like we can be involved in a real project» (Yes)
- yes, we need some more detailed subjects of highvoltage side as by looking at present industrial market demand senario.in (Electric power Engineering), we need some more detailed control subjects.» (Yes)
- brand management» (Yes)
- Rhetoric classes, Presentation classes, Excel classes, Powerpoint classes. All these things that you are supposed to master but never tought. What is the reasoning there?» (Yes)
- A "proper" modelling course (very useful, in particular for further academic studies)» (Yes)
- more economics and how to sell» (Yes)
- The MTS course Ethics in Biotechnology» (Yes)
- Heat and power system engineering. En mycket bra kurs som känns relevant för kemitekniker.» (Yes)
- More purchasing related course» (Yes)
- More softwares: CATIA Ver5.0 CAD/CAM » (Yes)
- Lean Production» (Yes)
- Art-based courses (e.g. those provided by Valand"s C:Art:Media)» (Yes)
- courses related to Petrolum, polymer and petrochemical process and properties and applications.» (Yes)
- Network Programing, Specific security subjects other than the general ones (Network security, Computer Security)» (Yes)
- may be a course in circuit simulations/em-simulation using state of the art software» (Yes)
- more courses to choose between when there are optional courses» (Yes)
- quantum mehanics, optical observation, recent topics in astrophysics» (Yes)
- There are some parts that could be there but since you can elect courses you can get the most things that you want.» (Yes)
- I would have liked a course in Heat and moisture with a problematic approach. To get understanding of the subject, not only make calculations.» (Yes)
- All the focus in my masters program is on software. Except for Antenna Engineering, there is not much emphasis on the hardware courses. I do not know if this is the right approach ... but just an observation that I made. » (Yes)
- 1) People Management 2) Cultural Effects & Adoptions » (Yes)
- statistics» (Yes)
- Flow acoustics» (Yes)
- It would be nice to have a envoronmetally course that are based on material and environment.» (Yes)
- Sketching techniques» (Yes)
- I think different management paradigms should be considered essential study, including lean, TQM, and agile. All of these are relevant beyond SPM and manufacturing. » (Yes)
- Financial course» (Yes)
- There should be more courses within the Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering track» (Yes)
- relevans för de obligatoriska kurserna!?» (Yes)
- more courses on antenna. » (Yes)
- Petroleum courses (ie. course based on refineries)» (Yes)
- courses about software and technology management» (Yes)
- Some type of course in materials» (Yes)
- Human Resource course and Economics» (Yes)
- "to integrate knowledge from different areas of acoustics and outside acoustics and handle the complexity of acoustics engineering problems."» (Yes)
- Planning processes, community planning.» (Yes)
- Control applied to power systems» (Yes)
- The area of Electric power Engineering is a very wide area and needed to be divided into High voltage and power systems , and increase the subjects in these two areas and another one is the power electronics and the drives and increase the subjects in those areas as well, It is working in that way in other countries like Canada, and i think it makes the student after graduation more stronger. The courses which are from available from Electric power are only 12 courses and there sould be more courses like courses related to Software applications like Digislient Power factory, PSSE and others, also Protection of electrical systems, Designing of electrical distribution networks and other areas, There should be more courses, For example at NTNU there is a course about illumination and other courses which are not available, Also in the corresponding American Universities there are a lot of courses which are not available at Chalmers. » (Yes)
- Many, but mostly, the quality needs to be raised substatially. Today, the quality of the programme is terrible, comparing to universities abroad (yes, I am a swede myself)!!» (Yes)
- Combustion engeneering» (Yes)
- fler påbygggnadskurser. kan ibland kännas som att kurser behandlar samma ämne, med de grunder vi har borde det kunna koordineras så efterföljande kusrer blir djupare och skippar introduktioner.» (Yes)
- One course related to Network Security which will be more advanced.» (Yes)
- Courses about Lean.» (Yes)
- practical usability/ergonomic courses or psychology courses» (Yes)
- Energy systems in developing countries, since it is most of the world. Also, it would be good if some of the Power systems engineering courses were made more available to the Sustainable energy systems programme» (Yes)
- Finance/economics/business as an optional course for those who don"t have skills in these areas. It would make it possible to allow higher pace in the rest of the education.» (Yes)
- More technical courses...» (Yes)
- A project management course and a course in economy.» (Yes)
- Some more courses that go deeper into the subjects in the second year.» (Yes)
- It would be great to work more with students from e.g. HDK and Mechanical engineering to give us a better understanding of our role in the industry.» (Yes)
- Some coding courses like coding in Flash. Since Flash can be really helpful in prototyping systems» (Yes)
- programming language like C++ or Fortran or basic things for writing the program with these software» (Yes)
- It needs more of electricity transportation and production knowledge. More about the grids and more of hydro and wind power, not only biomass and coal. At least it should be possible to chose such courses within the program.» (Yes)
- Analog design courses are too few. Only having Analog VLSI is insufficient to understand the subject.» (Yes)
- Some particle course in which there is less theory. » (Yes)
- wireless communication, advanced course about more things in GSM, WCDMA, HSPA and LTE, do not like wireless network. » (Yes)
- I will revise the options for elective courses. Before applying I had information of courses that later on were not available, for example international business. There should be more options for electives and I think that Gothenburg University can offer them but more coordination is required between the two universities when dealing with elective courses. » (Yes)
- There were a course in transformers, signals and systems which were supposed to be given for the biotechnology students. But because of the planning and arrangement of courses it was not possible to take this course because of too much trubble with collisions between lectures and not good to study 3 courses at the same time. This MUST be changed. I think it would give so much more to receive this knowledge in the start of the masterprogramme and it would prepare us better for all the courses.» (Yes)
- Immaterial rights, marketing strategies» (Yes)
- Financial management concerning innovation» (Yes)
- More real-world problems and use of commercial software» (Yes)
- Expand on Dynamical Systems» (Yes)
- optional courses in biology to complement the courses we do in computational biology and biology inspired optimisation methods and behaviour based robotics.» (Yes)
- More fluid courses for second year» (Yes)
- More hands on focus, more individualized attention. Team projects have forced this Masters program to be more about managing lazy group partners than learning any thing.» (Yes)
- More economics of production and project management for the "production Management" part» (Yes)
- Quality management!» (Yes)
- More elective courses for Risk Management» (Yes)
- Commersialazing the Nano products.» (Yes)
- Since the prerequisite for the program is Industrial Engineering and Management, I think engineering aspects are not covered at all in the program. If some engineering based courses (e.g. Operations Research) could be added as elective courses there would be a better variety of courses to choose between.» (Yes)
- More courses for second year.» (Yes)
- Science of Environmental Change» (Yes)
- In fact, more compulsory courses. Most of the credits we earned were elective.» (Yes)
- Course(s) about PLC and SCADA systems, which are heavily used in the industry but almost untouched in the masters program.» (Yes)
- Power System Quality Power System Protection Power System Stability» (Yes)
- More production engineering courses to the automation specialization. That would give a perspective on automation. » (Yes)
- Power System Protection,Electrical Machines» (Yes)
- Applied signal processing » (Yes)
- cultural topics» (Yes)
- Some more theory courses in physics subject» (Yes)
- I dagsläget är de mest intressanta kurserna på våren (CFD,AST etc) medan hösten är tunnare i det området. Därför känns det konstigt att läsa hösten två ggr och våren 1 gång. I dagsläget är mina kursval för den kommande höst ganska tom på kurser jag verkligen vill läsa. PÅ våren valde jag istället bort kurser på grund av krocker» (Yes)
- course in presentation technique both oral and visual» (Yes)
- Mandatory Lean course» (Yes)
- application layer of wireless» (Yes)
- I would like to had some courses more focused towards a Lean Manufacturing project with a company» (Yes)
- economics,investment principles, some other subjects within the business fiedld.» (Yes)
- Verilog coding, ASIC(theory based)» (Yes)
- More education towards using different softwares like Adobe Flash, Adobe Photoshop etc. They are used (maybe not explicitly stated) during the programme but each student is expected to know them before hand.» (Yes)
- risk management, lean and logisitc related courses» (Yes)
- A course on Finite element method or Boundary element method» (Yes)
- More interdicipilnary courses. Man-machine interaction» (Yes)
- I was sad to see Medical physics cancelled. Also, alot of non Chalmers students may benefit from a Matlab intro.» (Yes)
- the range of elective courses to be selected after the core courses should be expanded. » (Yes)
- More photonics system engineering in some way» (Yes)
- Game Theory» (Yes)
- i have sustainable chemical engineering program as i thought that Chalmers needs to offer more engineering course like industrial energy system and more about unit operation course instead of digital control system.» (Yes)
- More courses from computer sciences. Currently the program gives some mixture of Mathematics, Statistics, and Biology. But there are more necessary computer sciences aspect to be known such as ontology, semantics web, information systems, information design and visualization .. although students are free to choose elective courses but the schedule have been almost conflict with the program"s compulsory courses» (Yes)
- Something more practical such as small projects with industry» (Yes)
- I think that Sustainable Power Production and Transportation course is recommended for this master program» (Yes)
- some courses related to finance» (Yes)
- I feel that the course in nonlinear and adaptive control should be compulsory.» (Yes)
- More building physics and building services engineering» (Yes)
- In structural enginnering there should be a seperate course that deals with FE-modelling. The actual software used in structural engineering (commonly used in practice - not research!) deviates quite much from the basic learnt from the courses in Finite element method. There should perhaps also be another course given in quarter 3 (year 1), that is more adapted to the structural engineering department (as the advanced course in Bulding physics and the FEM application course is not relevant for all). I would also prefer that it would be given by Björn Engström. » (Yes)
- Complexities in social systems and applications of complex systems theory in social sciences» (Yes)
- PCB design System On Chip» (Yes)
- BASIC AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY.THIS COURSE IS ONLY OFFERED IN SWEDISH LANGUAGE.THIS SHOULD BE IN ENGLISH.BECAUSE MANY INTERNATIONAL STUDENTSWANT TO TAKE THIS COURSE BUT DUE TO LANGUAGE PROBLEM UNABLE TO TAKE THIS WITHINBIOMEDICINE TRACK IN BIOTECHNOLOGY.THIS IS VERY INFORMATIVE COURSE.» (Yes)
- project management» (Yes)
- A course focusing more on the practical aspects of professionally developing software in this field would give a broader base and better preparation for real work.» (Yes)
- there must be some course or courses regarding renewable fuels..» (Yes)
- Flowing the track of eHealth, and looking beyond the core courses, there is absolutely nothing the university as to offer. For specialising in eHealth, I ned courses like "Health Economics", "Health informatics", "Health policy and management" etc.» (Yes)
- Creation and management of sustainable energy/environment solutions. Creative thinking regarding non oil dependency in technology. Risks and preparation for over-population of the earth.» (Yes)
- more economics» (Yes)
- one basic course about networks or wireless networks(about the protocol or some other basic theory on networks)» (Yes)
- I want more detailed courses. Most courses repeat some topics such as global warming over and over again. I would prefer some courses to be closer to research. » (Yes)
- Bridge engineering» (Yes)
- Pls review the elective courses. Logistic students feel abit short changed. We have gone through most of the elective courses in comparison to those studying management. » (Yes)
- Advanced Analog Design or Design for communication covering more advance amplifiers, noise analysis, PLL"s, analog references, multipliers, filters and RF transceivers. The digital design courses must also have some part as memory design. » (Yes)
- some form of manufacturing and materials for designers to get guidelines and tips for future work life» (Yes)
- Product Planning / Product Platform. » (Yes)
- felsökningsteknik & komponentlära» (Yes)
- I think it could be better if the Master would be focus more in Security (more subjects of Network security and Computer security)» (Yes)
- Need more focus on either Bio or Electrical track» (Yes)
- project courses strictly based on learning softwares like hysys etc.» (Yes)
- More industrial design engineering courses, like for example IDE project» (Yes)
- fluid particle related courses» (Yes)
- Wireless Sensor Networks (currently it is taught as a very small basic part in one of the course)» (Yes)
- More course on circuit design (analogue, high frequency, ...)» (Yes)
- Digital communication» (Yes)
- some course in the network area» (Yes)
- more projects » (Yes)
- some course related to ergonomics, design» (Yes)
- More economy/finance related courses! Definetely useful, especially in within a future career within management.» (Yes)
- Subjects related to logistics, supply chain management, and management of innovation could be useful. Also, some of the content in the program could be simplified as part of the content of Total Quality Management.» (Yes)
- I strongly recommend Construction Safety Management. I think, may be more construction related courses could be added.» (Yes)
- Global trade, including incoterms and international payments etc...» (Yes)
- International Trade» (Yes)
- Nanotechnology for Sustainable Energies as optional Nanotechnology for Chemical Engineers as optional» (Yes)
- More economy» (Yes)
- Some logistics, management, biocrop agriculture and genetics behind the development behind biocrops and of course some economics. If one doesn"t understand the real world then one can"t apply anything to it. The programme needs a broader perspective. » (Yes)
- More practical design project» (Yes)
- more quantitative course like Simulation Models with Applications» (Yes)
- Finite element modeling Course on quality» (Yes)
- Robust Control Adaptive Control» (Yes)
- Change management International Law and Contracting Value chain management Lean management » (Yes)
- Marketing. There is a part of the Creating new business course which deals with marketing, but I don"t think it was enough.» (Yes)
- statistical inference statistical quality control design of experiments» (Yes)
- multicore programming» (Yes)
- some more applications» (Yes)
- SWEDISH class, cryptography advanced, network security advanced» (Yes)
- I would like to see a bit more focus on societal and economical aspects of sustainable development, and not only on the environmental aspects.» (Yes)
- corporate finance entreprenurial marketing» (Yes)
- Biological systems modeling» (Yes)
- Presentation techniques» (Yes)
- The package of nuclear courses for the 2nd year is not available anymore since it is spread over the whole second year. I was planning to take is but that"s not possible anymore.» (Yes)
- Photoshop，,Flash，,tutorials» (Yes)
- More about sustainability» (Yes)
- as elective courses, there should be some financial/economics course» (Yes)
- Courses about Fuzzy control and neural networks» (Yes)
- Optical networking, backbone switching.» (Yes)
- Not mandatory, but selectable course about loudspeakers» (Yes)
- Domain Driven Design. More up to date courses.» (Yes)
- more practical courses» (Yes)
- Leadership» (Yes)
- Algorithms for Machine Learning was a very good course that tied in nicely with the more hands-on approach of stochastic optimization and neural networks.» (Yes)
- perhaps computer program course in english, for 3D visualisations» (Yes)
- The chance to get some practical experience of product development. I think its important to really understand the manufacture and assembly methods used in the industry today. This is thoroughly explained in the litterature but as a student I feel I lack the hands-on understanding of what the problems/benefits of different methods are. Would be nice if chalmers could arrange internships during the summer in possible, relevant, areas related to product development. » (Yes)
- Finance course/ Research design course with emphasis on numerical data analysis/Some Advanced strategy course» (Yes)
- One which will describe and explain how to use various project management tools» (Yes)
- I would like to have some more lectures and practises.» (Yes)
- models facture» (Yes)
- Research methodology:1.5 point» (Yes)
- Courses about RF» (Yes)
- Mixed Signal Circuit Design» (Yes)
- Mer geoteknik/grundläggning. Det måste komma fler kurser så att studenterna har nåt att välja på. Som det är nu så är det två läsperioder där många i klassen inte vet alls vad de vill välja. Det finns väldigt mycket miljökurser men om man hade velat läst det hade man valt ett annat masterprogram. Som tur är har vi lärare som står på vår sida och lyckas "ruska fram" en kurs som vi vill gå och som lärarna tycker behövs. Detta till skillnad mot den programkordinator vi har som inte överhuvudtaget lyssnar på vad "hennes studenter" har att säga och vill ändra på. Hennes inställning är att det spelar ingen roll vad vi läser för kurser eftersom vi i framtiden inte vet vad vi kommer att jobba med!!! Detta är en väldigt konstig inställning för en person med detta jobb, med ansvar för så många studenters utbildning. Otroligt arrogant med tanke på att vi är många som har investerat väldigt mycket tid och pengar i att gå en utbildning som inte riktigt motsvarar förväntningarna de två sista åren. Om man har den inställningen så är det väl onödigt att utbilda sig överhuvudtaget, eller?» (Yes)
- Mixte structures concrete-steel» (Yes)
- More about social (and maybe also economical) sustainablitity, now the main focus is on environmental sustainability.» (Yes)
- The programme fail to connect project management and construction in some extent. Mostly, we study the two subjects seperately. » (Yes)
- there are too little courses running at the same semester. Students should be able to take 6-10 courses in a half year. Modern architecture theory should be added to the master programme. While it would be appreciated to add work experience between the bachelor and master programme to stregthen the students before entering the master programme. To make consistency between students levels.» (Yes)
- Mathematical methods such as operations research and inventory control models» (Yes)
- In Complex systems which is an interdisciplinary trend,It is very important to build a suitable mathematical foundation before going through examples.students use simulational technique while there is no course to teach them how to interpreate the result of programs which use stochastic generators. It is completely nontrivial subject and even in the level of scientists there are some struggles about simulational techniques. so writng a simulational prgram without knowing about mathematical foundation to interpret them does not have educational value. so I would like to have a course on simulations and statistical inference(Mathematical course not in the way that Simulation of complex systems was presented that was nothing at all» (Yes)
- Surface Physics and Nanophysics» (Yes)
- Finite Element Method» (Yes)
- Courses with some experimetal techniquies» (Yes)
- need at least one structures course in architecture. other electives would be nice, too. » (Yes)
- Digital Representation» (Yes)
- More focus on environmental management. Also more interactive teaching on all levels, ie. you learn by doing not only by listening. » (Yes)
- More geotechical corses should be available rock engineering» (Yes)
- A course that gives an introduction in transforms for students from the bioechnology program» (Yes)
- Ebedded system architecture ,this cource is tought in linkping university in SOC Program Secondly there should be some cources for SOC Bus Architectures» (Yes)
- Artificial Intelligence» (Yes)
- project management» (Yes)
- Graphics, Image Processing related or introduction courses» (Yes)
- Or it"s kind of hard too say that everyone should read a specific course but I think that booth Machine Learning in lp 3 and Artificial Intelligence, lp 4, could be considered to be part of the official CAS courses.» (Yes)
- more ecodesign» (Yes)
- one basic at the beginning to clarify the concepts and goals and to put all or most of the students on the same ground level of knowledge before getting deep into the specialization . » (Yes)
- more geotecnics and more about water and sewage distribution pipelines» (Yes)
- A course which deals with Model based development and use C# and .net framework would be very appreciated » (Yes)
- I think that the school project should be counted as a course.» (Yes)
- More track courses on in Biotechnology-Food and Health» (Yes)
- There"s only a "basic" course in each part of the programme. It would be nice to, if you want a certain edge of your programme, to be able to develop further within some areas like technical change or lca.» (Yes)
- catia and some useful tools maybe as an elective courses» (Yes)
- More elective courses. » (Yes)
- some more certification courses,like CCNP(Chalmers already provides CCNA) or some programming certifications» (Yes)
- Something more quantitative more hands-on instead of the high-level courses provided, e.g. valuation, Mergers and acquisitions» (Yes)
- Industridesign » (Yes)
- Applied Research Method» (Yes)
- some computer programmes especially some programmes for project management» (Yes)
- Management course to broaden education» (Yes)
- - Construction of virtual machines (JVM for instance). It is essential knowledge today and the things taught in programming languages/compiler construction does not cover this very much. - How to implement larger systems. We never do that, since we never have time in a single course, which results in that I know a lot about how to write small fragments of good code, but not which design choices are critical when building a bigger program.» (Yes)
- More Courses in graphical interfaces and less methods.» (Yes)
- more challenges in general» (Yes)
- 1. During some courses we"ve had elaborated discussion about information design >> how a presentation poster could and should look like. Theese discussions were very time consuming. Allthough Lena Falkheden was very kind and arranged a very needed lectura about graphic design, it"d been better if we"d had a short course about architectural graphics and maybe also some introduction to basic skills in presentation software as InDesign and Illustrator. 2. There"s been so much focus on sustainability in the program that sometimes the design aspect has got lost... I think it would be benificial for all to integrate a short course/workshop that only considers building/landscape design and esthetics.» (Yes)
- More courses within geotechnics and road engineering, and a course which includes railway enginneering.» (Yes)
- More strategy courses.» (Yes)
- Program verification Distributed Systems Real Time Systems. » (Yes)
- related environmental aspect, such as recycling or energy-efficient processing etc.» (Yes)
- More transportation courses, like freight transport system but a higher level.» (Yes)
- More focus on leading edge energy technologies, with heavier weighting on expertise and research at Chalmers, but include areas outside as well. More in-depth focus on details of renewable energy technologies.» (Yes)
- One CAD-course would be good» (Yes)
- Applications for production» (Yes)
- materials and details in architecture» (Yes)
- Composite Mechanics» (Yes)
- more design courses!» (Yes)
- more courses regarding security and network design» (Yes)
- tutorial about Matlab» (Yes)
- We need more computer modeling curses. There are some certain CADs which, we as Electrical engineers should be familiar whit, such as MATLAB, Finite Element Analysis, CADs .. these are very important and should be offered in special courses, I it is not enough to just have one hour about the CADs in other courses. » (Yes)
- Everything needs to be more linked to the industry, som courses are and some not. » (Yes)
- HVAC systems should be included in the compulsory part of the programme» (Yes)
- Composite (steel-concrete) structures (it could be some part of concrete structures course, or Steel structures course)» (Yes)
- Optimization, Optimal Control, Neural Networks and AI, Adaptive Control, Multivariable Control, Fuzzy Control, MPC all as separate elective courses for interested students. » (Yes)
- offshore structures» (Yes)
- LCA and some other IE tools.» (Yes)
- More thermodynamics» (Yes)
- Higher focus on negotiations. The marketing and purchasing courses could have been much better with more practical parts. Also it would be a good idea to have a workshop to learn sbout selling, since we all need to do that when we got a job.» (Yes)
- more CFD» (Yes)
- It would be better to some course focus on sustainable building technologies. And give more knowledge of management, such as supply chain, will help student aware what is problem in reality.» (Yes)
- A practical course about prototyping which includes some appropriate applications for prototyping (i.e. flash)» (Yes)
- R&D management and strategies» (Yes)
- I think there should be a paper technology course in this master program because I think paper is definitely a material. Also there are some good courses at the physics department and the mechanical department that could belong to the material master program.» (Yes)
- Change some of the madantory courses. » (Yes)
- More courses in structural engineering» (Yes)
- Signal processing» (Yes)
- Finance.» (Yes)
- 1- Rapid prototyping 2- Applied Mecharonics not focusing on electrical engineering» (Yes)
- Lean (principles, thinking, manufacturing)» (Yes)
- I would like more physical chemistry» (Yes)
- More programming, a lot of students hardly know java.» (Yes)
- in control area there are not enough courses, specially in second year of study period.» (Yes)
- Biomedical sensors...» (Yes)
- Law and some more economics. I see that as huge flaw in the course programme.» (Yes)
- More focus on environmental issues.» (Yes)
- Project planning and internships» (Yes)
- most of the courses in this majour should be changed» (Yes)
- Microwave Engineering» (Yes)
- Fondumental Structural Dynamics » (Yes)
- more technical courses» (Yes)
- I am in the master of Building Performance Design and I think it lacks in comparison to the Structural Eng. one in attention and more options for courses. This field seems to be wide open but unfortunately the courses we are offered are limited and often not well organized and specified. The master of Design for Sustainable Development though, has a lot of things in common concerning the theoretic part of my master and they seem to cover a lot of issues (even in the theoretic part). There should be an integration of the two programmes i guess or maybe a stronger cooperation.» (Yes)
- Knowledge Management Something like: https://noppa.tkk.fi/noppa/kurssi/tu-53.1030/» (Yes)
- Bridges» (Yes)
- Advanced complexity analysis, Algorithmic Game Theory» (Yes)
- modern condensed matter course» (Yes)
- Ac concern to Network...detailed practical courses should be added which provide the practical hands in knowledge in the field of Commuinication and Network.» (Yes)
- some more experimental workshops,industrial visits and focusing on practical issues not some repeating theories » (Yes)
- magnetism in nanostructures more practically oriented courses(can be introduced in the already given courses)» (Yes)
- larger project courses like eco marathon/formula or larger practical projects» (Yes)
- Course in optimization» (Yes)
- course related to bridge engineering» (Yes)
- Financial economics» (Yes)
- project management or something that will give you a chance to develop yourself and not just derive equations all day» (Yes)
- More about relay protections, protection coordination, practical insulation coordination, earthing, a course with PSS/E, transient studies...» (Yes)
- There are very less elective courses available.» (Yes)
- More softwares.» (Yes)
- Maybe more courses in the core subjects should be added.That makes me have more choice.» (Yes)
- A little economy would be very appreciated» (Yes)
- Humanoid Robotics» (Yes)
- more biotechnology courses for the Biomaterials track in BMEMP» (Yes)
- there should be some more subjects on Antennas like antenna designing etc» (Yes)
- more electives in year 2, the quality of the MEI program is lower in year 2 because of small number of electives to choose from» (Yes)
- Microarray analysis » (Yes)
- Compulsory solid state physics.» (Yes)
- Overall the program should be much more data driven. I would like to see a course in decision analysis where actual analytical work is applied. A course in game theory and how it applies in evaluation of competitive situations in a market should also be included.» (Yes)
- site management and planning, there are also some courses that seem relevant to my program but belong to another program (international project management) but you cant really take it because you have to choose between a course from another program or one of the selective courses available i.e strategic management. Perhaps a better program scheduling or rearranging of the courses would help. » (Yes)
- "Tribology" and "Fatigue" related applications in automotive design.» (Yes)
- I would like it to be more technical courses that we can learn new things from. The FEM course was almost the same course as the one tought in year 3! And just learning to use femap during a course is not sufficient enough. » (Yes)
- Embedded software related course. SOC architecture.» (Yes)
- Solid cad like catia, pro enginer» (Yes)
- More collaboration with the industry, preferable with internship. Some courses are very very basic and hardly not master level.» (Yes)
- strategic marketing» (Yes)
- Courses that look at the business perspective in a sense of monetary and economic perspective» (Yes)
- Some economy should be added» (Yes)
- PPU120 - Physical ergonomics» (Yes)
- Maybe some practical ones.» (Yes)
- Network oriented courses. like network architecture» (Yes)
- Applied Electronics and sensors, I have just recently joined an internship for a company that works for NASA and I work for a Mars and a Moonlander project. I have come to realize how very little pratical work I had with electric circuits, sensors and progamming. How to use a PLC, how to use amplifiers, how to use capacitors/inductors, everything like that. It sometimes feels almost shameful going out in the industry, claiming you are an mechatronics engineer, but then most of your knowledge is in control theory that is very rarely applied. More hands on practical work is needed with mechanics/electrical stuff!» (Yes)
- More about statistical control in production.» (Yes)
- Corrosion, it was a oppotunity to choose as an extra course but not possibly according to schedule.» (Yes)
- adaptive control (separate course) nonlinear control (separate course) robust control optimal control » (Yes)
- ship design» (Yes)
- I think there should be some courses about neural networks as well as some courses about designing.» (Yes)
- Gene technology, pharmaceutics (cancelled)» (Yes)
- No but I want them to go deeper!» (No)
- » (No)
- Not any compulsory.» (No)
- There were a lot of courses during the second semester which you only take once compared to the first semester.» (No)
- Think the approach with many elective courses are good» (No)
- all courses are available to choose so i don"t see any meaning with adding more to the program » (No)
- There should be a separate full credit examination for Astrophysics » (No)
- The flexibility of the programme plan allows you to chose courses outside the ones in the programme, so I think it is not necessary to include more courses. » (No)
- There have been a large improvement for next year. There are more recomended courses now.» (No)
- whats a "programme curriculum"?» (No)
- The Courses or subjects are fine but the contents must be revised like the projects and some advance study areas on which research is going on.» (No)
- No need of adding, just make the existing courses better. First of all, the courses and the tasks should already be set when the course starts!» (No)
- All compulsory courses should be in one year. There could be more elective courses to choose from.» (No)
- The programme is good, but the education provided is a bit poor. The academic level has to be increased.» (No)
- If Chalmers had delivered the already promised content that would"ve been a good start.» (No)
- I like the courses, however, the content of some of the courses could be revised considerably.» (No)
- The two I really wanted to go, were in the same semester, so I had to chose one of them. The other courses were less intresting.» (No opinion)
- För många kurser ligger på våren och för få på hösten. En vårtermin går åt till ex-jobb så det vart lite skev fördelning.» (No opinion)
- More co-ordinating between courses! It has been too much overlap.» (No opinion)
- Make the electable courses "material handling" and "lean production" mandatory courses. Maybe move them to the autumn so it is possible to take them both without exceeding 100% study pace.» (No opinion)
- I think it is quite free to choose the courses you wants to take.» (No opinion)

22. Are there any courses that you think should be heavily revised (or even removed) from the programme?

Yes (1 to 2)»		615		48%
Yes (3 to 4)»		90		7%
Yes more than 5»		20		1%
No»		374		29%
No opinion»		159		12%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- Heat and moisture engineering course should be deleted or revised because this course is a basic course all over the world in my major of study and this is sole Chalmers in world that has included that as a mandatory course. In addition, this course can be reserved but as an elective course since some students has already decided about their branch of study in this program before starting their studies as a master student. Therefore, this course can be elective to be chosen by students who are interested in this field or students did not have such a course before. The course Geotechnics is totally repetition for not only swedish student students but also for international students since every student of civil engineering has already had exactly this course in bachelor degree. Therefore, it should be more advanced or be deleted.» (?)
- Computer security and network security have a lot in common and they are very easy too, they could be combined to a single course making room for a new security course. » (?)
- Business law and business marketing and purchasing» (?)
- Kursen "structural systems" känns ganska meningslös att läsa. Innehållet i kursen lär man sig nog ändå när man sedan jobbar på riktigt som konstruktör "heat and moisture engineering" var som en repetition av tidigare kurser i det ämnet» (?)
- Form design, Advanced form design and Theory and methodology» (?)
- IEFS, hela våren borde synkas mer till ett sammanhållet koncept.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Courses related to logic (Logic in computer science and hardware description and verification) seem to be unrelated to the rest of the program, despite being very important.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Information Systems since those who have studied at I, Chalmers already had that course...» (Yes (1 to 2))
- ELDO should be revised. Change the VEF teacher!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Vibration control» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Environmental Management is the worst course ever, it should be removed or some other department should take over the course! Environmental Policy Instruments has to be revised.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The course biorefinery should handle the questions connected to a biorefinery and its processes not about different woods and organic cellulose chemistry.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Introduction to electronic system design» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Science of environmental change should be revised. The course is very important and it definitely fits within the programme and it should therefore not be removed from the programme, but it needs to be revised so that the importance of the course is better understood. Some of the course element in 2007 seemed not to belong in the course. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- applied industrial ecology => fewer methods and deeper study environmental management => new teachers, different focus, kindergarden level at class and horrible exam» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Energy systems modeling and planning is almost only a summary of the previous compulsary courses.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The "Wireless Networks" course is a joke. Remove or heavily revise the project part, and focus on the lectures instead. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- A really big problem with "microwave" course» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Data acquisition too similar to other courses taken in the bachelors" part of the program. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Energy systems modelling and planning» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The PLM course did have a very poor layout and support-system, it was really difficult. It is a valuable course though, so the course should be kept, but the course design should be better» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Energy System - not good To much of overlap during the spring term.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- International Projects, Building in Society - Because they are not suitable for 50 students. We have had NO feedback at all on the text we"ve produced in these courses. Therefore I"ve learned basically nothing from them.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Vibration control» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Business information system - Too low level » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Some courses are on a too low technical level concidering students from the Z-program. For example the mechatronics course.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- TEK190(Research design and methods), might be better integrated within the programme. Suggestion, remove it as a seperate course and implement the different learning objectives in the other courses. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- infortation theory» (Yes (1 to 2))
- FEM basics, Heat and Moisture Engineering - lot of work needed» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Passive safety (it should at least be moved to the safety track only)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Vibration control should be revised or instead replaced with a course in pure optimization.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Passive safety - already done though.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Global Chemeical Sustainability» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Materials selection and design. This course was very bad managed and the content was already known from old couses at Teknisk Design.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I think the Information theory should be moved to the fourth quarter where one would have more time for it» (Yes (1 to 2))
- HVAC either make it more focused on new designs or have it as a elective.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- ehealth» (Yes (1 to 2))
- DAT090 was a waste of time. Either the level should be set higher, as to incorporate a more advanced project, or the course should introduce new design methodologies. (Code conventions, testbench design patterns)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Introductory course. But it has already been done» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Mathematical modelling and computational tools (2007)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Service contract management is a very bad optional course, it is the worst i´,ve attended so far...» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Foundations of probability theory does not hold the same level as other courses. Too easy. Financial Risk, too easy to get a good grade. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Data aqusition and handling in systems biology is only repetition» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Sustainable development and ennergy systems modelling and planning» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The enviromental courses, Material Flow Analysis (in L2 year 1) and Enviromental management (L4 year 1, and "Modelling" (in LP 2 year 1.)Or at least to make them better! I decided to study abroad since the level of the courses was way too low!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- "Introduction to DES" is to simple. Lectures to slow to grasp a bigger picture and see purpose of tools like Supremica.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The HVAC course should be as elective for those who are interested sine it not ver much in line with the other courses. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Introduction to Electronic System Design should be heavily revised. This course was way to easy... the content is good but not suitable for a master programme.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Building in Society. Feels like an introduction for the exchange students to learn how to write in English» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Since many of the courses are so "allround", maybe some courses should be revised and have more focus. For example, Managing operation processes contained alot of previously presented theories and a lot of the questions on the exam could be answered by just common reasoning.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Information Systems for SCM. Interesting subject but the level of the course was too low, it should have been more in-depth in one area for instance ERP-systems with more practical exercises.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- This is not part of the program, but an optional course - Redo the Risk Management and Safety course from the beginning. The course is certainly not of Masters class! » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Information systems for SCM» (Yes (1 to 2))
- as I told the signal processing should be considered as more important course which needs more work and concentrate on it.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The "Form Design Development" courses did not give me anything of value that I felt that I could use. The configuration of the course should be more strict. I felt that it was more like "design whatever you want" now.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The applied mechatronics course should be revised. The course idea is good, but the outcome is not very great. The information given in and about the course is a bit diffuse.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Some of the sustainable courses did repeat a lot if information, instead of making room for technologycourses!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The course content does not match the examnination of some courses e.g. Environmental management and Environmental Policy Instruments. These should be better synchronized.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The credit for each course should be revised. As some of the course have heavy work, whereas some are little though they have the some credits-7.5.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Biopolymer» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Computer Introduction, Source Coding» (Yes (1 to 2))
- As the program intends to have us do the same thing 2-3 times but in more and more detail, I believe one such level could be removed and replaced by some broadening courses.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The course Environmental Management have the potential of being a very useful course, but in the way it is performed today it shows a really low quality. This problem has been raised by the students more than one time (the course has existed for many years), but the responsible teacher does not seem to be able to listen to the critical opinions.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Course instructors for exercise sessions often don"t know what help students need. Better communication between staff and students definately possible. Solutions to exercises/old exams required since course staff generally don"t have time to help students. Feedback is needed to know that a problem has been solved correctly to be able to move on from that to solve other problems.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Robotteknik» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Some courses have very similar content.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- eHealth and HCI are laughable.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Strategic Environmental Assessment » (Yes (1 to 2))
- The environmental course, should change the layout and the examination "method" » (Yes (1 to 2))
- I think it"s better that the course "Infromation Theory" will be given every year not every 2 year and also "Error Control Coding"» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Global Chemical Sustainability was to basic. It was like taking the environmental course from the bachelor once again.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- environmental system analysis» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Actually the course was fine but it didn"t quite live up the descprition so I was a bit disappointed. The course in question was Autonomous Agents.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The distributed systems courses» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Global Chemical Sustainability. Too easy and too general.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Some parts of the courses overlaps, which should be removed» (Yes (1 to 2))
- FEM applications» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Update Computer Security, it doesnt feel up to date.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Software Architecture» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Marine machinery system should be revised» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The course "Bioreactors" should either be seriously changed in its content, or simply removed. It was totally confusing and irrelevant course. Another irrelevant course was "data aquisition and systems biology". The things we learned during the course was already taught during the bachelor"s programme. Most of it was repetition. The irrelevant part was that it didn"t fit in the programme which had goals that did not correspond to it. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- The introductioncourse to the programme seemed to be two courses. They had combined the two introductioncurses two the former programmes Quality Technology Manamgement (QTM) and Production Operation Manamgement (POM). This seemingly without removing anything since both the previous programmes wanted all their content. There is a need for going through the content of the course one more time.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Already discussed with the teachers. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Analytical chemistry, you don"t learn much from having a bunch of people from the industry talking about their companies.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The managing operations processes didn"t teach me anything! Seriously, i got a grade 4 but cannot remember anything that i find useful!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Vibration Control» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Modelling and problem solving in civil engineering. More of a red line during the course.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Advanced Functional Programming. The course was to advanced and the help was little. In some way you had to learn the course all by your self, with the help of google.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Sometimes the courses get repetitive specially because there is a very small number of main lecturers.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- - "Manufacturing and Supply Chain Planning" is worth one lecture, not one course - idem for "Information Systems for SCM"» (Yes (1 to 2))
- the obligatory courses are not necassary, Data aquistion is a repetition on earlier courses and biopolymers is repetiion for ous that read the biomaterial and tissue engingeering courses. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Modeling and problem solving in civil engineering. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Engineering metals need to be on a higher level.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Management and Economics of Innovation should be revised Also Research Design and Methods should not run in 2 semesters» (Yes (1 to 2))
- IES ang global chemical sustainability» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Statistics and Differential analysis» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Some of the courses like Multimedia and video communications were not related to the program and some courses like Wireless networks were not well organized so they were not helpful!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- but they are not really in the program, just courses that you could choose yourself. But risk management was thw worst course i have ever had at chalmers. It was not at all connected to SCM and the teacher was horrible. Really bad.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Hybrids course, Powertrain mechanics» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Quality of Software Architecture course needs critical evaluation. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Science of environmental change is way to complicated and strives to include too much. The exergy part should not be included in Applied Industrial Ecology, there is simply no rationale at all for this, except to make the exam more difficult. Environmental management should be given by an institution that puts itself in the situation of companies and their reality, not an institution that is inherently negative to business in general. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Information systems for SCM...is the worst curse I have ever take and the elective project in suppy chian » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Discrete Event and Control Optimization» (Yes (1 to 2))
- E-health should be removed» (Yes (1 to 2))
- science of environemantal change needs a good improvment (maybe because is the first course) and some parts of applied industrial ecology course (exergy part does not seem very applied into IE)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Risk Management and Safety» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Natural Product and Medicinal Chemistry» (Yes (1 to 2))
- at DCPM, remove "financial management" or change it!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Stochastic Optimization Algorithms should be revised and made more analytical» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Program languages gave me nothing. It is better to make that course voluntary.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The course Programming language technology should not be mandatory and it should require the Funtional Programming and Automata Theory courses. Theese two courses would simplify the difficult laborations of Programming language technology. Alternatively the laborations could be made easier, for instance be removing the 4th lab wich covers functional programs.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- dynamics and material mechanics» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Some courses shouldn"t be compulsary, e.g. statistical physics II» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Microsystems technology, and Nanobioscience for information processing These courses are taught in a very basic level. There can be much more practical and Scientific information presented in teaching. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- The advanced algorithms and Discrete optimization could use a revision.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Environmental system analysis, » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Form design development och Form design development, advanced course och Materials selection and design» (Yes (1 to 2))
- AI, the course structure is messy if not completely absent. 1. The course contain 4 overview lectures. If the student had AI already, the lectures are useless. If not they too simple to help. A wikipedia page provide a more rigorous treatment of the subject. 2. The course is completely a self study + project course, this makes me wonder, what is the point of having it as a course. If it"s merely self study + project work, there is no need to have it as a part of the curriculum, one could do this on his own.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Energy System Modeling and Planning is mostly an overlapping course (with Sustainable Development and Energy Futures). Almost nothing new is added. Martes and Linear Programming beeing the exceptions. The other assignments took too long time with very little gain in new knowledge.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Sequence bioinformatics shouldn"t be compulsory for students in systems biology track.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Advanced chemical reaction engineering. The course content is perfect. But its final examination is not reasonable AT ALL!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Material Selection and Design. The idea of the course is good, but I was very disappointed by the implementation. There were almost no lectures or anything else that you needed to do. Basically you could just sit around and wait for those 7,5 credits to drop into your mailbox.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The data aquisition course basicly takes what we have learned in other courses and gives a basic presentation of it in another packaging» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Economics of Innovation need to be better connected to the programme and need for change of teacher...» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Modelling kursen i LP1 Y4 bör göras om. Miljökursen i LP2 Y4 bör absolut inte ligga som obligatorisk kurs utan bör bytas ut.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Yes, Environmental Management could perhaps be heavily revised if it is revised/removed yet.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Energy Systems Modelling and Planning is a course that I think needs to be better structured. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- systemic design» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Electronic System Design Project » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Some courses are just filled with good to know information and does not qualify as courses at all, they are more suited as seminar courses and does not qualify for an written exam, possible oral, but the nature of these courses are hard to define, yet necessary, so they don"t fall within what"s normal for any Chalmers course.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Material Mechanics.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Software Architecture should not qualify as a master program, neither should the teacher (Sven Arne, he can not speak english)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- EHealth - läraren är bra, men kursen är för smal och föreläsningarna för detaljerad för att kursen skall passa som obligatorisk.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I think that there should be some considerations about the obligatory courses within the program. A course like Data aq. can be too much repetition for those who read the biotechnology bachelor at Chalmers.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- "Heat and moisture engineering" and "Material Performance"» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Human Centered Design - the course is hard, we don"t know what we are expected to do. The requirements are not clear enough.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The course "Data acquisition and handling in systems biology" was really bad. Most of the material has already been studied in other courses (molekylärbiologisk metodik, molekylär bioteknik)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Digital Control should not be one of the semi-compulsory, but it should remain in the master programme. The first year sustainability course (q1) should not be compulsory for chalmers students with chemical engineering background.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Jag läste Digital control och det visade sig att vi som hade kandidatexamen från kemiteknik på chalmers saknade nödvändiga förkunskaper som övriga hade läst 5-poängskurser i. Det kändes lite knepigt att denna kurs är obligatorisk på vårt program när vi saknar förkunskaper och att detta inte nämnts på något sätt för oss innan vi började kursen.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Perhaps what courses that are required for all students should be revised - some could instead be placed in the different specializations and instead making room for more introductory courses in the different areas, giving studens a more gentle introduction to the possible specializations and enabling them to make more informed choices for the continuation of their studies.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I would say the main concerns are in the sequence of the courses rather than directly the content. Design methods should be taught first, instead of Graphical interfaces. The latter course should be support during the interaction design project, not an opening course. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- afp: shuld be as hard as you make it, not just palin hard» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Creating New Business. The book was terrible, and so were the lectures.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Environmental management (topic is highly relevant, but choices concerning current structure and teaching staff are strongly questionable)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The course Bioreactors and the course Bioploymers and Biocomposition» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I miss having more Swedish construction law. As it were, I felt like we only had a little because of the internationalisation of the programme. It feels important to learn properly if one is to work in Sweden.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Global chemical sustainability. Väldigt låg nivå. Kändes mest som gammal skåpmat och svår att genomföra på avancerad nivå i en klass där alla har så olika bakgrund inom miljö. Det går få intressanta kurser i den läsperioden. Miljö är oftast inbakat på ett bra sätt i andra kurser.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Revised: Risk Management and Safety, a good course but not enough related to supply chain management» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The course Earth science should be elective and there should not be separate examination for Three parts of Numerical methods, instead of it there should be project. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Real Time Control Systems Robot and Robotics» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Microwave projects should be revised. Peter Linner is not capable to manage the course. Project two is useless. The idea of project 3 is good but it need tighter specifications and a clear time budget.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Realtime controll system, SCM» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Industrial Engineering (almost revised) Modern Manufacturing Process (revised to some extent)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Information System in SCM» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Des f SD in a northen context should be more sharp with its passing critterias. It teaches a lot of good stuff but it is still very unclear what I have learnt. The soutern context course was great untill we got home, then all tutors that we needed for understanding what we did in Tanzania were gone. I didn"t see them for 2 months. I could have done a really good project but I needed some one to ask, so it turned out not so good.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Human Centred Design Design Methods (changed to focus more on the book"s content and less on actually carrying out methods before there"s a clear understanding of why they"re used or why they"re useful)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Science of environmental change was a very bad course..» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Introduction course could be revised. The "Microwave Projects part I" course need to change lecturer to someone who knows more about project management etc. For example take in guest lecturer from Industrial Economy, GU or someone from the industry.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Global Chemical Sustainability - Removed (everyone except the iranians know this from their first year anyway), Waste Management - revised» (Yes (1 to 2))
- active microwave circ. should be more assignment-oriented, the introduction-course could include more stuff, pretty much a rip off of the high freq. tech. course (in bachelor programme)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- radio and microwave engineering» (Yes (1 to 2))
- We have to elect 6 of 8 courses. The course Digital Control shouldn’,t be one of them, since its way over our pre knowledge. We could have one more energy course as one of the 8.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Not a addition but some courses need changes. Like internet technology. It tries to cover lots of topics. But it is impossible, also makes the course very difficult to pass. it might be divided into two course like socket programming with java and another course like advanced topics in networks. Another course that i would like to change is wireless networks, i am taking that course it is semi-mandatory course in my program but it goes in wireless communication aspect, it should include more software network stuff.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Introduction to Communication Engineering: I think the course book should be changed. The course content looks vague and there seems to be very little correlation between what is taught in class, what is discussed in exercises and finally what is asked in the exams. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Yes, make some more CFD courses available... Like turbulence course !» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The course "Project in Applied Mechanics" has to be revised substantially. The method the course is given can not be lead into the goals at the end of the period. The course is more to simulate the working environment and group work experience for students and let them know how to deal with a new project for which at the beginning enough information is not available. Obviously such a project can not be finalized in 7-8 weeks even by new engineers specifically if they want to stick to their honesty and not report some fake or wrong results. As a student you would always be confused by the essence of the course to be only a course or a project work according to the way the teacher provide the students with information. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Some of the courses are not hard enough for being master courses, freight transport for example. More like a bachelor course.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- more content in HRSV» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Risk Management and Safety» (Yes (1 to 2))
- systemic design» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Material selection and design could be an interesting course but i think the execution of the course is not good at all.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Physical computing» (Yes (1 to 2))
- TEK155 had very uninteresting lectures adding no value to the course » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Materials for lightweight design is far too easy for a master level but maybe too difficult for a bachelor"s degree» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Heat and moisture. The structure of the course have to better» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Complex Systems Seminar should be removed in favour of some other course» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Environmental Management should be removed» (Yes (1 to 2))
- experimental design,and global chemical sustainability» (Yes (1 to 2))
- 1. Building Acoustics and Community Noise. 2. Human Response to Sound and Vibration» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Financial Management and International Projects. The reading lists were minimal and basic, the lectures provided by Phil were ill-prepared, repeated previously studied material and generally useless, and the assessment provided no basis for learning. The courses both stated in the assessments that their aim was to develop students" research skills, as far as I know this was not the aim of the courses. These courses were a complete waste of my time. I would like to mention that the guest lecturers in FM were good. After checking the course material for IP I realised it would probably be as bad as FM so I did not go to many lectures. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- More structure needed in the RDM course. Tasks were to vague.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- "Bioreactors - design and control" - too many projects in combination with the exam. "Tissue Engineering I and II" - the demands on the students that are accepted to the course should be higher, so that everyone have the suitable background.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- system biology» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Antenna engineering (must contain hardware project(s) or simulation work with special emphasis on designing)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Digitial Control because it seems to be unrelated to chemical engineer. (ie. should be placed in the Systems, Control and Mechatronics program).» (Yes (1 to 2))
- courses that are given by Sven-Arne should be revised or have another lecturer and course director. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- I would suggest to remove the course "Radio and microwave engineering" as an obligatory course for two reasons: 1. It seems irrelevant for people who do not have a strong interest in receivers. 2. People with a physics background often have difficulties follwing the course.You need a strong electronics background. To keep the technological profile of the program I suggest to replace it by "Radioastronomical techniques and interferometry" which is useful for all three tracks. This course provides a more overall understanding of radio receivers while the Radio & micro-course gives a more detailed view. Then you are also able to skip the radio receiver part in "Space science and techniques".» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Design process... But the problem is more the teacher» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Material performance and Heat & Moisture» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The course Sustainable power production and transportation is to easy to be classified as an advance course. The assignments and laborations are okej but the exam are way to easy. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Sustainable Power Production and Transportation» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Building in Society. In other courses, consider how many students that are admitted, keep a good quality! Sometimes there are more students than what is planned for, which lowers the quality.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- road vehicle aerodynamics, passive safety» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Energy systems modelling and planning Sustainable development» (Yes (1 to 2))
- automation eftersom vi läst samma kurs på grundnivå, gör den djupare och smalare.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Seems strange that many of the courses give about the same info/knowledge as the introweek it had during the first course. IE. its just facts, no real learning or analyzing. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Global chemical sustainability - alldeles för låg nivå och fruktansvärd besvikelse på innehållet i kursen» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Product Planning and Market Analysis, separate this course from the product dvelopment project» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Waste management: the course lacked the structure. Gave just a very rough overview on topics that were already obvious. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Energy Systems Modelling and Planning» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Move the Production project work to year 2 so that it is possible to take Robotics and Logistics. All three of them are very good courses and would have been nice to read.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The administration of the theory and methodology course has been really poor. We took the course in the first study period but everybody in the class have not received their grades yet. All of our assignments have not been returned either. This is not acceptable. The content of the Material Selection course is not enough to fill 7,5 hp. The course seemed like a joke and the lecturer seemed lazy. It was good in a way to get more time to work on the other course that was more demanding and more fun, but much of the Material selection course seemed lika a waste of time.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I would drop the "Individual Preparation Course" (and maybee replace it with an elective course from another program....)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Vibration control» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Project in 4th quarter is bullshit nothing to learn and just wasting the time. even the coordinator or other guys don"t know what they want.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Energy systems modelling and planing should not be compulsary. The course focus too much of things that is already taken care of in previous compulsary courses. If they change the entire course so that it is a continuing course which learns NEW things and focus on things in modelling (like what do one have to think about specificly when modelling someting, how does the reality in the 3rd world look like in comparishon to the modell and the economical limits in the program.) then it can be a good course. IF the course should stay compulsary, then the pre-requirements should be much higher, so that we can go through new things not focusing on old suff from previous courses. (inviting a prof. in district heating systems to talk about the basics in district heating is both a waste of time for him as for people in MPSES. More advanced teaching!)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- There should be more tutorial discussions. Also there are some teachers who do not have the teaching ability.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- DAT090(the intro course) was a horrid experience. Should have been much better in introducing the subject and get the student better understand how to design and write proper VHDL and testbenches.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- [MVE135 Random processes with applications] This course is highly required. However it"s hard to study and understand at the 1st semester. The reason and suggestion are that the lecturer has quite exclusive atmosphere, and lean to ones favorite student. It would be nice if there is more open question sysmte. Also, we need guideline how to study at Chalmers generally from Chalmers. [SSY145 Wireless networks] This course is required, but can be improved much more. The course is not prepared well yet and not competitive comparing with similar course in other University world wide. It would be nice if the lecture contents, purpose, goal and focus are prepare well in advance. Also lecturer Ph.D. student is not motivated well due to busy days. The program worth thinking improvement for this course.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The microwave project courses need to change the staff to preferably two specialists in group management/ Wireless engineering and greatly increase the degree of seriosity. The projects should be well structured and thought through in advance.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The course Diagnostic imaging is not proper as a mandatory corse without revise it. It is way to focused at complicated algorithms and therefore feels like it belongs more to the signal processing track within the master programme. The level was too complicated and the content felt so spread out. I think this course has to be a bit refocused to fit as a mandatory course. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Research design and methods course» (Yes (1 to 2))
- To much product developement» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The theory part of FEM course seems to be too much. Having a deeper knowledge about the use of the software or learning an additional software would have been better.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Industrial Engineering needs to be revised, and production logistics is to basic if you already have studied a logistics course» (Yes (1 to 2))
- We are taken many courses which contain a lot of things we havee already read. I would prefer if the program focuses on new knowledge instead of repeating old. Like for example the course: Data aquisition in systems biology and bioreactors- design and control. In fact, the mandatory courses in my program have not been so good and appreciated by many people. It would be better to make them electible.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I think research design and method course should not be mandatory.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Sustainable Development and HVAC should be a suggested and not compulsory course.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- 1-advance topics in Networks and Distributed Systems 2-Introduction to wirless communication» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Computer System development in teams» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Some of the new courses added due to it being a two years program were not as throughly developed.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- DECO, terrible. Introduction to discrete event systems, too easy and not enough content.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The robotics course was odd. DECO course needs better examination. Either hand-ins with grades or an exam. Not tough handins that doesn"t matter for the grades. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- There are always ways to improve the courses!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- project design » (Yes (1 to 2))
- 1-Method for electronic system design 2- Introduction for electronic system design and verfication» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Fondations of probability theory» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Kursen tilldsammans med arkitekterna i lp 3 första året på masterprogrammet» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Första kursen GCS har ett litet tråkigt upplägg. Det beror egentligen inte på kursen själv utan på att de grupparbeten som utförs. Man blandas runt och tyvärr fick jag erfara att många utbytesstudenter inte kunde jbba med sådana projekt. De copypastade massor från internet och vi andra fick skriva om samt att det tärde på psyket att försöka lära upp utbytesstudenterna. De borde läras centralt med någon form av introduktionskurs hur man studerar i Sverige. Jag vill inte att andra ska behöva känna den psykiska påfrestningen som jag fick känna under projektets gång. Alternativet är att utbytesstudenterna som copypastar inte får studera mera (samma regler som svenska studenter) men det hade vart väldigt tråkigt. Jag tycker som sagt att någon form av semiobligatoriskt introduktion för mastersutbytesstudenter behövs!! Såklart får det vara på individuell basis eftersom olika utbytesstudenter har olika erfarenhet av projektarbete.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- architectural transformation and conservation» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Six sigma black belt course. Seminar days were to long and to little emphasis on mini tab. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- For example the six sigma course» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Freight Transport System It maybe better to focus on how they work in reality, not the theory. For the sandvik case, it"s very time demanding and we do not have enough information to solve the case.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- data conversion techniques....i feel not much important to mincro-electronic » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Material Mechanics is an important course but needs revising. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Research Design and Methods. Changed to one period instead of two, or if possible removed entirely.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The building acoustics course can be changed in a way that it is more applicable.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- User-centered design was probably the worst course I"ve ever taken. Mostly due to the teacher"s lack of ability to organize and inform.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- the course Introduction to Communication Engineering takes many hours and is very demanding for and introductory course» (Yes (1 to 2))
- MEI seminar course should inclusion of group presentation of the seminar paper written by studnets and perhap be subject to critical review in class. The structure of Research methtods and design should be reconsidered to ensure fair distribution of the course work duirng the two quarters» (Yes (1 to 2))
- digital control system. and put more courses regarding energy system.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Heat and moisture and material performance could be combined into one course. A lot of the topics have already been handles during the basic programme.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Remove FEM - basics and Structural systems as mandatory courses, since they do not contribute in the area of Building Performance Design, they are only for structural engineering students.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The course in Heat and Moisture Enginnering must be removed as it is performed today, if not for the waste of money and credits at least for the reputation of the department. However the subject is relevant for both branches of the master programme. Although I am sceptical regarding the institutions ability to even revise and change the course. As it is given today it does not contribute much to further understanding in the subject, especially not for those who are more leaning towards the structural engineering branch. The contents of the course might be relevant, the change need to be made in the teaching performance but also the course literature. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- The couse Heat and moisture was the worst course I"ve read at chalmers. Both content and administration was real bad. A large part of the master courses is just repetition for the swedish students, especially Material performance, Heat and moisture and Building physics-advanced. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Distribution Networks and Information Systems for SCM should be heavily revised. The topics are important as such, but I don"t think that the responsible examiners did a good job giving the courses. As the courses were given, I consider them a waste of time and I was really disappointed with them.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Passive Safety från 2007 om den är som då.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Advanced Topics in Networks and Distributed had good potential but carried out poorly. The quality of the topics and their difficulty varied a lot, and the exam was a really bad summary of it all with most focus on the examiners own topic (which did not fit very well at all). The Wireless Networks course is not adapted very good to students from our programme. Teachers expect previous knowledge in communications which is not stated in the course plan.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- you must have to remove digital control or it must be taught by a teacher who has chemical engineering background. its a compulsory subject so you must have to pay attention ti improve this » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Diagnostic Imaging, intersting course but the work load is not balanced. No. of lectures is too high, assistance with the labs is not so adequate, fresh lecturers are hard to understand...» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Research design and methods, could be replaced by two seminars in stead. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Heat and moisture» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Programming language technology, it"s only software engineering» (Yes (1 to 2))
- revise the first introduction course» (Yes (1 to 2))
- "Product Planning and Market Analysis" (PPU085). The course should be renamed to only "Market Analysis"» (Yes (1 to 2))
- EDA397 Agile development processes I think it is a good subject and valuable knowledge. But the course felt like a joke. When a lecturer states that everything written about a subject is wrong and that he knows best you start to wonder, and when this doesn"t just happens once but several times during the course you start to question the real value of what is thought.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Lars Bengtssons courses» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Modern manufacturing processes Not interesting for the systems and management track.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Material selection for design was the only course available as a technical course, and it didn"t give me anything. This course is according to me NOT at advanced level.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- digital control» (Yes (1 to 2))
- 1) Wireless Networks 2) Antenna Engineering» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Its too basic for most of students, coming for this program.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- DAT110 is useless. Introduction course should be revised.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Data Compression, Wireless Networks, Not the course, but the teachers.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- maybe ubiquitous computing , because it seems like extension of physical computing,no big difference, just carry out a project» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Environmental management should be removed due to incompetent staff.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Financial Management should be revised, the content is very superficial. More information related to assess the economical feasibility of projects, and calculations related to present value of of future investments could be included (economical evaluation of projects)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Leadership course , it has nothing to do with construction. Others are really good courses.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Superconductivity and Low Temperature Physics should be optional Statistical Physics II should be optional» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Building in society» (Yes (1 to 2))
- the course "science and environmental change" is not necessarily compulsory for students with related background» (Yes (1 to 2))
- economic of innovations research design and methods» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Research methods and design was just not very good. Lectures were less than you would wish for. The book was way to thick for that kind of subject. The important thing is that we understand the principles, not 600 pages of details. But the topic is interesting.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Organizational management and Financial management/improved with better reading material and more structured classes» (Yes (1 to 2))
- In general, there should be MUCH more case based learning. Today you typically spend 5 weeks on one case per course, mostly writing, and the grade is mostly based on the paper. However, in corporate life, presentations are much more important, therefore, it is better to have e.g. 1 case per week during five weeks of each course, with heavy focus on the presentation. That means less writing, more information gathering, more analytical thinking, and more practice giving and designing presentations. Presenting more often exposes you to questions about the case, questions which one must learn to be prepared for before the presentation. Only doing one case per course means a lot of time is spent on writing whereas the most important skill (in the corporate world) is learning how to communicate the message and tackle tricky questions. When most students go on to a career in companies and not the academic world, it is questionable why such focus is placed on writing.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Geothecnics» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Improvement processes» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Agile Software Development Software Development in Teams» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The couse of Computer Security seems not very relative to my master programme.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Optimizaton course should be compatible with the time of the quarter. it is very lengthy.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- material mechanics, and one should ahve fem applications before material mechanics. project course could be much better arranged. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- The project in applied mechanics is very bad planned.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- smaller changes within different courses, but mainly issues concerning things that students have complained about during the years but is not taken into account by the teachers» (Yes (1 to 2))
- datda aquisition» (Yes (1 to 2))
- eHealth:removed Diagnostic Imaging:Revised» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Research design and methods (it has some good points, but overall the course is a joke - more focus on presentation techniques, less focus on further phd research and change to a lecturer that know what rhetoric is...)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Human Centred Design» (Yes (1 to 2))
- 4th year - spring semester - sustainable building in a northern context. this course is really unupdated and should be heavily revised!!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The courses Complex Systems Semninar and Simulation of Complex Systems are not very good. Also, the system of hand-ins in most other courses need reworking.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Method for Electronic system design and Introduction to electronic system design are better to revised.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Human Response to Sound and Vibrations » (Yes (1 to 2))
- HCD，,maybe the course is neccesary, but maybe try to give it in other way. I think I havent learn much from that course.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- "eHealth" and "Human-computer Interaction" should be either totally removed and replaced by more suitable courses or be heavily revised.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- information systems » (Yes (1 to 2))
- EDA382 Developing computer-based systems in teams, is really a boring course, I thought I would learn how to develop software with other students, but, we only wrote a lot of documents following some templates, that is boring and useless» (Yes (1 to 2))
- System Architecture» (Yes (1 to 2))
- we can not learn from the lectures of Multimedia and video communications and wireless networks» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Better recommendations for elective courses» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Diagnostic Imaging eHealth» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Data aq. but i know that course is changed for next year. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Environmental managment should be more connected to reality.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Some courses about RF» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Give KFK150-Applied optical spectroscopy first and then KOK032-Applied organic molecular spectroscopy, since the former one is more basic in the theory.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Data Conversion Techniques» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The content of the first compulsory semester should be reviewed» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Software architecture course should have more up-to-date lectures and better presentations. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- No removed, but some of them are a little extrange. Anyway the problems are the kind of problems that can be solve with course evaluation» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Building in society, International projects.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- User Centered Design» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Financial management» (Yes (1 to 2))
- digital control» (Yes (1 to 2))
- global sustainable chemical engineering» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Diagnostic imaging! The course was too large. Better to focus on smaller parts of it. Very difficult course.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Programming Paradign has a very very exellent teacher but the work load and course content are very intensive.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I had trouble with finding the red thread in "Simulation of Complex systems". It was good to be able to apply what you just studied in Nerual Networks and Evolutionary Computation but as a single course it was a bit confusing.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- the course material selection and design is recommended but was the worst course I have taken at Chalmers. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Unix internals,the teacher is not able to deliver any knowledge it can be done as self study and save his time and efforts.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Yes i think that Developing computer-based systems in teams should be revised, it was to easy to pass on the project. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- industrial design engineering theory and methodology-a little boring and hard to understand deeply compare to other courses.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Data aguisition and handling in system biology» (Yes (1 to 2))
- introduction of automotive engineering as the first course at the beginning of this master programme, it makes a little bit heavier on workload since it includes so many knowledges in so many automotive areas such as aerodynamics, passive safety, active safety, etc.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- some teachers are not good as well as the content» (Yes (1 to 2))
- advanced design materials » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Passive safety, Hybrid Vehicles and Controls» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Applied Mechatronics and Real time control.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Hardware Description and Verification (DAT956) : this course is very important for us as the hardware designers, but the lecturer this year (Mr. Thomas Hallgren) is not as good as I expected! Almost students in class thought so, too. Need to change next year!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The human aspect of traffic safety couse(TME105) needs to be improved. As for now there is not enought information in it. Maybe adding some phyhological lectures can help.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Data aquisition and handling in systems biology» (Yes (1 to 2))
- - Logic in CS: It does not help me in my daily work. Every course should to some extent. Neither have I used the contents of this course in a later course. - Models of computation: I didn"t even see a hint of a single application thoughout the whole course, neither did I see an effort to specify any results of what we were doing. Added to that, the teacher was very rude.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- System Development in Teams. Software Architecture.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Material mechanics» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Material mechanics should be heavily revised, project in applied mechanics must be better planed» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Big parts of courses have I already studied at batchelor grade. Even the same powerpoint slides is used...» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Wave Induced Loads (Completely redone, very poor quality of education) Marine Systems (good material, poorly examined)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I think the course about sustainable studies and development could be better if it ends to an architectural outcome like design in a sustainable way, even a very small flat! it is better to be more of action than words.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- wireless networks Real time systems» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I think digital control and global chemical sustainability should be volontary courses and not belong to the mandatory ones. global chemical sustainability has a content that is very similar to KMV, KMS and PPH(Process- och produktval ur ett hållbarhetsperspektiv). It could maybe be mandatory for exchange students that have not had this education before.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The introduction course needs to be reworked. (if it hasn"t already)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Information systems for SCM» (Yes (1 to 2))
- MKM135 Semiconductor Circulate and Devise It was the worse course I have ever have in CHALMERS, despite the fact that MKM135 should be one of the very important subjects in our program. In that course just student gave lectures!! so apparently students can not teach themselves well. the examiner just solve the homeworkers, and he expects very heavy and advance problems and materials in homeworkes and final exam!! lots of important phenomena that we need learn in that course. I did not know where find the solutions, lectures, web, Books.... Personally I have very bad memory about that course. I had spend more time than any other course, but in the end I haven"t goten my desire Result. That was the only time in CHALMERS, I felt my right as student is not respected and I did not have any voice, to change the situation. MCC020 Nanobioscience for information processing First of all, this course should not be compulsory for our program. Personally, I think the subject of this course is interesting and can be useful for our program. But, it should be more organized. There were not good connection between lectures and subjects, It would be good to follow the subjects from a good reference book. That would be better to have one lecturer (Zoran) rather than different people from different fields. The engineering and technological aspects should be more emphasized. There should be good literature book for this course. In general, I think successful courses, follow a good reference book, I dont know why in CHALMERS professors do not encourage student to study reference book. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Advanced vehicle dynamics-the worst course I"ve ever taken, not clear what you are supposed to learn, only derivation of equations all through. Why not implementation, suspension evaluation in Adams? etc. Pretty much all of the courses are way to easy, you do not have to attend any of the lectures or exercises and still get a grade 4 or 5, way to easy.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The smaller courses (7,5 cr) could be much more appreciated if they were concentrated to full time a few weeks instead of being spread out parallell to the main studio. It creates unnecessary problems when one has to concentrate on several tasks at the same time. Maybe the smaller courses could be implemented in the large studio so that the same ideas and groundwork from the main project could be applied in those other parts.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- finite element, applied machatronics. good courses but not really suitable for PD.and I think we as pd students weren"t informed about the content of the course very well.just saying that it follows technical route doesn"t really mean anything where you can chose between only two options.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- heat and moisture- an interesting subject, but very bad arrangement of the course geotechnics- too much repetition, could be replaced by a bridge or offshore structures course.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Fundamentals of Micro and Nanotechnology » (Yes (1 to 2))
- The current syllabus for the course in Dynamics of structures is more suitable for Mechanical engineers. It can be revised to include the subjects of more interest for Structural engineers (e.g. some material related to dynamic loading and analysis in Euroodes)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Research design and methods» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Some could be a little harder.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Real-time control must be revised. It had absolutely nothing to say! » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Make sure that SCM-course is the only one that makes som summary of the first three years at Economics and management of Technology. Today, many more courses repeat information. The IS-course was a catastrophy as we all know. The MSCP-course was neither any good structure, since all detailed information was difficult to understand the purpose with. Today this masterprogramme seems to have focus to bring something to students who doesn"t have a bachelor from Economics and management of technology at Chalmers. Too bad!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Data acquisition» (Yes (1 to 2))
- HVAC had lots of statup-problems.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- global chemical engineering- It"s hard to take it serious. It"s good to have a enviromental course where you accually learn something but this course only contains a lot of things which a five year old could anderstand.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The "Complex Adaptive Systems Seminar Course" should be highlighted.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Foundations of Probability Theory» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Human Centered Design was a course that gave little, much due to being very unstructured» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The GIS course is not working with 60 students on 20 computers. It is not possible to learn.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- maybe we can do only the sustainable energy future course and skip the sustainable development (some information are redundant) » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Financial Mananagement should be revised and improve» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Microwave project course was 2 months over time due too bad organizational skills within the master program itself.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Research by design» (Yes (1 to 2))
- PPU110 Product Lifecycle Management (PLM): bad information, planning, etc. PPU080 Advanced computer aided design: not advanced enough. Included only the basic cad modeling techniques. Booring lectures because of the teacher.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Advanced classical mechanics could have been better, for instance more and better exercise sessions. QFT was pretty hard and since it is such an important course, it could have got more attention and room in the programme I feel.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Revise the Risk Management course» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Digital control, instead of selecting I was taking this out of my courses and felt more limited. There were many interesting courses to chose from in one period and it made it difficult to chose, while in other periods there wasn"t much choice.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Depends on which direction you choose. I don´,t think that all courses in the first quarter should be compulsary. Some student alredy know in which direction they wan to go abd therefore some courses are of no interest.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Risk Management & Safety» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Remove MCC020 from compulsory courses» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The corrosion course need to be more advanced,it"s an interesting subject.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The course that gave only 5 to ALL students» (Yes (1 to 2))
- eHealth ! what kind of jocke is it ?? Bioelectromagnetic : irrelevant and so boring !» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Building in society. The quality was lower than bachelor level. MACF should be more than just a history lecture in project management.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Applied mechatronics wasn"t the best (atleast not the first year).» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Applied Signal processing was to some extent a disaster. The course contents are good but the organization was bad. Random Processes with appliations. Good content but too much (and erroneous) slides.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- service contract management course should be revised» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The mandatory IT course in period 3 felt a bit unstructured. The topic should still be there, but the course could have been better structured.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- VIN032 Indoor climate and HVAC course should be revised.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- introduction to electronic system design in the first quartor.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Source Coding, Antenna Engineering» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Idea evaluation and feasability studies 7, 5 hp » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Heat and moisture and finite element application .. the Geotechniqe should have totally another teaching staff» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The AI course. Split into specialized courses into subfield of AI (There is one for Machine Learning already)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- 1. Nanoscience» (Yes (1 to 2))
- DAT110 Methods for electronic system design and verification It is hard to understand what you are doing in the labs and there is no explination just some steps to follow.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Semiconductor materials physics should be revised, the way the lecturer takes the course is not motivating at all, it is such an interesting and fundamental area for nanoscience that its a pitty it turned out to be a boring and disapointing course.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Information systems for SCM - remove this course. It is not feasible that we should take almost the same course as during the bachelor. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Algorithms is difficult and should be made an optional course rather than a compulsory one.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Vibration control and the project course» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Heat and Moisture» (Yes (1 to 2))
- the passive safety course, i did not chose automotive engineering to learn about the muscles of the human body» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The two first courses were both very massive and did not really take each others working load into account.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Sustainable power production and transportation. It"s way too easy for this master programme.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Nanobiosciences for information processing» (Yes (1 to 2))
- CAD needs to be heavily revised. Put in small exercises or get to know exercises from other softwares» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Production project work and the Automation course» (Yes (1 to 2))
- From the biomaterials track point of view, we should have less courses of the BMEMP and more of the biotechnology MP» (Yes (1 to 2))
- PLM course should be revised heavily.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Logic in computer science» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Antenna Engineering course, i think it needs revision. there should be some projects in this course. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Mathematical Modelling Large Scale Genomics.. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- I think Molecular Electronics needs better structure and course material.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Managing Development Projects should be removed. It has a completely social sciences perspective and it is not relevant to the engineering background that students have. Research Design and Methods should also be removed. It has no relevance whatsoever unless you are seriously considering doing a PhD, which a very small minority does have.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- environmental management should be removed, it doesn"t provide any input about environmental considerations taken in the construction sector i.e energy efficiency, material choice, what materials to recycle and how,or indoor climate. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Some of the courses from the Industrial Economy institution, I think there are to many of those...» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Too many safety courses!!! Automotive Engineering is not purely related to vehicle safety!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Advanced design materials is not a good course. I have almost not learned anything at all! Change the CAD course!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Material selection and design, you dont learn alot during this course mainly to do with bad teaching.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Courses overlap which is good but they tend to repeat the same things. And in the late spring it feels like there is no more new content in the courses. Can also be seen from the schedule which has less lessons (= less learning). And the schedule for next autumn looks like this trend of repeating the same old again is continueing.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- information systems for SCM- a catastropfy! take it away!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The marketing course should be more detailed in the project. It is hard to grasp the different concepts fully. Total quality management should look over the cource-PM (allot of missinformation)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Source Coding» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Distributed systems with Sven Arne AND THE WORST ONE: Multimedia and video communication. A total disgrace for chalmers. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Introduction to microwave and photonics engineering» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Functional material as a choise because it was hard to understand when you have not read advanced level on physics.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The goals of real time control systems should be more specific Nonlinear and adaptive control is too much for 8 weeks and should be separated into 2 courses. The course quality was not so good and some topics were oversimplified to be able to finish the materials in 8 weeks.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- MTS, Nanotechnology for chemists» (Yes (1 to 2))
- IT for SCM Material and supply chain management Distrbution networks They are either irrelevant or already dealing with stuff we have read at I.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- modern manufacturing processes ...» (Yes (3 to 4))
- content in Project management, MOCI, law chapter in Contract relationship, Building in society» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Internet Technology, Distributed Systems I & II: Lectures & slides are just a copy and paste from the book (fortunately for DS2 labs are very good).» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Remove the System Development in Teams course, a copy and paste course. Felt like the teacher wanted something easy. Rework the Programming Paradigms, John Huges are WAY to detailed on his functional programming for anyone new to the subject getting more out of it than a strong hate for the programming style Software Architecture fire that so-called teacher like NOW? Jesus he can"t even stick to the subject for 5 minutes before he turns the lecture in to a self-biography» (Yes (3 to 4))
- DECA, IDEC, applied mechatronics,» (Yes (3 to 4))
- The DECO course did not give much. It could be removed. Applied meachtronics should be revised, the focus was totally on screw nuts and DC motors, the focus should be on the system as a whole. Real time control systems should be revised, the purpose of the cuorse was good but the content was very sctterd. The SCM course was to vague, the goal was not clear and the problem to solve was to hard.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Microwave projects I and II Introduction to Photonics Engineering» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Image Analysis is too close to diagnostic imaging, eHealth: I really like the amount of guestlectures at Chalmers but ONLY is too much. Bioelectromagnetics: In principle a very interesting topic but that does not reach us as students. Nice practical examples but could be more. Microwave Tomography: Slides too bad, only formulas no one got a thing there» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Programming paradigms. The part with functional programming was far too advanced as most had never used a functional programming language. Software Development in Teams should be removed. I only learned how to copy and paste from existing documents. Software Architecture should use existing software to demonstrate principles instead of having the students develop from scratch.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Management of Architectural and Construction Firms Buildings in Society » (Yes (3 to 4))
- The astrophysics and earth science should be split into two courses - they are not related at all. I think that it would be better to let students choose between a 7.5hp course in astrophysics or a 7,5hp course in earth science. The spectroscopy and electromagnetic waves course should also be split apart - maybe the spectroscopy could be put together with the astrophysics. The waves part must be revised - when I took the course we had ~8 lecturers in ~10 lectures, the course didn"t have any clear path at all. The geodesy part of the radio astronomy course might also be separated from this course - most students taking the course are only interested in the astrophysical sense of radio astronomy, not the geodetical. The relativistic astrophysics demand previous knowledge that we have had no chance of gaining before the course. According to the teacher, the Gravitation and Cosmology should be held before.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Advanced CAD (shift from Geometric modeling to parametrization, programming and simulation) Product planning and market analysis (revised) Product Lifecycle management (lab revised)» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Det är väldigt många kurser inom masterpogrammet bioteknik med inriktning mot biomedicin som tar upp exakt samma saker som under kandidatexamen. Detta blir extra tydlilgt då GU elever utan kunskap om cellen etc läser denna kurs. Hade gärna sett mer fördjupning och mindre grundläggande i kurserna.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- -Data acqusistion and systems biology. -Reduce the amount of mandataory courses.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Same as above» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Ta bort miljökurserna. Vill man läsa sådant väljer man ju ett environmental-masterprogram.!» (Yes (3 to 4))
- All the mandatory courses, namely: -data aquisition: Most of the material is already familiar for former Chalmers students. Make it more useful for us! Mathematical modelling could be interesting. -biopolymers: The course is okay but it doesn"t seem relevant for us in the medicin track. It should not be mandatory. -Bioreactors: Swedish students must fulfill the following requirements: Have taken a basic course in Applied microbiology, Bioreaction engineering, Bioprocess technology, Chemical reaction engineering, or similar, and a basic biochemistry course. However, many of the non-Swedish students have never studied neither bioreactor engineering nor mathematics and I can"t understand why the same rules are not used for them. In the group exercises, these students are not to any help, instead my group mate has to have everything explained for him (even derivatives, matrices). This decreases our possibility to develop our knowledge and it is also very irritating that some students can become better grades (because of group exercise points) without contributions to the group work. Let the prerequisites be the same for all students, then the course will be good!» (Yes (3 to 4))
- ESA» (Yes (3 to 4))
- The information system course should be heavily re-defined to include more applicable information The course in transportation networks also needs redefinition to put more emphasis on the supply chain as a whole and theories regarding that rather than spending time learning about the size of containers and different railway systems» (Yes (3 to 4))
- I think there are to many environmental-courses, Add more Geo and more water and keep the environment courses in the environment master programme» (Yes (3 to 4))
- The IDE methods course. The first of the advanced design courses I took was a disaster both in planning and achievement. Many courses don"t feel like they add very much to what was learned the first three years, but maybe this is due to the basic courses being to in depth.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Distributed systems 1, is a terrible course didn"t learn anything useful. It should be more focus on one area and more up to date with reality. Distributed Systems 2, didn"t learn anything useful in this course either. First it doesn"t really continue where the last course started(which is what you expect from a follow up course). Second it didn"t have any material, I don"t understand who this course even can exist as it is right know, isn"t there any quality control at chalmers? Internet technology, this course isn"t bad, however much of the information in the course is redundant when you are coming from chalmers since all students already red the computer communication course. Make this course more advanced.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Electrical Drive I,High Voltage Engineering (revision), Sustainable Power production (revision)» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Phil Thomas as teacher should be replaced, he is holding 3 courses» (Yes (3 to 4))
- design processes and construction processes and managing organizations in the construction industry» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Goal mentioned in site is Security and reliability of network-based systems. however, language based security, programmign languages and some other courses are not for network security, they are for software developer and application security side» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Market analysis course, should not be mandatory. Advanced design materials, today it has a poor layout, just a bunch of guest lectures and nothing that binds the course together as a whole. I would have wanted this course to be a lot more technical and not so industrial design oriented. » (Yes (3 to 4))
- Quality and Operations Management, Custoer Focused Product Development, for example.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- numerical method - I think this course is nonsense except the wavelet transform parts!» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Skip the introductory part in every course. The first week of every course is always spent on basics we already know.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- foundations for Photonics engineering is totally weak and useless both teacher and course material and has no effect on our future study or career, Microwave project 1 theoretical part is really weak, Antenna engineering needs to be improved to rich our program standards but it is ok.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- The material we study in microwave project1 course is not new. We knew them from the previous courses, the class is boring, but the projects we did are good. I think the antenna course should revised for our program and offered in our department. The class in electrocal department is so crowded. Compare to the foundation for microwave which gave us a deep insight in to microwave,the foundation for photonics course was not useful enough and was not practical. This course does not have a specific goal I think.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Material performace, Heat and moisture and Building Physics should be heavily revised, all of them.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- agile - revised software development in teams - revised software architecture - revised» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Agile Development in Teams, System Development in teams (more indivisualzed attention should be put) and Software Architechture.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Building in society, and Moci and CCR cannot be together is to much work that quarter, and then construction Processes is boring and very bad planned! » (Yes (3 to 4))
- e-health, bioelectromagnetics, image analysis - boring lectures! bad teachers!!!!!!!» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Mathematical Modeling Large-scale Genomics .. the courses gave too broad perspectives, although it"s good to explore this and that stuffs, but we should stay in focus as well» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Science of environmental change: the lectures were not attractive at all, though the content is very important and can be interesting if presented in a more "interactive" way with the students Applied industrial ecology: the projects/assignments are good but not enough, maybe additional smaller exercises/study cases would be required to cover all the tools and methods taugh in the course which are hard to understand if never applied/used by the student Environmental policy instruments: the literature (Thomas Sterner book) was enough, the lectures did not add anything! (but the group project was very good) Environmental management: most of the lecture with guest lecturers were excellent => TO BE KEPT!, but the discussion seminars were not so interesting, no structure in the debates... smaller group debates (or just discussion with classmates outside those seminars) were more productive!» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Keep it more concrete.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Restructure the program so that there will be 4 courses per term à 7,5 ECTS, thus Introduction could removed the first term, its contents merged into e.g Intercultural communication at 7,5 ECTS, and the other three courses during the first term expanded to 7,5 ECTS each. Risk management could be merged into Quality mananagement with a total of 7,5 ECTS. Research methods could be merged into some of the other courses, maybe part of Human factors during the first term, total 7,5 ECTS. The remaining courses to be expanded to 7,5 ECTS each.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Courses "Hybrid vehicles and Control" and "Modeling and Simulation" should be heavily revised. In general: the courses should be more advanced.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- The design studio, master thesis course and competition course should be heavily revised. Putting students into 3 tracks of design studio is unreasonable in the beginning of the 4th year study while there was no proper briefing session even it was requested many times by students. Levels between and within studios vary in a big extent and it is unreasonable everybody passes the course. The outline of the 3 studios should be heaviliy revised by comparing with the international standards. The financial support to the 3 studios is seriously un-balanced. Master thesis course is messy. The structure is not well organized in advanced. Quality between students work varies in a big extent and a lot of time doesn"t fulfil international standard. The medium of language should be fixed to English if the master programme is supposed to be English. A hugh lack of support for master thesis students from the department in relating and linking up students project with existing relevant companies, NGOs, clients and so on. Competition course is an inflexible course which is a internal play for the students in year. It enclosed and protected the students from broaden their horizon and be competitive internationally. The whole idea is too parental.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- 1-Simulation of complex systems: with current form of presentation this course is nothing more than a game.It can be removed or changed to mathematical techniques for analyzing complex systems I, and then student can write a simulation in addition to written exam for this course. 2-Computational Biology I and II can be recombined together in one cours 3-Dynamical systems in two courses,intermediate and advance 4-compulsory course about stochastic processes given by mathematical department with teacher who can speak english well» (Yes (3 to 4))
- some of the compulsory courses are not interesting and I have seen many students who does not like to take these courses. but they have to do that!» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Developing computer-based systems in teams Software architecture Distributed systems » (Yes (3 to 4))
- Research design methods- honestly giving this course for students the 4th year at Chalmers is the biggest joke EVER. It might be suitable in the first year of a bachelor. Learning of how conducting interviews, doing analyses etc. when we have practiced it for 4 years. Technological change and industrial transformation is on a too high level, it"s very interesting but not at all useful. Managing development project, the course is great but the professor was not able to get me interested. Showing movies with more than once on scheduled time is like being back in ground school again. Do Chalmers actually pay professors for starting a movie and then leaving the class? » (Yes (3 to 4))
- Financial management, International project, Knowledene management» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Research design and Methods, Economic of Innovation, R&D Strategy and Organization (good but too heavy)» (Yes (3 to 4))
- building in society, » (Yes (3 to 4))
- Geotechnics Heat and moisture Material Performance» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Industrial energy systems- Digital control-Global Sustainability» (Yes (3 to 4))
- ACP and QFT should have another examiner/lecturer. Advanced QM should have a more clear focus and "röd tråd". The course in Advanced Advanced Subatomic Physics should have more content, right now it is mostly a reiteration of the first course in subatomic physics.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Data acquisition and handling in systems biology was not good. More of a recapulation of what we had done before. I need to be organized much better, and there has to be different tracks. within the course so that all 3 tracks within the biotechnology program feels that the course is applicable to them. "Bioreactors - design and control" could also have clearer focus and the different parts of the course could be connected in a more obvious way. » (Yes (3 to 4))
- The courses are not useless, but needs to be revised.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- the courses from the institution of building physics and materials in general and the course haet and moisture should be removed» (Yes (3 to 4))
- I am not satisfied with any of the courses i"ve taken on the master level, except the ide project course. I don"t feel like I"ve learned anything, or at least anything that I will make use of. I feel the need for a more academically challenging education, right now it is too easy to just slip through without learning anything. It should be easier to take courses at other master programs, like coordinating schedules with blocks so that not all courses clash at one point. If the week would be divided in say 5 blocks, teachers would book a block of times for lectures, and then at least the courses recommended by programs to take wouldn"t be impossible to take. » (Yes more than 5)
- I do not understand why we have so many elective courses that are dealing with environmntal issuses. If you want to specialise in envionmenatl issues, you choose the master programme Environmental measurements and assessments!» (Yes more than 5)
- 1.Building in society is useless and it"s not clear why it should be compulsory. 2.International projects is a waste of time and has nothing to offer. 3.Leadership and communication is run by a teacher with linguistic background instead of someone who has enough experience in the subject within construction sector or even a project organization. 4. process in planing and building has a very confusing and crowded curriculum for a very simple final project that is an architectural project not a construction project 5. project management does not even fulfill its name and gives nothing regarding the issue beside lack of anything to do with construction projects 6. Managing organizations in the construction industry is run by a researcher who doesn"t have any practical experience of the subject. this course is just a name with a very heavy and busy schedule that teaches nothing in the end.» (Yes more than 5)
- All courses projects that are graded. Although, the course topics and the choice of projects are excellent. This seems to be exploited for one"s own benefits in getting high grades unfairly with copied reports from seniors !!» (Yes more than 5)
- Engineering geology - mindre repetition av ettans kurs och mer nytt. GIS- behöver omarbetas helt. Traffic and urban planning - behöver omarbetas helt (läraren inleder med att "det blir mycket traffic och ingen urban planning", men så blev det inte mycket traffic heller). Environmental risk assessment in engineering -behövs mer inflytande från lärarna från Bygg och miljö, och BETYDLIGT mindre inflytande för Sverker Molander. Behövs fler kurser, vissa perioder finns bara två kurser "att välja på"» (Yes more than 5)
- Again, the quality of pretty much all of the courses are very bad! I actually think its a disgrace to call have these courses on an "Advance Level", what have I acctually learned during this programme?!» (Yes more than 5)
- MCC020 - Should be totally removed. Reason... 1) It is not related to the program 2) The teacher has no idea what he"s talking about 3) Three teacher in this course and none of their lectures has connection to eachother 4) Three teacher talk about three diffrent rute 5) Exam system is confused & complecated » (Yes more than 5)
- Most courses I"ve taken sofar need extensive revising due to old pedalogical content. Above all more induvidual projects and more focus projects, integrated courses. The catalysis course can to some extent be integrated to the CFD course to yield integrational learning patterns and to increase conceptualization of the tasks.» (Yes more than 5)
- distributed systems 1 and 2 » (Yes more than 5)
- I think the students should have enough knowledge about cars when they start this programme so that the introduction course will not be needed. The hybrid course consists of approximatly 5 hours effort to pass the entire course. Advanced vehicle dynamics is all about theory. Rather use Adams and Lotus instead of writing Matlab codes.» (Yes more than 5)
- The placement of the courses are very bad. They should be more spread out!» (Yes more than 5)
- Human Centered Design course, the teacher doesn"t teach at all. » (Yes more than 5)
- Interaction Analysis -- Since I could not get more then Grade-3 after having complete understanding of this course. My attendance to course was 100% and never missed any assignment.» (Yes more than 5)
- internet techology, unix internals need to be rebuilt» (Yes more than 5)
- Not from the first year.» (No)
- There are many courses which need to step up the level though, for example Biological Physics and Fuel Cells.» (No)
- the mandatory courses in my programme was very interesting all of them» (No)
- Of course some courses need inprovement but not "be heavily revised".» (No)
- programs are really intersting and knowlegeale» (No)
- No, the current courses is rather a lower bound of what you should learn.» (No)
- I want to see better options for the second year.» (No)
- but almost all should be much better» (No)
- Core courses are great, comment below regarding elective courses rather than core courses. The Research design and Methods course should be changed to be the first course to study. The information regarding the 50% of elective courses that may not belong to the program is VERY dissatisfying. Jamal, who was in charge of the introduction of these courses, did a very poor job, even going as far as not sending out information he promised to send out regarding courses not represented at the time. The fact not even half the elective courses was presented did sure not help. The courses Idea Evaluation and Feasibility Studies and Service contract management have been VERY poorly handled by their respective teachers. As the real MEI courses hold such a high standard it is a pity students are not warned regarding the decrease in quality. I would have liked to see MEI program recommend certain courses that matches the program well, and which quality is accounted for.» (No)
- It would be a good thing to make the traces more clear, and to give the students an idea of that the goal of each trace is. » (No opinion)
- Some parts has been inquestionable. A graphic design approach (+lecture) at the master level was considered to be late. A workshop, nice but was it realistic? A workshop about entrepreneurship. Research by design must be seen over and connect better to recent conditions. The startup plan part about Strömstad 2007 was too long and I longed to do presentations belonging to the field of architecture and to improve the language of architecture, while visiting that course in sus. dev. We mostly produced posters and thoughts. » (No opinion)
- my suggestion is that the timing is too crowded and it will be ok if you could have one week befor exam i.e. make it a little bit relaxed» (No opinion)
- The way of teaching should be changed not the coure itself.» (No opinion)
- Its hard to say courses should be removed because maybe its not clear for the students of the one branch that these courses are important for the other branch. The thing is that the organizer of the master has to think if the compulsory courses before the students split to the two branches can be in both cases useful for all the students.» (No opinion)
- There must be more electables, as it is know there are too few relevant courses to chose from during 2nd year.» (No opinion)

Programme administration

23. How satisfied are you with the programme administration?

1273 svarande

Not at all»		49		3%
Not so satisfied»		124		9%
Neither/Nor»		170		13%
Satisfied»		608		47%
Very satisfied»		278		21%
No opinion»		49		3%

Genomsnitt: 3.86

24. How satisfied are you with the support from the Student centre?

Not at all»		32		2%
Not so satisfied»		81		6%
Neither/Nor»		171		13%
Satisfied»		555		43%
Very satisfied»		324		25%
No opinion»		112		8%

Genomsnitt: 4.1

Study climate

25. Did you feel welcomed by Chalmers and the staff at the Masters programme during your first days?

No, not at all»		20		1%
To some extent»		77		6%
Quite OK»		270		21%
Yes definitely»		649		50%
Excellent welcoming»		219		17%
No opinion»		44		3%

Genomsnitt: 3.87

26. How satisfied are you with the cooperation between you and your fellow students?

Not at all»		28		2%
Not so satisfied»		114		8%
Neither/Nor»		124		9%
Satisfied»		626		49%
Very satisfied»		365		28%
No opinion»		15		1%

Genomsnitt: 3.98

27. How satisfied are you with the opportunities to come in contact with teachers?

1271 svarande

Not at all»		11		0%
Not so satisfied»		59		4%
Neither/Nor»		105		8%
Satisfied»		660		51%
Very satisfied»		417		32%
No opinion»		21		1%

Genomsnitt: 4.16

28. Do you think that the student opinions and results from course evaluations have significant impact (taken seriously by the Programme coordinator)?

Not at all»		72		5%
To some extent»		222		17%
Could be improved»		348		27%
Yes, definetly»		458		36%
No opinion»		172		13%

Genomsnitt: 3.34

29. How large percentage (%) of the teachers in the core subjects within the Master programme have a good pedagogical ability?

0-20 %»		30		2%
20-40 %»		133		10%
40-60 %»		356		28%
60-80 %»		519		41%
80-100 %»		223		17%

Genomsnitt: 3.61

30. How large percentage (%) of the teachers in the core subjects within the Masters programme have a good ability to teach in English?

0-20 %»		21		1%
20-40 %»		98		7%
40-60 %»		232		18%
60-80 %»		415		32%
80-100 %»		503		39%

Genomsnitt: 4.02

31. To what extent is your knowledge/competence from your Bachelor degree sufficient to attend this programme?

Very poor»		14		1%
Poor»		57		4%
OK»		187		14%
Good»		354		27%
Very good»		653		51%
No opinion»		10		0%

Genomsnitt: 4.27

32. To what extent do the courses in the programme make use of, develop and deepen your knowledge/competence from your Bachelor degree?

1270 svarande

0-20 %»		67		5%
20-40 %»		166		13%
40-60 %»		379		29%
60-80 %»		468		36%
80-100 %»		193		15%

Genomsnitt: 3.44

Summarizing questions

33. Considering your experience from this programme, would you choose this programme if you could turn back time?

No»		66		5%
Probably not»		74		5%
I would consider it»		188		14%
Yes - probably»		361		28%
Yes»		570		44%
No opinion»		13		1%

Genomsnitt: 4.05

- The program and its cources itself. Teachers are extremely bad at english. The aministrative personel have lack of competence. I still use Lilian Sandström when questions needs to be answered.» (No)
- I feel that it doesn"t provide enough practical tools. The theory that it is focused on is usually practised by 40-50 to fifty year olds on companies where they have high management status. I whink that the program should contain moore day-to-day tools that can be used when graduating. » (No)
- It is too far from engineering.» (No)
- The level of teaching in the program was not as high as in my undergraduate program. Always on the surface of the theory.» (No)
- Changed areas of interest since the start of the programme.» (No)
- This master program is a joke, and I would try another program at Chalmers if I could and hope that at least there you learn something. Now I"m just staying here to get my papers so at least I can pretend I have a degree in something.» (No)
- It is way to general, I cannot say that it have teached me that much...» (No)
- Because there is no other that are dealing with infrastructure paning and design. engineering and trafic. » (No)
- I have gained interest for other industries and regret studying at a management programs tied to a specific industry. » (No)
- Då innehållet i kurserna överlappar på tok för mycket med kurser som låg som obligatoriska i kandidatexamens. Samt det faktum att det är väldigt forskar inriktat.» (No)
- The program has not given me a clear expertise which I can find jobs with. Too much basic information in too many areas.» (No)
- The quality is very questionable and the courses have misdirected focuses.» (No)
- It"s to easy and has a to little core signals and system courses in it. When I chosed the biomedicalengineering program I thought I would be able to build a CT-scanner after the program was finished. But I think that after finishing an other electric-masterprogram at chalmers I would be much better of.» (No)
- Det är alldeles för få och grunda kurser inom "Väg och vattenbyggnad"-som man trodde att man började på 2005.» (No)
- I would choose aplied mechanics as it is more general and there is no jobs in the AE sector for the moment.» (No)
- Bad teachers(dist syst 1 & 2). Courses need some serious revising. Especially the "select 3 out of 4" needs to be better, make sure they all contain good and useful information and are teached by good teachers since everyone NEEDS to read them and cannot exchange them for other courses.» (No)
- because of Curriculum if u compare the curriculum of Msc networks of Chalmers with Msc networks of other univsiteis in sweden, things will be cleared i.e KTH, Communication System and Network Services » (No)
- it was not exactly conducted as it was mentioned on the program description on the website, it did not well coordinated and it did not satisfy my expectation from a design engineering program in many aspects.» (No)
- My time is better spent elsewhere. Possibly FoCAL.» (No)
- because there is subject relating to practical networking except routing for example there is no course such that traffic analysis,network monitoring, Mpls etc. » (No)
- I will go for fundamental physics program instead. I found that they offer high quality lectures and the contents are compact. Most courses in MPRSS prgram are not up to the one I expected.» (No)
- as i m plan to go back to home country after doing master. and there is no scope of new processes eastablishment.but it helps me to gain knowledge in some techniques by studying some core courses» (No)
- The quality of the programme did not at all meet my expectations.» (No)
- Because the reason is that this course takes in the direction of research but when the time comes to find the thesis not a single person in department help you out and offers thesis.Not the avaialble staff has the capability of teaching rather than they just pass the course with out giving any knowledge to students. We were not expecting this here. Sory to say but International students comes far away from home to study but when you see this that some teachers do not even think what they are doing with the career of the students than its really painful thing. I think at least the core courses teachers must have the capability of delivering the knowledge to students. These are some bitter facts but this is the time to accpet the truth to improve this course. » (No)
- because this program is too much hard as i found so many projects,labs, computer programs. i know its good to have these things but time to appear for examination due to quarter system is very short. so we can not gain so much in this case. i have seen almost all to make a formality to pass the courses rather then going into the depth of the course and it not possible for one to gain such high level of goals in this very short time lkie classes are completed on friday for example and exam will be on monday and only gap of one day you come for next course exam. its really hard.» (No)
- I do not want to work in the automotive industry. (economical situation)» (No)
- Probably i prefered to choose International Project management or Architecture due to my bachelor degree» (No)
- Because it is not related at all to engineering which is my background. It"s only Management.» (No)
- I could study the courses i like, and not the irrelevant courses. » (No)
- my brother who is 17 would be able to finish this programme» (No)
- Because the level of english knowledge to get addmitted to the program must be a real joke! It feels lika a slap in the face, starting your fourth year of university studies by helping/teaching/learning other students in your group work english. Some of the forreign students has e.g. never written a technical report. The large amount of time spent with work related to these issues could definetly been used to deepen my knowledge in the subjects instead. I was also told that, when asking the program director what language the master edducatio will be in, he answeared: - Ous program works very closely with the Swedish construction sector, soo we will used their oppinion in this question. Ok, so WHY is the program in english, when nobody and no company uses english as business language in the swedish constructiion sector!? I can say that if I could turn back time, I would have taken my master studies in some other country at a more serious university. I have e.g. veery good experiences while studying business related subjects at University of Technology in Sydney, at least the techers and student could handle the language.» (No)
- many things are not clear and understandable.» (No)
- Because the market size is far smaller than the admission capacity of the universities. The advertizement for promotion of this master program is definitely exaggerated and I feel decieved and misled. » (No)
- The programme is not for me, defenitely not the right choice.» (No)
- The architecture programme doesn"t match the international standard. I am afraid of the master degree I attained would not be recognized by the professsional institute in my home country.» (No)
- I would prefer another program like Medical Physics that is more intresting to me. I took this program as a challenge and I have almost achieve my target. Although it is a very tough MSc but I somehow managed my level of understanding problem.» (No)
- it is so deep for me and it is not my intrest.» (No)
- the program is good is just personal preference . i would go for more economical studies , rather than computing and technical studies . » (No)
- I haven"t deepen my knowledge, since much is just repetition. I would prefer raising the prerequisites and actually leverage what we have learn during our bachelor. » (No)
- - Because the teachers never have time for the students, there are too many students per teacher in the CS department. It is very frustrating and it makes you feel even more like a burden to the school than as the primary purpose of the whole thing. - Because little of what is taught is applicable in The Real World(tm). - Because the education, compared to other places at Chalmers, is kind of low-level. It is almost as bad that students start complaining if they see a formula. I need a high level to keep my interest up.» (No)
- I don"t feel I"ve learned much more than what I knew before coming! The courses were kind of review on what I"d learned before or even less. » (No)
- There is too little meat in the courses. Don´,t aquire knowledge or skills.» (No)
- I doesn"t match with my previous degree, so hard to learn. Little bit out of my aim study. » (No)
- I would not have read courses that I don not find interesting. Instead I would have "made" my own programme.» (No)
- it was really far from my thought. camparing to other usiversity which offer this program it was very poor» (No)
- First year was just awful and in all practicality non-exsistent. Close to no teaching and at best 4 lectures in 1 year - what do you call that? The last term before diploma was a lot better but somewhat disorganized. First year teacher, Erik Linn had neither enthusiasm or any organization, third term however was quite the opposite. Morten Lund had a lot of both enthusiasm and commitment.» (No)
- The program is way too theoretically focused. More case work should be included. By more case work I do NOT mean the type of cases that are administered now, which is nothing but academic reports. The program should seriously consider bringing in cases from business schools in the US, such as Harvard Business Cases. Any case that is considered to be used in a class should fulfill the criteria of being data drive, i.e. the students should be given a REAL problem to solve using financial and market data, NUMBER CRUNCHING IS A MUST! No decision in real business life is ever made on qualitative arguments...it is completely irrelevant if "this author states this or that author states that"! The write up of these cases should be capped at maximum 3-4 pages where the goal for the students is to show their thinking...not what literature says or how literature can be used! Coupled with these cases an EXTENSIVE use of Microsoft Excel and Powerpoint should be incorporated. The entire business world relies on these programs, we MUST be forced to learn these programs well!» (No)
- Low quality and does not meet my expecttations. More interested in software engineering» (No)
- I had another view of the program before I started. It did not really turn out the way I wanted it to.» (Probably not)
- Because it was just repitiom of the first three years. The elective courses that were interested could be chosen from another programme» (Probably not)
- Because less than half of the teachers I have had during these 2 years have actually been able to get the message out?» (Probably not)
- I would instead try to focus on taking the courses that my fellow students recommend. For instance take the "best" courses from the master programme, Geo and Water and DCPM.» (Probably not)
- The work opportunities seem slim.» (Probably not)
- My bachelor degree is from Electrical and Electronics Engineering and I could not find enough courses related with my bachelor degree. Especially in communication track. » (Probably not)
- Did not wake my interest and motivation. Lectures were more frustrating, either boring or not communicated well. In some courses the motivation could be seen but without effect on the lectures» (Probably not)
- I studied Mechanical Engineering for my bachelor and I feel that the courses are too allround. I loose much of my core competence» (Probably not)
- Because of the lack of information from the programme coordinator and the lack of interesting courses both in spring semester in V4 and in autumn semester V5» (Probably not)
- Not as it is now. » (Probably not)
- Hard to see that much of any practical use was thought, which might lead to problems if one wants to find a job in the field afterwards.» (Probably not)
- This program is far away from what a Construction management program is supposed to be. it seems that those who are responsible for this program has not looked at similar program at other universities in countries such as UK or US that are the biggest markets in the construction industry and have the best construction schools.» (Probably not)
- It doesnt really feel like a masters programme, more like some sort of limbo between bachelor level and graduate level.» (Probably not)
- Was not my first choice when I started and would probably not be next time either» (Probably not)
- Because the course is more statistics and mathematics based then the computer or biology side and it feels that i am being prepared to be a mathematician and being a computer scientist myself i wanted to gain more knowledge in biology which I could not receive as their were clashes with the compulsory courses.» (Probably not)
- As the market has rapidly changed over the last year, I would have been more focused on a Master Program with very good job opportunities. » (Probably not)
- It is far from what it should be considering similar courses around the world. » (Probably not)
- tycker inte det lever upp till de förväntningar som fanns - känns inte alls som en ingenjörsmaster får ingen alls användning av de ingenjörskurser vi läst innan i några projekt» (Probably not)
- It is to wide, I would have wanted it to be more specialized, one or two courses in mechanics and some other calculations courses. » (Probably not)
- What I knew from master of structural engineering was something which is more common in the world as structural mechanics. I expected more theory in conjunction with practical maters. In this program, i feel the emphasis is on educating good ordinary engineers for society but not good researchers and good engineers with profound theoretical background. Some of the courses are absolutely basic and they are not appropriate for name of master of science. Also some courses are too practical and the background theory is not taught. » (Probably not)
- The program is not well-known among industry. The name is very general and miss-leading. Companies don"t know what a "production manager" can do deferent from a "production planner"!» (Probably not)
- because i don"t believe i had enough knowledge from my bachelors degree that could be suffient to this program.» (Probably not)
- Did not give me useful knowledge for my future job (even though I have a job).» (Probably not)
- I am not satisfied with the courses that are offered in this program. The Networks should have been separated from the Distributed systems.» (Probably not)
- I think there is other programs with greater potential» (Probably not)
- It can not feet my interest and my background related to polymer materials» (Probably not)
- Because there are to many similar courses that are compulsory. There is no depht!» (Probably not)
- Strange way of teaching. No deep thoughts, just the basic facts as if it was high school.» (Probably not)
- I come to Chalmers not only to study my specialization, but also to learn "Swedish way studying" in this opprtunity. "Swedish way" means to have good understanding, and simulate them through excersise and projects to obtain sustainable competence. I don"t think I fulfill these goal now. First, it took time for me to know how to study at Chalmers because I can"t have opprtunity to listen to someone. Due to a lot of international students, also lack of opprtunity to know swedish way, and lower moral (a lot of copy are there, using language other than english), I tend to lost myself, what was my goal and what is correct and what is wrong, what moral is available in Chalmers? what is the best way? Will industry be satisfied and think Chalmers studnets are qualified? I think faculty needs to show strongly about swedish way or what they expect or recommend how to study, clearer. The faculty is lack of swedish lecturer, especially Ph.D students, also full of international MP students having lower moral. Please try to take balance.» (Probably not)
- Because this programme is based on totally theoretical knowledge and very less in practical knowledge. Industry demands some practical knowledge and this programme lacks it. » (Probably not)
- I"ve realised I"m more interested in project management and marketing strategies» (Probably not)
- I personally was targeting for a more research-oriented degree. A serious problem with master"s in Sweden is that there is no bloody way to do research. I have friends in the US, Canada and Australia who have got more research outcome from their master"s, so to say publications (and I"m pretty confident that I am able to do as good as them as we have been classmates for years and I know them quite well). The problem is that teachers still look at master"s student as undergrads, and I believe it is wrong! I personally approached several teachers for doing something extra and they almost never took it serious. In one case that I persisted, the professor gave me something that was almost nothing worthwhile. Honestly, I really feel bad that if I had also done my degree somewhere else I had now much better chances for getting into PhD studies since that has been my aim since 3-4 years ago.» (Probably not)
- Programmet i sig var bra men av personligt intresse skulle jag idag läsa master program på Maskin istället. » (Probably not)
- I would go for a program that make a good mixture of biology, mathematics, and especially computer science. The Chalmers program are seems favorable to mathematics and statistics. I agree that they"re powerful tools, but considering in current practice we can"t neglect the practice of computer science or to say exactly information technology.» (Probably not)
- Two really poor compulsory courses and only one really good compulsory course (SCM Intro course, 15 hp).» (Probably not)
- I took all my elevtice couses at Management of Innovation and Technology and really liked them. » (Probably not)
- Felt I choose wrong. Algorithms, Languages and Logic would be more suitable for me.» (Probably not)
- We were promissed a masters program for electrical engineers with electronics, ended up with almost only programming and computer knowledge.» (Probably not)
- I expected learn more in deep subjects related with security and useful for a job.» (Probably not)
- It is mostly computer engineering than electrical engineering. I have a background in electrical engineering.» (Probably not)
- dissatisfied with some of the courses, mentioned above and especially some teeachers( Jan Wickenberg) » (Probably not)
- I am expecting some core statistics, but it turned to be other way. Rather, i would like to do masters in mathemetical statistics now. » (Probably not)
- personnal taste» (Probably not)
- The program is generally interesting and good, but it lacks a bit of focus. I find it quite hard to explain to company representatives what we"re studying and why we"re doing that. Of course I understand that complex systems is a gigantic field, which is a problem. I would now rather choose something else and then choose the best courses from CAS as elective courses, because the best ones are really very good.» (Probably not)
- Most of the part it felt like a repetition from Bachelor degree.» (Probably not)
- I feel that I"ve learned a lot during the whole product development project, but this at the cost of great frustration. This was mostly caused by the fuzzyness of the project, which was not presented in the beginning, and the lack of support from the project sponsor and the supervisor. Also I find that the group dynamic has been poor in the sense of initiative from the other groupmembers.» (Probably not)
- most of the courses depend on written exams solely.» (Probably not)
- There is very little feefback offered. Mostly, the tasks are to read or write aarticles, and the focus is HOW we write them, i.e. methodolgy etc, not WHAT we write. It feels like they only try to prepare us for a future within chalmers as a researcher. The way of teaching is not satisfying concidering how may student we are. In order to learn, while being over 59 student in every class, good course litterature must be offered. This is not often the way it is.» (Probably not)
- 1-Interdisciplinary trends need to be established based on the cooperations between different departments.It is not good that one person teaches most of the courses 2-attention toward mathematics of theory which is the most important part is not enough 3-CAS program needs mathematician very very much.Although some of the most exciting investigations in mathematics are being done by theoretical physicists I found that there are serious differences between a view of mathematician and physicist 4-It is impossible to have a good program with 40 persons in master because the chance of discussion and real form of cotact with teacher is very low.so reduce the number of accepted persons 5-in some cases I found the persons who were responsible for evaluation of projects did not have the eligibility for that and they just were biased toward some definite solutions which were presented by a group who had done it together » (Probably not)
- because i was very disapointed at how long goals and how which subjects you were able to choose among» (Probably not)
- Think it is a little bit too basic.» (Probably not)
- The level is far to low. You don"t really need to put in any effort at all to pass the courses. » (Probably not)
- not suitable for myself» (Probably not)
- Most of the lectures are terrible. The program is not technical enough» (Probably not)
- I think the IESD program would have suited me better. But Communication Engineering was a good program and I don"t regret it.» (Probably not)
- because it really did not give the knowledge I"d been looking for» (Probably not)
- No structure» (Probably not)
- There are something I can not understand » (Probably not)
- Because I think this program is not so good and there is not so good future to find a work in this field.» (Probably not)
- It is too many student in each course. Redo the courses to fit the increased number of students or even better reduce the number of students again. More student = More money, why not more courses, assistant and so on? Are you getting greedy on my behalf? Anyhow, my education suffers from it!» (I would consider it)
- I thought it was going to be more focus on the automotive industry. Instead, it was only about the car itself which was a shame. I think that I would have taken the product development programme instead.» (I would consider it)
- Several lecturers are so bad attending is a waste of time. I really think Chalmers should put more effort in picking lecturers who can teach. I do understand that this must be difficult, but this is my major gripe with my education.» (I would consider it)
- I think that the programme has intresting topics but not all courses have been goog.» (I would consider it)
- I would probably not choose Chalmers again if I could turn back time five years, but I would choose MEI before SCM and QOM.» (I would consider it)
- Maybe not as much "product development" as I would like, plus the sometimes disappointing administration of courses followed by the inability to listen to the students to make a change. This sometimes resulted in bad conditions for the students.» (I would consider it)
- You dont get enough information about the different programms to be able ta make the right choice, a studyvisit to companies where different master students work would have been nice, to see more of what you can do when finished with the different master programs. » (I would consider it)
- It is too much like the military service. do this, do that, and if you"re lucky I will answer questions.» (I would consider it)
- I would choose Geo and water because of their staffs and coordinator, unfortunately in my program some of the students couldn"t communicate with some staffs and specially coordinator» (I would consider it)
- I would probably choose fundamental physics, but some courses in CAS were definitely of use.» (I would consider it)
- The programme has not given me the hands on tools that would be useful for my first job. The learnings have been very high level and I would have liked to get more concrete tools.» (I would consider it)
- Too few courses to choose among. It"s not possible to specialize in one subject or two subjects.» (I would consider it)
- I was not informed about the overall perspective of the MP before. Now i found other MPs beeing more interesting» (I would consider it)
- Det visade sig att det ju inte var så mycket väg- och vatten över det hela...bara en massa miljö!» (I would consider it)
- The course selection is good, but the content of each course does not seem to finnished » (I would consider it)
- The level on the some of the courses have been to low and some of the compulsory courses have been more or less repetition from the Bachelor. » (I would consider it)
- but i would choose to do the technical track instead .(but i would prefer all the management paper summed up in a single paper )» (I would consider it)
- I would rather go for something in Handels, with more managerial skills. Also, the requirmentes for intl students include some job experience, when that is unexistent for Sweds. I think it lowers a lot the level of discussions at class, when you compare someone with experience to someone who has only read books. I don"t know why, but at least on the poeple I know, the students at handles seems to be older. Also I had some course of the QOP program, where the level of intl students is hihger (therefore the amount of students that has previous working experience is higher) and the level of discussions is highly superior» (I would consider it)
- I would probably choose it but since the career prospects are unclear and a bit blurred I might consider a course oriented towards computer science. But nevertheless I find the course quite flexible and would hopefully be of some help to move to a computing career if necessary» (I would consider it)
- There are not enough courses of interest, too many environmental courses. » (I would consider it)
- It is a stressful program whcih requires you to work more than I feel that I physiclly can manage but it is also very interesting and I have learned a lot. » (I would consider it)
- I think I am more interested in another track » (I would consider it)
- In my opinion, it should be more practical real work» (I would consider it)
- The courses are to general and easy. » (I would consider it)
- I would probably choose MPSES instead, since I have realised that I am very interested in energy» (I would consider it)
- i learn a lot this year, but i am not so sure that this could be applied in my own country.» (I would consider it)
- Era jävla stolpskott!!! Jag läser MEI men inte på Chalmers!! Kan vara ganska smart att fråga det innan man börjar fråga om "hur man blev bemött på Chalmers" och "hur lärarna är".. Men men .. antar att det är ert problem att lista ut vilka som läst första året av sin Master på Chalmers och vilka som läst den på andra universitet via World Wide och Unitech.. Antar att jag försöker säga att ni nog fuckat upp validiteten i undersökningen genom att inte kolla det... Lycka till iaf!!» (I would consider it)
- The number of international students (I am from Sweden) have been a big issue. We have had projects in almost every course, and in several courses I have been forced to do everything myself. Some (international) students never show up, never do what they promised to do, have never used MATLAB before. I have been forced to do everything myself, because I don"t know if they are gonna do it or if they are gonna be "sick" or have an "emergency" or "miss the bus" (yes, I have heard all these excuses, and I can"t understand why missing the bus makes you miss a 2 hour meeting) the days before the deadline. On the other hand, it has been an honour to work with some (other) international students. Easy to cooperate with and to understand. The programme has been good, the structure and the content. But some of the students have been a pain to me.» (I would consider it)
- The program is alright, but there is no work which is the state of the markets fault. Other areas have been less affected like energy optimization.» (I would consider it)
- Hard to tell. It was not really what I understood it to be, bur Im satisfied altough.» (I would consider it)
- I now realize that I would like to pursue my career in a more business management field than deep down into technical field.» (I would consider it)
- I would like to learn more concrete knowledge and skills» (I would consider it)
- The concept of Master"s in Sweden seems to be taken quite lightly and has very little value. It seems that any one can get in and many of the students are simply there because they know they will have a difficult time finding a related job. I find that the student"s relatively uninterested attitude prevents the opportunity for inter-student topical stimulation, and the thinking is rarely challenged. Frankly, the courses seem to focus on telling the students what to learn and does not encourage the students to explore what they are keen on. In general, I am disappointed in the Master"s level students" lack of interest and initiative. » (I would consider it)
- Its hard and i maybe want to work in a different field.» (I would consider it)
- quite good to learn more things, but something is too general, means that maybe the content is good, but we can not learn much» (I would consider it)
- The other master program I considered has a braoder job market after graduation.» (I would consider it)
- lack of competition» (I would consider it)
- because this design project course, teacher are not give any help, and all the international studet were dropped this course. let the swidish student all pass.» (I would consider it)
- finns inte så mycket annat att välja bland i stan.» (I would consider it)
- I would hesitate between Industrial Ecology and Sustainable Energy System programmes» (I would consider it)
- Many of the required courses was not my cup of tea.» (I would consider it)
- The compulsory courses given by the building physics department. » (I would consider it)
- Some of the compulsory courses have questionable quality, and seems to be included only because of their name.» (I would consider it)
- Market for jobs is not too bright for industrial ecology. Some of the topics are a bit abstract.» (I would consider it)
- Some of the courses have been just a repeat of my bachelor"s degree courses. I do not think that I learned much new staff. » (I would consider it)
- I would select other courses» (I would consider it)
- I didn"t learn much from this programme, although it contains lots of information, but these are so wide in range, and we don"t know which is our focusing field.» (I would consider it)
- You don´,t get sufficiently skilled in logistics and international trade on an operational level, which whould look so much better when at an interview!» (I would consider it)
- The programme gives the perspective that it covers nanoscience and technology abroad. Once that you are studying it, it turns out that it is very specificly oriented to few areas such as quantum devices, molecular electronics or superconductors, loosing in a way the bionanoscience and extremely the chemonanoscience, or at least is difficult to find it.» (I would consider it)
- a bit to thoretical.» (I would consider it)
- depend on if getting a job afterwards or not» (I would consider it)
- With my bachelor background I probably would have benefited by chosing another mater programme instead, as I feel that they might be too little interrelated with each other» (I would consider it)
- Not entirely sure, but I would like to have more skills that are sought after among companies. eg. Simulation software, experimental experience etc.» (I would consider it)
- The overall progression from bachelor degree in architecture from a university in denmark is too poor. » (I would consider it)
- the level is not high enough» (I would consider it)
- Jag skulle kolla mer på de liknande utbildningarna vid de andra högskolorna. » (I would consider it)
- I am concerned that my training at Chalmers is not sufficient to become an architect in my home country. I will not have the opportunity to take many courses that are required back home. » (I would consider it)
- since after this program and passing some courses in Graphics field, Ifound my real field of interest.» (I would consider it)
- I learn a lot from this programme,but i am still very interesting in perceptual design.» (I would consider it)
- But there is not enough use of software or calculation» (I would consider it)
- Did not live up to my expectations.» (I would consider it)
- The do not feel i have improve so much my competences in this area. In one year it is possible to obtain better result, it is little poor.» (I would consider it)
- It is too much the same.» (I would consider it)
- i may have found another choice» (I would consider it)
- The courses has not deepend my courses from the bachelor level enough, it has been more focus on repeating. Why should I then study 2 more years?? If I don"t get to learn anything new?» (I would consider it)
- I think if I could choose construction management in other countries i would go there not chalmers.the syllabus in chalmers really can improve.» (I would consider it)
- I"m not sure it"s for me.» (I would consider it)
- I would have like to develop my knowledge from my bachelor degree more» (I would consider it)
- I would choose some program within material science» (I would consider it)
- Learning outcomes from the courses did not meet my expectations, but the other aspects of the programme I like.» (I would consider it)
- Would like to learn programming better.» (I would consider it)
- Less practical courses as i anticipated.» (I would consider it)
- I have been a bit disappointed by the knowledge I got within the master programme. I would have expect a higher level in the courses.» (I would consider it)
- Still intresting subjects and the only available with the specific genre» (I would consider it)
- It does not bring very much new knowledge. It feels as a repetiotion of I with some extras.» (I would consider it)
- I am very interested in the subjects taught in the program but I don"t think it manages to teach those subjects very well.» (I would consider it)
- The core courses was on the average(in terms of content and quality). Staff was not enough (in numbers). Not many elective courses directly related with our programme. » (I would consider it)
- Chalmers is better because We can study in the same room together with Swedish students. but compare IESD-CTH to SOC-KTH, SOC-KTH has better curriculum. » (I would consider it)
- No so such electable course, very poor information. Why not collaborate with universities in Scandinavia?» (I would consider it)
- I like the programme and wish it would be better but it needs stronger administrational management and attention by the coordinators. On paper this all sounds very good but at class room the reality is different in a bad way. Basic things like information flow from coordinators is not sufficient, feeling is that we have not got enought information related to our studies or the information comes just before something needs to be done.» (I would consider it)
- too many students in the class. 20-50 yould be acceptable, but 100++ for a masters program is unacceptable.. Plus, I expected the courses to be more practical.» (I would consider it)
- The programme could benefit from a more focused selection of courses and a better timetable.» (I would consider it)
- Also considered Naval architecture» (Yes - probably)
- Half of the courses were very interesting» (Yes - probably)
- There is no better to choose.» (Yes - probably)
- I would probably today choose between supply chain mgt, Quality and operations mgt and production engineering» (Yes - probably)
- Very interesting field and interesting courses, but some of the courses could be revised/approved.» (Yes - probably)
- i discovered other programmes quite interesting too this year.» (Yes - probably)
- It has been a broad programme. I feel prepared to take work in a number of different careers. And choice of career path is importand, especially in today"s economic crisis.» (Yes - probably)
- Everything about the school was perfect. But the social aspect was not as good. Did not get a connection with the other students.» (Yes - probably)
- I am becoming like my programme now thourgh studing.» (Yes - probably)
- Even though much can be improved in the programme, I feel that the masters programme has led me into a track of work that satisfies me.» (Yes - probably)
- Or a program focusing more on industrial systems/energy systems or industrial ecology.» (Yes - probably)
- Even though it has lots of improvement opportunities it still has the right main content suitable for my interrests.» (Yes - probably)
- I would consider the nano-technology programme, since I would like to get more practical knowledge in nano-fabrication. » (Yes - probably)
- I think that improving SCM in companies, is somehting that will be crucial for the future. I am very happy that i choose this master program but i think that it might have been an even bigger challenge, for me, to try to get into business school.» (Yes - probably)
- Good mix of courses with a lot of options of taking other courses. There is a red line throughout the programme. SCM project was an example of a good experiment that was made in the programme, while Discrete Event and Control Optimization was a horrible experiment.» (Yes - probably)
- This programme or the Chemistry and Bioscience programme include the subjects that I"m interested in and want to have a career in.» (Yes - probably)
- If I had erasmus scholarship then would have taken NordSecMob.tkk.fi» (Yes - probably)
- Why not definitely yes?! As it took A LOT of energy in the 1st year. As an international student I was used to another educational system and I think the 1st year workload should be revised.» (Yes - probably)
- Cause this is what I choosed to learn and study the first time I applied to this school, this is what I want to do» (Yes - probably)
- it gives opportunity to complete project with foreign students, and improve my oral english.» (Yes - probably)
- I would probably choose it again, but I would also seriously consider MEI instead, with elective courses taken from IE.» (Yes - probably)
- I think its the best programme for Mechanical Engineers.» (Yes - probably)
- It would probably be the fastest way to get a job in the building construction sector.» (Yes - probably)
- I think it is an interesting area and it could be a really good program in a couple of years. » (Yes - probably)
- Chalmers MPNET is the only valid choice.» (Yes - probably)
- Men jag hade kanske läst lite andra kurser.» (Yes - probably)
- cause network security and stuff is quite interesting.» (Yes - probably)
- Some coarses are quite basics and very much repetition for some people in the class. I can"t say that I have gained a deeper understanding for the subjuct. Most of the coarses are just basic.» (Yes - probably)
- The standard is very low compared to the Bachelor level (Teknisk fysik, Chalmers). In some sense it is convenient since human is lazy by nature, but at the same time I think it is a shame for Physics at Chalmers. Many of the courses I have taken would have been laughed at at bachelor level.» (Yes - probably)
- The two afore-mentioned courses were a scandalous waste of time and resources (international projects and financial management). The degree gives a lot of freedom of chioce of units which allows me to create an invaluable tailor-made degree for myself. However the course focuses almost exclusively on soft skills without any real critical analysis of individuals" performance which can help them develop. For this reason I might choose a degree with more tangible aims.» (Yes - probably)
- I could choose a different area of interest.» (Yes - probably)
- I find the area of work interesting.» (Yes - probably)
- Or taking the energy systems program at NTNU (Norway).» (Yes - probably)
- I would also like to attend electrical power engineering.» (Yes - probably)
- This is the program that suits me the most but there are still room for improvements. The mandatory courses is not that good due to the fact that they repeat a lot of the knowledge we already have recieved in previous courses. The should be electible instead.» (Yes - probably)
- It is very flexible.» (Yes - probably)
- I would probably choose a little different among the courses, but still the same program. Most important though, I would delay my starting of the program with one year, as I wasn"t motivated enough at the beginning, which (combined with private things) resulted in poor results.» (Yes - probably)
- Good work opertunity, some of the thinks seams funn» (Yes - probably)
- some new stuffs» (Yes - probably)
- Because it is the only possible continuation for my bacchelor programme.» (Yes - probably)
- The classes is not as challenging as I expected» (Yes - probably)
- Most of the interesting courses were electives anyway.» (Yes - probably)
- Found here some other interesting programmes as well, so...it is possible that second thoughts could appear last second!» (Yes - probably)
- I may have chosen something more physics-oriented. But it was good either way.» (Yes - probably)
- intense academic atmosphere» (Yes - probably)
- The program two years since its introduction, needs some advanced courses in the second year» (Yes - probably)
- :) It"s a rather good program, given that one can choose the majority of the courses.» (Yes - probably)
- Even though it might not meet the standards I expected there is reslly no alternative for me at chalmers sice it is the only one combining design and product development» (Yes - probably)
- Because it contains the courses that I wanted to study (on the other hand, I could have taken them at a different university that perhaps would have been better). I"m not proud of Chalmers.» (Yes - probably)
- I have chosen to acquire the knowledge elsewhere or at least deepen it elsewhere, there are possibilities to attend projects and so on in order to learn what I felt was missing in the program» (Yes - probably)
- Found out that Im interested in interaction design aswell, so it would be either sw-e or that.» (Yes - probably)
- I"m really interested in the subject and that"s the reason. On the other hand there is more to wish for when it comes to overall set of courses available in this master program.» (Yes - probably)
- Good mixture, my field of intrerest» (Yes - probably)
- I am interested in this kind of subjects.» (Yes - probably)
- Might have chosen a program with a higher degree of connection to some sort of hardware.» (Yes - probably)
- Since there are a lot of different students from different universities in this programme, there are a big difference in what knowledge each student has when attending this master programme. The difference is actually to big and since the master programme is quite technical I think an entrance exam would be needed.» (Yes - probably)
- Mostly because all the other programs suck.» (Yes - probably)
- This is what I want to do, no other way around it if you want to study in Gbg» (Yes - probably)
- There is no better option to chose from. But the program needs to get better» (Yes - probably)
- Because i want a job related to this program.» (Yes - probably)
- Some courses are total rubbish, Felt like I was waisting my time on those courses. The courses in the beginning of the master were at a very low pace and didn"t broaden my knowledge, just gave a recapitulation of previously collected information. » (Yes - probably)
- There are other good options.» (Yes - probably)
- came from Z, så IE was totally different but gave me a much better analytical mind» (Yes)
- very interesting courses» (Yes)
- I picked it because of the individual courses which are all good-very good and the possibility to freely choose a large part.» (Yes)
- Because it was overall a good programme where the teachers was also overall good» (Yes)
- I still would have wanted to stay in Göteborg and I find the field of bioinformatics very interesting. But I still find that I could have learned so much more during these two years...» (Yes)
- Väldigt bra organiserade kurser, höga krav, en klar röd tråd genom programmet» (Yes)
- My expectations were met.» (Yes)
- Interesting courses and commited teachers! » (Yes)
- it is above expectations, really great, opens up your mind about more issues than the ones directly connected to uni» (Yes)
- The course were well organized and gave us a total new view on business activities. The mendatory courses were well chosen and we got many possibilities to specify ourselfs. The topic is new and seems to be very important in the future. The program prepares us for the future and gives us an adavantage for the future in compare to people which are not that into the issues of supply chain management. The combination of theory and projects which include teamwork and presentations is great and prepares us not just related to theoretical knowledge.» (Yes)
- I would choose it because of the field of study, but the job market is far too poor in Sweden to get a job within the field. The teachers of the master programme overexaggerated the quality of the programme aswell as the job oppertunities after.» (Yes)
- I have sus. dev. 50% (MPDSD)¨, I have architecure 50% (MPARC) » (Yes)
- It"s the best» (Yes)
- The available options weren"t as interesting.» (Yes)
- - broad range of subjects inside the program (from Distribution to Purchasing to Production) - excellent teaching, especially the variety of educational means (guest lectures, project works, simulations, site visits, ...)» (Yes)
- Itäs the correct line of work that I would like to work with» (Yes)
- I enjoyed the program but will not take some of the courses!» (Yes)
- I feel like I have found my calling in life, and this is it. I absolutely love my masters program.» (Yes)
- This two year"s time may choose my life.» (Yes)
- Many interesting courses» (Yes)
- It"s fun!» (Yes)
- Many good courses which are directly related industry. Very practical training system. I need more project courses coworked with companies.» (Yes)
- Learned so much, had a great time!» (Yes)
- It is a great programme» (Yes)
- It"s a good program deepening my knowledge in a very interesting field.» (Yes)
- It is what I am interested in» (Yes)
- It is a very broad and intriguing area. The possibilities and challenges are really compelling. At the price of less security and structure, more creativity and humanity than in other engineering fields to my knowledge. The issues for me are maybe that lack of structure is less professionalizing, and less fit to meet the needs of industry. But the human development and opportunity to think deeply and broadly are vividly appreciated.» (Yes)
- Because this is my area of interest. » (Yes)
- The program has lived up to my expectations.» (Yes)
- I am satisfied with it - it allows me to stay close to my bachelor subject» (Yes)
- This is what I am interested in.» (Yes)
- I like the freedom of the program, no mandatory courses instead core courses (take 6 of 10). I can easily combinde my chemistry and biotechnology interest in the same program. The teachers are all very good and kind!» (Yes)
- It is a very good program where you learn both practical and theoretical skills. The things we learn are directly applicable to the real world, and still very much advanced. The program has put me into contact with both professors and the industry. I feel confident that after finishing this program I will get an interesting job, whitout having to look for long.» (Yes)
- A part from the Building performance part I am very happy with this master programme. The teachers within the Structural Engineering are all very good and are always there when you need help or clearifications. And this I find very important in a master programme.» (Yes)
- No opinion» (Yes)
- Most teachers were extremely competent and kept themselves updated about their subject.» (Yes)
- it consist the subjects I am interested in» (Yes)
- Much better than I thought, a very interesting programme with good (mostly) courses» (Yes)
- I would not apply if was not free to study in Chalmers, although I am very satisfied with the whole program that I have studied.» (Yes)
- It has been very good.» (Yes)
- I am satisfied with the outcomes. This master program is a good complement of the bachelor and gives me more career opportunities. » (Yes)
- I would absolutely choose this programme again. Overall I am satisfied and think it is a good programme and I am aware of that there are always problems in the start. This is where my area of intrest is so I can not think of any other programme to choose.» (Yes)
- This is what I want to study.» (Yes)
- It was good in general, adds value to my proffesional development.» (Yes)
- Because I love it even more than the time that I applied for it.» (Yes)
- This is what i like to do.» (Yes)
- My general opinion of the programme is very good, however there some of the course vad with unmotivated teachers.» (Yes)
- it"s an interestign subject» (Yes)
- the programme has a good number of courses and has a lot of openning in research» (Yes)
- There are no optional MP that deals with indoor climate and HVAC. But I think there are to much repetition from earlier courses.....» (Yes)
- Because it was a great experience, i enjoyed the lab activities during most od the courses and that i really like the course» (Yes)
- I was hoping chalmers, as the some teacher regards it "the best techincal school of nothern europe" would provide superior and modern study oppertunities however in my opinion its inferior, obsolete and run poorly. Nevertheless the subjects of the masterprogramme is awesome and really interesting. I guess I am so dissapointed because this programme could be so much more... » (Yes)
- Although I was quite unfamiliar with the field of Interaction Design and took this programme with the goal of developing video games, it has opened my eyes to many other posibilities and above all to an element very easily overlooked by engineering: the user.» (Yes)
- It is oportuinistic and great created international program with two perspective view on management» (Yes)
- Because it is a very interseting master program. The problem is only my background. Not enough knowledge from my Bachelor» (Yes)
- as I expected before.» (Yes)
- Because this is what interests me the most and what I want to work with in the future. The thing is that I"ve studied my first and only year of master abroad and not at Chalmers, that"s why it"s so many "No opinion" but I"ve still tried to match my courses here with the ones offered at home.» (Yes)
- I would still take it, but there are a few courses as I have mentioned above that I would have not taken. Replaced them with other subjects to avoid poor teaching and poor quality of material. » (Yes)
- I quiet like this programme. But I am a little confused what kind of job can we do in company. Hope there will be more information in this aspect.presever» (Yes)
- It"s in the area where I want to work» (Yes)
- It offers perspectives usually rare in this field, for example the systems perspective.» (Yes)
- I´,ve learned so far.» (Yes)
- It was pretty much what I expected.» (Yes)
- Studying Engineering Physics at Chalmers gives a great foundation in physics, so the Nanoscale programme was a choice to continue to study interesting physics. Instead of only being a purly theoretical programme, there were also great oppertunities to apply it by means of the nanoscale fabrication possibilities. I.e. great and interseting physics in both theory and practice is what made me choose the Nanoscale programme!» (Yes)
- It is the most interesting programme on Chalmers.» (Yes)
- Because I love the subject and I"ve got a job within it that fits me perfectly.» (Yes)
- It"s just right for me. I"ve been looking for what I want to do for years, always choosing something fuzzy, and undefined since the well defined choices didn"t match my interests.» (Yes)
- Because of following factors: 1. Teachers 2. Course Contents 3. Exposure of program» (Yes)
- I like my program very much.» (Yes)
- It is nice to get to know a lot of students from the whole world.» (Yes)
- Although the core courses are somehow too distributed and less focused, it is good in the sense that it offers great variety and possibility. Students have the freedom to choose their direction and teachers welcome their choice. I prefer very much the freedom we have in this course.» (No opinion)
- well the only thing i felt that there should be some easy going subjects in the first quarter as it is very difficult for the international student to come settle here soon due to the accommodation problem and settlement with the environment, so student should be given some edge in this regard. » (No opinion)

34. What should definitely be preserved in your Masters programme?

35. What should definitely be changed in your Masters programme?