ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Evaluation of Economics of Innovation, IDY035

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2007-11-05 - 2007-12-05
Antal svar: 36
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 51%
Kontaktperson: Daniel Ljungberg»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

1. Name (optional)

- Jonatan Hedin»
- Tha Boss»
- Robert Hedberg»
- Niels Goos»

2. I am originally coming from*

36 svarande

the Department of Technology Management and Economics»18 50%
another department at Chalmers»5 13%
another Swedish university»0 0%
I am an international student»10 27%
I am an exchange student»3 8%

Genomsnitt: 2.3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.3

General

3. Overall the course was*

36 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»12 33%
Good»21 58%
Very good»3 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.75 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

4. How much did you learn from the course?*

36 svarande

Nothing at all»0 0%
A little»1 2%
Medium amount»16 44%
Much»15 41%
Very much»4 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.61 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

5. The structure of the course was*

36 svarande

Hard to follow»1 2%
Slightly hard to follow»5 13%
Neither hard nor easy to follow»21 58%
Somewhat easy to follow»6 16%
Easy to follow»3 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.13 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

6. The pace of the course was*

36 svarande

too slow»0 0%
slow»2 5%
neither slow nor fast»22 61%
fast»11 30%
too fast»1 2%

Genomsnitt: 3.3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

7. The administration of the course was*

36 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»3 8%
OK»18 50%
Good»11 30%
Very good»4 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.44 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

8. Did the course meet your expectations?*

36 svarande

Not at all»0 0%
Slightly»6 16%
Quite much»19 52%
Much»9 25%
Very much»2 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.19 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Very broad approach, difficult to implement this knowledge in practice (e.g. projects).» (Slightly)
- Too much literature to study in too short a time period.» (Slightly)
- Felt that the examiner wasn"t engaged in the course» (Quite much)
- The investigation of the biotech firms was quite interesting, but I think it does not fit in course who is called Economics of Innovation. Instead I expected some more theoretical models about economies e.g. Schumpeter» (Quite much)
- The group tasks were good and the home exam was a good form of examination for learning these things. » (Quite much)
- Expected it to be more of a basic course with a broad perspective. You really got familiar with some concepts etc» (Much)
- It gave a comprehensive platform of innovation knowledge and provided a good understanding of the subject which will prove helpful in the following courses» (Much)
- -» (Very much)

9. How demanding was the course?*

36 svarande

Not at all demanding»0 0%
Slightly demanding»2 5%
Quite demanding»15 41%
Demanding»14 38%
Very demanding»5 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.61 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

10. How difficult did you perceive the course?*

36 svarande

Not difficult at all»1 2%
Slightly difficult»9 25%
Quite difficult»20 55%
Difficult»5 13%
Very difficult»1 2%

Genomsnitt: 2.88 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

11. How relevant do you perceive the required literature?*

36 svarande

Not at all relevant»0 0%
Slightly relevant»0 0%
Quite relevant»7 19%
Relevant»23 63%
Very relevant»6 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.97

12. Did the examination forms (GTs and Take home exam) mirror the course content?*

36 svarande

Not at all»0 0%
Slightly»5 13%
Quite much»13 36%
Much»10 27%
Very much»8 22%

Genomsnitt: 3.58 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

13. Did the examination forms give opportunities for reflection and learning?*

36 svarande

Not at all»0 0%
Slightly»7 19%
Quite much»7 19%
Much»13 36%
Very much»9 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.66 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.41

Lecturers

14. Maureen McKelvey*

Matrisfråga

- Poorly prepared and unstructured»
- Too much text sometimes on the slides, however, this is good when you look them through once again later on´,.»
- some presentations had cram full slides with less important details»
- Is an excelent professor and is a pain that she had left Chalmers »

Overall the lecturer was*
36 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»2 5%
OK»10 27%
Good»19 52%
Very good»5 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.75 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

How did you perceive your lecturer?s competence on this topic?*
36 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»5 13%
Good»14 38%
Very good»17 47%

Genomsnitt: 4.33 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

How did the lecturer present the information?*
36 svarande

Very poor»1 2%
Poor»1 2%
OK»17 47%
Good»12 33%
Very good»5 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.52 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

How was the lecturer?s commitment and interest?*
36 svarande

Very poor»1 2%
Poor»2 5%
OK»8 22%
Good»18 50%
Very good»7 19%

Genomsnitt: 3.77 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

Your opinion of the overall topic(s), relative to course?*
36 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»1 2%
OK»8 22%
Good»23 63%
Very good»4 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.83 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

15. Magnus Holmén*

Matrisfråga

- Magnus get students involved in this way learning is more effective. The lecture is active which is something good.»

Overall the lecturer was*
36 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»10 27%
Good»23 63%
Very good»3 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.8 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

How did you perceive your lecturer?s competence on this topic?*
36 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»5 13%
Good»22 61%
Very good»9 25%

Genomsnitt: 4.11 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

How did the lecturer present the information?*
36 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»11 30%
Good»19 52%
Very good»6 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.86 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

How was the lecturer?s commitment and interest?*
36 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»9 25%
Good»23 63%
Very good»4 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.86 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

Your opinion of the overall topic(s), relative to course?*
36 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»9 25%
Good»23 63%
Very good»4 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.86 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

16. Christian Sandström*

Matrisfråga

- what an enthusiastic lecturer! I hope we will have the opportunity to listen on his lectures in the future»

Overall the lecturer was*
36 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»1 2%
OK»9 25%
Good»19 52%
Very good»7 19%

Genomsnitt: 3.88 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

How did you perceive your lecturer?s competence on this topic?*
36 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»2 5%
OK»10 27%
Good»16 44%
Very good»8 22%

Genomsnitt: 3.83 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

How did the lecturer present the information?*
36 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»1 2%
OK»9 25%
Good»19 52%
Very good»7 19%

Genomsnitt: 3.88 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

How was the lecturer?s commitment and interest?*
36 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»3 8%
OK»6 16%
Good»20 55%
Very good»7 19%

Genomsnitt: 3.86 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

Your opinion of the overall topic(s), relative to course?*
36 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»1 2%
OK»13 36%
Good»16 44%
Very good»6 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.75 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

17. Johan Brink*

Matrisfråga

- very smart guy but he was not very succesful in making the contact with audience. »

Overall the lecturer was*
36 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»1 2%
OK»11 30%
Good»21 58%
Very good»3 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.72 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

How did you perceive your lecturer?s competence on this topic?*
36 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»11 30%
Good»19 52%
Very good»6 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.86 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

How did the lecturer present the information?*
36 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»14 38%
Good»19 52%
Very good»3 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.69 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

How was the lecturer?s commitment and interest?*
36 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»12 33%
Good»20 55%
Very good»4 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.77 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

Your opinion of the overall topic(s), relative to course?*
36 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»1 2%
OK»12 33%
Good»18 50%
Very good»5 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.75 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

18. Daniel Ljungberg*

Matrisfråga

- Was he hungover?»
- He must work more on his presentation techniques»
- The attitude was wrong, he did not show any interest in teaching. It was bored and even though the topic was interesting the learning was a failure.»

Overall the lecturer was*
36 svarande

Very poor»6 16%
Poor»11 30%
OK»9 25%
Good»9 25%
Very good»1 2%

Genomsnitt: 2.66 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

How did you perceive your lecturer?s competence on this topic?*
36 svarande

Very poor»2 5%
Poor»8 22%
OK»16 44%
Good»7 19%
Very good»3 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.02 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

How did the lecturer present the information?*
36 svarande

Very poor»7 19%
Poor»11 30%
OK»11 30%
Good»5 13%
Very good»2 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.55 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

How was the lecturer?s commitment and interest?*
36 svarande

Very poor»5 13%
Poor»9 25%
OK»15 41%
Good»5 13%
Very good»2 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.72 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

Your opinion of the overall topic(s), relative to course?*
36 svarande

Very poor»2 5%
Poor»5 13%
OK»19 52%
Good»8 22%
Very good»2 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.08 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.63

Comments

19. Too little attention was paid to?

- Discussing medical device industry»
- Analytical frameworks.»
- different economic models and theories»
- The Tidd book, seemed like an interesting book but it was too fragmentized.»
- The things we had to write about in the GTs and the home exam was things we had talked way too little about, however, it was very interesting when you had to value a company and so fourth, but to be able to do that in a good way, we should have got more information and lectures about that.»
- Through our assignments we need to deal with some economic indicators (and understand them), although many of us don`t have economics background - the lecture of fundamental knowledge by Christian Sandström was very good but maybe it was not enough!»
- How econmics influence projects»
- Whether students can study the vast literature at the same time while doing the group tasks.»

20. Too much attention was paid to?

- Biotech»
- Readings, more reflectionbased assignments would be good, the take-home exam was do some degree reflectionbased which I wound very satisafctory.»
- investigation of biotech firms»
- the home exam payed too much attention to evaluating stuff, which we havn"t talked THAT much about in the course lectures.. »
- Grundläggande termer som bland annat I:are har lärt sig om i 3 år. Tex utbud/efterfrågan etc.»
- basic stuff that should be known before the course.»
- broad concepts»
- Group Tasks.»

21. Comments on the course literature?

- Sometimes too much, more reflection on the readings , e.g. litterature seminar would be good.»
- good»
- Scherer book was interesting, light read. Tidd book should have been given more attention.»
- too much to read, one can"t read everything and have a personal life on the side,, I"ve felt stressed up this whole period due to all the reading..»
- I found it good. Although it was difficult I managed to read and understand most of the articles. However, I know that for some foreign students it was extremely difficult. The course is good, the literature as well, but it is unfair of Chalmers to bring people here who clearly will have difficulties understanding the course literature without offering them any help. Many Asian students for example have to work in order to afford life here. This means they are forced to waste time and energy on working when they in fact would need to put even more time and energy into reading than the average Swedish student - who has everything to his/her favor (background knowledge of economics, student loan from CSN, good English knowledge). This makes some foreign students feel very bad. Chalmers should help foreign students survive without having to work. »
- Unfortunately we didnt use the whole innovation book»
- Many good articles. Scherer book not so structured. Tidd book a little too general and basic.»
- too many articles needed to read...unproductive reading: read and forget it after few days»
- It is not necessary to buy Tidd book, since we read less than half of it. It would be enough with Scherer and all the articles»
- Too vast. Should be reduced, to help International students, coming from courses other than Industrial Engineering. Example - I come from Electrical Engineering, and I am not used to study such huge course literature in such a short time.»

22. What other comments or recommendations would you make for future program courses?

- maybe involve some more real life examples in the lectures. Because the literature is easy and good to read, so there is no need to explain everything literally. Would be nice to speak about real life issues / emamples. »
- Presentation of the projects, next time I suggest dividing the groups in two and assign the group a date when they should present, thereby all of the groups will present sometimes.»
- deeper investigation of the factors of success for economies --> different theories --> different conclusions»
- Not so much weekly tasks to do!»
- Clearer structure, preferably divided in segments.»
- more practical examples and more explanations of fundamental elements in economics »
- It is good to have the course tutor present during the entire course because it gives more seriousness to the process. »
- Try to further develop this course so it can help innovation managers to make decissions. This suggests a more focussed approach.»
- Reduce the course literature. Group Tasks are still good.»
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.53
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.63

* obligatoriska frågor

Kursutvärderingssystem från