Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Remote sensing 2009, RRY055

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-03-24 - 2009-04-11
Antal svar: 8
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 88%
Kontaktperson: Patrick Eriksson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

8 svarande

At most 10 hours/week»1 12%
Around 15 hours/week»2 25%
Around 20 hours/week»3 37%
Around 25 hours/week»1 12%
At least 30 hours/week»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.87

- The course very extensive, very extensive» (At least 30 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

8 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 12%
75%»2 25%
100%»5 62%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

8 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 12%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 12%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»5 62%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- Too many people involved which made it very confusing and chaotic» (The goals are difficult to understand)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

7 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»5 71%
No, the goals are set too high»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 2.28

- too extensive a course and too little time to cover the material in depth» (No, the goals are set too high)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

7 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»6 85%
Yes, definitely»1 14%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.14

- knew that I had not covered radar and DOAS adequately» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the lectures been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»1 12%
Some extent»3 37%
Large extent»4 50%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.37

- The teaching was not good in many cases» (Small extent)

7. To what extent has the problem solving classes been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»1 12%
Some extent»1 12%
Large extent»5 62%
Great extent»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- Needed the RADAR lectures to be better and have the problem solving class as well» (Large extent)

8. To what extent has the lab tasks been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 25%
Large extent»5 62%
Great extent»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.87

- The matlab lab was great and helpful. The doas lab was a week before the test and presented us with a FTIR which was not talked about in the book or handouts. Radar was good but was not nearly adequate enough for the exam question.» (Large extent)

9. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»1 12%
Some extent»4 50%
Large extent»1 12%
Great extent»2 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- This book should be changed, the RSS department should be compile some relevant material!!!» (Small extent)
- Many things in the DOAS and RADAR was not in the book. A compendium is needed.» (Some extent)

10. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

8 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»6 75%
Very well»2 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

Study climate

11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

8 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 12%
Rather good»3 37%
Very good»4 50%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

12. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

8 svarande

Very poorly»1 12%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 25%
Very well»5 62%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- Only one was willing to work together.» (Very poorly)

13. How was the course workload?

8 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 12%
Adequate»4 50%
High»3 37%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- The time was too short for so much material» (High)

Sustainable development

14. Do you consider remote sensing to be a part of "sustainable development"?

7 svarande

Yes»5 71%
No»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 1.28

- What does this mean?» (?)

15. To what extent should the course contain a sustainable development perspective?

Only relevant if you have answered yes above.

6 svarande

None»0 0%
Brief coments»4 66%
Small»1 16%
Large»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- Once the understanding of the course is achieved, a clear perspective about sustainability should be understood between lines. I think is better to give emphasis to the explanation of the concepts than to the applications.» (Brief coments)

Summarizing questions

16. What is your general impression of the course?

8 svarande

Poor»1 12%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»4 50%
Good»2 25%
Excellent»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- but poorly organized and taught» (Good)

17. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- matlab project»
- all but more time and better literature. Better labs that are in the beginning or middle of the course -- not at the end»
- MATLAB project»
- 1)Electromagnetic radiation, 2)Radiative transfer theory, 3)Passive microwave systems, 4)Spectroscopy, 5)Radar and 6)Data inversion. »

18. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Better RADAR and DOAS teaching and lab»
- The labs and the matlab project should be graded, not only the exam»
- More MATLAB?»
- I think the material regarding photographic systems is good for understanding, but obsolete. Maybe, an small explanation about orbits could be included in the introductory class instead of a whole lecture. Radar altimetry could be also a part of radar applications instead of a lecture.»

19. Additional comments

- A better consistancy between the lectures and the solving class»
- The content of the course is rather too much to be done in one quarter.»
- Maybe, more emphasis could be given to the radar part of the course.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från