ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Reliability and thermal management of microsystems, MCC095, MPMIC, VT2009, MCC095

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-03-16 - 2009-03-21
Antal svar: 3
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 23%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

3 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 33%
Around 20 hours/week»1 33%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

3 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»1 33%
100%»2 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.66

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

3 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 33%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 33%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 3

- for the reliability part» (The goals are difficult to understand)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

3 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»3 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

3 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 66%
Yes, definitely»0 0%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

3 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 33%
Large extent»1 33%
Great extent»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 3

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

3 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 33%
Large extent»2 66%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- the lecture notes contained small amount of information, and they were almost all displaying different works done perviously. but no discriptions which the exam was asking about» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

3 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 33%
Rather well»1 33%
Very well»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 3

- the schedules were changed, the timeedit was not updated. some excersises changed to normal lectures» (Rather badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

3 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»2 66%
I did not seek help»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

3 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 66%
Very well»1 33%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

11. How was the course workload?

3 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
High»1 33%
Too high»2 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.66

- it seems they were supposed to be two courses, which they merged it to a new 1 course, so the load was ex termly heavy» (Too high)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

2 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
High»0 0%
Too high»2 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

Course-specific questions:

13. What is your opinion about lecturers of Johan Liu?

3 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 33%
Good»0 0%
Excellent»2 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

- He has true passion of delivering knowledge what he has.» (Excellent)

14. What is your opinion about lecturers of Leonid Kuzmin ?

3 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 33%
Good»0 0%
Excellent»2 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

- He is superb teacher.» (Excellent)

15. What is your opinion about lecturers of Anna Herr?

3 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 33%
Good»0 0%
Excellent»2 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

16. What is your opinion about exercises given by Teng Wang?

3 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 33%
Good»1 33%
Excellent»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 4

17. What is your opinion about exercises given by Kristian Berland?

3 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 66%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»1 33%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

18. What is your opinion about labs: Lab A: Measurement of mechanical properties of metallic materials by Ihab Sinno?

3 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 33%
Good»0 0%
Excellent»2 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

- Ihab is a good demonstrator and convey knowledge in good way.» (Excellent)

19. What is your opinion about labs: Lab B: Thermal properties of polymeric materials by Yifeng Fu?

3 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 33%
Good»2 66%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

20. What is your opinion about labs: Lab C: Measurement of thermal interface matetials by Björn Carlberg?

3 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»1 33%
Excellent»2 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.66

21. What is your opinion about the project work?

3 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 33%
Good»1 33%
Excellent»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 4

- it is better to have several projects for this course. here almost all students were doing the same work, which makes it kind of boring when attending the presentation» (Adequate)
- But its somehow messy with course.» (Excellent)

22. What is your opinion about the examination questions?

3 svarande

Poor»1 33%
Fair»1 33%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»1 33%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

- It"d be better to have a normalaized questions. almost all of the problems requiring calculations were from reliablity part.» (Fair)

Summarizing questions

23. What is your general impression of the course?

3 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 33%
Adequate»1 33%
Good»0 0%
Excellent»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

24. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- I think its good effort to summarize two courses this year »

25. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- the compandium of reliability must be over viewed.»
- i think burden was quite high on students so course should be little bit decreased comparative to now.»

26. Additional comments

Kursutvärderingssystem från