ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Information systems for logistics, ITR 353

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-03-16 - 2009-04-01
Antal svar: 29
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 48%
Kontaktperson: Henrik Sternberg»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

29 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»17 58%
Around 20 hours/week»5 17%
Around 25 hours/week»6 20%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 1.72

- took 3 course and prioritzed the other ones» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered (lectures and exercise classes) did you attend?

29 svarande

Less than 20%»1 3%
20-40%»2 6%
41-60%»1 3%
61-80%»4 13%
More than 80%»21 72%

Genomsnitt: 4.44

3. How well did the course fullfill your expectations?

29 svarande

1 (not at all)»3 10%
2»10 34%
3»6 20%
4»9 31%
5 (very well)»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 2.82 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- I wanted something more detailed on IT systems (more exercises and work on computers)» (1 (not at all))
- Nothing new really, studied Management of IS earlier in my education and this course was about almost the same things.» (2)
- Very basic level. The course got very repetitive at times.» (2)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.82

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

4. How understandable are the course goals?

29 svarande

The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 4%
The goals are fairly well described»7 33%
The goals are well described»10 47%
The goals very well described»3 14%
I have not seen/read the goals»8

Genomsnitt: 3.71

- Quite a small topic for a whole course though. We talked about almost the same things every week.» (The goals are well described)

5. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

29 svarande

No, the goals are set far too low»4 19%
No, the goals are set too low»5 23%
Goals set somewhat too low»1 4%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»11 52%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%
Did not read/remember the goals»8

Genomsnitt: 2.9

6. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

29 svarande

No, not at all»1 3%
To some extent»10 38%
Yes»7 26%
Yes, it did it well»6 23%
Yes, it did it very well»2 7%
I dont know/have not been examined yet»3

Genomsnitt: 2.92

- it"s not useful to know the exact definition of an "information" ...» (No, not at all)

Teaching and course administration

7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

29 svarande

Very small extent»1 3%
Small extent»6 20%
Some extent»7 24%
Large extent»13 44%
Great extent»2 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.31

- I could have read the book during a weekend and learned almost as much.. I learned a lot from the guest lectures though.. » (Small extent)
- the lecturers from Meridion were great» (Some extent)

8. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

29 svarande

Very small extent»7 25%
Small extent»4 14%
Some extent»7 25%
Large extent»9 32%
Great extent»1 3%
I did not read the book»1

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- This book IS NOT at a Master"s level at all. It seemed more like an introductory course for computers or something.» (Very small extent)
- the book is NOT interesting !» (Very small extent)
- The book is really bad.. especially chapter 10» (Small extent)
- The books does not contain that much usefull information with exeption of couple of chapters concerning the course of Supply Chain Management» (Some extent)

9. How well did the Navision Exercise contribute to your learning?*

29 svarande

Not at all, I did not learn anything new from this exercise»0 0%
I have learned some from this exercise»9 31%
The learning has been satisfactory»7 24%
Well, I have learned from this exercise»10 34%
Very well, I have learned a lot from this exercise»3 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.24

- Too easy...» (I have learned some from this exercise)
- Maybe there should be more practice with this program. Or some other program. Stig-Arnes said that Navision was not that good.» (Well, I have learned from this exercise)
- I think it can be added one more exercise to get to know ERP system better. It doesn"t have to be long but with a little bit more advanced questions » (Well, I have learned from this exercise)
- I think if we spend more time on this kind of exercises would be more helpful and we"ll have more practical experience.» (Very well, I have learned a lot from this exercise)
- we should do more exercises like that» (Very well, I have learned a lot from this exercise)

10. How well did the ERP Case assignment contribute to your learning?*

29 svarande

Not at all, I did not learn anything new from this exercise»1 3%
I have learned some from this exercise»12 41%
The learning has been satisfactory»4 13%
Well, I have learned from this exercise»10 34%
Very well, I have learned a lot from this exercise»2 6%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Since we don"t have access to these programs sometimes it"s very difficult to some of the points and especially the questions done by Gunnar in the presentations» (I have learned some from this exercise)
- But the goals of the assignment was not stated well enough. Could also be better discussed when finished.» (The learning has been satisfactory)

11. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

29 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 3%
Satisfactory»6 20%
Rather well»12 41%
Very well»10 34%

Genomsnitt: 4.06

- compare with other courses it was very well organized and on time.» (Very well)

12. Did you get a satisfactory service from the course examinator?

28 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»2 7%
Satisfactory»5 17%
Good»10 35%
Very good»11 39%

Genomsnitt: 4.07

- Not enough cooperation between Henrik and Gunnar.» (Satisfactory)

13. Did you get a satisfactory service from the course administrator?

28 svarande

Very Poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 3%
Satisfactory»6 21%
Good»8 28%
Very good»13 46%

Genomsnitt: 4.17

Staff lectures

14. How was the quality of the lectures given by Johan Bystedt?*

29 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»3 12%
Satisfactory»7 28%
Good»15 60%
Very good»0 0%
Don´,t know»4

Genomsnitt: 3.48 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The first one was hard to follow if no previous knowledge of EDI. The second one was not that well prepared and orgnaised (why have a question on the exam on this???? And why did he get 25 out of 75 points on the exam when this was not part of the litterature?)» (Rather poor)

15. How was the quality of the lectures given by Gunnar Stefansson?*

Frågan är kopplad till lärare: Gunnar Stefansson»

29 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»7 25%
Satisfactory»4 14%
Good»12 42%
Very good»5 17%
Don´,t know»1

Genomsnitt: 3.53 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- No extra material. Only from the book, I can read my self...» (Satisfactory)

16. How was the quality of the lectures given by Henrik Sternberg?*

Frågan är kopplad till lärare: Henrik Sternberg»

29 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 3%
Satisfactory»4 14%
Good»16 59%
Very good»6 22%
Don´,t know»2

Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- We want to learn, you can talk more about the subject concerned... » (Satisfactory)
- Henrik seems to have a lot of practical and theoretical knowledge that could be really interesting for this course.» (Very good)

17. How was the quality of the lecture given by Stig-Arne Mattsson?

29 svarande

Very poor»1 4%
Rather poor»0 0%
Satisfactory»2 8%
Good»9 36%
Very good»13 52%
Don´,t know»4

Genomsnitt: 4.32

- Very nice with real experience and knowledge.» (Very good)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.67

Study climate

18. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

29 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 3%
Rather good»8 27%
Very good»16 55%
I did not seek help»4 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.79

19. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

29 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»7 24%
Very well»22 75%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

20. How was the course workload?

29 svarande

Too low»4 13%
Low»10 34%
Adequate»14 48%
High»1 3%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.41

21. How was the total workload this study period?

29 svarande

Too low»1 3%
Low»5 17%
Adequate»15 51%
High»8 27%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.03

- I read Teknikhistoria as the other course.» (Adequate)
- The other course had seminars every week.» (High)

22. How well did the planning, such as the scheduling of deadlines hand-ins etc work for you?

29 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 6%
OK»6 20%
Well»16 55%
Very well»5 17%

Genomsnitt: 3.82

- Should have been better stated from the start.» (Rather badly)
- I think the planning was done quite well in a matter of spreding the workload smoothly during the course » (Well)

23. Did you get enough help with computer exercises from the exercise teacher?*

29 svarande

No help at all»0 0%
Too little help»0 0%
OK help»3 11%
Good help»11 40%
Excellent help»13 48%
I did not ask for help with the computer exercises»2

Genomsnitt: 4.37 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The exercises could be a lot more complicated. They were very easy i think.» (Excellent help)

24. How well did the student representatives work?

29 svarande

Very badly»1 5%
Rather badly»1 5%
Rather well»7 35%
Well»8 40%
Very well»3 15%
No opinion»9

Genomsnitt: 3.55

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.37

Summarizing questions

25. What is your general impression of the course?

29 svarande

Poor»7 24%
Fair»3 10%
Adequate»8 27%
Good»10 34%
Excellent»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 2.82

- This course didn"t give nything special. We hve heard the sme stuff before from the other courses.» (Poor)
- This course was very dissapointing. The book was expensive and basic and the content wasn"t interesting either. In this level, we shouldn"t be asked to just memorize things from the book. We should have more analytical studies to make us think and even want to try to improve. Besides, this day and age these terms that we had to learn are sometimes interchangeable.» (Poor)
- I did"nt learn a lot of things ... except the exact definition of what is an information. Lecturers from Meridion were great especially on EDI.» (Poor)
- Do not understand why it is mandatory for SCM.» (Fair)
- Gunnar and Henrik are both good teachers!» (Good)

26. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Chnge the book. It is not proprite book for a university. + it costs much.»
- The Navition sessions»
- Guest lectures, Navision exercise»
- For the next year, maybe more ERP applications should be studied by groups in seminars to enhance the understandings to ERP in the companies.»
- I think the book was well and also Nav exercise and lectures about Data base and system integration were excellent.»
- Guest lectures»
- The case study»
- I think the guest lecture of implementing steps of ERP system was very usefull and shoud be preserved next year »

27. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- More More relevant computer labs, for example in SAP»
- More specific which chapter in the book that is important. Some of the chapters were quite poor.»
- The book More lectures Make it more interesting nd challenging for the students.»
- den ska definitivt inte vara obligatirisk! Ämnet är viktigt att lära sig om men kursen är på dagisnivå, en katastrof, slöseri med vår tid och en indirekt förolämpning.»
- The book and the group assignment»
- The whole content should be reevaluated. What is REALLY important for us to learn? Did we really have to read about software, hardware at A MASTERS LEVEL? The group project was slightly better but it still wasn"t something meaningful. »
- More assignments, other course litterature, more guest lecturers, higher level on assignments»
- More seminars and less lectures. »
- More computer labs»
- Book, level»
- The book»
- The book! It is very bad»
- We want more exercises on computer and more lectures like those we had by Meridion»

28. Additional comments

- All the lecturers seem to have more useful knowledge than what they have given us. I honestly think the subject didn"t give me any competitive advantage when it comes to other professionals (that maybe don"t have a Master"s degree)»
- it would be better if we have some other courses related to information technology for those who are interested to go through this field of work because I think we need to more about IT and IS and I couldn"t find other courses in other universities that is related to SCM.»
- I got the feeling that the "teachers" weren"t really interested in teaching and actually sharing their experience and knowledge. It was easier to just buy a book and use it without questioning anything.»
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.63
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.65

* obligatoriska frågor

Kursutvärderingssystem från