ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Engineering polymers 2008/2009, MPM080

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-03-14 - 2009-03-28
Antal svar: 10
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 23%
Kontaktperson: Maria Knutson Wedel»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Klass: Övriga

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

10 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 20%
Around 20 hours/week»5 50%
Around 25 hours/week»2 20%
Around 30 hours/week»1 10%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

10 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»2 20%
75%»4 40%
100%»4 40%

Genomsnitt: 4.2

- Almost 100%. Did miss some lecture.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

10 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»10 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

Teaching and course administration

4. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 30%
Large extent»5 50%
Great extent»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- Nice of the teachers to show some parts that we could feel and see.» (Great extent)

5. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

10 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»8 80%
Very well»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- We have gotten all information and it has been kindly copied to us.» (Rather well)
- No problems at all» (Very well)

Study climate

6. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

10 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 10%
Very good»6 60%
I did not seek help»3 30%

Genomsnitt: 4.2

- The teachers have been very open to questions and been structured. Some extra explanations during the break have been done if there is a wondering after as well. » (Very good)

7. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

10 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 10%
Rather well»3 30%
Very well»6 60%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- For the DMTA lab I think we where to many, so everything became a little delayed» (Rather well)
- Good teamwork through our labs and report writning.» (Very well)

8. How was the course workload?

10 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 10%
Adequate»7 70%
High»2 20%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.1

9. How was the total workload this study period?

10 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»5 50%
High»3 30%
Too high»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

- because i had 3 courses» (High)
- I had three courses so it is my own fault.» (Too high)

10. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- the report and the presentation»
- group project»
- The compendium, it was very good.»
- Labs, teamwork was nice. "Showing object" to a better understanding»

11. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Free lecture notes!!»
- more clear structure and more labs»
- I think the labs should be a little earlier»
- The DMTA-lab! It was really just waste of time.»
- Smaller labgroups must be made, or make the reports individual. It"s very bad to have 6-7people writing a report together, the outcome in most cases is poor. »
- Too many equations.»

12. Level of information presented in lectures was... (put an X)

10 svarande

too high»1 10%
reasonable»8 80%
too low»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Rodneys lecture material just consisted of a bunch of diagrams with no explanation.» (too high)

13. Lectures gave substantial information

9 svarande

Agree»9 100%
Hesitant»0 0%
Disagree»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

- Don"t understand the question.» (?)

14. Do you think the course should cover more or fewer topics?

10 svarande

More topics»2 20%
Fewer topics»0 0%
No change»8 80%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

- some environmetal impact, such as products recycling, toxic additives.» (More topics)
- Perhaps with a bit more information in each topic» (No change)
- Just try to connect the topics better to each other, I got the impression that there was just a lot of different topics but no connection between them.» (No change)

15. Tutorial problems helped to better understand computational aspects

10 svarande

Agree»8 80%
Hesitant»1 10%
Disagree»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 1.3

- I dont think the tutorial about the rheology where so good.» (Hesitant)

16. Measuring techniques (labs) were helpful from the point of view of the theory and laboratory practice

10 svarande

Agree»8 80%
Hesitant»1 10%
Disagree»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 1.3

- Labs gives better understanding when you see it live.» (Agree)
- The DMTA-lab was just waste of time!» (Disagree)

17. Topics to study brought me more into the world of polymers

10 svarande

Agree»7 70%
Hesitant»2 20%
Disagree»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 1.4

- The limited amount of time for presentation and two-page report, made it hard to go any deeper into the subject.» (Hesitant)

18. CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING TTS were useful

10 svarande

agree»10 100%
hesitant»0 0%
disagree»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

19. Course book was a helpful source to study polymeric materials

10 svarande

Agree»9 90%
Hesitant»1 10%
Disagree»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.1

- As some of courses weren"t in the handout, that was not optional to have the book, so yes, it was helpful!» (Agree)
- I think the book i good and not to expensive» (Agree)
- Some part but other not. But the compendium was good. » (Hesitant)

20. On the whole you would

10 svarande

Recommend the course»9 90%
Hesitant»1 10%
Not recommend the course»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.1

- It was good that the course didn"t contain so much chemistry and was more towards mechanical properties.» (Recommend the course)
- for student have polymer background in university, most of part is a refreshment of knowledge.» (Hesitant)

21. Additional comments

- I learned a lot with this course!»
- The exam wasn"t really representative for the content that was covered during course. For example viscoelasticity was a BIG part of the course (5-6hrs) and not a single question on that during exam. Other things that were covered very briefly had 2 questions on them. »
- The teachers had a good structure, but Giovanans tutorial lecture was not understandable but her lab was much better. It is good to create the learning self by writing and drawing. I don´,t think that the last part of the examine was relevant to what we had talked about on the lectures. What happened with viscoelastic part on the examine that was so important and lot talked about during the course?»

Kursutvärderingssystem från