ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Ship Stability and Geometry, MMA 136

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-10-23 - 2008-10-21
Antal svar: 15
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 93%
Kontaktperson: martin schreuder»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

15 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 6%
Around 20 hours/week»8 53%
Around 25 hours/week»4 26%
Around 30 hours/week»2 13%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.46

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

14 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 7%
75%»2 14%
100%»11 78%

Genomsnitt: 4.71

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

14 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 14%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»7 50%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»5 35%

Genomsnitt: 3.07

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

12 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 8%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»9 75%
No, the goals are set too high»2 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.08

- The amount of knowledge about the probabilistic approach asked is to high in the short amount of time. » (No, the goals are set too high)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

14 svarande

No, not at all»1 7%
To some extent»6 42%
Yes, definitely»5 35%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

- The tutorial didn"t corresponded to the exam» (To some extent)
- i do not know the grade yet.» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the Lectures been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent»3 20%
Some extent»4 26%
Large extent»7 46%
Great extent»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

- The lecture might be very skillful in the subject, but he didn"t fulfilled to deliver the knowledge. Perhaps should the lecturer change his lecture notes...» (Small extent)
- ronnie hanzen may be a good proffesional but teaching is not something that he should do.» (Small extent)
- the lecturer was often to fast» (Some extent)
- My learning was mainly due to autostudy.» (Some extent)
- The lecturer was sometimes to fast and hard to understand. » (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the Design Classes been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent»1 6%
Some extent»5 33%
Large extent»7 46%
Great extent»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- But the last exercise was far too comprehensive, and it was also began too late. » (Large extent)

8. To what extent has the Tutorials been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent»1 6%
Some extent»4 26%
Large extent»6 40%
Great extent»4 26%

Genomsnitt: 2.86

- The solution of problems could be presented in a much more easy and clean way.» (Some extent)
- Great tutorial!» (Great extent)

9. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent»1 6%
Some extent»4 26%
Large extent»8 53%
Great extent»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 2.73

- The compendium is quite bad, difficult to read and understand. » (Small extent)
- The compendium was sometimes hard to understand(derivation of the wallsided formula for example)» (Large extent)

10. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

14 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 7%
Rather well»7 50%
Very well»6 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

- Webpage, admin worked very well. Handout of 2nd assignment was too late» (?)
- The hand-written solutions from tutorials and for self-studies were very hard to read.» (Rather badly)
- the solved Problems on the weppage are difficult to read» (Rather well)

Study climate

11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

15 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»5 33%
Very good»10 66%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

12. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

14 svarande

Very poorly»1 7%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 7%
Very well»12 85%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

13. How was the course workload?

15 svarande

Too low»1 6%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»9 60%
High»5 33%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- Exept for the Probabilistic Damaged Stability assignment wich was impossible to do in one week» (Adequate)
- Part of the Assignment(probebalistic stability) in the Design classes started one week before the end of the examination -this is a problem because this makes it difficult to start with the new course.» (High)

14. How was the total workload this study period?

15 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 6%
Adequate»10 66%
High»4 26%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

Summarizing questions

15. What is your general impression of the course?

15 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 6%
Adequate»2 13%
Good»11 73%
Excellent»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- » (Adequate)

16. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- all the course content»
- speed of the tutorials was good.»
- Tutor and assignment 1»
- The design classes have to be preserved»
- More time in design class and more lecture that one can realize problem.»
- more assignment»
- The design classes and the tutorials»

17. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The samall prodject in Propabilistic calculations»
- the text should be improve upon»
- The probabilistic part in design class is too repetitive and tedious. Why not reduce the number of compartments?»
- Assignment(probebalistic stability) could be shorten -and should not start short before course end. The speed in the lectures was to fast.»
- Reduce the workload on assignment #2 and change lecture notes on the lecturer»
- The compendium and the handwritten slides.»
- It might be a good idea to have a shorter last assigment (about the probabilistic method) which was very interesting but too long. I think that we would understand very well with a simple case of ship with only 2 divisions and 4 or 5 tanks.»
- More time in this class»
- give sosme assignment with regard to ship resistance calcuclation»
- the quick view over the probabilistic damaged stability in lectures is not enough to reach a practical knowledge and use it in reality»

18. Additional comments

- the course served its purpose very well»
- Nothing»
- it is a good course and I have learn a lot from it even though I have taken the same course in my country »

Kursutvärderingssystem från