Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Form design development, MPP110

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-03-09 - 2009-03-22
Antal svar: 19
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 52%
Kontaktperson: Oskar Rexfelt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

19 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»3 15%
Around 20 hours/week»7 36%
Around 25 hours/week»7 36%
Around 30 hours/week»1 5%
At least 35 hours/week»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.47

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

19 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»2 10%
100%»17 89%

Genomsnitt: 4.89

- Almost» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

19 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 15%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 5%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»8 42%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»7 36%

Genomsnitt: 3

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

16 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»15 93%
No, the goals are set too high»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.06

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

18 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»5 27%
Yes, definitely»6 33%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»7 38%

Genomsnitt: 3.11

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

19 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»6 31%
Large extent»7 36%
Great extent»6 31%

Genomsnitt: 3

- tycker det har varit sjukt abstrakt skulle hjälpa om det var mer klart vad som menas med olika saker, plus att litteraturen varit så tung att det är svårt att läsa i den» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

19 svarande

Small extent»1 5%
Some extent»9 47%
Large extent»8 42%
Great extent»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.47

- boken är för komplex, är till och med svårt att ta sig igenom en sida i den. Skulle vara bättre med en bok som är lättare att ta till sig » (Small extent)
- I have not read much of the extra literarure, I focused on the lectures.» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

19 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»8 42%
Very well»11 57%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

- It would have been better if the teacher had set the groups from the beginning, and changed them too. This would have saved time.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

19 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 5%
Very good»18 94%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.94

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

19 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»3 15%
Rather well»4 21%
Very well»12 63%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.47

11. How was the course workload?

19 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»12 63%
High»5 26%
Too high»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.47

- alla assignments har tagit väldig mycket tid i förhållande till deras storlek. » (Too high)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

19 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»7 36%
High»11 57%
Too high»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.68

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

19 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 5%
Adequate»4 21%
Good»9 47%
Excellent»5 26%

Genomsnitt: 3.94

- väldigt abstrakt. tycker dock den ligger väldigt långt från ingenjörsämen och att vi läser en ingenjörsutbildning kommer bort skulle vara bra om ingenjörsdimensionen kunde komma in också, känns lite mer som en HDK-kurs» (Adequate)
- It has been fun and interesting, but it is hard to know of how much real use this course will be. I guess that will be clearer in the next course in the series.» (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- I think it was great that we changed groups a lot. It gives everybody a chance to get to know people in the class better as well as evening out differences if you find yourself in a "bad" group. I also liked that we had oral presentations each week. I feel I have become much better at this during the course. It is also easier to make a powerpoint and speak about a subject than to write a report about it in that short amount of time.»
- Every week assignment and having different group members»
- It good to have these assignment so you dont just get the teoretical part as this is not a subject like math that has right and wrongs it needs to be discused. »
- The one assignment per lecture format and the absence of a project»
- The engaged teacher!»
- I think the presentations are a useful tool for getting the students to understand each lecture.»
- The assignments»
- presentations»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The group creating process could be structured in a better way to ensure that there is an even better mix than it was this time.»
- Nothing»
- Recommend literature that is a little easier to reach, if possible.»
- I think Anders should be free to make the course as he wanted, without the meddling of Ulrike Rahe. Her parts are too theoretical and unrealistic. Anders has a much more reality-based teaching...»
- I felt a presentation every week was very demanding as I have other courses and commitments as does every member of the group, it was difficult to get a group of 4 people together at the one time. I also think it was unfair to give the groups one day (which happened in the last two presentations) to create a presentation due once again to other commitments outside the course. More time between presentations would be more appropriate. »
- The groups. It did not work with the exchangestudents.»
- att man får med ingenjörsdimensionen. rapporten borde vara klart från börjarn vad som ska göras, var flera som börja jobba efter de första riktlinjerna och sen ändrades de helt. tycker också att rapporten som den var nu inget kanske gav så mycket var rätt flummigt »
- the time edit»

16. Additional comments

- It was very nice to study.»
- It is hard to know if I reached the goals in the course after the presentations each week since we didn"t get that kind of feedback. It would be good with some kind of feedback on what is needed of the students to know which grade there going to get.»
- nothing»

Kursutvärderingssystem från