|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Quantum Informatics, FKA172, MPNAN, VT2009, FKA172Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2009-03-08 - 2009-03-21 Antal svar: 11 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 78% Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Teknisk fysik 300 hp
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.11 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.9 - Time consuming, yet interesting course» (At least 35 hours/week) 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?11 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.54 - missed 2 lectures.» (75%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?11 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.9 - I think the goals can be extended as well, for example to include the knowledge that the student is expected to get on qubit implementations/applications (experimental realization)» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn) 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.11 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.9 - I thought more understanding would be expected. I think the prerequisites level should be higher or at least be followed.» (No, the goals are set too low) 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?11 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.72 Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?11 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.36 - More focus on getting forward and emphasising the important parts, than repeating details that can be looked up outside of class.» (Large extent) 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?11 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.54 - I feel like I didn"t need them, but they were expensive! Either more should be demanded of the students (so we need to read the literature) or there should be no course literature more than the lecture notes (which are good)» (Small extent) 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?11 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.81 - Handouts were nice and useful, they helped to keep us fresh with the topics and sometimes to understand better the content of the lectures.
Though I was not very satisfied with the handout sessions with the TA. I think he could have been better prepared for them, also it was hard to clear doubts because it seemed he had some problems in explaining himself to us. Can be improved...» (Rather well) Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?11 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.9 - The teacher always made sure he took the time to clear doubts.» (Very good) 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?11 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.18 - with some students I did benefited from nice discussions» (Very well) 11. How was the course workload?11 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.36 12. How was the total workload this study period?11 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.63 - all though it became quite loaded at the end, with 2 lab w/reports in the last 2 weeks, adding to the 2 labs we had in superconductivity course. So it was hard to make time to study during the previous days for the exam.» (Adequate) Course-specific questions:13. To what extent has the lab at Chalmers been of help for your learning?11 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.27 - The teaching was quite good. The lab is a bit difficult to discuss since we did not see the experiment performed.» (Large extent) 14. To what extent has the lab in Lund been of help for your learning?11 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.9 - It was nice seeing another kind of qubit but the period is not the best for it.» (Some extent) 15. To what extent has the guest lectures by Jens Koch been of help for your learning?10 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.9 - Did not attend» (Small extent) Summarizing questions16. What is your general impression of the course?11 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.18 - I was really pumped before the course. But then not much was demanded, the focus was not on understanding but on details. Also there were two things which influenced me negatively psychologically. 1) The amount of low-level questions which were "allowed" during lectures (especially by one person). That type of questions can be sorted out after class. More focus on getting on with the reasoning. 2) I bought the literature which turned out not to be needed. More should be demanded of the students.» (Fair) 17. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The ability to ask questions during class.»- The lab in Lund was very helpful, the hand-in system is very good to understand the concepts» - The laborations, both Thilos and the Lund lab were really good.» - - The range of topics in the program (it could be useful to add a brief discussion about NMR, especially when the Bloch equations are introduced), - The labs.» - The laborations» - I think almost everything.» - lund lab» - keep it up !» - The structure and the conception is excellent.THE LABORATION MUST BE EXTENDED! I THINK IS AN EXCELLENT COURSE, » - The course teacher,the laborations, handouts, a guest lecturer if possible(of course one doesnt expect the same will come, but if there is a good researcher visiting its nice that he/she joins this initiative)» 18. What should definitely be changed to next year?- CTH lab report size.»- The exercice cessions are maybe not efficient enough.» - The recitations should be more focused on problem solving rather than explaining the hand-in from previous week.» - Adding some more content about quantum communication» - nothing specially» - Quantum algorithm» - The TA for the handouts can improve his way of carrying the sessions, they felt very slow and hard to see a clear picture of what he wanted to explain us.» 19. Additional comments- Very good course. I would recommend it to other students.»- It would be good to have some additional preparatory material for the labs, especially that one at Chalmers. Some original research papers on similar experiments could be helpful.» - Just thanks to Goran and Tilo for their such a good course. I enjoyed a lot.» - The problem solving session should be make more interactive.» - THANK YOU VERY MUCH PROFESSORS GÖRAN AND THILO, AS WELL PEOPLE IN LUND, I THINK THE COURSE MUST BE JOINT WITH THE ONE IN LUND AND CREATE A SUPERCOURSE IN QUANTUM INFORMATICS, AS WELL THE GROUPS, MAYBE CREATE A COLLABORATION, IT COULD BE VERY GOOD FOR THE SWEDISH SCIENCE » - I like the way the teacher took the class and his way of explaining things(very didactive). Though I have a couple of comments that could be taken into consideration for the next time(if it applies). I appreciated the way the teacher approached doubts and questions from students, he always tried to re-explain a topic in better words to make sure the things were understood and took the time neede for this, the problem is that sometimes it felt too much especially with things that either the students "should" know previously or that sometimes felt not so relevant to the lecture itself. I know this makes the teacher good because he helps the students with doubts but there has to be some line drawn because this also affected the pace of some lectures and thus it can keep the teacher from going throughly with the course material and discussing details about relevant topics. Related to this and can be easily improved next time is that the teacher should not allow students to ask(too much) about course administration related issues during the lecture time. It is fine and understandable if the teacher has to give an announcement about rescheduling or lab details and along with this the corresponding doubts from students. But, in several lectures, students would interrupt the beginning of the lecture to ask about things relating handouts, labs, dates, etc (which in my opinion can be discussed during a break) and this lead to loosing valuable lecture time and sometimes some topics had to be skiped. To avoid these issues I can suggest that the teacher should make it clear to students that this sort of doubts can be adressed during breaks. Though in my opinion students should already be aware of this (so its not the teachers fault in the first place...) »
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9%