Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Information theory, advanced level, SSY210, VT2009
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2009-03-02 - 2009-03-16 Antal svar: 11 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 84% Kontaktperson: Madeleine Persson»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.11 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 1 | | 9% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 2 | | 18% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 2 | | 18% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 3 | | 27% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 3 | | 27% |
Genomsnitt: 3.45 - It was very good to read the book, solve the excercises and do the projects deeply.» (At least 35 hours/week)
2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 11 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 0 | | 0% |
75%» | | 0 | | 0% |
100%» | | 11 | | 100% |
Genomsnitt: 5 - It was the best course that I have ever passed.» (100%)
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?11 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 3 | | 27% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 8 | | 72% |
Genomsnitt: 3.18 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.9 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 9 | | 100% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 - I have not seen/read the goals» (?)
5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?11 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 1 | | 9% |
Yes, definitely» | | 6 | | 54% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 4 | | 36% |
Genomsnitt: 3.27 - Here I considered assigned problems instead of the examination.» (Yes, definitely)
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?11 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 3 | | 27% |
Large extent» | | 4 | | 36% |
Great extent» | | 4 | | 36% |
Genomsnitt: 3.09 - Perhaps a fixed consultation time every week would be a good idea, where the students can come and ask questions about the problems.» (Some extent)
7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?11 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Large extent» | | 4 | | 36% |
Great extent» | | 7 | | 63% |
Genomsnitt: 3.63 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?11 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 5 | | 45% |
Very well» | | 6 | | 54% |
Genomsnitt: 3.54 - The assignments could have been given a bit earlier in some cases.» (Very well)
Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?11 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 3 | | 27% |
Very good» | | 8 | | 72% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.72 - It"s hard to know when Thomas is available.» (Rather good)
10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?11 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 2 | | 18% |
Very well» | | 8 | | 72% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 1 | | 9% |
Genomsnitt: 3.9 - It was encouraged to cooperate between students, which also helped a great deal in solving and understanding the problems. Very important since there are so few scheduled hours.» (Very well)
11. How was the course workload?11 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 2 | | 18% |
High» | | 7 | | 63% |
Too high» | | 2 | | 18% |
Genomsnitt: 4 - But considering the additional credits it is ok.» (Too high)
12. How was the total workload this study period?11 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 9% |
High» | | 9 | | 81% |
Too high» | | 1 | | 9% |
Genomsnitt: 4 - Research + Teaching + Having a course = High workload» (High)
Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?11 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 0 | | 0% |
Good» | | 8 | | 72% |
Excellent» | | 3 | | 27% |
Genomsnitt: 4.27 - I think most courses should be given in this format» (Excellent)
14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The great engagement of the teacher.»
- Probably everything»
- textbook»
- The free coffee =)
The seminars were very good and thorough, it"s very nice to go through the proofs and the text so closely.
The book.»
15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Somewhat better prepared assignments.»
- I think it should be presented in two quarthers because we could read 12 chapters and we did not have time to read the other six chapters»
- Not much»
- The problems to be solved must be posted earlier.
More and better computer problems.
A four hour session instead of three.
»
16. Additional comments- It was the best course that I have ever passed. Thanks Thomas!»
- It"s very nice to now have an exam!»
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|