ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Power system operation, ENM065, MPEPO, V2009, ENM065

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-03-02 - 2009-03-22
Antal svar: 34
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 59%
Kontaktperson: Valborg Ekman»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

33 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»9 27%
Around 20 hours/week»9 27%
Around 25 hours/week»8 24%
Around 30 hours/week»6 18%
At least 35 hours/week»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 2.42

- Managable within this time frame» (Around 20 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

33 svarande

0%»2 6%
25%»2 6%
50%»4 12%
75%»9 27%
100%»16 48%

Genomsnitt: 4.06

- I have trouble understanding the teachers» (0%)
- Couldnt understand the english spoken..» (0%)
- I had a hard time to hear and understand during class. The teachers english is not the best, when he speaks. But his lecture slides where in very good english.» (25%)
- Don"t understand the language during clas» (50%)
- more teaching than study period which is ok» (75%)
- The lecutres are useful» (100%)
- I just missed 2 days of lectures.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

33 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»5 15%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»10 30%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»18 54%

Genomsnitt: 3.24

- Ok» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

29 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»29 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- ok» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

32 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»7 21%
Yes, definitely»19 59%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»6 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.96

- ok» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

33 svarande

Small extent»7 21%
Some extent»10 30%
Large extent»12 36%
Great extent»4 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.39

- tuans is not so good. » (Small extent)
- Most of the topics were well explained.» (Large extent)
- Tuan and Ibram, both of them need to improve their English Language.» (Large extent)
- The Lectures given were very good.» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

32 svarande

Small extent»7 21%
Some extent»1 3%
Large extent»16 50%
Great extent»8 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.78

- more information where you can read more about the things that has been talked about during class.» (Small extent)
- tutorials put on the web has been helpful, and the lecture notes» (Large extent)
- The reference book is really good and help a lot to completely understand many topics. Also the extracts from other books that were given to the students.» (Large extent)
- 1- Please write the lecture notes with the computer, not with hand (as in the Protection and transient stability). 2- Please provide explanation needed for the Voltage stability under each curve, So we can easily understand what you want to say and don"t assume that we are going to understand every thing verbally and We are going to keep it in our mind tell the exams. - Please review the solutions made by Ibram which are posted on the Web as they have a lot of mistakes. - I didn"t understand anything form Ibram and the Slides were very bad in that area with no Explanation for the graphs. » (Large extent)

8. To what extent has the study-visit been of help for your learning?

32 svarande

Small extent»12 37%
Some extent»7 21%
Large extent»9 28%
Great extent»4 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.15

- useless» (Small extent)
- We couldn"t really see to much, electrical distribution is not what we study in this course.» (Small extent)
- The study visit was very helpful to see how are things being done in industry. However, It was not totally advantageous because of the number of people that attended to the visit. I couldn"t see anything from the control room, for example» (Large extent)
- really we gained a lot of practical concepts» (Large extent)
- It enlarge our horizons.And we have a basic understanding of the Gothenburg low voltage monitor system.» (Large extent)

9. To what extent have the worked-out examples been of help for your understanding of the lectures?

33 svarande

Small extent»7 21%
Some extent»5 15%
Large extent»14 42%
Great extent»7 21%

Genomsnitt: 2.63

- The tutorials were not at the same level as the other activities in the course.» (Small extent)
- tutor for the the tutorial section was not fully prepared. he not good teaching skills.» (Some extent)
- But next time give the answers to the examples in study week 1 instead of study week 6.» (Large extent)
- Many of them where good applications of what have been teached.» (Large extent)
- ok» (Great extent)

10. To what extent has the practical laboratory experiment been of help for your learning?

- eventough I have no problem of understanding the transient stability it have given me a practical knowledge of synchronisation snd simulating faults in system »
- some extent. I think it was good»
- Lab didn"t demonstrate anything. For, the idea had beed to really verify that if we are above the critical time machine losses synchronism. However in the lab it could been verified because of excesive damping. It is not logic, since it is expected that under any disturbance the machine will oscillate, but what makes different if we choose the critical time? I don"t know the reason why it coudn"t be done. If it is not possible to let the machine run out of step there should be an indicator that it really has lost synchronism.»
- to some extent.»
- some extent»
- great extent»
- It is good to have practical laboratory after learning theoretical, so we get batter understanding of subject.»
- some extent»
- its good.»
- Great extent.»
- great.»
- It is good,i learn a lot.»
- great extent»
- Great extent. »
- to large extent »
- Small extent. It was really just like Power Sytems Analysis demostration but this time we got to press some buttons...no bid difference.»
- Large Extent »

11. To what extent has the computer-based project (DigSILENT) been of help for your learning?

33 svarande

Small extent»6 18%
Some extent»3 9%
Large extent»11 33%
Great extent»13 39%

Genomsnitt: 2.93

- The project was interesting, a little bit disorganized but still very good.» (Large extent)
- The case to analyze was good. The project could be even better but the problem is that the topic that it involves, is teached around the fourth/fifth week, a little bit late in order to make something bigger and more valuable.» (Large extent)
- it was really intersting. i liked it too much» (Great extent)
- I like that software» (Great extent)
- But don"t expect that I can work on that Software.» (Great extent)

12. To what extent has the ARISTO-demonstration been of help for your learning?

29 svarande

Small extent»5 17%
Some extent»11 37%
Large extent»7 24%
Great extent»6 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.48

- I missed that one» (Small extent)
- havent used it on my own. just shown once» (Small extent)
- did not attend» (Small extent)
- It was really cool to know about this software. You get to learn more about real time operation.» (Some extent)
- it was also interesting and i gained a lot of practical concepts.» (Large extent)
- I want to learn more about it,it is really useful» (Large extent)

13. To what extent has the "lamp model"-demonstration been of help for your learning?

30 svarande

Small extent»4 13%
Some extent»10 33%
Large extent»6 20%
Great extent»10 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.73

- I dont know what that is» (?)
- This was a very interesting demonstration, eventhough it was very simple. It really showed me a lot and was very valuable.» (Large extent)
- before this experiment i was not cleared about the relatd topic, after this i found more concepts in me » (Great extent)
- wow that was great demonstration!» (Great extent)
- Very interesting how such a simple experiment can clarify things.» (Great extent)
- ok» (Great extent)

14. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

32 svarande

Very badly»1 3%
Rather badly»3 9%
Rather well»17 53%
Very well»11 34%

Genomsnitt: 3.18

- The solutions were always posted on the web late.» (Very badly)
- Put the thing out on the webpage after the class or before so you have chans to go trough it. And you don"t need to go to class so everyone skould be able to have all the material.» (Rather badly)
- It took some time before the handouts was put on the web page» (Rather badly)
- Things came up in the end of the course. WOuld have been better earlier..» (Rather badly)
- some not given on time» (Rather well)
- Everything was on time.» (Very well)

Study climate

15. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

32 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 3%
Rather good»12 37%
Very good»18 56%
I did not seek help»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 3.59

- could attend to us without appointment. Realy good» (Very good)
- The lecturer, the tutor and the project leader were all always willing to help.» (Very good)

16. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

33 svarande

Very poorly»2 6%
Rather poorly»1 3%
Rather well»11 33%
Very well»19 57%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

- with some» (Rather well)
- ok» (Very well)
- The work with my teammate was really good. We also had a little interact with other groups.» (Very well)

17. How was the course workload?

33 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»3 9%
Adequate»23 69%
High»7 21%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.12

- Well, the course it self had low workload, but since Electric Drives II meant lots of work, it was well balanced.» (Low)
- low att the begining because you did not have anything to work with so it became very high in the end. If everything were handle out at once it would be good.» (Adequate)
- ok» (Adequate)

18. How was the total workload this study period?

32 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»14 43%
High»14 43%
Too high»4 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.68

- ok» (Adequate)
- Although, it will be better to give this courses in different study periods since a lot much can be teached in Power Systems Analysis. Also, the project could be bigger and more interesting.» (Adequate)
- It is because the Electric Drives II Course» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

19. What is your general impression of the course?

32 svarande

Poor»1 3%
Fair»3 9%
Adequate»8 25%
Good»12 37%
Excellent»8 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

- I consider that the problem is that there are too many topics to cover in this course. That is why the lecturer has to "run" to cover each topic. I consider that the course should be split in two in such a way that all the topics can be covered in detail. Reactive power control can be taught in PSO and there should be a course of just Power system stability, that covers in detail some topics that are missing, like small-signal stability, machine modeling, etc. » (Adequate)
- The topics are to many and this meant that just a brief overview of all of them was given which I didn"t like considering the high relevance of the teached topics in the Power Sytems area. The course should be splitted into 2 or even 3 courses where Stability should be taken by itself. It could be also the case for Electrical Systems Protection.» (Adequate)
- I liked this course and teaching by the professor very much» (Excellent)
- It covers alot of areas» (Excellent)

20. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- every thing»
- lamp demonstration was really great.»
- Lab should be preserved but improved. The rest is ok.»
- lecturer,tutorial,lab,demonstration and specially digsilent project work»
- Need some more time for revision of lecture.»
- project, handouts, laboratory.»
- study visits and laboratory»
- Lectures, visits, project, and demonstration.»
- more project works.»
- Lab »
- All of them.»
- sylubus»
- The project, the Aristo demonstration.»
- Computer LAB Project»

21. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- the tutorial material on the webpage much sooner. The lecture material on the webpage much sooner. What to do in the project should be decided before it starts not after.»
- more elaboration on generators and voltage stability»
- The project could be carried out earlier in the course. So that you can start focusing on the exam the last week.»
- I would divide the whole course in two.»
- there should be talented/confident teacher for the tutorial section next year»
- the study tour to göteborg energy»
- No time for revision, since the there was class till end. Need some gap between the last class and exam.»
- tutorial teacher»
- tutorial,more study visits and tutor has to give real time examples more.»
- The tutorial problems where ok. The explanation of the solution was not very good. The project organization can be better. Finally, during the last day it seemed that we lacked time to finish the last topic and conclude the course.»
- Nothing»
- the teaching of reactive power control part»
- time before exams»
- The lab was no good. More things should be done. The study visit also should be better to a power generation center.»
- - Please replace the hand written material with material written on the computer.»

22. Additional comments

- this course was highly impressive for me»
- sometimes the tone of voice of the lecture teacher can be very flat. try making the lectures more dynamic by involving the students»
- I think it would be interesting to have a course about protections (power system protections, electric motor protections, transformer protections, etc..)»
- Power operation was perfect and I did not »
- Too many questions are asked during the classes,i think ,the tutor and lecturer should control the time.It cost us a lot of time waiting for someone to ask the simple question.Maybe they can ask after class without wasting our time.»
- I think more text handouts should be added because some handouts were not clear when I wanted to review them.»
- course is ok»
- As mentioned before, this course treats so many topics that just a breif overview is seen. It should be splitted into 2 or 3, since the topics involved are more than interesting and important in the Power Systems area.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från