ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Design of Technological Innovations and Markets, CIP010

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-02-26 - 2009-03-06
Antal svar: 7
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 9%
Kontaktperson: Anneli Hildenborg»
Klass: Övriga

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

1. How understandable and reasonable are the course goals?

7 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 2 28%

The goals are difficult to understand» 0 0%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 4 57%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

- No kurs-PM» (I have not seen/read the goals)
- Where can we find these?» (I have not seen/read the goals)
- There is a lot of information in the beggining of the course, so it is not easy to follow all the information. The course is very fast.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)
- I didnt really know when we had dtim or when we had tbe.. condusing. Goals could be clearer!» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

2. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

7 svarande

No, not at all» 0 0%

To some extent» 2 28%

Yes, definitely» 4 57%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

- The course was very practical and some of the assignments showed if we had understood the processes and strategy, but the exam was not in correspondense with the lectures.» (To some extent)
- The exam was too easy though, but on the right things» (Yes, definitely)
- See 1.» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)

Study climate

3. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

7 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 0 0%

Rather good» 5 71%

Very good» 2 28%

I did not seek help» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

- Some teachers were very available while some never answered.» (Rather good)
- The need for questions wasnt really overhanging. Good opportunity during classes though» (Rather good)

4. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

7 svarande

Very poorly» 0 0%

Rather poorly» 0 0%

Rather well» 2 28%

Very well» 5 71%

I did not seek cooperation» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

- Bad group, but I studied a lot with friends in the class.» (Rather well)
- The group work was excelent, we exchanged knowledge in all arenas, legal, business and engineer. The cooperation between the areas was very good. » (Very well)

5. How was the course workload?

7 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 2 28%

High» 4 57%

Too high» 1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

- No time to private life. A lot f lectures, work group and readfing. Work 24/7.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

6. What is your general impression of the course?

7 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 0 0%

Adequate» 2 28%

Good» 4 57%

Excellent» 1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

- I had already done most of it before.» (Adequate)
- Except that we did not get our assignments back in itme and we did not get any appropriate feedback during the whole autumn» (Good)
- Clearer goals and a higher level, more focus on strategy» (Good)

Part I: General Questions

7. What is your overall impression of the DTIM course/module? Please motivate your answer.

- It was very much about strategies and I think that reading the books it was very good learnings, but the lectures didn"t get the message of what was important through.»
- Need hard working.»
- Despite the course was very demanding, it was very good and rewarding because we had an overal impressional on how to work with different professionals and arenas.»
- Abit splittered. Alot of alot, so to speak. Would like to have it more focused. »

8. What would you recommend us to do differently next year, do you have suggestions for improvements?

- More feedback!»
- Mats Lundquist should sum up the point of the lecture at the end and also stick to the topic, he has a tendency to take side tracks which are hard to follow.»
- Not really.»
- Include some readings in the summer list.»
- Strategy parts, extend these. More advanced subjects. »

9. What were the pros and cons of working with real projects?

- Con: It is very hard to know what is real and what is fiction. What we can use and what we cannot use. A real project would probably have been better.»
- cons, we did not get the right material straight away»
- Cons is that you only get the skill to do it and not the understanding of the system or why you need to do it and the absolut Pro is that nobody cares about the theory in the working life, they want you to execute and that is the important thing to learn.»
- Pros: be more creative.»
- Pros: manage to find answers that were not given in the exercise by ourselves. Deal with professional of different areas. Cons: Timeline was very short. I real life wecould try to negotiate the deadline.»
- Its harder but much more giving. Biggest con is that the cases was old, which gives a tasty time affect.»

10. What was your general impression of the administration of the course?

- ..they had too much to do so they did not have time to do it as good as they could have»
- Good. Exept that the evaluation has come this late...»
- Ok.»
- Very professional and acessible teachers. This course was very well organized.»
- Quite good. Not that much admin needed. »

11. What did you think about the assignments?

- Very good.»
- Don"t remeber which ones was this course but they were generally good, and challanging.»
- Pretty tough.»
- The assignments were very demanding and not always clear enought because not all the students had all the skills to do the assignments. E.g: lawyers working with financing, or engineers working with sharehoders agreement.»
- Dont remember them all. TIM was good, one of the better. »

12. What did you think about the examination?

- The exam was good to get you to read the books and get a grasp of what you should know after the course and the assignments was more unclear examinations.»
- Easier than I suppose.»
- I liked that we recieved and old exam as a base to study. Otherwise it would be hard to know what expect from the exam because we had too much reading.»
- Too easy, but on the right things. »

13. Miscellaneous comments

Part II: Lectures and Exercises

14. The entrepreneurial university - Mats Lundqvist

7 svarande

Very good» 1 14%

Good» 3 42%

Satisfactory» 1 14%

Poor» 1 14%

Very poor» 1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

- One of his better lectures where it was clear what he was talking about» (Good)
- It"s really hard to follow ML"s red thread. It is easier when revisiting his slides afterwards.» (Poor)

15. University ownership capabilities - Ulf Petrusson

7 svarande

Very good» 3 42%

Good» 3 42%

Satisfactory» 1 14%

Poor» 0 0%

Very poor» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.71

- Repeated alot what Mats said but did put it in a different setting. He also talked more realistic» (Very good)

16. Degunkification Exercises - Jessika Olsén, Caroline Pamp, Henrik Rosén

7 svarande

Very good» 2 28%

Good» 3 42%

Satisfactory» 2 28%

Poor» 0 0%

Very poor» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- The consultation was poor but the exercise was good to see what it was all about. (we had Henrik who couldn"t answer direct questions)» (Very good)
- Some date issues. Also a bit of a misunderstanding in the expectations, but generally a good exercise!» (Good)

17. Intellectual Asset Assessment - Jens Bördin

7 svarande

Very good» 2 28%

Good» 4 57%

Satisfactory» 1 14%

Poor» 0 0%

Very poor» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.85

- This was also good to see how this works, the feedback on this was very poor» (Very good)
- Very tricky format. How to write a good report on it? Hard to communicate the analysis that we did.» (Good)

18. Innovation and strategic capabilities - Mats Lundqvist

6 svarande

Very good» 0 0%

Good» 3 50%

Satisfactory» 2 33%

Poor» 1 16%

Very poor» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- see 14.» (Poor)

19. The innovator’,s dilemma - Mats Lundqvist

7 svarande

Very good» 1 14%

Good» 4 57%

Satisfactory» 1 14%

Poor» 1 14%

Very poor» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.28

- Explained the situation. » (Good)
- see 14.» (Poor)

20. Shaping the innovation - Bo Heiden, Sverker Alänge

7 svarande

Very good» 2 28%

Good» 3 42%

Satisfactory» 2 28%

Poor» 0 0%

Very poor» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Good lecture that took up the most important things and did put it into a realistic approach. I got a good understanding of the meaning of this lecture» (Very good)

21. Shaping the market - Bo Heiden, Sverker Alänge

7 svarande

Very good» 2 28%

Good» 3 42%

Satisfactory» 2 28%

Poor» 0 0%

Very poor» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

22. Market analysis (Bo Heiden) - Bo Heiden, Sverker Alänge

7 svarande

Very good» 2 28%

Good» 2 28%

Satisfactory» 3 42%

Poor» 0 0%

Very poor» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.14

23. The material and intellectual value chain - Bo Heiden

7 svarande

Very good» 3 42%

Good» 3 42%

Satisfactory» 1 14%

Poor» 0 0%

Very poor» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.71

24. Business models - Anders Sundelin

7 svarande

Very good» 3 42%

Good» 2 28%

Satisfactory» 1 14%

Poor» 1 14%

Very poor» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- One of the most structured lecturers! Good!» (Very good)
- It didn"t say anything that you can"t figure out yourself» (Poor)

25. Licensing and IP-based business models - Ulf Petrusson

7 svarande

Very good» 2 28%

Good» 4 57%

Satisfactory» 1 14%

Poor» 0 0%

Very poor» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.85

- going through the different tools is very good to get a overview» (Very good)

26. Techno-economic value analysis - Bo Heiden, Sverker Alänge

7 svarande

Very good» 3 42%

Good» 3 42%

Satisfactory» 1 14%

Poor» 0 0%

Very poor» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.71

- Good background to why this is important.» (Very good)

27. Introduction to financial theory - Tamir Agmon

7 svarande

Very good» 2 28%

Good» 0 0%

Satisfactory» 2 28%

Poor» 3 42%

Very poor» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

- Economic theory isn"t my good side and it was on a high level to understand. I havn"t used this knowledge in any way.» (Satisfactory)
- I know it"s hard for external people to set a good level...» (Poor)
- Totally wrong level, although he was very knowedgable. I left that class in protest. » (Poor)

28. Fundamentals of entrepreneurial finance - Tamir Agmon

7 svarande

Very good» 2 28%

Good» 0 0%

Satisfactory» 3 42%

Poor» 2 28%

Very poor» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

- Did not attend» (Satisfactory)

29. Venture financing in practice - Per Hulthén

7 svarande

Very good» 6 85%

Good» 0 0%

Satisfactory» 1 14%

Poor» 0 0%

Very poor» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.28

- Really interesting to get a picture of how the real world looks like. I liked this lecture because he makes sure that everyone understands everything.» (Very good)
- Per is keeper!!» (Very good)

30. Fundamentals of financial accounting/reporting - Tamir Agmon

7 svarande

Very good» 2 28%

Good» 0 0%

Satisfactory» 3 42%

Poor» 2 28%

Very poor» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

- Did not attend» (Satisfactory)

31. Valuation and value creation - Anders Sundelin

7 svarande

Very good» 2 28%

Good» 2 28%

Satisfactory» 3 42%

Poor» 0 0%

Very poor» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.14

- It is hard for someone not been in contact with these formulas that he is very fast presenting to get in and understand why to do them and how. » (Satisfactory)

32. Valuation methods - Anders Sundelin

7 svarande

Very good» 1 14%

Good» 2 28%

Satisfactory» 4 57%

Poor» 0 0%

Very poor» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.42

- Not too good explained. He was too tired. » (Good)
- Too basic!» (Satisfactory)

33. Exercise –, Valuing intellectual assets - Anders Sundelin

7 svarande

Very good» 2 28%

Good» 1 14%

Satisfactory» 4 57%

Poor» 0 0%

Very poor» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.28

- Though I think another simulation case could have given more opportunities to use the different methods. Since we didn"t really use these numbers in the final Business Plan such a change would not matter.» (Good)

34. Negotiations theory and Exercises - Max Rapp Ricciardi

6 svarande

Very good» 1 16%

Good» 1 16%

Satisfactory» 4 66%

Poor» 0 0%

Very poor» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- Though, this was more confilct management than negotiation theory. Didnt help us with the negotiations.» (Satisfactory)
- Max is good, but the excercise didnt incorporate everyone.» (Satisfactory)