Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Data conversion techniques, Lp3 Vt09, DAT115

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-03-02 - 2009-03-15
Antal svar: 16
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 36%
Kontaktperson: Åsa Lundgren»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

16 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»4 25%
Around 20 hours/week»4 25%
Around 25 hours/week»4 25%
Around 30 hours/week»2 12%
At least 35 hours/week»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.62

- For post lab and pre lab time is needed and require study» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

16 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»4 25%
75%»8 50%
100%»4 25%

Genomsnitt: 4

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

16 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 6%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 6%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»6 37%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»8 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.31

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

15 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»14 93%
No, the goals are set too high»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.06

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

16 svarande

No, not at all»1 6%
To some extent»4 25%
Yes, definitely»4 25%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»7 43%

Genomsnitt: 3.06

- I guess it is harder to make sure that everyone fulfills the requirements with a lab-based examination.» (To some extent)
- It is possible for bad students to stick with good students to get a pass without doing anything.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»1 6%
Some extent»3 18%
Large extent»11 68%
Great extent»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- The teacher is good.» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»2 12%
Some extent»3 18%
Large extent»10 62%
Great extent»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.62

- The book was difficult so My idea is to bring some easy book so that the understanding regarding the course literature might be increased» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

16 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»10 62%
Very well»6 37%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- Excellent Job Prof!!!» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

16 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 6%
Rather good»3 18%
Very good»12 75%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.68

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

16 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»3 18%
Rather well»8 50%
Very well»5 31%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.12

11. How was the course workload?

16 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»6 37%
High»10 62%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.62

- The workload is completely skewed: way too little in the beginning and way too much in the end, also coinciding with DAT095 stuff.» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

16 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»6 37%
High»8 50%
Too high»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

16 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 12%
Adequate»3 18%
Good»8 50%
Excellent»3 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- Teacher is very good and very nice. He has a great concept of this course. He taught this course with very enthusiasm. » (Good)
- A really interesting course with a good administration.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- hand in!!!»
- Yes it is good. Create understanding and clear the concept when we going to implement the things on hardware.»
- The hand-in.»
- Labs, Handin»
- »
- The labs are very interesting»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Book as its really hard to understand for those who dont have excellent background in signal processing. »
- Nothing »
- Workload skew. Do more in the labs and less in the handin. The labs should prepare more for the handin.»
- »
- The hand-in is definitly very very difficult»
- The course book must be easy for the better understanding»

16. Additional comments

- Method of examination as Lab is also good. Lars is a good teacher.Regards for him.»
- It would be good to have a course plan which describes what is studied during each week.»
- Good course, but skewed workload.»
- »

Kursutvärderingssystem från