ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Marine Structural Engineering 2009, MMA131

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-03-04 - 2009-03-30
Antal svar: 1
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Jonas Ringsberg»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

1 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 100%
Around 20 hours/week»0 0%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

- It was not really enough I think, seen from after the exam» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the lectures offered did you attend?

1 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»1 100%
100%»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

3. How large part of the tutorials offered did you attend?

1 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»1 100%
100%»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

4. How understandable are the course goals?

1 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»0 0%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»1 100%

Genomsnitt: 4

5. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

1 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»1 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

6. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

1 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»0 0%
Yes, definitely»1 100%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- I found out I did not entirely reach what I should/could have learned» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

7. To what extent has the lectures been of help for your learning?

1 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 100%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Though I enjoyed the lectures a lot because they cover much more than what is in the book, they seem to be more additional to what I can read on my own anyways.» (Some extent)

8. To what extent has the tutorials been of help for your learning?

1 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»1 100%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- But watching somebody solve and explain a problem is something completely different than doing it on my own. Thoug it is is good to have some correct and explained problems!» (Large extent)

9. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

1 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»1 100%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

10. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

1 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»0 0%
Very well»1 100%

Genomsnitt: 4

Study climate

11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

1 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»0 0%
I did not seek help»1 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

12. How was the course workload?

1 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»1 100%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

13. How was the total workload this study period?

1 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
High»0 0%
Too high»1 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

- I took 3 courses and one of them was really hard, so this is "my own fault".» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

14. What is your general impression of the course?

1 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»1 100%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The mix of tutorials and lectures is good. »

16. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Doing some sort of Homework obligatory might be a good idea, just as you told us it will be in the advanced course.»

17. Additional comments

Questions on the different parts of the course

18. What did you think of the lectures in engineering beam theory? (Jonas Ringsberg)

1 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
Acceptable»0 0%
Good»1 100%
Very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

- I think the lecutres could be more based on the book. That takes some of the extra away, but maybe it would then be a good idea to update the book to a easy-to-find structured compendium» (Good)

19. What did you think of the lectures in reliability-based methods (Jonas Ringsberg)

1 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
Acceptable»0 0%
Good»0 0%
Very good»1 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

20. What did you think about the tutorials in engineering beam theory (Per Hogström)

1 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
Acceptable»0 0%
Good»1 100%
Very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Sometimes he got confused because of our asking and made mistakes.. (I don"t want to blame anything on Per, it happens, I know that)» (Good)

21. What did you think about the tutorials in reliability-based methods (Jonas Ringsberg)

1 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
Acceptable»0 0%
Good»0 0%
Very good»1 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

22. Was it a good combination of lecures and tutorials?

1 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
Acceptable»0 0%
Good»0 0%
Very good»1 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

23. Did you buy the litterature?

1 svarande

No»0 0%
Yes»1 100%

Genomsnitt: 2

- I think the literature is not so good. It could take an update in terms of content and structure. The lecture notes contain so much more than the book and the book contains a lot of things that I never really used or read. I think its hard to find the things you need in the book. A more compact structure would be good. The tables are in swedish, the text is in english, the font is not very overview-friendly, the examples in the book are not really helpful I think. And the statistics-part is pure statistics that never come to application in the problems or are being explained in detail in the lectures. If we are supposed to know it from previous courses then why print it again (in that detail)? It would do to just give the applications and what is relevant for those possible problem variations and/or spend more time explaing all the stuff.» (Yes)

Kursutvärderingssystem från