Visa resultat

Valuation and entrepreneurial financing, CIP041

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

5 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»		3		60%
Around 20 hours/week»		2		40%
Around 25 hours/week»		0		0%
Around 30 hours/week»		0		0%
At least 35 hours/week»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 1.4

- The amount of papers we had to turn in within this course was beyond reason. One exam, one 15 page report, one 20 page report and a 25 page report seems insane, given that all the lectures were mandatory workshops.» (Around 20 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

5 svarande

0%»		0		0%
25%»		1		20%
50%»		0		0%
75%»		3		60%
100%»		1		20%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- I went to all classes, I often left early because I learned more by reading the litterature» (75%)
- mandatory for no reason, considering the fact that everybody in class has different levels of knowledge on the subject» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

3. How understandable are the course goals?

I have not seen/read the goals»		0		0%
The goals are difficult to understand»		2		40%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»		3		60%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

- the name of the course has nothing to do with the actual course. Seems very misleading» (The goals are difficult to understand)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

4 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»		0		0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»		2		50%
No, the goals are set too high»		2		50%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- They don"t give basic expectations» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

No, not at all»		1		20%
To some extent»		3		60%
Yes, definitely»		0		0%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»		1		20%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		3		60%
Some extent»		2		40%
Large extent»		0		0%
Great extent»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 1.4

- None. Techer speaks insufficient English. The Target Costing class was good though.» (Small extent)
- The teacher couldn"t explain thing in good way.» (Small extent)
- Kaj is very good at explaining things in swedish, I learned the most when he was explaining in swedish. But in English he was not good» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		1		20%
Some extent»		3		60%
Large extent»		1		20%
Great extent»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- It was better if the teacher provided materials in English as well. Also he put so few examples online. » (Small extent)
- one of the books was pretty good (how to read a financial report), the other one was (and this was admitted by the teacher) much too complicated for this course. also, doesn"t seem fair with all this expensive literature. when only 20% of a book is part of the cocurse and the price of it is 600 SEK, another book should be selected.» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

Very badly»		3		60%
Rather badly»		0		0%
Rather well»		2		40%
Very well»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 1.8

- To dependent on studentportalen» (Very badly)
- techer does not (ever) answer emails techer shows up late or not at all in some cases and when a feedback session in school was cancelled by him he asks us to come to his office in stead in a different school. not ok. correction of assignments took 2 months most of the time. there is a 1 month limit at the university which was not respected. an assignment presented as not graded ended up being graded and included in the course grade.» (Very badly)
- It was difficult to find out when new things were on studieportalen.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

Very poor»		2		40%
Rather poor»		1		20%
Rather good»		1		20%
Very good»		1		20%
I did not seek help»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

- Hard to reach by phone and e-mail» (Very poor)
- The teacher was not able to explain things in English so there was no point in asking questions.» (Very poor)
- Techer was to some help sometimes, but many times he couldn"t answer questions in a good way. lack of knowledge or lack of English language skills.» (Rather poor)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

Very poorly»		1		20%
Rather poorly»		0		0%
Rather well»		0		0%
Very well»		4		80%
I did not seek cooperation»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

11. How was the course workload?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		0		0%
Adequate»		2		40%
High»		1		20%
Too high»		2		40%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Except for Assignment 2 that was to extensive. Much better to have oral examination on that part, considering all reasoning needed to fulfill Kaj"s expectations.» (Adequate)
- The problem was that teached couldnt explain thing properly so I had to go and read at home. Attending the lecture was waste of time for those who knew finance and those who didn"t have background in finance.» (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		0		0%
Adequate»		2		40%
High»		1		20%
Too high»		2		40%

Genomsnitt: 4

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

Poor»		4		80%
Fair»		1		20%
Adequate»		0		0%
Good»		0		0%
Excellent»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 1.2

- grading of the assignments was very ad hoc. the grading criteria were how well we had lived up to his expectations with our paper. These expectations were not communicated beforehand.» (Poor)
- The whole course was not homogeneous and the explanation and examples were not good as well.» (Poor)
- I had completely different expectations of the course. the course had nothing to do with valuation and entrepreneurial finance. this was an accounting class» (Fair)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

16. Additional comments