Visa resultat

Powertrain Mechanics, TME170

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

20 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»		3		15%
Around 20 hours/week»		6		30%
Around 25 hours/week»		7		35%
Around 30 hours/week»		4		20%
At least 35 hours/week»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

- the most time took the assignments» (Around 30 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

20 svarande

0%»		0		0%
25%»		0		0%
50%»		0		0%
75%»		10		50%
100%»		10		50%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

Goals and goal fulfilment

3. How understandable are the course goals?

I have not seen/read the goals»		3		15%
The goals are difficult to understand»		0		0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»		9		47%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»		7		36%

Genomsnitt: 3.05

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

16 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»		3		18%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»		13		81%
No, the goals are set too high»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 1.81

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

No, not at all»		0		0%
To some extent»		13		68%
Yes, definitely»		4		21%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»		2		10%

Genomsnitt: 2.42

- I think that the exam was too difficult, with questions which hadn"t been discussed during lectures.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		0		0%
Some extent»		8		40%
Large extent»		12		60%
Great extent»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

7. What did you think about the lecturers?*

Matrisfråga

- I think the lectures were good overall»
- The course was too shattered. There where no red line through the course. Most of the lecture content where very trivial.»
- The lecture about hybrids was totally unnecessary since it was very basic and whole class had alreday taken a hybrid course before. Jonas Hellgren was obviously not aware of that and held a very basic level throughout the lecture.»
- not that much new for hybrid vehicles compare to the course last year»
- I think everybody in the whole class knew more about hybride vehicles and automotive engineering than what was in the content of the hybrid lectures. Give the lecturers better understanding of what we students already know. Jonas lecture was my last lecture at chalmers and he talked about the same things we did at the very first lecture in the automotive engineering program.» (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)

Sven Andersson - Engine balansing theory*
20 svarande

Not well performed at all»		0		0%
Bad»		2		10%
OK»		7		35%
Very good»		10		50%
Excellent»		1		5%
No opinion/did not attend»		0

Genomsnitt: 3.5

Ingemar Denbratt - Valves and valve trains*
20 svarande

Not well performed at all»		0		0%
Bad»		0		0%
OK»		7		38%
Very good»		8		44%
Excellent»		3		16%
No opinion/did not attend»		2

Genomsnitt: 3.77

Anders Hedman - Conventional and dual clutch transmissions*
20 svarande

Not well performed at all»		0		0%
Bad»		2		10%
OK»		2		10%
Very good»		8		40%
Excellent»		8		40%
No opinion/did not attend»		0

Genomsnitt: 4.1

Magnus Evertsson - Clutches and couplings*
20 svarande

Not well performed at all»		0		0%
Bad»		0		0%
OK»		7		38%
Very good»		10		55%
Excellent»		1		5%
No opinion/did not attend»		2

Genomsnitt: 3.66

Jan Andersson - Automatic planetary transmissions*
20 svarande

Not well performed at all»		0		0%
Bad»		3		15%
OK»		8		42%
Very good»		8		42%
Excellent»		0		0%
No opinion/did not attend»		1

Genomsnitt: 3.26

Bengt Jacobsson - Differentials, AWD & AWD clutches*
20 svarande

Not well performed at all»		3		16%
Bad»		2		11%
OK»		6		33%
Very good»		6		33%
Excellent»		1		5%
No opinion/did not attend»		2

Genomsnitt: 3

Jonas Hellgren - Hybrid vehicles*
20 svarande

Not well performed at all»		4		20%
Bad»		3		15%
OK»		9		45%
Very good»		4		20%
Excellent»		0		0%
No opinion/did not attend»		0

Genomsnitt: 2.65

8. What did you think about the different assignments*

- Assignment 2 was more math than automotive in my opinion. The third assignment was unneccessarily tricky»
- They were good but they didn"t cover the course.»
- Ass 1 - Inget optimeringsproblem! Om det är ok att lämna in handskrivet så kan man inte fråga efter en viktoptimering! Likaså ska det inte sägas att rapporten ska utformas som ett hjälpmedel för att beställa fjädrar om man inte bryr sig om det vid rättning! Alla Ass - Dåligt precicerade uppgifter. Vad vill man ha och vad bryr man sig om när man rättar?? Optimering, rapportutformning, ekvationer, värdesiffror, backväxel osv.. Den mallen som användes på rättningsformuläret borde man fått se innan man lämnade in rapporten!»
- På alla uppgifter var frågorna dåligt formulerade, främst första uppgiften. t.ex. ass1: optimera fjädern till så liten vikt som möjligt, men handskrivna uträkningar går bra att lämna in, som inte är optimerade för nånting... ass2: gör figur som är proportionellt riktig, men som efter rättning ska ha utskrivna mått... Det ska vara klart vad som efterfrågas och att man rättar efter dessa frågor.»
- make sure to state ALL requirements for the assignment in the assignment description so that one does not have to fail the assignment due to lack of information»
- Learned a lot about planetary gears and transmissions.»
- very instructive»

Assignment 1 - Valve spring dimensioning*
20 svarande

Not relevant at all»		0		0%
Bad - to some extent relevant for the overall topic»		0		0%
OK»		8		42%
Good»		6		31%
Excellent and relevant»		5		26%
No opinion»		1

Genomsnitt: 3.84

Assignment 2 - Step transmission, ratios and gears*
20 svarande

Not relevant at all»		0		0%
Bad - to some extent relevant for the overall topic»		1		5%
OK»		5		26%
Good»		2		10%
Excellent and relevant»		11		57%
No opinion»		1

Genomsnitt: 4.21

Assignment 3 - Planetary gears*
20 svarande

Not relevant at all»		0		0%
Bad - to some extent relevant for the overall topic»		0		0%
OK»		5		26%
Good»		3		15%
Excellent and relevant»		11		57%
No opinion»		1

Genomsnitt: 4.31

9. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		2		10%
Some extent»		5		25%
Large extent»		11		55%
Great extent»		2		10%

Genomsnitt: 2.65

- Too shattered.» (Some extent)
- Since the slides of each lecture is all literature we"ve got (almost) for the exam, perhaps some slides should include more descriptive texts. Transmission slides ex. Dual-clutch» (Great extent)

10. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

Very badly»		1		5%
Rather badly»		6		30%
Rather well»		7		35%
Very well»		6		30%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- Took some time for us to get hold of a course PM. Several weeks actually.» (Rather badly)

Study climate

11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

Very poor»		0		0%
Rather poor»		0		0%
Rather good»		8		40%
Very good»		12		60%
I did not seek help»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- David and Critoffer was easy to get hold of for questions about the assignments. The different tutors were however harder to get hold of for questions since they don"t work here.» (Rather good) (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)

12. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

Very poorly»		1		5%
Rather poorly»		0		0%
Rather well»		5		25%
Very well»		13		65%
I did not seek cooperation»		1		5%

Genomsnitt: 3.65

13. How was the course workload?

Too low»		1		5%
Low»		3		15%
Adequate»		16		80%
High»		0		0%
Too high»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

14. How was the total workload this study period?

Too low»		1		5%
Low»		2		10%
Adequate»		16		80%
High»		1		5%
Too high»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

- I was taking only one course» (Too low)

Summarizing questions

15. What is your general impression of the course?

Poor»		2		10%
Fair»		2		10%
Adequate»		3		15%
Good»		12		60%
Excellent»		1		5%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- It is clear that this was a new course. The level was set too low.» (Poor)
- It didnt reallt cover anything, common knowledge was the key to pass the exam, not really a suitable way to end the Automotive Engineering masters program.» (Fair)
- Intressant och relevant men för lösryckta föreläsningar utan att föreläsarna visste vad de andra hade sagt. Likaså var det för enkelt.» (Adequate)
- I finally got and understanding for the whole powertrain of a vehicle. From power generation in the ICE to the rotation of the wheels. » (Good)

16. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

17. What should definitely be changed to next year?

18. Additional comments

* obligatoriska frågor